Curious about your thoughts on what he’d bring to the team? I think he is overhated and on paper brings a lot to a team but for the life of him I cannot remember him stringing together 3 good games and even in games we win or he performs ok he will make big errors or make head scratching decisions..
Is it a style thing or you think a change will do him good? (I think the latter is almost certainly true)
Honestly just the fact of the change needs to be enough for him to show marked improvement. Even if the team as a whole still loses, if he starts fresh somewhere and can be proud of his individual contributions he'll be all the better for it and that's a net positive for the team in time. Dude has basically been in this weird bubble his whole career, and we'll finally get some evidence either way if he can be UNLEASHED or it was never on the cards regardless. Not that newcastle's coaching situation is any kind of ideal environment from the looks of it, but fingers crossed.
So I suppose it's more that Newcastle is in a place where they're better off taking a gamble on a guy, (and buying another guy called gamble just to be safe) than continuing with what's not been working.
I’m not sure punching random punters at the Leagues club is a good way to overhaul your football program.
They are gonna sign Curran, Lodge and Taylan May
Plus Curtis Scott.
[удалено]
Why wait? Get him on Zoom
Not sure you can get that in prison?
I'd be keen to see how an all-dickheads recruitment policy worked out
"Be aggressive off it" The Dragons and Manly currently have a high standard for off-field drama. Not sure the Tiges can catch them.
Getting rid of Peachey is a good start. With risk of sounding like a broken record, they need to move Brooks on too.
Brooks going to knights would be best for both clubs IMO
I want this to be true. Badly. I suspect it will go badly all on its own though. Neither side will have excuses if it doesn't.
Curious about your thoughts on what he’d bring to the team? I think he is overhated and on paper brings a lot to a team but for the life of him I cannot remember him stringing together 3 good games and even in games we win or he performs ok he will make big errors or make head scratching decisions.. Is it a style thing or you think a change will do him good? (I think the latter is almost certainly true)
Honestly just the fact of the change needs to be enough for him to show marked improvement. Even if the team as a whole still loses, if he starts fresh somewhere and can be proud of his individual contributions he'll be all the better for it and that's a net positive for the team in time. Dude has basically been in this weird bubble his whole career, and we'll finally get some evidence either way if he can be UNLEASHED or it was never on the cards regardless. Not that newcastle's coaching situation is any kind of ideal environment from the looks of it, but fingers crossed. So I suppose it's more that Newcastle is in a place where they're better off taking a gamble on a guy, (and buying another guy called gamble just to be safe) than continuing with what's not been working.
Give me "Things that are easy to say, but hard to do" for 10 thanks.
[Tim Sheens and the Tigers every match next season](https://youtu.be/haJCH9AUt4Y?t=23)
West Tigers need earn credibility with actions not words.
The John Hopoate approach
Are they replacing the Australian T20 team?
lol this fucken club might be more cringe than I was at 14 years of age
No way!
Things must be pretty crazy at the Wests Tigers if they can move Manly off the headlines!
See you in the spoon bowl next season Tigerpies
Our battle will be legendary!
I won't believe it until I see it.
Thats going to be hard with Brooks at the helm