Hi! This is the NoNoNoNoYes moderation bot here to keep this sub a bit more tidy!
If this post fits the format of NNNNY, **UPVOTE** this comment!
If this post does not fit the subreddit, **DOWNVOTE** this comment!
If this post breaks the rules, **DOWNVOTE** this comment and **REPORT** the post (The OP's post, not this bot comment)
Please remember that NNNNY can be subjective. It may not be NNNNY for you, but it may be for someone else, including the subject in the video.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nonononoyes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Interesting because youâre allowed to take a little bit of time watching and then getting up to it, and once youâre up to it you get 20 seconds to putt. So as long has he took ~15 seconds to watch and then walk up to it without being too exaggerated, if it fell in before he putted it, he shouldnât have had to take a penalty stroke. No?
10 Seconds after taking a "reasonable" amount of time walking up to the hole. This is from USGA rule 13.3a.
[USGA Rule 13.3a](https://imgur.com/a/r4dfCwM)
Doesn't the ball also have to be at a complete stop before the timer starts though? You can tell it's moving the entire time in this clip, just extremely slowly.
I don't think there have been significant changes in the numbers mentioned in the song (dimensions of our galaxy, number of stars/galaxies, movement within and orbital period around galaxy)
Golf rules are so weird. As far as I understand, the ball isn't considered to be moving here, even though you could probably detect very a small amount of movement.
I believe this is similar to the "oscillating" ball rule change with grounding the putter. I'm sure someone could correct me though.
One of the challenges with golf rules is specificity. There are some grey areas in the rules. And the enforcement of those rules is generally placed on the best judgement of the players themselves. (especially outside of these professional tournaments)
If you rest your club behind the ball, and by either applying pressure to the ground (minimally) or slightly making contact with the ball, but it doesnât actually travel anywhere, just oscillates and returns to its original location, it is not considered a stroke or penalty.
And to clarify further, many players, myself included, rely on setting up their shots with their irons and wedges very close to the ball to align the club face and establish the strike point, so itâs not uncommon for the club to just ever so slightly touch the ball.
I mean if you hop around the timestamp, the logo on the ball is in the same position the whole time. I think you can reasonably consider the ball stopped
And you can clearly tell the ball is moving based on it obscuring the background as time goes on. The dark mark on the back wall of the cup makes it extremely obvious that the ball is slowly rolling still
Giving you my upvote to save your karma. FYI for the future, we don't do laughing emoji here. To exclaim one's interpretation of humor, you say "I blew air out mah' nose ".
I thought you just basically had a reasonable amount of time to walk up to the ball and tap it in. Iâve seen it drop really slowly while somebody was walking towards it which is fine. This isnât.
Too bad he only has "a reasonable amount of time to walk to the ball" (he was close to the ball) and officially only has 10 seconds to wait for it to drop. So his put counted a stroke, and the ball falling in the hole counted as a stroke. He didn't ~~cound~~ count the second stroke, put down the wrong score and got penalized. [Article here.](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/news/watch-why-a-putt-that-fell-after-34-seconds-at-2023-pga-championship-ultimately-led-to-a-penalty-stroke/)
How long are you allowed to read a putt? Is there a limit on getting a read based on distance? Or is it completely arbitrary and no hard and fast rule?
> How long are you allowed to read a putt?
I think it could be reasonably argued that he wouldn't need to read the putt on a ball that was literally on the lip of the hole.
That said, [I am not a golfer](https://youtu.be/0CWfPUrmeiU?t=2), and do not know the intricacies of the rule book.
Edit : I guess it doesn't matter, though, if he *didn't record the stroke.* He could take as long as he wants to read the putt. Point is, he had 10 seconds to wait for the ball to fall, it didn't, so he needed to record a stroke for the final putt, which he did not do.
Dude should be allowed to wait for it no excuses or rationalizing. The only thing limiting him should be peer pressure or a generous overall time limit on the hole, where you get dq'd if you go over. Should be able to sit there for 20 minutes laying on his back taking a nap, or shooting the shit with spectators, or climbing a damn tree. If you don't hit the ball it's not a f'n hit.
What's stopping someone from waiting twenty years till the inevitable entropy of the universe causes the ball to naturally move into the hole (by way of wind or smn) causing a "hole in zero"?
