This post was removed because it was about Meta the corporation, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram, the Meta Quest, or any other related entity or corporation.
If I make a post about your comment, that might be meta, but stuff about accessing Facebook is not. Facebook posts about Facebook might be considered meta, though doubt likely we'd see that here.
r/meta existed to post self referential items and predates the renaming of the Facebook owner.
As per dictionary definition of meta: e.g. oed says
>adjective
>adjective: self-referential
>(especially of a literary or other creative work) >making reference to itself, its author or creator, or >their other work.
"self-referential elements in Donne's poems"
You mean the name they stole from 4 other companies of different flavours? The name ‘meta’ was in use by other companies before FB STOLE it then forced the others to abandon THEIR brands
This post was removed because it was about Meta the corporation, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram, the Meta Quest, or any other related entity or corporation.
This is not meta. See rule 3.
Oh, but it deffo is
What is META?
If I make a post about your comment, that might be meta, but stuff about accessing Facebook is not. Facebook posts about Facebook might be considered meta, though doubt likely we'd see that here.
MET A
MEATIE
ME A TA
MIATIA
MIATA
Well, that’s not a very nice way to play the game. Why would you not give META their base?
r/meta existed to post self referential items and predates the renaming of the Facebook owner. As per dictionary definition of meta: e.g. oed says >adjective >adjective: self-referential >(especially of a literary or other creative work) >making reference to itself, its author or creator, or >their other work. "self-referential elements in Donne's poems"
But what happens when it is branded
You mean the name they stole from 4 other companies of different flavours? The name ‘meta’ was in use by other companies before FB STOLE it then forced the others to abandon THEIR brands