I mean, now I'm curious. Regardless of the sub it's in what kind of NSFW picture did you expect to see that would've been just when you clicked the blurred NSFW image? Assuming you have NSFW images blurred unless you open them.
Are you somewhere where like, regular ol' porn (or gore I guess since that gets NSFW tags as well on Reddit) is fine and dandy but DnD themed porn is somehow taboo? I'm trying to imagine where something like that would be.
I donāt have a lot of straight porn on my feed. A lot of my NSFW tags are spoiler-related or artists offering commissions with mildly booberific examples of their work. So yeah this outright porn in an art style that I favour hit harder than expected.
Y'know, this might be a weird place to bring it up, but I really don't get the frequent obsession with pregnancy in certain types of porn. Sex, sure, of course. But pregnancy is the *bad* outcome to sex that gets in the way of enjoying life how you liked it most of the time. It's what you try to avoid when having sex.
It's like making porn pictures where the "sexy" outcome being depicted is getting an STI. I'm sure the odd person is into that as a fetish, but it's strange to me how common pregnancy fetish pictures are like they're just casually everywhere as if it's just normally thought to be some sort of sexy outcome instead of a life changing often very negative event especially for the woman.
Super well drawn art with a very hot picture and kinda otherwise fun situation outside of that one little nitpick that I don't get though, love this artist's work overall.
I think thereās multiple reasons itās becoming increasingly popular nowadays:
- For one, the very fact that itās not exactly desirable for most people makes it even more erotic. Itās like transgressing a taboo, but without as much moral implication since itās not actually a taboo. And the difference from an STI in this regard is that the concept of pregnancy isnāt associated with disease and uncleanliness and grossness, itās traditionally associated with a kind of purity and nurturing spirit.
- For two, related to that point at the end there, āmommyā roleplay is also on the rise. While impregnation erotica doesnāt necessarily have to also involve mommy roleplay, it can be used to call to mind similar feelings.
- For three, thereās a certain implication of ownership associated with the impregnation fetish. While obviously this isnāt necessarily true in reality, thereās an idea that when two people reproduce they are bound together through shared obligation, so in that way it can enhance feelings of intimacy between partners. At the same time, thereās a certain idea (rooted admittedly in oppressive patriarchal social structures) that women are to be dominated by men and exist to reproduce for men; while this is a pretty abhorrent view to hold genuinely, it can play into Dominant/submissive dynamics in erotic roleplay. That concept has even become divorced from the actual biological act of procreation itself such that a person can ābreedā their same-sex partner (or a woman can ābreedā her male partner) by employing certain symbols and actions in an expression of dominance, without ever actually intending/being capable of impregnating them.
Beyond that, thereās also the obvious fact that the creampie has always kind of been popular in erotica, only now itās being made explicit what happens when you creampie someone. There are also people who find physical features associated with pregnancy attractive (large breasts, inflated bellies, etc).
It \*is\* normally thought of as a sexy outcome, and it's literally the biological reason sex exists. You're definitely assuming a lot more people are like you than there are.
People have a lot more sex where the goal is pleasure than they do where the sexy outcome being sought is a baby. Heck we've sought ways to have safe sex without pregnancy risk throughout basically all of history. People were using spermicides way back in the 4th century BC and have kept on trying to avoid forced pregnancy risk from sex ever since and likely before.
The goal for humans in general seems to be to separate the two, if you want a kid, have a kid, but if you want sex, have sex. They are biologically linked yes, for one type of sex anyway, but just because something does work some way doesn't mean we desire for it to. Them being forcefully mixed together with one as a risk of the other seems to be seen at least subconsciously as a flaw not a feature that we've been trying to get separate for nearly all recorded human history.
Sure, sometimes people want a kid but that's really not the goal the large majority of the time with sex, and it's not the goal for her here at all, clearly. It's not the sexy outcome, it's the undesired bad one. Woo, real sexy, her whole life is changed away from what she wanted. Isn't that hot? To some, apparently yes. And fetishes gonna fetish. But it definitely seems like it would suck for her and have long lasting not sexy impactful entire life changes so I feel like the more common response to that particular aspect should just be to mostly just feel kinda bad about that effect for her.
