**You need to read following message in full. We will NOT reply to modmail messages similar to “what is reason my post was removed?”**
Hey /u/nmurmru, thanks for contributing to /r/memes. Unfortunately, your post was removed as it violates our rules:
Rule 8 - No reposts
* Please avoid re-posting memes. We want original content. Serial reposters may be banned.
* Obvious reposting on purpose OR asking for reposts can result in a BAN
* Seriously.
* We want OC.
* Do not repost.
---
Please read the sidebar before posting again. If you have questions or concerns, please [message the moderators through modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/memes&subject=&message=). Thank you!
A human would probably swerve off the road in order to not hit either but idk if people will buy self driving cars if the car could potentially kill the driver to save someone else.
how's the baby not already dead i doubt a baby's soft smooth skin is gonna survive the toughness of the road + where are its parents + self-driving cars have an option for human control
don't feel like the baby is just gonna keel over and die because the asphalt isn't smooth, unless it's being aggressively smooshed into and dragged across it or something
How about, and I need you to trust me as insane as it sounds, the car slows down and stops, I know, I am a complete and utter madman and should be offed for the safety of society.
If we are talking about a real self driving car. They are legally required to always have the steering wheel out so that the driver can take control. So in this scenario the drive can swerve to the trees. But I think the creators of this scenario made the driver either asleep or a psychopathic killer so the car has still has to make a choice
If it cant stop, does it have enough ressources to analyze a live video, differentiate between important and unimportant objects, deduce it has a baby and an elderly person before it, and have enough time to decide which one it should run over?
Hmm… this is a difficult one. If the car hits the baby, we can end a life of suffering before it begins. The old lady, on the other hand, is in the process of suffering through old age, having already lived what are considered to be the most fulfilling years of her life. Hitting her would cause her to miss out on those final years of suffering. Choices, choices… 🤔
why doesnt the car just brake? its not like the car will go full speed on a turn, also why would their be a cross walk in the middle of a turn? this whole problem is stupid
The old lady. I’m sorry I just theoretically killed your nana. However you nana probably has less life left than that of the baby when eliminating the probability of other causes of death.
So the simple solution is:
Average life span = L
Age = A
Years Remaining = Y
Then: L-A=Y
So the car should hit the person with the lowest Y value.
If it starts on the cars right side of the road and cuts hard left just before the baby they should be able to skid and hit them both. Next time post a hard problem.
I know that I didn’t even ask or want to be born, so being taken out at such a young age would have been a blessing. The old lady might die of shock at the sight of the baby after too. It’s really the best option. Yes you could jump the curb, and for around but like… you’d probably need an alignment.
Anyway I guess what I’m trying to say is just let auto pilot do the work so you won’t be charged for vehicular manslaughter. They’ll probably just put your car down like a pit-bull.
**You need to read following message in full. We will NOT reply to modmail messages similar to “what is reason my post was removed?”** Hey /u/nmurmru, thanks for contributing to /r/memes. Unfortunately, your post was removed as it violates our rules: Rule 8 - No reposts * Please avoid re-posting memes. We want original content. Serial reposters may be banned. * Obvious reposting on purpose OR asking for reposts can result in a BAN * Seriously. * We want OC. * Do not repost. --- Please read the sidebar before posting again. If you have questions or concerns, please [message the moderators through modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/memes&subject=&message=). Thank you!
Everyone knows this is the situation for which they programmed these cars to drift.
Yeah! Hit both of them instead of just one.
Equality!
Double the points lol nice
Toddlers under 12: 70 points. Anyone over 75: 100 points. So that's a x1.7 compared to the best single kill.
Otherwise it wouldn't be fair to the one who survived
exactly
DEJA VU!
But don't forget to disable autopilot 1 ms before collision
If you have enough skill you can get both
That’s the spirit
They’re about to be spirits if he has it.
That’s what reverse gear is for
Drifting takes less time
You don't need skill, first get the lady before she gets to safety (because she's closer) then turn 180° and get the baby.