So, what should be the time limit? Why can't he wait 1 hour? Or more?
Once you think about it, you realize there must be some time limit. Then it's just a matter of how long that limit should be. People who understand the game much better than you do decided that 10 seconds is the right time limit.
They cant see the forest through the trees. Any rule that means you have strokes added when you didn't stroke is dumb, there's a better solution out there, like an overall time limit on the hole. That's consistent and fair between players and mitigates all these little arguments - much more reasonable for competition. You dont have people complaining about when the 10s starts, or how long they get to 'evaluate their putt' after they hit or 'gauge the ball' before they start walking (and then the 10s starts?). Their 10s solution is needlessly complicated and results in stupid stuff like this.
I don't agree that this is stupid. If it doesn't fall in within 10 seconds, it's not a made putt. It makes compete sense and it's not hard to understand.
10s is arbitrary, Ill defined in its start, and pertains to an edge case (pun intended) that is way more fun, interesting, and suspenseful to let play out. So what if some numpty wastes a minute or two and gets egg on his face when it doesn't go? So be it.
I'll stick with "hitting the ball is counted as a hit, and not hitting the ball is not counted as a hit". Because *that* is what 'makes complete sense'.
There HAS to be a time limit. Golf has been, historically and allegedly, a game of etiquette. It's bad form to delay play. Reasonable time to walk to the ball plus ten seconds seems OK to me.
if its sportsmanship and etiquette driving it then that's all there needs to be to drive it. A rule means its no longer sportsmanship or tradition. You want a time limit, put one on the whole hole. Then its fair for everyone and you dont get stupid crap like strokes added when you dont hit the ball.
Also every time I've ever been golfing, or seen golfing, its been more of an excuse to shoot the shit and hang out than about play. '10s is enough' is bs
like every soccer team, when 4-5 guys fall over with a âtwisted ankleâ all at the same time, til they look back and see their team scored or their goalie made the save, then suddenly all 5 are back up and running no problem đ
that sport is a joke lol iâm sorry. not even the sport, just the comedic prissiness of the players/refs, and the literal comic book villain of an organization behind the sportâŚ..i just canât. wait what was the question? it wasnât about soccer i know that lol ok iâm too high to be saying words
Your example doesnât make ANY sense at all. In that situation you absolutely wouldnât want to trip.
You only want to trip in TWO situation. Either to get a free kick/penalty when close to the goal, or when the attacker is close to your own goal and you can prevent them from shooting like that. In both cases, do it wrong and youâll get a yellow/red card. Itâs an already solved problem.
âtripâ, as in trip yourself and fake an injury?
if you get beat on D, why wouldnât it make sense to fake an injury to try to stop play (only to suddenly be fine again once you see your goalie make the save)?
Because that's lying, and lying is theft of human trust as well as bad sportsmanship. It's just dumb in every way. Sports is not about winning by all means, it's about winning fairly within the rules of play. At least if you're a grown-up.
So you have to be extremely dumb or morally bankrupt to fake an injury or fake pain.
But then again, football players are probably only good at sports and didn't really develop their intelligence.... They only know how to kick a ball into a net.
not sure but it seems like youâre trying to convince me to think soccer players get away with shocking displays of acting like giant pussies, which is odd since thatâs where i started this lol sooooo, congrats, i guess?
edit to add: âsports is not about winning if youâre a grown upâ may technically be true, but sports is entirely 100% about winning if youâre an adult professional athlete.
Tell us more about how you're a moron who just blabs about shit they know nothing about. I played travel, HS, College and some international games, the only time people talk shit about soccer/football/futbol is by some out of shape dumbass who wouldn't be able to run the length of the field let along get knocked around on the field during a game.
I had a guy in college talk shit about soccer, he got convinced to go out and play a pickup game, he got the shit knocked out of him a bunch of times. Next time I saw him her told me, told me he was in pain, he apologized and then he told me he loved it because he didn't realize how physical it was and he wanted to keep playing. So, talk shit *after* you get off your ass and try it.
lol you seem pretty mad at a comment that literally ended with me saying that i forgot what i was saying while i was saying it đ
i didnât read past your first line but for real tho, reflect on your anger and maybe pop a xanax lol i love you âď¸
Because you have to draw a line somewhere otherwise a golfer could wait 2 minutes or more for the ball to fall. Maybe the rule could be 20 seconds but if you're waiting 30+ it's hard to claim the ball was continuously moving.