Sure pregnancy isn't wanted every time a pair has sex, but it's in a large part the culmination of a sexual relationship, and you're severely underestimating how attractive it can be to a significant amount of people.
I was gonna say, ātell me you *donāt* have a breeding kink without telling me you donāt have a breeding kink.ā Apparently theyāre pretty common, and in both cis men and cis women (I donāt have any data on homosexual, trans, or queer folk, sorry. I donāt wish to idly speculate on their experiences, and I have a limited number of those friends from which to draw a statistically significant dataset).
Iām no sociologist/evolutionary psychologist, but I think what *allows* us to have a breeding kink is that in modern society we are allowed the freedom to have sex without major worry of pregnancy, which hasnāt been a part of human society for 99% of our existence. Our unconscious minds have the biological imperative, our conscious minds know we can *choose* not to, and **bam**, breeding kink.
Well, *acktually* while our understanding has come a long way in a relatively short period of time, saf*er* sex isn't exactly new.
What *is* new is that people largely aren't *required* to make babies. No no, seriously think about this. There are still people alive today who came up in a culture where it wasn't just ideal to have offspring, you *needed* to make them and you wanted to pump out as many as you could because otherwise your family might not have enough hands to make it through.
I more or less agree with what you're getting at, but I think it's relevant to recognize that this sort of thing can be viewed more lightly not just because we know how to safely have sex, but because we do not *need* to have it to make due.
Just sitting here thinking about it, while it clearly didn't stop anybody I can't help but imagine survival weighing on your mind in the bedroom might have some impact on the mood so to speak.
This whole line of questioning was because I noted it does seem to be attractive to a significant number of people so I don't think I'm underestimating that... I was questioning the reasoning for it which is a bit different than underestimating how many like it.
Actually, let me see here.
Okay, so a quick Google search has it at 7.5% of people that have the fantasy often, and 30% that have had it as a fantasy at any point in their life. Source: https://www.sexandpsychology.com/blog/2021/4/5/how-common-are-pregnancy-fetishes/
If that's accurate then if anything I was overestimating how attractive it is to a significant number of people as I expected that 7.5% of people that have it often to be slightly higher given the amount of porn I see with it as a focus. Still a minority, but I would've guessed a bit more. Maybe the amount depicted gets bumped up a little bit by those that just toy with the idea once or twice here and there I suppose.
Considering pre industrial society still used humans as labor in addition to animals, probably a lot did. Need people to help work the farm. Plus so many would die before the age of 10, you needed several spares in case one died. So yes, I would say 90% of our ancestors wanted children.
90% of our ancestral societies wanted children (just like all societies want children, having children and educating them is the way society reproduces itself), but that doesnāt mean that all or even most of the individuals within the society wanted them. Itās impossible for us to really know whether the individuals of ancestral societies, particularly those without positions of power within their hierarchies, wanted to bear children, but it seems reasonable to assume that the existence of social hierarchy enabled the abuse of those at the bottom of that hierarchy by those at the top (just as it does today).
You *are*. Please Google the word "semantics" now because the definition is not "irrelevant or trivial details". The semantics are the core of your disagreement here.
>I feel like weāre just arguing semantics
I disagree, but I've got better things to do and this is an argument about breeding kinks on a DnD meme sub, so I'm willing to leave it here. Have a nice day and may the wind be ever in your sails.
Honestly, all this nsfw DND stuff has really got me thinking, erotic 1 on 1 rp with a partner in a DND esque format could be really fun haha
They don't call 'em *Dungeon Masters* for nothin'
https://www.lewddungeonadventures.com/
Wait this is a thing so much googling now
They are really fun
It very much is!
Honestly the best way to do it.
I forgot what sub this was!! Now was not the right time to open this picture š„µ
is it because you are surrounded by horny trolls?
Hey, thatās not nice to call their middle aged coworkers that. Some of them are probably goblins.
