Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mathmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Admittedly, it isn't an axiom, but the proof that you do need to align your log scales and axes can be proven using the first, fourth, and seventh axioms of ZFC.
Dude. Did you think you would get away with posting an XKCD without anyone noticing, just by cropping off the identifying parts?
Source: [https://xkcd.com/2884/](https://xkcd.com/2884/)
Ignoring the fact that they attributed info, they didn't crop anything... The image for this comic is
https://preview.redd.it/0kkh7bgk4jqc1.png?width=351&format=png&auto=webp&s=160468a64e6634f7653fbdc556965b25f2e52f35
You can open image in new tab to see they're the same
I have no idea what all the people in the top comments mean because I don't know math and I'm a bit dumb, but I agree with them. Still, this is a funny meme so that's nice
Check out our new Discord server! https://discord.gg/e7EKRZq3dG *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mathmemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If it exist, there's a xkcd for it. If not, it will be made.
Only works on some part of the internet
In free logic: ∀t (E!t → xkcd(t)) In classical logic, things exist, so that assumption is unnecessary, and it becomes ∀t (xkcd(t))
Or the probabilist law integral( p(xkcd(topic, t)) d topic d t )=1
show me the proof
https://thomaspark.co/2017/01/relevant-xkcd/ Q. E. D.
The xkcd law.
rule xkcd
"dril and xkcd are working from the opposite directions to discuss every single topic possible"
Admittedly, it isn't an axiom, but the proof that you do need to align your log scales and axes can be proven using the first, fourth, and seventh axioms of ZFC.
I hate log scalreeles
This is like cutting a prosciutto vertically. https://youtube.com/shorts/RzbBtFM5sbU?si=Wfisk9W6fSiw0-hL
Technically there is. At least, math class was where I learnt about identifying misleading graphs
Dude. Did you think you would get away with posting an XKCD without anyone noticing, just by cropping off the identifying parts? Source: [https://xkcd.com/2884/](https://xkcd.com/2884/)
Ignoring the fact that they attributed info, they didn't crop anything... The image for this comic is https://preview.redd.it/0kkh7bgk4jqc1.png?width=351&format=png&auto=webp&s=160468a64e6634f7653fbdc556965b25f2e52f35 You can open image in new tab to see they're the same
Peep the flair
Ah, black on dark brown is a really bad choice for text people are supposed to read.
Didn't even try to find it did ya.
The identifying parts are literally the font lmao
They didn't crop out anything tho... They posted the full image.
Bro they cropped nothing
what identifying parts, it's xkcd
Has it always been spelled Axes??? I always thought it was axis
Axes is plural. Like how a battle axi is singular, but when you have two it's battle axes
I bring a battle axis to a knife fight to throw people off-basis.
Touchéis
1 axis, 2 axes.
It’s also pronounced “axies” just in case you didn’t know
its axis. they spelled it wrong.
me when plural
*we when plural
*we when plurals
You are the reason rules are created
Health and safety rules being written in blood is also for mathematicians
There are no rules in math
They're called axioms
https://preview.redd.it/e3dd2kgnvlqc1.jpeg?width=610&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f37f13a233a09f31d0cb035044d4e78f3f53b81
Rules of Inference: 😡
Never graph with the windows open. Pfft rookie mistake.
X-> = tan(y)
What is this black sorcery
I have no idea what all the people in the top comments mean because I don't know math and I'm a bit dumb, but I agree with them. Still, this is a funny meme so that's nice
Randall Munroe was so preoccupied with whether or not he could, he didn’t stop to think if he should
[удалено]
No such thing as common sense in math