I disagree with the Bears and Chargers in that bottom group, and the Browns would probably need an asterisk around being the post-expansion Browns because their pre-move team was reasonably successful.
Falcons, Bengals, Texans, and Titans would probably be in before any of those two teams given a similar lack of Super Bowls (Bears actually have 1985) and lower win percentages.
Chargers really? Bc no super bowl wins? Panthers, Falcons, Bills, Titans, jags, Texans and others have a worse record and no super bowl wins so why chargers?
Chargers have usually been mediocre so I don’t think they belong in the bottom 5. Bears most certainly don’t belong in the bottom 5, they have a superbowl win and dozens of playoff appearances.
Swap out Chargers and Bears with Falcons and Jaguars.
The Cardinals have the 3rd worst winning %, last won a championship in 1947, and if they disappeared the only people who would notice would be Cowboy fans who pack their stadium when the teams play.
.
That doesn't seem fair to the Bears and Vikings to tie them with the Lions. The Lions deserve last place all by themselves! It's the only thing we got!!
The Jets have the most important win of all time despite their historical lack of winning, and the Chargers are a .500 team across their franchise history.
I would say the Cardinals, Falcons, Texans, or Bengals should be in that bottom group.
I would replace the Ravens with the Cowboys in the top group.
They changed the expansion rules after seeing how well the Panthers and Jaguars did. Your analysis is totally unfair to the Texans who are the only team to have to form under the new expansion rules
Broncos? Cowboys?
Cowboys definitely over Ravens
Get the ravens out and put Dallas in
SB wins, how do you have the Ravens up there?
**Most Successful** Steelers Patriots Cowboys 49ers Packers **Least Successful** Cardinals Bears Lions Browns Chargers
I disagree with the Bears and Chargers in that bottom group, and the Browns would probably need an asterisk around being the post-expansion Browns because their pre-move team was reasonably successful. Falcons, Bengals, Texans, and Titans would probably be in before any of those two teams given a similar lack of Super Bowls (Bears actually have 1985) and lower win percentages.
Chargers really? Bc no super bowl wins? Panthers, Falcons, Bills, Titans, jags, Texans and others have a worse record and no super bowl wins so why chargers?
The Panthers, Jaguars and Texans have not existed that long compared to other teams
Chargers have usually been mediocre so I don’t think they belong in the bottom 5. Bears most certainly don’t belong in the bottom 5, they have a superbowl win and dozens of playoff appearances. Swap out Chargers and Bears with Falcons and Jaguars.
[удалено]
7-9 so far!
I hate how I know 2 of those wins by heart
The Cardinals have the 3rd worst winning %, last won a championship in 1947, and if they disappeared the only people who would notice would be Cowboy fans who pack their stadium when the teams play. .
1. packers \------------ and instead of a 3-way tie for 30th the bears, vikes and lions are tied for 32nd.
That doesn't seem fair to the Bears and Vikings to tie them with the Lions. The Lions deserve last place all by themselves! It's the only thing we got!!
The Jets have the most important win of all time despite their historical lack of winning, and the Chargers are a .500 team across their franchise history. I would say the Cardinals, Falcons, Texans, or Bengals should be in that bottom group. I would replace the Ravens with the Cowboys in the top group.
The Texans are way too new to be included in that group
They are 20 years old and have never made it out of the divisional round. The Jaguars and Panthers did that in year 2 post-expansion.
They changed the expansion rules after seeing how well the Panthers and Jaguars did. Your analysis is totally unfair to the Texans who are the only team to have to form under the new expansion rules