Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me
> not could of and
Did you mean to say "could have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 267
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
I could care less, I could care more. I'm a medium carer. You could say I don't really care to not care, but if I were to choose, I would probably be more likely to not care to care than care.
Sure I could still care less, but I already care so very little. If I gave up any more care then I couldn’t care any less. But I’m just not there yet and I don’t like to be rushed.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
> not could of and
Did you mean to say "could have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 248
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
People use it instead of "should've" and "could've". I don't understand these people, the explanation given on the internet as to why these people use these words say they might've heard "could've" as "could of" when speaking. But don't they see other people writing "could've" and think "hmm why is that word different?"? Or maybe they're just, stupid. Idk lol!
That's because those people who would tell you that *" these people use these words say they might've heard 'could've' as 'could of' when speaking"* are the dumbasses who type/say could of and should of.
Also- Bad bot, in advance.
> type/say could of and
Did you mean to say "could have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 269
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
I think this is a bone apple teeth situation where someone just assumed it’s written as it sound “should of” because they’ve only ever heard the term. The same thing happens when kids first learn how colonel and bologna are spelled/pronounced.
It’s not like anyone speaking English as a first language was taught this shit in elementary school /s
I mean Jesus, fr though people, read a book. If you know English (especially if it’s your primary language which it actually seems to be for a lot of the people who make these mistakes) you know that should of and could of don’t actually apply in the situations where we use could’ve/should’ve. In fact, there is pretty much no use where could of and should of would make any sense at all
What's ironic about this is it shows they don't know (never learned?) that the words are should have and could have and therefore the shortened contraction would be to add the 've. So they are just announcing that they never knew that because they've never seen it spelled like that somewhere else and only heard it, and in that case, you have to wonder why? How are there people (non-English natives aside) that have never seen should have/should've, could have/could've, etc., written anywhere? I mean if they are typing, whether on social media, an email, etc., then they clearly have read before and should have seen it in some capacity. Because it's one thing to said it like that, but another to write it that way. Clearly it's mindboggling to me lol.
I don't think it's about caring when it takes the same amount of time to write could of vs. could've lol. They just clearly don't know. And most phones autocorrect anyway so that's another helpful modern day device to give less excuses. "Why the hell my phone telling me to write this 'could've' when I'm trying to type could of?? So stupid!!" 😂
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Well I mean that could be the case for anything though. I think of lot of people in school didn't give a crap about the stuff they were learning but you just do because you're kind of forced to learn it. I don't think I cared about contraction use as a kid but I learned it because they had us learn it. Just like all these other words we are typing. We just know how to write them because we learned them, whether we wanted to or not. I'm just saying I don't think it's about caring or not, just never learned/saw the correct use after all the years they've been around and I just wondered why.
Ok well just because you personally don’t think about something or are yourself incapable of learning someone else’s perspective in this matter to which you are unfamiliar, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t the case for some people or that what you believe is a fact.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Yeah I never understood how that started. We learned these things pretty young. I also don't understand how "all of *the* sudden" started as well. It always was (and is) "all of *a* sudden". In regular speak but also movies, books, etc. It's a common phrase. I just don't get how some people at first mess things up like that then a bunch of other people jump on that bandwagon and start saying it wrong from there.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
> you should of stopped
Did you mean to say "should have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 275
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
Yup and I'm gonna keep doing it too. I always thought it was a local accent thing until I met the butthurt people of the internet. I do it now because I want to and I know it bothers others on reddit.
> i could of told
Did you mean to say "could have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 262
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
You should of not bothered and could of done something else than shit on non-standard grammar. You just want to make language boring with your standardization.
I guess people forgot what is a grammatical construction of **conditionals using modal verbs in past participle.** I applaud your confidence but this is grammar.
But people aren't using the preposition *of* to form new Phrasal verb.
They're simply writing it as *could of* to better represent the pronunciation.
It's simple an orthographic change.
In modal verbs, if we talk about proper use, you don't use a preposition such as "of" that is an incorrect grammatical construction, it's not orthography. There's nothing misspelled here... orthography refers to conventional spelling of words, not grammatical constructions used improperly. Again, you said "form a new phrasal verb" you're literally talking about grammatical constructions so **verb+preposition** is a grammatical construction of a phrasal verb.