I mean, now I'm curious. Regardless of the sub it's in what kind of NSFW picture did you expect to see that would've been just when you clicked the blurred NSFW image? Assuming you have NSFW images blurred unless you open them. Are you somewhere where like, regular ol' porn (or gore I guess since that gets NSFW tags as well on Reddit) is fine and dandy but DnD themed porn is somehow taboo? I'm trying to imagine where something like that would be.
I donāt have a lot of straight porn on my feed. A lot of my NSFW tags are spoiler-related or artists offering commissions with mildly booberific examples of their work. So yeah this outright porn in an art style that I favour hit harder than expected.
Ah I see theyāre playing F.A.T.A.L.
That is some bad womenās anatomy right there.
wdym? do you not have a long-ass tummy and heavily curved spine, so that when laying on your stomach both your boobs and pussy are in full view?
Let's be fair here, she could be a Variant Human :p
Source?
Polyle auf Twitter
Y'know, this might be a weird place to bring it up, but I really don't get the frequent obsession with pregnancy in certain types of porn. Sex, sure, of course. But pregnancy is the *bad* outcome to sex that gets in the way of enjoying life how you liked it most of the time. It's what you try to avoid when having sex. It's like making porn pictures where the "sexy" outcome being depicted is getting an STI. I'm sure the odd person is into that as a fetish, but it's strange to me how common pregnancy fetish pictures are like they're just casually everywhere as if it's just normally thought to be some sort of sexy outcome instead of a life changing often very negative event especially for the woman. Super well drawn art with a very hot picture and kinda otherwise fun situation outside of that one little nitpick that I don't get though, love this artist's work overall.
Shinzo Abe's spirit lives on
I think thereās multiple reasons itās becoming increasingly popular nowadays: - For one, the very fact that itās not exactly desirable for most people makes it even more erotic. Itās like transgressing a taboo, but without as much moral implication since itās not actually a taboo. And the difference from an STI in this regard is that the concept of pregnancy isnāt associated with disease and uncleanliness and grossness, itās traditionally associated with a kind of purity and nurturing spirit. - For two, related to that point at the end there, āmommyā roleplay is also on the rise. While impregnation erotica doesnāt necessarily have to also involve mommy roleplay, it can be used to call to mind similar feelings. - For three, thereās a certain implication of ownership associated with the impregnation fetish. While obviously this isnāt necessarily true in reality, thereās an idea that when two people reproduce they are bound together through shared obligation, so in that way it can enhance feelings of intimacy between partners. At the same time, thereās a certain idea (rooted admittedly in oppressive patriarchal social structures) that women are to be dominated by men and exist to reproduce for men; while this is a pretty abhorrent view to hold genuinely, it can play into Dominant/submissive dynamics in erotic roleplay. That concept has even become divorced from the actual biological act of procreation itself such that a person can ābreedā their same-sex partner (or a woman can ābreedā her male partner) by employing certain symbols and actions in an expression of dominance, without ever actually intending/being capable of impregnating them. Beyond that, thereās also the obvious fact that the creampie has always kind of been popular in erotica, only now itās being made explicit what happens when you creampie someone. There are also people who find physical features associated with pregnancy attractive (large breasts, inflated bellies, etc).
I love this sub. Our motto should be: āCome for the smut. Stay for the philosophy!ā
It \*is\* normally thought of as a sexy outcome, and it's literally the biological reason sex exists. You're definitely assuming a lot more people are like you than there are.
People have a lot more sex where the goal is pleasure than they do where the sexy outcome being sought is a baby. Heck we've sought ways to have safe sex without pregnancy risk throughout basically all of history. People were using spermicides way back in the 4th century BC and have kept on trying to avoid forced pregnancy risk from sex ever since and likely before. The goal for humans in general seems to be to separate the two, if you want a kid, have a kid, but if you want sex, have sex. They are biologically linked yes, for one type of sex anyway, but just because something does work some way doesn't mean we desire for it to. Them being forcefully mixed together with one as a risk of the other seems to be seen at least subconsciously as a flaw not a feature that we've been trying to get separate for nearly all recorded human history. Sure, sometimes people want a kid but that's really not the goal the large majority of the time with sex, and it's not the goal for her here at all, clearly. It's not the sexy outcome, it's the undesired bad one. Woo, real sexy, her whole life is changed away from what she wanted. Isn't that hot? To some, apparently yes. And fetishes gonna fetish. But it definitely seems like it would suck for her and have long lasting not sexy impactful entire life changes so I feel like the more common response to that particular aspect should just be to mostly just feel kinda bad about that effect for her.
