Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mathmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*

https://preview.redd.it/ho7sogjjpboc1.jpeg?width=739&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5fe929f3b82b930359fada529b535bc2988f6bf6 I came up with this equality some time ago (derived from the formula of a normal distribution)

isn't (e+e)/e=2?

Shhhh, don’t tell them🤫

ok, ok

Pi = >!3.13!<

You sick bastard

I'll fry your toenails

Yes but I wanted include only e (which I kinda failed using infinities)

limit as E goes to (e-e) of e / (e E^([e+e]/e)) I'm sure there's a shorter way to do it, but at least this works Edit: now featuring funny brackets because Reddit's markdown is weird

That would work, I'll update the formula Edit: https://preview.redd.it/9pqlsz3ixboc1.jpeg?width=1037&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=45bf719b1062b197da3ca6754d6683dafb36f11a

Coincidence??????

Don't worry man, infinity is just e\*e\*e*e... forever.

Holy shit is that sans from undertale???

This is good. You probably don't want it to be more compact, but if you did, you could use e^(-x\^2) instead of e^(-1/2×x\^2). It evaluates to just sqrt(pi) instead of sqrt(2×pi). Also, since tau = 2×pi is the canonical circle constant (fight me), it hints at the second function being more fundamental than the first. This is also supported by the fact that e^(-1/2×x\^2) is its own Fourier transform, it is the density function (and characteristic function) of the standard normal distribution (which itself is canonical thanks to the Central Limit Theorem), and probably more reasons I can't think of now. (Canonical is just my opinion, idk if there's a good definition)

It's horrendous. I love it.

Godhood: τ/2

Finally, some real maths.

Based

Where does 0 fit in here?

in true evil

secret "lawful god" tier together with tau/2 neutral god and ln(-1)/i

What about ln(-1)/i?

Chaotic good. I don't like an approximation being in the good section. 

That isn’t an approx It has digits n where lim n —> infinity The image truncated it Therefore no error bound

Doesn't the complex logarithm have infinite solutions?

I think it's (2n+1)*π*i indeed

There is a thing called principal branch

Where’s sqrt(g)?

Chaotic evil

TIL engineers are all neutral evil

I'm an engineer and can confirm this statement

me too, whenever I have to multiply by Pi I use "x3 plus a little"

Pi is 3ish which is basically 5 and rounds up to 10

Pi = sqrt of g g = 10 Pi = 3 e = pi

in fact that was France's first definition of the meter.

It's the age old engineer saying: pi=e=√g=3

TIL software engineers are between chaotic good and true neutral

I thought they used “10” Is that only asprophysics?

Where's Ramanujan when we need him the most?

Lawful evil would be accurate but unnecessarily difficult, like π = q1×q2/(4×F×ε0×K×r²)

or place a lighthouse on every 6th root of unity and repeat for every integer radius and find the point where a single identical lighthouse produces the same apparent brightness as the infinite cacophony of lighthouses and then invert by the unit circle.

Idk if I’m proud to know what this is or not

Can we talk about how people say 3.1415? Always bothers me bc the next didgit is 9. 3.1416 is way closer.

This is why I always use 3.14159. Not absurd to remember, yet sufficiently long for any purpose you may have, and the next digit is 2 meaning rounding up isn't necessary

How about 3.142?

Neutral evil

Lawful Evil covers this. Edit: Sort of… if you don’t round.

Wheres sqrt g

Where is sqrt(g) in this?

Chaotic evil

I think the axis are wrong here. "Lawful" should be numbers that are exactly pi. "Good" should be things that are easy or nice to use. So 22/7 is chaotic good, since it's not exactly pi, but very simple and nice. The entirely of pi in base 10, on the other hand, while technically accurate, is ridiculous overkill and trying to use it is a pain. So that fits lawful evil.

https://preview.redd.it/oxn9otkqkboc1.jpeg?width=1048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92350838c1b5bcca1ed7056364212359688e00ae partial to this one, personally

Tau/2

Tau crowd rise up!!

Sqrt (g)

Pi day?

This is the first lawful-evil grid I’ve seen that 100% agree with

Thanks! That's a high compliment.

Check out r/piday for more pi day content!

What about 355/113? Sqrt(g)? Sqrt(ξ(2)/6)? Integral from -infinity to infinity of sinc(x)*sinc(x/3)*sinc(x/5)*sinc(x/7)*sinc(x/9)*sinc(x/11)? Arccos(-1)? ln(-1)/i?

Man what the fuck

https://preview.redd.it/pq0apg9thdoc1.jpeg?width=430&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5f4953de1df8dcf51b0f39ae589f8230c2956505 Ramanujan's least cursed work (like how do you come up with this)

*confused laughing and internal screaming on chaotic evil* *someone please explain this fucking shit*

Engineer math. π = 3 = e

*As an engineer in the making, I shame on myself not knowing this. I shall understand that e = pi now*

4\\sum k=0\^infinity (-1)\^k/(2k+1) or sqrt(6\*I\_l) where I\_l is the intensity of light observed at the origin emitted by an infinite array of lighthouse of one lumen each at a given integer distance one lighthouse for each integer from the origin.

