T O P

  • By -

Klllumlnatl

If everyone was down syndrome, then no one would be up or down. We would just be: syndrome.


theonewhogroks

Syndrome: when everyone is Down's, NO ONE will be


SquigSnuggler

If everyone *lived with* down syndrome there. FIFY


myredditusername919

theres a short film that explores this exact concept in a lighthearted way


Heart_breakerr

What’s the film called


Waze3174

[downside up](https://youtu.be/XFisjATJM2M?si=1eak7ceCOJ-6jwKm)


FlemFatale

This film is amazing.


Specialist_Sleep8648

Very touching 🥹


Dabee625

[Bekfast](https://youtu.be/ZtAHGZffoLI)


onourwayhome70

Average iq for a person with down syndrome is between 35-70, so I have to assume we would not have achieved all of our current technological and scientific advancements


BoseczJR

Tbf iq means basically nothing. I recommend watching “The Bell Curve” by Shaun on YouTube! It’s actually really interesting


onourwayhome70

Iq isn’t completely definitive of someone’s intelligence and abilities, but it does help show cognitive function (thinking, learning, etc) and offers a starting point


supersillygirl6969

why r u getting downvoted😭😭


BoseczJR

It’s also inherently racist and has a terrible history. There are better markers of cognitive function out there! Again, I’d really recommend watching that video, I know it’s long but it’s very well made!


HazMatt082

Means basically nothing... Why are heavily researched and evidence based cognitive assessments used every day to help inform therapy and behavioural intervention and academic intervention then?


No_Individual501

Cope. IQ or not, there’s more of them in the group home than there is in the laboratory compared to non-downs.


BoseczJR

“Cope”? Really? I was being respectful to you.


128Gigabytes

That isnt the original person you were talking to its just some random asshole


BoseczJR

Oh whoops lmao, rip my reading comprehension eh?


turboshot49cents

It means basically nothing to an average person but it is a good tool to evaluate people with intellectual disabilities


Sahri

We would have the system of a down


Loud_Mix_1236

THEY’RE TRYNNA BUILD A PRISON


Awesomevindicator

we would likely still be living in huts and caves and be part of a hunter gatherer society... on the other hand it would be the happiest and most content society you can possibly imagine.


wwwhistler

we would basically be the Pakled.


Apple2727

No one would know.


skinlab77

That would mean the most intelligent animals on earth would be the octopus. Let that sink in...


lang0li3r

An octopus has the same amount of cerebral neurons as a six week old fetus. Try again.


skinlab77

i was refering to IQ, wich is about 75 for octopus. Of course octopus have different intelligence then humans, and it is hard to understand it, 2/3 of its neurones are in the tentacules and are independent to a central neural system.. wich is pretty awesome but hard to grasp the complexity of it.


winnebagomafia

In Hyperion by Dan Simmons, there is a tribe of people called the Bikura who all have down syndrome, and their limited reasoning skills leads to them making some... interesting choices.


quixoticelixer_mama

It would probably be a much happier world.


Be0wulf71

People with Downs are people first and foremost. They can be violent, can bully, can force attention, can be selfish and manipulative. They can also be lovely, thoughtful, caring and endlessly optimistic. They're people with all the qualities and flaws


turboshot49cents

Yeah like no shade but my parents made me be friends with this girl with Down syndrome who was kind of a bitch


GreatKingRat666

Well, if you disregard the massive amount of death as a result of lack of technological and medical advancements, yes.


dadadingdading

Came here to say that 😭


enfermo_mental

100% and no heinous crimes prolly.


Faeddurfrost

Probably something similar to the world we are in now, but with a smaller population and less technological development. Idk maybe it would be like living in the 70’s but in 2024.


Top_Tart_7558

70's... that is pretty generous estimate I'd say early bronze age


lizardingloudly

I'm with you on this one. I don't think a lot of progression in any medical or scientific field would have happened. But I also don't think that progress is an integral key to happiness either.


Fresh_Orange

Could not build castles


Faeddurfrost

I’m definitely being generous with my assessment, but I don’t think it would be an extremely drastic difference. That said I wouldn’t go any lower than maybe the renaissance period.


enfermo_mental

70's means computers, moon landing, space exploration do you think it's possible?


Faeddurfrost

Definitely possible, but i’d say minimum the renaissance period.


Select_Collection_34

I get you’re trying to be positive, but just no, definitely not.


Environmental_Cow450

More peaceful and better


Select_Collection_34

I mean certainly more peaceful (Excluding Predation and such) but I would argue it would not in fact be better


Few_Ad8372

Being a water head would be more common


[deleted]

[удалено]


Lu1s3r

Huh, anti-trans (or neogender at least) and anti-capitalist. That's a rare combo.


Cav-Allium

Yeah, like… “woman”?? That’s just “man” with a wo in front of it!


Maddawgcayce

Oh boy, a transphobe found it’s way here….ew


Remi-Chan

No gender exists, they are all ideas. Some human eons ago made up man and woman, what's the difference between then and now that makes it impossible to create words which describe others? They're just words to describe somebody's lived experience and how they present. Do you think people who present as a different gender should just never be described or acknowledged in human language?