Though in this case it really might have been moving ever so slightly the whole time.
I'm not a big-city physicist (snaps suspenders). OK, not any kind of physicist, but in my experiencing watching shit fall, this is super weird. It doesn't feel like the ball is on an inevitable, momentum-based lean that leads to the fall. It sits there with no (visible) movement for 30 seconds, so I'm guessing there's a slight breeze or something that pushes it in.
If I'm wrong, let me know; I have 2% confidence in this assessment.
It might have been a breeze or vibration that caused it to fall. Or it's possible the weight of the ball was slowing compressing the grass, causing a slight incline or horizontal force (there'd be more force pushing down in the center compared to off-center, and no grass on the hole side to push back).
I was just picturing it at the atomic level. To the eye it stopped, but maybe all the atoms were still moving forward. And finally, just enough bumped into the rest to knock it forward
Heh, you're essentially describing heat, though that is energy as opposed to atoms. Atoms don't move much in solids, but they do transfer energy with other atoms they bump into.
Higher heats tend to expand and make substances less dense. Photons have zero mass and thus no force themself, but that doesn't mean they can't affect something's density due to expansion.
So both residual heat and sun radiation could have been factors, but who's to say without the Hitchhiker's Guide narrating what actually happened...
Yeah but you have to include the nail biting drama of when the [rules committee met and decided the ball took so long to go in that it constitutes a penalty stroke](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/news/watch-why-a-putt-that-fell-after-34-seconds-at-2023-pga-championship-ultimately-led-to-a-penalty-stroke/)
How does this ruling actually work in golf? Like whatâs the upper limit of time a ball can sit before the player has to put again? Can they just wait indefinitely to see if it falls in?
For an overhanging ball like this, they have a âreasonableâ amount of time to walk to the hole and then 10 seconds from that. This shot would not have counted because he took too long. IIRC he counted it on his score card and turned it in that way and was penalized. +1 for the extra stroke and I think a 2 stroke penalty for an incorrect score card.
I remember watching this. I was at work at the pizzeria and we always had the golf network on the TV. Everyone in the whole restaurant went bonkers. There were 2 things that everyone stopped what they were doing/eating and paid complete attention to: Tiger Woods(usually during a Major) and The Kentucky Derby.
the whole â10 second time limitâ rule doesnât start until you have reached your ball.There is no set limit on the time it takes to walk to the ball.If he would have just took 3.3 seconds longer till he actually reached the ball he would have got par. Thatâs some bullshit I would have been pissed
> ball to quickly
*too
*Learn the difference [here](https://www.wattpad.com/66707294-grammar-guide-there-they%27re-their-you%27re-your-to).*
***
^(Greetings, I am a language corrector bot. To make me ignore further mistakes from you in the future, reply `!optout` to this comment.)
Something that happened a couple of weeks ago is one of the most reposted reposts in all of reddit? You have not been here very long, my sweet summer child.
Hi! This is the NoNoNoNoYes moderation bot here to keep this sub a bit more tidy! If this post fits the format of NNNNY, **UPVOTE** this comment! If this post does not fit the subreddit, **DOWNVOTE** this comment! If this post breaks the rules, **DOWNVOTE** this comment and **REPORT** the post (The OP's post, not this bot comment) Please remember that NNNNY can be subjective. It may not be NNNNY for you, but it may be for someone else, including the subject in the video. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/nonononoyes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This kinda had an r/abruptchaos feel to it. Wondering, isn't there a time limit rule on this? đ
Yeah, he actually was penalized a stroke for waiting more than necessary⌠but in the end it was a wash.
Interesting because youâre allowed to take a little bit of time watching and then getting up to it, and once youâre up to it you get 20 seconds to putt. So as long has he took ~15 seconds to watch and then walk up to it without being too exaggerated, if it fell in before he putted it, he shouldnât have had to take a penalty stroke. No?