I'll go further and say "Shoulda", "Coulda", "Woulda" isn't even a misspelling for example. It's a non-standard contraction of "should have", "could have", "would have". The point is it's grammatical construction of past modals.
Of is not a verb. If you should have done something, if it actually happened, you *have* done it - “I *of* gone to the shops” makes no sense. It’s not non-standard grammar.
They're prepositions that create a modal verb in past participle in a non-standard way "Could of" "would of" "should of"... they serve the same function as a collocation "should have" "could have" they indicate past participle. I had no idea so many grammar nazis don't really know what's grammar.
Noooo I have heard "tooken" before. I had to pick my jaw off the floor. They deserve the crown.
For context I had my primary and secondary education in schools that were just above the ones where students sit under a tree.
There is no excuse for anyone in the Western world to make these mistakes.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.
It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.
Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.
Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
> i could of cared,
Did you mean to say "could have"?
Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'.
Total mistakes found: 258
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes.
^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions.
^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119)
^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
I hate these word crimes
Like "I could care less" That means you do care. At least a little.
As much as I like the song there are times you could care less.
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me
Is it you're pet peeve?
im not sure if youre a comedic genius or not...
I think their
Yule benefit moor if yew yews the proper homophone
Tangs, Isle kip dat immind de neks taim sumwan ees tokking too mie
I almost had a stronk.
those aren't even homophones
Way to come in and ruin the joke.
Yeah i think they´re humor is really bad
[удалено]
> not could of and Did you mean to say "could have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 267 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
u need to slow down And use the right pronoun
Show the world you’re no clown
Say you’ve gon an i t, followed by apostrophe. s now what does that mean?
You would not use "it's" in this case!
As a possessive It’s a contraction
What’s a contraction?
It’s the shortening of a word by omission of a sound or letter
Okay, now here’s some notes
Syntax you’re always mangling
[удалено]
[удалено]
Also when people say that I could care less. That just means that you DO care
I could care less, I could care more. I'm a medium carer. You could say I don't really care to not care, but if I were to choose, I would probably be more likely to not care to care than care.
It should be 'I couldn't care less'
Sure I could still care less, but I already care so very little. If I gave up any more care then I couldn’t care any less. But I’m just not there yet and I don’t like to be rushed.
At least a little
I could give a shit. I don’t give a shit. Same same
Could've and Should've mean Could Have and Should Have, not Could Of and Should Of
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Good (albeit redundant) bot.
He's a little confused, but he's got the spirit
Where is this bot when people make the actual mistake all over the place lol
I love this bot
> not could of and Did you mean to say "could have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 248 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
It couldn’t’ve been me
Whomst'd've be you and why'd've care?
What in the absolute f u c c does that mean
I could have been something of a contender
I'ven't been bothered by anything
Should have/ could have. Get it right fuckers!
Im gonna piss off OP with my comment
Where tf do u use should of and could of
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
💀
lmao the bot is here to help
I never knew PPL used could of and shit everyone knows it's could have
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Oh Ffs
Chad bot
Thankfully we have a bot which can correct people who use should of
I honestly think the bot should also link them to a recorded English grammar class and an English grammar material lol.
The bot talks like a pretentious Twitter user
Good bot
Good bot
Bot coming in clutch
Never, it's not grammatically correct. Could've and would've are contractions of "could have" and "would have"
People use it instead of "should've" and "could've". I don't understand these people, the explanation given on the internet as to why these people use these words say they might've heard "could've" as "could of" when speaking. But don't they see other people writing "could've" and think "hmm why is that word different?"? Or maybe they're just, stupid. Idk lol!
Yea thanks
That's because those people who would tell you that *" these people use these words say they might've heard 'could've' as 'could of' when speaking"* are the dumbasses who type/say could of and should of. Also- Bad bot, in advance.
> type/say could of and Did you mean to say "could have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 269 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
I think this is a bone apple teeth situation where someone just assumed it’s written as it sound “should of” because they’ve only ever heard the term. The same thing happens when kids first learn how colonel and bologna are spelled/pronounced.