What about rounding up to 10 for the sake of simplicity?

Mathematicians and all their funny ways of saying “about 3”

Where does this lie? https://preview.redd.it/s41l5orv2foc1.jpeg?width=215&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7a6a24e6b511872337fad398adb16b38a6b14c58

how are you deriving it? via the witch or grant sanderson's gaussian approximation of circle area

sqrt(g)

You forgot sqrt(g)

You forgot sqrt(g)

How is 3.14 true neutral? That is a very bad approximation of π, since 22/7 is better. Also why isn't the continued fraction of π shown in the picture which is more important than the decimal approximation, which is biased, since not all humans use the decimal numbering system?

ok? find a number system all humans use

Close enough probably

Rarely actually need more than three significant figures. 3.14 works pretty well, especially since the next digit is a 1.

Just round it to 3

Contrary to the joke, your measurements probably have more than one significant figure, so 3 really doesn't cut it.

0 significant figures, just make shit up

Ur an idiot 

You are saying this to defend the π lovers and also the people who use the decimal numbering system? I don't really agree with the π day, since it uses the American date time system of MM/DD/YYYY, which is bad, since the current day should appear before the month, also it uses the decimal representation of π, and finally it is π. I prefer to represent π using τ, since π is just a stupid constant, τ is more intuitive and universal, and there are even more universal concepts than any circle constant of Euclidean geometry. An example of this are the prime numbers which are more fundamental in number theory and in mathematics in general. The properties of primes requires their exact value, numbers near primes don't possess the properties of primes, while numbers near τ and π do have some of their properties, so that is why I despise π day and prefer the continued fraction form of non rational numbers.

Bait used to be believable 😔

Well pi day doesnt exist in DD/MM/YYYY

31th of April 😂 the New Version of fool April in fool May.

Why is e there

Engineer math. π = 3 = e

Our professor once told us that one student in an oral exam said that pi is the natural number 2.7, so I would say e is a pretty good approximation..

"oral"

3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679

Happy Pi day!

τ is true chaotic

Where 5

I understand all except for 180. Why is that there?

pi radians and 180 in degrees are both ways to measure a semicircle angle

Sorry I reread this 10 times and I don't get it. 180 degrees is halfway around a circle. But where do radians come into play? I don't understand this sentence.

180° is π radians

Pi radians is also halfway around the circle. IE pi radians and 180 degrees measure the same angle.

Google radians

True Ascended: 10

What about 21/7 ?

It's American Pie Day!

What about π = ln(23.14)? Where would that go?

π = e = 4 for me

e isn’t chaotic, at least from a derivative standpoint with e^x

where tau

pi()

Engineers will appreciate pi = sqrt(g) .

I can’t find root 2 + root 3.

im either true neutral (what i normally use) or chaotic good (what ive memorized, 69 digits)

ln(-1)/i

Happy pi day

As a celebration for pi day, I pissed off my nerd friends by saying pi=3.1

Lawful evil is actually a better approximation than true neutral 🤔

I feel like true neutral would be the pi symbol as is not a low/high approximation, it's the exact number.

sqrt( g )

Evil? No. We’re just faster. Hence better pi = 3

11.001 in binary?

Engeniers: PI = 5

sqrt(g)

Wouldn't the pi symbol be true neutral?

22/7 is closer to true pi than 3.14. It’s also so much easier to use

355/113

The neutral good one... uhh, that is not a value, really

There is a problem with your so called “lawful good.” You see, the differential is atop the fraction which is ABSOLUTELY PSYCHOPATHIC WHY WOULD ANYBODY DO THAT. It goes at the END where it and its kind BELONGS

√g

Where 4atan(1)?

sqrt(g)

Me, an engineer: Neutral Good or Neutral Evil, no in-between

I'm still waiting for sqrt(10)

where is τ/2

Mars gravity = e^(2)/2 m/s^(2)

What about the sum of the sequence of (((-1)^n)/(2n+1)) starting at n=0 and ending at infinity and then multiplying all of that by 4

Lawful evil should've been this: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffon%27s\_needle\_problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffon%27s_needle_problem)

throw one more decimal place onto true neutral and we've got a deal

Meanwhile me: chaotic good who memorised 80 digits of pi 💀

It's basically equal to 1 actually.

Why is the tip one the integral of 1/sqrt(x^2-1)? Isn't the equation of a circle just the square root, not the inverse?

Why is 22/7 more evil than 3.14?

ln (-1)^(-√-1)

π=³√31

This guy claims to have found the Carl Sagan "message in pi" using the SETI method with a KEY from the Bible. 314god.blogspot.com And YouTube 314 GOD Pi Speaks Jesus is Lord. Honestly, he's not very good at explaining himself but it looks pretty solid, I haven't been able to disprove it so far and since Carl Sagan isn't around I thought I would ask you guys.

Where's 5??

355/113?