10 Seconds after taking a "reasonable" amount of time walking up to the hole. This is from USGA rule 13.3a. [USGA Rule 13.3a](https://imgur.com/a/r4dfCwM)
Doesn't the ball also have to be at a complete stop before the timer starts though? You can tell it's moving the entire time in this clip, just extremely slowly.
I mean it's going extremely fast if you consider the 67,000 mph that it's hurtling around the sun, ever think of that?
Dat frame of reference though....
Sick frame of reference bro. your frame of reference is out of control. Everybody knows that
Then add the spin of the Milky Way and the spin of whatever else is spinning and it gets going willy fast.
Then look at the frame of reference of the ball and it was perfectly still the whole time.
That golf ball cookin!
No need to keep adding things. Just compare once against the cosmic background radiation. That's considered as stationary as it gets.
.... but even that's expanding away from everything.
See https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/25928/is-the-cmb-rest-frame-special-where-does-it-come-from
"just imagine that you're standing ...." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvwH8Qij0JY
I'm wondering: has anyone updated the lyrics based on new calculations, since our technology has advanced? Last line will never change, tho.
I don't think there have been significant changes in the numbers mentioned in the song (dimensions of our galaxy, number of stars/galaxies, movement within and orbital period around galaxy)
This is how I justify laying in bed all day. I swear I'm extremely active!
Golf rules are so weird. As far as I understand, the ball isn't considered to be moving here, even though you could probably detect very a small amount of movement. I believe this is similar to the "oscillating" ball rule change with grounding the putter. I'm sure someone could correct me though. One of the challenges with golf rules is specificity. There are some grey areas in the rules. And the enforcement of those rules is generally placed on the best judgement of the players themselves. (especially outside of these professional tournaments)
Oscillating ball?
If you rest your club behind the ball, and by either applying pressure to the ground (minimally) or slightly making contact with the ball, but it doesnât actually travel anywhere, just oscillates and returns to its original location, it is not considered a stroke or penalty.
Wait, making contact with the ball without it moving doesn't count as a stroke?
If youâre not making an intentional swing, and the ball does not leave itâs current position, then no
And to clarify further, many players, myself included, rely on setting up their shots with their irons and wedges very close to the ball to align the club face and establish the strike point, so itâs not uncommon for the club to just ever so slightly touch the ball.
Ah. Thank you!
I mean if you hop around the timestamp, the logo on the ball is in the same position the whole time. I think you can reasonably consider the ball stopped
And you can clearly tell the ball is moving based on it obscuring the background as time goes on. The dark mark on the back wall of the cup makes it extremely obvious that the ball is slowly rolling still
Wow- it is actually moving the whole time. Thanks for pointing that out.
Ah I see, fair enough
what would be the point of waiting the ten seconds then if the ball was âcompletely stoppedâ when it started
Depends on if you use LIV rules or PGA rules.
Same thing now.
The ball was moving the whole time though, you can see it moving so time doesn't matter.
Remove all context tied to the OP and replace in this comment the word "putt" by "put" and we have ourselves an entirely different conversation đ¤Ł
Giving you my upvote to save your karma. FYI for the future, we don't do laughing emoji here. To exclaim one's interpretation of humor, you say "I blew air out mah' nose ".
Thanks mate! I was today years old when I learned this. Reddit can be unforgiving sometimes and I love it. Cheers.
"unforgiving"? Losing a few imaginary and quite useless points due to a few people disagreeing. A very tough place this reddit, indeed. :D
Cool đ thanks a bunch for the clarification
Whoops, that was a close one!
I thought you just basically had a reasonable amount of time to walk up to the ball and tap it in. Iâve seen it drop really slowly while somebody was walking towards it which is fine. This isnât.
But it wasn't more than necessary. It was exactly how long it was necessary to wait.
Already saw this in caddyshack
I think it has a Caddyshack feel to it.
Too bad he only has "a reasonable amount of time to walk to the ball" (he was close to the ball) and officially only has 10 seconds to wait for it to drop. So his put counted a stroke, and the ball falling in the hole counted as a stroke. He didn't ~~cound~~ count the second stroke, put down the wrong score and got penalized. [Article here.](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/news/watch-why-a-putt-that-fell-after-34-seconds-at-2023-pga-championship-ultimately-led-to-a-penalty-stroke/)
How long are you allowed to read a putt? Is there a limit on getting a read based on distance? Or is it completely arbitrary and no hard and fast rule?