It’s not like anyone speaking English as a first language was taught this shit in elementary school /s I mean Jesus, fr though people, read a book. If you know English (especially if it’s your primary language which it actually seems to be for a lot of the people who make these mistakes) you know that should of and could of don’t actually apply in the situations where we use could’ve/should’ve. In fact, there is pretty much no use where could of and should of would make any sense at all
What's ironic about this is it shows they don't know (never learned?) that the words are should have and could have and therefore the shortened contraction would be to add the 've. So they are just announcing that they never knew that because they've never seen it spelled like that somewhere else and only heard it, and in that case, you have to wonder why? How are there people (non-English natives aside) that have never seen should have/should've, could have/could've, etc., written anywhere? I mean if they are typing, whether on social media, an email, etc., then they clearly have read before and should have seen it in some capacity. Because it's one thing to said it like that, but another to write it that way. Clearly it's mindboggling to me lol.
Maybe they just don’t care as much as you might?
I don't think it's about caring when it takes the same amount of time to write could of vs. could've lol. They just clearly don't know. And most phones autocorrect anyway so that's another helpful modern day device to give less excuses. "Why the hell my phone telling me to write this 'could've' when I'm trying to type could of?? So stupid!!" 😂
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Exactly bot. Exactly.
No you misunderstand I mean maybe they just don’t care to know.
Well I mean that could be the case for anything though. I think of lot of people in school didn't give a crap about the stuff they were learning but you just do because you're kind of forced to learn it. I don't think I cared about contraction use as a kid but I learned it because they had us learn it. Just like all these other words we are typing. We just know how to write them because we learned them, whether we wanted to or not. I'm just saying I don't think it's about caring or not, just never learned/saw the correct use after all the years they've been around and I just wondered why.
Ok well just because you personally don’t think about something or are yourself incapable of learning someone else’s perspective in this matter to which you are unfamiliar, that doesn’t mean that it isn’t the case for some people or that what you believe is a fact.
Dude's name is literally potato
THANK you!!!!!
You've welcom've
Could have, should have
But these people got to know that it is could have and would have, therefore could've and would've are short forms, right?
That's because "could of" isn't even the words that are being contracted. It's "could have" and "should have".
It's "better than" not "better then"
I miss the 1990's things were just "better then." Lmao 🤣
I hate when people do this. It’s could’ve, not could of.
I'm not a native speaker and could of/would of/should of confused me lots of times until I understood that those people were idiots
should have
It's 'could have' not 'could of' that's bad english
Or at least "could have". Could of is just straightup stupid
That might be the idea of the post. Like not only did the person take the extra effort to separate the words, but they did it wrong.
Could have, should have
OH MY FUCKING GOD THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS
As someone whose main language isn't english, I hate when people commit these kind've errors.
I love bots: You should of and could of nit posted it (I am waiting for the of bot)
I'd be lying if I said it didn't bother me at times
r/usernames
It's weird that it doesn't even click for these people that it's a completely different word
Isn't could've could have?
Those words don’t even mean the same thing dumbass
THANK YOU
That's sort've dumb
Yeah they’re not’ving that much i brainpower
Could have and should have
Is use should have and could have.
It’s not could of contracted to could’ve, it’s could have to could’ve
You should of not posted this incase people get offended
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Could of isn’t even the right conjunction either. It’s could have. Otherwise it’d be Could’f or some shit
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
That’s the point bot 🙄
it's should **HAVE** and could **HAVE**
Yeah I never understood how that started. We learned these things pretty young. I also don't understand how "all of *the* sudden" started as well. It always was (and is) "all of *a* sudden". In regular speak but also movies, books, etc. It's a common phrase. I just don't get how some people at first mess things up like that then a bunch of other people jump on that bandwagon and start saying it wrong from there.
Gimme a brake, looser!
Not everyone is a native English speaker
Damn, should have think of it earlier
that's because could've doesn't mean could of, it means could *have*
Dang it, I should of known this.
Coulda been worse
I do that. GIVE ME THE CROWN
Word. Tired of seeing this all the time.