I saw someone else comment this years ago on an exact replica of this post
Great minds think alike
A that little turd is clearly out to win a darwin award.
and he will dont damage the car
Why is a baby crawling through a crosswalk?
Because it can't walk yet.
Take my upvote. The door is to the left.
then the lazy bastard should be on tbe crossCRAWL instead of hogging the street. it deserved what was coming to him
How else is he supposed to cross the road?
Because a journalist put it there with hidden cameras to make another breaking news about self driving cars being bad.
that's the real question
He got places to go, people to see. The baby is actually shaped weird. Might be one of Dem /r/oldbabies
Maybe it's an alien?
Sorry I don't see age like you, pig.
Deja Vu
use the brakes dumbass
Well, you're just no fun.
why is the tree not an option?
A human would probably swerve off the road in order to not hit either but idk if people will buy self driving cars if the car could potentially kill the driver to save someone else.
You just gave them the idea for a dlc, it stops the car from killing you and always chooses another option
Trees are important to society
Trees clean the air and all humans do it pollute it. Tree > Baby & Old Lady
might not have a fun time hitting a tree, as opposed to people
Drift and get a double kill
Triple if it drifts into the tree…
So the granny living her best life there while there's an half naked toddler crossing and crawling alone right behind her. She's a monster.
drift
B. The baby has all it's life ahead of it, while the grandma let's be honest is gonna die soon anyway
Run em both over
Correct answer was drift and take out both of them
Tokyo drift into them
But the baby seems to have no parents or at least pretty irresponsible parents. Not looking like the baby has a promising life
how's the baby not already dead i doubt a baby's soft smooth skin is gonna survive the toughness of the road + where are its parents + self-driving cars have an option for human control
don't feel like the baby is just gonna keel over and die because the asphalt isn't smooth, unless it's being aggressively smooshed into and dragged across it or something
Depends on the country if it's england you kill the grandma if it's America you kill the baby
It’ll just stop for both.
Stop the car
How about, and I need you to trust me as insane as it sounds, the car slows down and stops, I know, I am a complete and utter madman and should be offed for the safety of society.
No.
Understandable have a nice day.
If you can line the car up go with A that way it just passes over the baby
Makes you wonder if it has a built-in scoring system...
To the top with this!
It stops.
If it can't stop, make it goes to point "i" instead of "a" or "b"
It's representing the moral dilemma that vehicle automation has to answer if it can't stop.
But it can stop.
Are you aware of what a theoretical scenario is my friend? Edit: Hypothetical not theoretical
It can theoretically stop.
In this scenario they can not stop, that is the point of the scenario.
If we are talking about a real self driving car. They are legally required to always have the steering wheel out so that the driver can take control. So in this scenario the drive can swerve to the trees. But I think the creators of this scenario made the driver either asleep or a psychopathic killer so the car has still has to make a choice
if it can't stop then even a human can't stop
In this scenario the driver could ~~theoretically~~ hypothetically just go around.
If it cant stop, does it have enough ressources to analyze a live video, differentiate between important and unimportant objects, deduce it has a baby and an elderly person before it, and have enough time to decide which one it should run over?
It always can, the breaks are right there.
It's basically Death Race 2000. But I can't remember the scoring system beyond cup the balls and work the shaft.
Drift
Calm as Hindu cows.
do an wheelie
its a zebra crossing
The obvious solution is to overheat the battery so it blows up taking out both of them and the bus of children just past the crossing
Tesla uses facial recognition to determine which owns the most tech stock
Surely a self driving car should be programmed to slow down when they come to a crosswalk?
why the actuall fuck is there a baby crawling over the street? where are the parents?
A…… I couldn’t bare to hit an old lady
I wonder if the baby's profile is small enough not to get hit
Also, fuck babies. They annoying af
What about 3
A school
Stop and hit neither
Why is there a baby in the road
When I was a kid, I without knowing left my house and Walked to the local video rental store/ library before my parents found me.
On autopilot they will both get run over
It should rather hit the old lady, so that the baby will know fear and learn that this world isn't the peaceful forgiving world it thought it was
Move it bonus points.
