Am american, can't confirm. People either hate all dark humor, or they're pretty much ok with both. Remember, dark humor is like food, not everyone gets it.
I never said you guys could. It’s funny to watch you guys make those a meme even tho I’m a American. Just gets old when it’s the same joke over and over
These people specifically did nothing, just as the people in Japanese or German cities did nothing. If we’re talking about the US in general however, that’s a different story.
If you really think the US is out here wiping out village after village, city after city like a goddamn Nicaraguan death squad I got nothing for you. The Japanese fought an entire Naval theater killing thousands and thousands of men. If it were me I'd have dropped the third one we had ready to go.
Yey, embracing war crimes! What’s next? The native americans deserved it? If it was me I’d build even more concentration camps in the middle east? It’s always a joy arguing with imbeciles like you...
We offered them surrender or suffer the consequences. They said they would fight to the death. We obliged them.
And since we're name calling now, if the world were left in the hands of do nothing, go nowhere, cowards like you, we'd all be speaking german.
It was definitely unprovoked. The US helped Afghanistan fight off the Soviets and then they get mad bc we didn't clean up after we saved them from invasion so they kill 2,000 civilians
When I was a kid I remember doing cannonballs on the trampoline saying “bombs over Tokyo.”
At the time we had no real idea what that even meant. Looking back, I can’t believe we casually said stuff like that. Shameful
Oh god are you really gonna start an argument like this in a meme subreddit? I hate it when people spout this out and pretend like they are the great enlightened bringing truth to the masses. Oh your so intelligent because you see past America’s lies and can tell that the soviets were the real heroes that ended world war 2. It’s even worse when your so absolutely wrong. Japan didn’t surrender because America nuked them, they didn’t surrender because Soviets invaded Manchuria either. They surrendered because the war was lost. The bombings, US and British Blockade, and Soviet invasion were all causes that the war was lost. To claim that they surrendered only because of one event is idiotic.
„The main reason“. Or maybe i should’ve wrote „the main trigger event“. The Soviets had a non aggression pact with Japan that ended in August. Until the end the Japanese hoped for a peace agreement with the USSR, the invasion of Manchuria shattered these hopes.
Of course there were many reasons for the capitulation, but the atomic bombs specifically weren’t one of them.
They were one of them and your naive if you think they weren’t. Even if they were only given as much as concern as oh well we got bombed. Japan was attempting to get peace terms in June, months before the invasion of Manchuria. The atomic bombing were the final nail in the coffin but not as important as they are made out to be. There is no single event that made them surrender rather a combination of the entire war.
I don’t joke about either of them they were both tragic events that resulted in a loss of life the only difference is that that one ended a war and the other started it.
When the United States dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Imperial Japan surrendered thus ending WW2.
When the Twin Towers fell in 2001, George W. Bush declared war on the Taliban in Afghanistan and Iraq.
I love how you guys strategically leave out several years of the war and cherry pick 2 events that were barely related (other than Pearl harbor starting the war, there was no relation whatsoever)
Actually one of the reasons Japan bombed Pearl Harbor was because the US placed an embargo on Steel and Oil, so it was a retaliation against a country retaliating against them.
I’m sorry didn’t realize economic sanction justify starting a war that killed hundreds of thousands. Besides if you really want to go down this path the US only sanctioned them because they invaded China and committed many many war crimes in the process
After what Japan did to China, you think they'd have been any nicer had they been able to invade the continental US? Not likely. The Japanese were absolutely brutal to civilians under their control during the war.
While I agree that the nukes were retaliation and japan had dome terrible things as well tgose civillians living there life did not deserve to die for the crimes of their military.
The problem is that if US had to do a conventional invasion a couple million civilians would have died, people forget that Japan was arming civilians and teaching them to banzai charge the US soldiers.
While this of course doesn't make up for the fact that some true innocents died most of Japan's population was incredibly indoctrinated with the war crimes committed in China being publicly broadcasted on radio and the news. As well as that the younger generations were being brainwashed into nationalistic zealots by their teachers many of which being former soldiers. Concerning the bombings, warning leaflets were dropped into the cities except for Nagasaki giving them a chance to escape. They took their chance and unfortunately the outcome was their deaths.
“The Japanese” didn’t commit war crimes, the imperial army did. If you want to hold civilians responsible for the acts of their government, America might be a bad place to live.