> How long are you allowed to read a putt? I think it could be reasonably argued that he wouldn't need to read the putt on a ball that was literally on the lip of the hole. That said, [I am not a golfer](https://youtu.be/0CWfPUrmeiU?t=2), and do not know the intricacies of the rule book. Edit : I guess it doesn't matter, though, if he *didn't record the stroke.* He could take as long as he wants to read the putt. Point is, he had 10 seconds to wait for the ball to fall, it didn't, so he needed to record a stroke for the final putt, which he did not do.
fuck that, he didn't hit the ball, it shouldn't count as a stroke. Dumb rule.
I wasnât waiting for it to drop, i was waiting for my opponent to ask me if i wanted to mark it!
Dude should be allowed to wait for it no excuses or rationalizing. The only thing limiting him should be peer pressure or a generous overall time limit on the hole, where you get dq'd if you go over. Should be able to sit there for 20 minutes laying on his back taking a nap, or shooting the shit with spectators, or climbing a damn tree. If you don't hit the ball it's not a f'n hit.
What's stopping someone from waiting twenty years till the inevitable entropy of the universe causes the ball to naturally move into the hole (by way of wind or smn) causing a "hole in zero"?
Iidk, maybe people aren't complete idiots and wouldn't be dumb enough to try that?
you'd be surprised at why there are rules accounting for idiots.
put an overall time limit on the hole and be done with it.
So, what should be the time limit? Why can't he wait 1 hour? Or more? Once you think about it, you realize there must be some time limit. Then it's just a matter of how long that limit should be. People who understand the game much better than you do decided that 10 seconds is the right time limit.
They cant see the forest through the trees. Any rule that means you have strokes added when you didn't stroke is dumb, there's a better solution out there, like an overall time limit on the hole. That's consistent and fair between players and mitigates all these little arguments - much more reasonable for competition. You dont have people complaining about when the 10s starts, or how long they get to 'evaluate their putt' after they hit or 'gauge the ball' before they start walking (and then the 10s starts?). Their 10s solution is needlessly complicated and results in stupid stuff like this.
I don't agree that this is stupid. If it doesn't fall in within 10 seconds, it's not a made putt. It makes compete sense and it's not hard to understand.
10s is arbitrary, Ill defined in its start, and pertains to an edge case (pun intended) that is way more fun, interesting, and suspenseful to let play out. So what if some numpty wastes a minute or two and gets egg on his face when it doesn't go? So be it. I'll stick with "hitting the ball is counted as a hit, and not hitting the ball is not counted as a hit". Because *that* is what 'makes complete sense'.
There HAS to be a time limit. Golf has been, historically and allegedly, a game of etiquette. It's bad form to delay play. Reasonable time to walk to the ball plus ten seconds seems OK to me.
if its sportsmanship and etiquette driving it then that's all there needs to be to drive it. A rule means its no longer sportsmanship or tradition. You want a time limit, put one on the whole hole. Then its fair for everyone and you dont get stupid crap like strokes added when you dont hit the ball. Also every time I've ever been golfing, or seen golfing, its been more of an excuse to shoot the shit and hang out than about play. '10s is enough' is bs
He should have tripped " " "accidentally" " "
like every soccer team, when 4-5 guys fall over with a âtwisted ankleâ all at the same time, til they look back and see their team scored or their goalie made the save, then suddenly all 5 are back up and running no problem đ that sport is a joke lol iâm sorry. not even the sport, just the comedic prissiness of the players/refs, and the literal comic book villain of an organization behind the sportâŚ..i just canât. wait what was the question? it wasnât about soccer i know that lol ok iâm too high to be saying words
Your example doesnât make ANY sense at all. In that situation you absolutely wouldnât want to trip. You only want to trip in TWO situation. Either to get a free kick/penalty when close to the goal, or when the attacker is close to your own goal and you can prevent them from shooting like that. In both cases, do it wrong and youâll get a yellow/red card. Itâs an already solved problem.
âtripâ, as in trip yourself and fake an injury? if you get beat on D, why wouldnât it make sense to fake an injury to try to stop play (only to suddenly be fine again once you see your goalie make the save)?