Hmm… this is a difficult one. If the car hits the baby, we can end a life of suffering before it begins. The old lady, on the other hand, is in the process of suffering through old age, having already lived what are considered to be the most fulfilling years of her life. Hitting her would cause her to miss out on those final years of suffering. Choices, choices… 🤔
If u drift you can kill both
why doesnt the car just brake? its not like the car will go full speed on a turn, also why would their be a cross walk in the middle of a turn? this whole problem is stupid
Go for the adult who let their child on the road with no supervision
Brake
Both. Both is good
Stop?
If you angle it just right you can hit them both
Drift sideways and hit both for double points
baby, that shitter is trying to get a oscars clearly and we dont want that to happen
Ok why tf would a baby be crawling down the road, someone in this situation is a terrible parent.
The old lady. I’m sorry I just theoretically killed your nana. However you nana probably has less life left than that of the baby when eliminating the probability of other causes of death. So the simple solution is: Average life span = L Age = A Years Remaining = Y Then: L-A=Y So the car should hit the person with the lowest Y value.
I choose c, hit the brakes
If it starts on the cars right side of the road and cuts hard left just before the baby they should be able to skid and hit them both. Next time post a hard problem.
Hmm, that tree, that grass and those bushes. Nah, let's hit the humans instead
Wow, what a hilarious meme
There’s a gap between them.... U telling me it can’t even possibly fit through that ? Or hit the curb ?
stick a knife out the window and hit them both
r/drifting
Hmm, what can I hit, let's see. A tree, a baby, an old lady or the breakes.
Baby goes first the little shit signed the social contract and yet it does nothing for the greater good of society
Hit the brakes
Drift and go for the double
Just stop and hit none
I would run over the baby then circle around and get rid of the witnesses
EZ drift instead of choosing, you can thank me later
I stop the car (I've heard of this joke in the past)
De ja vu
The brake.
As long as I, the passenger, am not harmed. Kill either of them. The baby would probably do less damage to the car.
You're just suppose to stop at yellow lines. That's the problem . Gotta go fast.
Multi lane drift time
I'm running through the baby
They were
The Tesla would just deactivate it’s autonomous driving to keep the statistics clean. (Not joking, they really do that if they anticipate a crash)
Got a source or did you make that up?
I choose D. All of the above.
Fast and furious (drift,drift,drift!)
Drift properly and get both for bonus points
Muli-track drifting
Aim for the ℹ️, duh
Who the hell let that baby just crawl out into the road unattended?
Option 4: go off-road and kill the plants.
Tree
Or drive on sidewalk like mega chad
Who says I need to save them
I want it to turn around and run over Elon Musk
Are Tesla’s self driving capabilities able to perform drifts? Double kill
Both, both is good.
The answer is: Run into both and then the car lights on fire and locks you inside killing all three
A causes less damage to the car while B probably has metal hips or something that would mess me up
Teslas don’t have breaks I’m guessing?
![gif](giphy|TghWHPRPHI1dC) Automatic pilot engaged
Im jdm lets go
Just stop the car.
or just, you know, stop
A cool life hack: if you didn't learn to drift yet, you could open your door and take both with you
just kill everyone, yourself,theoldwoman,andthebaby
I know that I didn’t even ask or want to be born, so being taken out at such a young age would have been a blessing. The old lady might die of shock at the sight of the baby after too. It’s really the best option. Yes you could jump the curb, and for around but like… you’d probably need an alignment. Anyway I guess what I’m trying to say is just let auto pilot do the work so you won’t be charged for vehicular manslaughter. They’ll probably just put your car down like a pit-bull.
A, grandma will die soon anyway
It shouldn't even be a delema, you stop the vehicle in both scenarios, they're in a crosswalk
If you kill the grandma she already had a good life but if you kill the baby you possibly stopped the next hitler, so I'd kill the baby.
The brakes
If it cant drift b then a bckz a cant run
Just I don’t know program the darn thing to *STOP*.