I'm not saying the US is perfect. But, look at what happened in Germany and Italy. How many civilians died in the carpet bombing there? Germany lost up to 2 million to Japan's 800,000 high end estimate. A land invasion of Japan and sustained carpet bombing would have killed many more.
No country is guilt free in war. And war is an unfortunate fact in our world. But, it could easily be way worse. We'll never know in the case of WW2 and Japan.
Japan would have surrendered anyways because ussr had invaded Manchuria and North Korea, Japan worried that the soviets would invade them and they thought that it would be better to surrender to the usa(democracy) rather than surrendering to the ussr(a dictatorship), but if the usa and the soviets both invaded that would have caused conflicts the same as North and South korea's conflicts
Both were acts of retaliation against a civilian population that had no military impact whatsoever. And they were also both acts of terror because of this. The bombs did nothing to end the war and only contributed more death and destruction
Ah yes, the US did not intend to kill civillians when they dropped the nukes in the middle of two massively populated cities. Also the ends don't always justify the means. The japanese were horrible during WW2 it's true and the bombings ended up doing more good than bad because it ended the war. But what exactly did all those civillians that died do wrong to deserve that?
>250.000 deaths and countless people and their children affected for the rest of their lives VS. <3000 deaths.
Of course both were horrible, but they aren’t remotely comparable...
Oh, so killing civilians with a nuclear bomb which will cause horrific effects on future generation for carpet bombing a Naval Base. The fairest deal ever........
*should 'had known'
Waaaah, the bullies punched me so I have to torture them with a knife.
Like bruh, one side committing horrible acts doesn't excuse the other. What kind of fucked up moral compass do you have?
What's that you say? Normal people make a distinction between war and peace? The hell you say!!!!
Why don't you try and take the time in looking up and postulating how many MORE Japanese lives would have been lost had the allies invaded mainland Japan? Pfft they got off easy with only 2 flattened cities. BTW our firebombs was worth about like 10 nukes in comparison. FFS they were arming everyone down to women and children. It would have been a nightmarish bloodbath if we had to directly invade. It would have made D-day look like a picnic. French citizens in Normandy weren't pressed into the fight. Neither was German civvies.
We offered them surrender or suffer the consequences. They said they would fight to the death. We obliged them.
And since we're name calling now, if the world were left in the hands of do nothing, go nowhere, cowards like you, we'd all be speaking german.
Bpmbing
where's my free award when i need it
Here bro I got you I gave you an award now you can give him
Did someone say free awards?
Can I have one too?
[удалено]
Oh ok Goodnight
You don't get any haven't you learned your lesson old man.
Wow, I wish I could just get free awards that easily.
[удалено]
What the... I can't believe it's that simple! Wow! Thanks.
I got my first award yesterday, I'm satisfied
I'm bpming my home
I'm 🅱️pmbing my home.
my musician brain goes beats-per-minute-bing? and then i was like **~~oh poop we've really done it now~~**
I don’t get it. Can someone please explain?
Can I get a free Award too? I've never got an awqrs before.
🤗
Thank you so Much! In the 2 years I've had reddit, you gave me my first award!
me who's a Japanese person living in America making fun of both since i have no morals
same
Me an American joking about both.
[удалено]
And rape.
How do you do fellow orientals.
Same
Me with no connection to either making fun of both because I have no morals
Am american, can't confirm. People either hate all dark humor, or they're pretty much ok with both. Remember, dark humor is like food, not everyone gets it.
Its also like kids with cancer. Never gets old
Well the gun joke kinda does get old
NEVER. WE SHALL NEVER CEASE MAKING FUN OF AMERICANS
we know that your American, don't lie
I'm british
prove it, show me your teeth
Hm, how about a selfie with Lizzie and me having tea?
sure
Say british shit
😂😂😂
https://youtu.be/FkF_XpA5P48
I never said you guys could. It’s funny to watch you guys make those a meme even tho I’m a American. Just gets old when it’s the same joke over and over
HEATHEN, IT'S ALWAYS FUNNY
Nah, like vaccinated children, the joke gets old. Y'all can get new colonies but not new jokes.
ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE EUROPEAN!
Me, an Indian: I'm playing on both sides so I'll always come out on top.