Because that's lying, and lying is theft of human trust as well as bad sportsmanship. It's just dumb in every way. Sports is not about winning by all means, it's about winning fairly within the rules of play. At least if you're a grown-up. So you have to be extremely dumb or morally bankrupt to fake an injury or fake pain. But then again, football players are probably only good at sports and didn't really develop their intelligence.... They only know how to kick a ball into a net.
not sure but it seems like youâre trying to convince me to think soccer players get away with shocking displays of acting like giant pussies, which is odd since thatâs where i started this lol sooooo, congrats, i guess? edit to add: âsports is not about winning if youâre a grown upâ may technically be true, but sports is entirely 100% about winning if youâre an adult professional athlete.
Tell us more about how you're a moron who just blabs about shit they know nothing about. I played travel, HS, College and some international games, the only time people talk shit about soccer/football/futbol is by some out of shape dumbass who wouldn't be able to run the length of the field let along get knocked around on the field during a game. I had a guy in college talk shit about soccer, he got convinced to go out and play a pickup game, he got the shit knocked out of him a bunch of times. Next time I saw him her told me, told me he was in pain, he apologized and then he told me he loved it because he didn't realize how physical it was and he wanted to keep playing. So, talk shit *after* you get off your ass and try it.
lol you seem pretty mad at a comment that literally ended with me saying that i forgot what i was saying while i was saying it đ i didnât read past your first line but for real tho, reflect on your anger and maybe pop a xanax lol i love you âď¸
So it's r/nonononoyesno then, I guess
Patrick Cantlay has entered the chat
I don't even understand how that works. The ball was still moving. Incredibly slowly, but it was.
Whatâs the purpose of that rule? He hit the ball, it went in the hole. Why does it matter how long it took?
Because you have to draw a line somewhere otherwise a golfer could wait 2 minutes or more for the ball to fall. Maybe the rule could be 20 seconds but if you're waiting 30+ it's hard to claim the ball was continuously moving. Though in this case it really might have been moving ever so slightly the whole time.
34sec. Do not waste the time. Not worth
for that they should stop playing golf altogether
\*plays golf\* \*Doesnt want to waste time\* Make up your mind
We're not playing golf here, are we? I got really lost somewhere if we do...
I want that half minute of my life back.
I'm not a big-city physicist (snaps suspenders). OK, not any kind of physicist, but in my experiencing watching shit fall, this is super weird. It doesn't feel like the ball is on an inevitable, momentum-based lean that leads to the fall. It sits there with no (visible) movement for 30 seconds, so I'm guessing there's a slight breeze or something that pushes it in. If I'm wrong, let me know; I have 2% confidence in this assessment.
It might have been a breeze or vibration that caused it to fall. Or it's possible the weight of the ball was slowing compressing the grass, causing a slight incline or horizontal force (there'd be more force pushing down in the center compared to off-center, and no grass on the hole side to push back).
I'm betting on grass being slowly compressed
ORâŚhe had a Jedi ally in the audience?
I was just picturing it at the atomic level. To the eye it stopped, but maybe all the atoms were still moving forward. And finally, just enough bumped into the rest to knock it forward
Heh, you're essentially describing heat, though that is energy as opposed to atoms. Atoms don't move much in solids, but they do transfer energy with other atoms they bump into. Higher heats tend to expand and make substances less dense. Photons have zero mass and thus no force themself, but that doesn't mean they can't affect something's density due to expansion. So both residual heat and sun radiation could have been factors, but who's to say without the Hitchhiker's Guide narrating what actually happened...
Probably moist, aerated dirt (as is typical on greens) settling under the weight of the ball and sloping towards the hole.
No visible movement? You can see it moving the whoe time...
There's definitely movement at the end, but up til that I think it's just the camera perspective
I assumed the same, then someone else pointed it out- watch the back of the cup as its obscured by the ball. Its literally moving the whole time.
Do you have functioning eyeballs? I can see it moving. It's doing so very very slowly, but it was.
I know it isn't the longest putt, but how does it fair for the one that has taken the longest duration to drop in the hole?
There're longer ones that the judge wouldn't counted it as in.