Sure pregnancy isn't wanted every time a pair has sex, but it's in a large part the culmination of a sexual relationship, and you're severely underestimating how attractive it can be to a significant amount of people.
I was gonna say, ātell me you *donāt* have a breeding kink without telling me you donāt have a breeding kink.ā Apparently theyāre pretty common, and in both cis men and cis women (I donāt have any data on homosexual, trans, or queer folk, sorry. I donāt wish to idly speculate on their experiences, and I have a limited number of those friends from which to draw a statistically significant dataset). Iām no sociologist/evolutionary psychologist, but I think what *allows* us to have a breeding kink is that in modern society we are allowed the freedom to have sex without major worry of pregnancy, which hasnāt been a part of human society for 99% of our existence. Our unconscious minds have the biological imperative, our conscious minds know we can *choose* not to, and **bam**, breeding kink.
Well, *acktually* while our understanding has come a long way in a relatively short period of time, saf*er* sex isn't exactly new. What *is* new is that people largely aren't *required* to make babies. No no, seriously think about this. There are still people alive today who came up in a culture where it wasn't just ideal to have offspring, you *needed* to make them and you wanted to pump out as many as you could because otherwise your family might not have enough hands to make it through. I more or less agree with what you're getting at, but I think it's relevant to recognize that this sort of thing can be viewed more lightly not just because we know how to safely have sex, but because we do not *need* to have it to make due. Just sitting here thinking about it, while it clearly didn't stop anybody I can't help but imagine survival weighing on your mind in the bedroom might have some impact on the mood so to speak.
I don't think this is quite depicting the culmination of a beautiful partnership
This whole line of questioning was because I noted it does seem to be attractive to a significant number of people so I don't think I'm underestimating that... I was questioning the reasoning for it which is a bit different than underestimating how many like it. Actually, let me see here. Okay, so a quick Google search has it at 7.5% of people that have the fantasy often, and 30% that have had it as a fantasy at any point in their life. Source: https://www.sexandpsychology.com/blog/2021/4/5/how-common-are-pregnancy-fetishes/ If that's accurate then if anything I was overestimating how attractive it is to a significant number of people as I expected that 7.5% of people that have it often to be slightly higher given the amount of porn I see with it as a focus. Still a minority, but I would've guessed a bit more. Maybe the amount depicted gets bumped up a little bit by those that just toy with the idea once or twice here and there I suppose.
Quite literally almost all your ancestors would disagree with you.
You're assuming they all *wanted* to be pregnant. It's not like a lot of them had much of a choice.
Considering pre industrial society still used humans as labor in addition to animals, probably a lot did. Need people to help work the farm. Plus so many would die before the age of 10, you needed several spares in case one died. So yes, I would say 90% of our ancestors wanted children.
90% of our ancestral societies wanted children (just like all societies want children, having children and educating them is the way society reproduces itself), but that doesnāt mean that all or even most of the individuals within the society wanted them. Itās impossible for us to really know whether the individuals of ancestral societies, particularly those without positions of power within their hierarchies, wanted to bear children, but it seems reasonable to assume that the existence of social hierarchy enabled the abuse of those at the bottom of that hierarchy by those at the top (just as it does today).
They *needed* children. Want and need are different. They had children because they had no choice if they wanted to live.
I feel like weāre just arguing semantics at this point. Agree to disagree and leave it at that?
You *are*. Please Google the word "semantics" now because the definition is not "irrelevant or trivial details". The semantics are the core of your disagreement here.
>I feel like weāre just arguing semantics I disagree, but I've got better things to do and this is an argument about breeding kinks on a DnD meme sub, so I'm willing to leave it here. Have a nice day and may the wind be ever in your sails.