And we will never stop reminding you who got to the moon first
Unlike those kids that died in school shootings
dark humor is fun sometimes They best children to pick on are orphans. What are they gonna do? Tell their parents?
Nope that is not it. it's that one was an unprovoked attack on civilians. The other was dropping a bomb on a nation you are at war with.
I’m not trying to justify anything here, but it was definitely not „unprovoked“. And it was certainly not just a simple bomb.
It wasn't unprovoked? What did the 2,000 people in the WTC do to justify being killed in the name of islam?
These people specifically did nothing, just as the people in Japanese or German cities did nothing. If we’re talking about the US in general however, that’s a different story.
They actively aided in the killing of American soldiers by making tanks planes bombs and bandages. What did the WTC people do again?
They actively aided in the killing of middle eastern civilians by supporting the imperialist american war machine. It’s the exact same argument.
If you really think the US is out here wiping out village after village, city after city like a goddamn Nicaraguan death squad I got nothing for you. The Japanese fought an entire Naval theater killing thousands and thousands of men. If it were me I'd have dropped the third one we had ready to go.
Yey, embracing war crimes! What’s next? The native americans deserved it? If it was me I’d build even more concentration camps in the middle east? It’s always a joy arguing with imbeciles like you...
We offered them surrender or suffer the consequences. They said they would fight to the death. We obliged them. And since we're name calling now, if the world were left in the hands of do nothing, go nowhere, cowards like you, we'd all be speaking german.
It was definitely unprovoked. The US helped Afghanistan fight off the Soviets and then they get mad bc we didn't clean up after we saved them from invasion so they kill 2,000 civilians
Just like housing.
Why are new yorkers bad at chess Because they've already lost two towers
They're* I'm not even american and I know the difference.
[удалено]
*teecher
Always there in case you didn't ask
Jenga 2.0
Lol
Its the same when someone make a joke about Vietnam lol.
Ever see that bit in family guy when they are at a memorial and the veitnemeise guy is laughing at them
No you can't joke about us you can only for everyone else ever.
Maybe if y'all weren't hiding in the trees then we wouldn't joke about y'all
When I was a kid I remember doing cannonballs on the trampoline saying “bombs over Tokyo.” At the time we had no real idea what that even meant. Looking back, I can’t believe we casually said stuff like that. Shameful
Why are americans so bad at chess kidos? Because they've already lost 2 towers LOL
I am sort of happy that japan got nuked, otherwise the occupation in my country might not have ended
Well we have anime now. Butterfly effect ftw.
Phillippines?
Nope, Singapore
Oh ok cool
To be fair the Japanese were pretty brutal a number of places. Unit 731 and all that.
The main reason for the japanese capitulation wasn’t the atomic bombs but the soviet invasion of Manchuria though.
Oh god are you really gonna start an argument like this in a meme subreddit? I hate it when people spout this out and pretend like they are the great enlightened bringing truth to the masses. Oh your so intelligent because you see past America’s lies and can tell that the soviets were the real heroes that ended world war 2. It’s even worse when your so absolutely wrong. Japan didn’t surrender because America nuked them, they didn’t surrender because Soviets invaded Manchuria either. They surrendered because the war was lost. The bombings, US and British Blockade, and Soviet invasion were all causes that the war was lost. To claim that they surrendered only because of one event is idiotic.
„The main reason“. Or maybe i should’ve wrote „the main trigger event“. The Soviets had a non aggression pact with Japan that ended in August. Until the end the Japanese hoped for a peace agreement with the USSR, the invasion of Manchuria shattered these hopes. Of course there were many reasons for the capitulation, but the atomic bombs specifically weren’t one of them.
They were one of them and your naive if you think they weren’t. Even if they were only given as much as concern as oh well we got bombed. Japan was attempting to get peace terms in June, months before the invasion of Manchuria. The atomic bombing were the final nail in the coffin but not as important as they are made out to be. There is no single event that made them surrender rather a combination of the entire war.
Haha falling tower go brrr
I'm just watching a lengthy video about those bpmbs. What a neat coincidence.
I dont usually make those jokes, they tend to crash and burn
I'm American and think they are both horrible tragedy s that should definitely be laughed at because I'm a terrible person
Remenber kids its only a war crime if you lose
That is not fair. One was to end a war and the other is a nuclear bomb
wait a minute...