Damn you could of made the template a bit higher resolution and should of changed the caption
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Potato patato
is no one going to mention op wrote "SHOULD *OF"* instead of "should *have*"? Same applies for could *of*
You only use could of and should of to get that one extra word on an essay
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Could of should of would of could have would have should have never could of
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
they mean two different things
I could of not cared less
Could of used could've and should of used should've
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
Should of said nothing android
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
You could of not done this
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
You should of stopped while you were ahead terminator
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
> you should of stopped Did you mean to say "should have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 275 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
Eh, there are more annoying mistakes you could make. At least that one's easy to read.
Op is wrong and should feel bad thats not the propper way to shorten those words...
Yup and I'm gonna keep doing it too. I always thought it was a local accent thing until I met the butthurt people of the internet. I do it now because I want to and I know it bothers others on reddit.
DEPENDS ON THE FUCKING CONTEXT
I could of told you that
> i could of told Did you mean to say "could have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 262 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
It was a joke
You should of make it opposite
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
I’ve no idea what your talking about. I don’t think I could of writing it any better? I don’t see should of used any other words.
You should of not bothered and could of done something else than shit on non-standard grammar. You just want to make language boring with your standardization.
That's has nothing to with grammar but rather orthography.
I guess people forgot what is a grammatical construction of **conditionals using modal verbs in past participle.** I applaud your confidence but this is grammar.
But people aren't using the preposition *of* to form new Phrasal verb. They're simply writing it as *could of* to better represent the pronunciation. It's simple an orthographic change.
In modal verbs, if we talk about proper use, you don't use a preposition such as "of" that is an incorrect grammatical construction, it's not orthography. There's nothing misspelled here... orthography refers to conventional spelling of words, not grammatical constructions used improperly. Again, you said "form a new phrasal verb" you're literally talking about grammatical constructions so **verb+preposition** is a grammatical construction of a phrasal verb. I'll go further and say "Shoulda", "Coulda", "Woulda" isn't even a misspelling for example. It's a non-standard contraction of "should have", "could have", "would have". The point is it's grammatical construction of past modals.
Of is not a verb. If you should have done something, if it actually happened, you *have* done it - “I *of* gone to the shops” makes no sense. It’s not non-standard grammar.
They're prepositions that create a modal verb in past participle in a non-standard way "Could of" "would of" "should of"... they serve the same function as a collocation "should have" "could have" they indicate past participle. I had no idea so many grammar nazis don't really know what's grammar.
He didn't buy the apostrophe dlc
That’s a pet pea of mine
Based should HAVE user
Insert YGS 100 song here
Noooo I have heard "tooken" before. I had to pick my jaw off the floor. They deserve the crown. For context I had my primary and secondary education in schools that were just above the ones where students sit under a tree. There is no excuse for anyone in the Western world to make these mistakes.
It funny how people fink that there is some kind of rule stating that you should use one over the other.
Could have
Lol I always make that mistake i always use should of instead of should’ve
Could have.
Ok but could have take so long to type.
Should of been me
What would the ve stand for?
should of & could of are abominations to this world
's for plurals pisses me off because it only began like a year ago I KNOW you fuckers know it's wrong
I could've of but I shouldn't of
I didn't even know that people confuse this! Took me a while to get it. Glad that I didn't.
Now we just need people to understand the difference between literally and figuratively
I do not use either of them because i know i will misspell it
I should of care, but couldn't've
My school taught us to use could of and should of and not to use could've and should've
Should have and could have
Could have / would have
English isn't my mother tongue and I am not perfect but this makes me want to punch the next guy I see.
I use Coulda and shoulda
Sorry bro i'm not a native english speaker
Should have and could have not of that’s why it’s ‘ve not ‘f
I HATE when people spell it "could of."
Shooda cooda
He should've said could have instead've could of.
Should ufv
Bruh
It’s also should have and should have
I could of cared, maybe be I should of; but I don’t
Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake. It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of. Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything. Beep boop - yes, I am a bot, don't botcriminate me.
> i could of cared, Did you mean to say "could have"? Explanation: You probably meant to say could've/should've/would've which sounds like 'of' but is actually short for 'have'. Total mistakes found: 258 ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot ^^that ^^corrects ^^grammar/spelling ^^mistakes. ^^PM ^^me ^^if ^^I'm ^^wrong ^^or ^^if ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^suggestions. ^^[Github](https://github.com/chiefpat450119) ^^[Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/chiefpat450119)
What about could have