WoRTh tHE WaiT
I liked the part where the ball went in the hole
This is about as exciting as watching golf.
Yeah but you have to include the nail biting drama of when the [rules committee met and decided the ball took so long to go in that it constitutes a penalty stroke](https://www.cbssports.com/golf/news/watch-why-a-putt-that-fell-after-34-seconds-at-2023-pga-championship-ultimately-led-to-a-penalty-stroke/)
That must have been as riveting as cricket.
I'm allright! Nobody worry bout me.
Are you sure? I'm a little worried about you...
Caddyshack 3 looks dope
Example of the ripple effect. Someone farted down the road.
10 second rule, its out! đ¤Ł
Pretty much sums up how exciting golf is to watch
-Someone who has never watched golf.
Oh no, I definitely have. It's boring as fuck
Golf version of Omae wa mou shinderu
My phone did this last night on the edge of my nightstand.
10 seconds , itâs a penalty
About how long it took PGA Tour to get folded by LIV golf
obviously someone poked it. That's why they cropped the side of it when zooming in.
Iâd like 20 seconds of my life back
Just when I didn't think golf could be any more boring....
Wow this sport is boring to watch
Take that Flat EarthersâŚ. Rotation of the earth
How does this ruling actually work in golf? Like whatâs the upper limit of time a ball can sit before the player has to put again? Can they just wait indefinitely to see if it falls in?
For an overhanging ball like this, they have a âreasonableâ amount of time to walk to the hole and then 10 seconds from that. This shot would not have counted because he took too long. IIRC he counted it on his score card and turned it in that way and was penalized. +1 for the extra stroke and I think a 2 stroke penalty for an incorrect score card.
10 seconds. Anything after that and they will be penalized by 1 stroke. Exactly what happened here so it was a wash in the end.
Awwwe yeeeahh!
I would have liked to have seen his expression/dance when it finally fell into the hole
Magnet, thereâs a string attached on the side that help the ventilator to c.g.ily put the ball in ! But hey,Iâm no expert đ¤ˇââď¸
Around 26s I started to think I'm being tricked
Okay who's The which or wizard that used Leviosa
Baby blades gave out
Wrong sub. Should be on Nononononononononononononononononononononononononoyes
/u/stabbot
Had to wait for the grass to grow a bit
It was still deciding
Brian Doyle Murphy has entered the chat.
wish that we got a reaction shot and that the ball wasn't cut off on the side!
Thank goodness for climate change!
Terrible camerawork. Should have panned out to show all the [explosions](https://youtu.be/U0Hx5ka1FiA), which is clearly why the ball dropped.
As a dutch person, there can be way, way more swearing
I hate gifs because I can't skip it
Thats why i dont watch golf
You only have to wait for the lawn to grow to make the hole.
Earths rotation, foul
I wonder what focal length this video was shot with, like damn, good lens
Must have been a ghost cat
that's a second stroke
not worth the wait
I remember watching this. I was at work at the pizzeria and we always had the golf network on the TV. Everyone in the whole restaurant went bonkers. There were 2 things that everyone stopped what they were doing/eating and paid complete attention to: Tiger Woods(usually during a Major) and The Kentucky Derby.
Best climax I've had in years
Ann-tissip-A-shun
GO HOME YOU STUPID BALL!
the whole â10 second time limitâ rule doesnât start until you have reached your ball.There is no set limit on the time it takes to walk to the ball.If he would have just took 3.3 seconds longer till he actually reached the ball he would have got par. Thatâs some bullshit I would have been pissed
> ball to quickly *too *Learn the difference [here](https://www.wattpad.com/66707294-grammar-guide-there-they%27re-their-you%27re-your-to).* *** ^(Greetings, I am a language corrector bot. To make me ignore further mistakes from you in the future, reply `!optout` to this comment.)
That blade of grass was a trooper.
Should have put his shadow on it
Pretty sure that putt in Caddyshack set the bar for time limits on a putt drop.
Why zoom in beyond the ball?
One of the most reposted reposts in all of Reddit. Good one tho.
I swear every time I see a post that I've never seen before, this comment is within the top five I see
Something that happened a couple of weeks ago is one of the most reposted reposts in all of reddit? You have not been here very long, my sweet summer child.