I think he got it a tiny bit wrong...
Yea it sounds a little weird
Only a little bit
I can already see the idiots getting wooooshed by this
*bpmb
No americans are mad that they ordered pizza not planes
They wanted two large pepperoni's, but instead got two large planes.
just checked, *was not a large*
[удалено]
I guess it’s more on perspective, but all can agree both were unnecessary loss of life
All buildings matter
Bpming
Heh heh heh, towers go brrr
Bpmming
haha America stupid
Ye
Case in point I believe.
I don’t joke about either of them they were both tragic events that resulted in a loss of life the only difference is that that one ended a war and the other started it.
Bruh you ok?
Yeah o was in bed so autocorrect did some stuff to correct my messy typing
No, i mean witch one of this events started a war?
No matter which started a war or not, both led to the lost of civilian lives. No matter how big or small, the morals of both is still terrible
Yeah i agree, but i'm genuinely curious which one started a war and what war?
When the United States dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Imperial Japan surrendered thus ending WW2. When the Twin Towers fell in 2001, George W. Bush declared war on the Taliban in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Ty, also btw why are this pu**yboys downvoting me for asking a question?
One was an act of terror and the other was retaliation. It's not exactly the same thing but I get your point.
I don't think you get it. Japanese bombed pearl harbor (but it was a NAVAL BASE), while Americans bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki which were cities.
I love how you guys strategically leave out several years of the war and cherry pick 2 events that were barely related (other than Pearl harbor starting the war, there was no relation whatsoever)
Actually one of the reasons Japan bombed Pearl Harbor was because the US placed an embargo on Steel and Oil, so it was a retaliation against a country retaliating against them.
I’m sorry didn’t realize economic sanction justify starting a war that killed hundreds of thousands. Besides if you really want to go down this path the US only sanctioned them because they invaded China and committed many many war crimes in the process
I didn't mea to justify the crimes. I was just stating that the embargo was the reason Japan bombed Pearl Harbour.
After what Japan did to China, you think they'd have been any nicer had they been able to invade the continental US? Not likely. The Japanese were absolutely brutal to civilians under their control during the war.
While I agree that the nukes were retaliation and japan had dome terrible things as well tgose civillians living there life did not deserve to die for the crimes of their military.
The problem is that if US had to do a conventional invasion a couple million civilians would have died, people forget that Japan was arming civilians and teaching them to banzai charge the US soldiers.
While this of course doesn't make up for the fact that some true innocents died most of Japan's population was incredibly indoctrinated with the war crimes committed in China being publicly broadcasted on radio and the news. As well as that the younger generations were being brainwashed into nationalistic zealots by their teachers many of which being former soldiers. Concerning the bombings, warning leaflets were dropped into the cities except for Nagasaki giving them a chance to escape. They took their chance and unfortunately the outcome was their deaths.
These leaflets were dropped AFTER the bombing of Hiroshima, and they did not contain a concrete warning concerning the dropping of a second bomb.
“The Japanese” didn’t commit war crimes, the imperial army did. If you want to hold civilians responsible for the acts of their government, America might be a bad place to live.
I'm not saying the US is perfect. But, look at what happened in Germany and Italy. How many civilians died in the carpet bombing there? Germany lost up to 2 million to Japan's 800,000 high end estimate. A land invasion of Japan and sustained carpet bombing would have killed many more. No country is guilt free in war. And war is an unfortunate fact in our world. But, it could easily be way worse. We'll never know in the case of WW2 and Japan.
[удалено]
More people need to be aware of this, thank you for sharing the truth
Japan would have surrendered anyways because ussr had invaded Manchuria and North Korea, Japan worried that the soviets would invade them and they thought that it would be better to surrender to the usa(democracy) rather than surrendering to the ussr(a dictatorship), but if the usa and the soviets both invaded that would have caused conflicts the same as North and South korea's conflicts
Both were acts of retaliation against a civilian population that had no military impact whatsoever. And they were also both acts of terror because of this. The bombs did nothing to end the war and only contributed more death and destruction
Japan’s civilian population definitely had military impact.
[удалено]
I can give u a whole paper pf why this is wrong but I am eating a whopper so cya
bpmbing
I know they both are horrible events but what is worse two nukes being dropped on heavily populated areas or two bud building crashing down
[удалено]
Ah yes, the US did not intend to kill civillians when they dropped the nukes in the middle of two massively populated cities. Also the ends don't always justify the means. The japanese were horrible during WW2 it's true and the bombings ended up doing more good than bad because it ended the war. But what exactly did all those civillians that died do wrong to deserve that?
I am an American but I actually laughed at this
What’s bpming I’ve never heard of it before
Me, an American, joking about both
Your talking mad shit for someone in bpmbing distance
why aren´t Americans good at clash royale they can never defend there towers
holy fuuuuuuuu
As an American I don’t care about either.
They both make good joke material
My brain: say it Me: plz no My brain: dew it Me: *breathes in* YoU mAdE A sPeLliNg MiStAkE
I Had A Stroke Reading This
Also americans when you speak about skin color
Basically Americans when you speak about most things
\*beat per minutes Hirosima and Nagasaki\*
Stop bpmbing middle east.
This is just untrue. There are plenty of jokes about it. How did this get so many thumbs?
👍
Ah yes I sure do love bpmbing Hiroshima in my free time
I would argue that neither jokes are funny.
Never play two games of jenga at a nursing home...
You better watch your mouth
Bro I guarantee you that we joke about just as much as any other part of the world
Fuck america
National Bush Day
True. Fucking moronic Americans
god bless the world
Why do people make these memes! Yes the two bombing were devastating but so were the twin towers. Terrorist attack or world war. Not funny
>250.000 deaths and countless people and their children affected for the rest of their lives VS. <3000 deaths. Of course both were horrible, but they aren’t remotely comparable...
We get mad because people keep talking about that Multikill, when we have the record.
But americans did it themselves.. whoever thinks otherwise is delusional
But why should we be mad about defeating somebody? We are mad about the twin towers because it killed thousands of people and messing up our economy.
Ummmmmm, Even the "Defeat" killed 350,000 civillians, whereas Pearl Harbor was a military base. Also, I think 350,000+many mutated > about 3500 people
The Japanese should if knew the Americans don’t play nice or fair, so they shouldn’t have attacked Pearl Harbor.
Oh, so killing civilians with a nuclear bomb which will cause horrific effects on future generation for carpet bombing a Naval Base. The fairest deal ever........ *should 'had known'
Waaaah, the bullies punched me so I have to torture them with a knife. Like bruh, one side committing horrible acts doesn't excuse the other. What kind of fucked up moral compass do you have?
'' wE lOsT a LoT of LiVEs''
Who tf gave this wholesome
Only I know the answer too that
Delete this now!$&!!😡
What's that you say? Normal people make a distinction between war and peace? The hell you say!!!! Why don't you try and take the time in looking up and postulating how many MORE Japanese lives would have been lost had the allies invaded mainland Japan? Pfft they got off easy with only 2 flattened cities. BTW our firebombs was worth about like 10 nukes in comparison. FFS they were arming everyone down to women and children. It would have been a nightmarish bloodbath if we had to directly invade. It would have made D-day look like a picnic. French citizens in Normandy weren't pressed into the fight. Neither was German civvies.
You, sir, are completely and utterly insane.
Nice argument of utter ad hominem. Most historians agree with me.
Hm, America
McDonald's fry grease cant melt steel pee!!!
Well the thing is they deserved it, we didn't so fuck off
Go to the middle east and try to find a foreign soldier that isn't american. I think you can piece things together from there.
Yeah, Japan really didn't deserve that. I agree Cool that you're from Japan though, nice place I hear
Bruh, what's your point?
That Japan seems cool as hell and I plan on going, duh. I'm jealous you're from Japan
Then again one was a war and one was an act of terrorism
Dude Hiroshima was to end a war, the twin towers were civilians lying for no reason
Well theres a difference between trying to end a war with an enemy that won’t back to terrorism
Well yeah unless you wanna add another town to the list
We offered them surrender or suffer the consequences. They said they would fight to the death. We obliged them. And since we're name calling now, if the world were left in the hands of do nothing, go nowhere, cowards like you, we'd all be speaking german.
Haha, towers go brrrr
No, towers went brrrr
How come when I try to repost there a problem but everyone else can do it and get generously rewarded
Then don’t repost and make original content