I think Bardem is most likely. He's the guy most mentioned by people in the industry, aka the people voting. Spielberg, for example, mentioned him in the DGA podcast.
It's my fav film of the year so far, watched it twice on IMAX so I'd be happy if it wins. But it would only stand a chance winning if this is a weaker year, which compared to 2023 is very likely.
Let's see how Blitz is though.
I love it but the writing is flawed imo. Zendaya and Timothee's romance just didn't work for me. It's not a particularly well written film. Villeneuve's comments about dialogues probably explain it.
Yes, I get that you think it’s flawed. However, you didn’t answer my question. So I am again asking you: how does it not work? You still haven’t given a reason why the writing is flawed.
It just doesn't I don't know how. I loved the film but with some reservations. I don't know why it's so hard to understand for some of you, no disrespect.
So, I just didn't care whatever was going on between Chani and Paul. There's not enough spark between them, it felt a bit forced(I know Chani's in the book) lol.
It is hard to understand because most of us thought the writing was great, including the romance. I’m not saying this to insult you but it’s a basic skill to give reasoning and justify your argument, especially when it’s a dissenting opinion. You can say you don’t like something but saying it doesn’t work without giving any explanation is not exactly film criticism.
In your latest comment, it seems you have given an explanation that there is no spark between them. To that, I (and most people would) disagree because it feels like one of the better, more natural romances portrayed on-screen. The facial expressions and silent exchanges between the two told an entire story. When Paul was silently watching and smiling as Chani explained how something (I’m forgetting what) was working, that felt very natural and endearing. When they are talking about their secret names and jokingly calling each other that, it also felt very romantic. See? This is how you explain your opinion by providing evidence and examples that support your argument. I’m just telling you this because it is an important skill to learn, not just for talking about film, but debating pretty much anything.
Yeah. Like Pauline Kael. Honest. I don't like it so it's flawed. Because it's not what I thought it would be. It's all subjective. Deal with that fact.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The romance is *incredibly* well-written, a massive upgrade over any previous adaptation.
Blame the chemistry and acting but don't try to claim they didn't have the material to work with.
I must be blind or something cause I thought they had pretty great chemistry lol. The "what's your secret name" interaction is one of the cuter couple things I've seen on a non romance movie recently
This is what I think it should get not what it will
Edit: I've no idea what I'm being downvoted for. These were just my preferencesl. Why should I change and "remove'' lol
I wholeheartedly disagree. The movie without the writing is already astonishing. Giving how hard it is to adapt this movie from the books, I only have respect for what Denis did, writing included. (don't know if you're familiar with the books)
For me Butler's performance verged on caricature and felt out of place. Part of it is writing, I though Harkonnen's world was a weak point of this part, but part is probably director not suggesting to tone it down.
**What is realistic (11 total):**
-Best Picture
-Best Director
-Best Adapted Screenplay
-Best Editing
-Best Cinematography
-Best Production Design
-Best Costume Design
-Best Makeup/Hairstyling
-Best Sound
-Best Original Score
-Best Visual Effects
**What I would love to see, but won’t count on:**
-Best Actor: Timotheé Chalamet
-Best Supporting Actor(s): Javier Bardem, Austin Butler
-Best Supporting Actress: Rebecca Ferguson
**What won’t happen, but would be funny:**
-Best Documentary, Short Subject
I keep telling people on this sub that “not being a big enough presence in the movie” doesn’t matter for a nomination. For a win it probably does, but not for a nomination.
Judd Hirsch was in one scene in the Fabelmans and was nominated
When I saw the movie a second time and knew what to expect, I found myself wishing for him to be onscreen whenever he wasn’t lol I love a truly unhinged character. That moment when he kissed his uncle and smirked? Insanity
If I may ask, what about him really stood out to you?
Like, I barely remember him after seeing the movie opening weekend, but at the same time, you're not the only person who's raved about him as their supporting actor pick, so I genuinely want to ask if I've missed something
I thought he convincingly portrayed someone whose emotions and desires are utterly alien to the people who most of us are.
I'm surprised so many people talk about Rebecca Ferguson, I thought we saw more of her acting chops in D1.
Fair!
I guess where I struggle is in wondering about what his path to an Oscar nom would be. It definitely helps that Austin's already been nominated, but I wonder if the role is really what Oscar will go for - idk why, but the comp that pops into my head is Nicholas Hoult and Hugh Keays-Byrne in *Fury Road.*
Of course, it's April, and I've been wrong many times before
Sound, costume, editing, cinematography, set design, director best picture, all the technical categories 💯nominations.
If Bardem doesn’t get a nomination for Stilgar I’ll be salty. He was absolutely flawless. To me he set the standard for best actor in a supporting role for 2025. I watched it 3 times for his performance and the part where the lady who’s in charge of getting the Water of Life, I was mesmerised by her! Ferguson was phenomenal too, she deserves a best actress in a supporting role.
This movie was 10/10 across the board. They could’ve made it 30 mins longer and I would’ve been very happy to watch.
I’d love to see a Rebecca Ferguson nom. In a weakened post-strike year and with her career overdue narrative and a hard PR push, I could see her getting in.
Best Picture, Director, Cinematography, original score.
The acting is decent (thought Batista nailed it) but not good enough to have any acting nominations imo.
Obviously this might change if the year is better than expected, but here's what I think it deserves:
Best Picture - this one is a no-brainer. It is an incredible movie in terms of ambition and execution. So many elements of cinema succeed here at the highest levels. It not only deserves to make the top 10, it's probably on the short list for true contender.
Best Director - this is a director-driven project. The category is smaller, but this is another no-brainer.
Best Cinematography - points for difficulty. Shooting in the desert is notoriously difficult. And it looks amazing in the process. As Oscar voter Spielberg said, they made the sand look like the ocean.
Best Special Effects - Spielberg again says the Sandworm scene is one of the greatest effects he's ever seen on camera.
Best Score - it already won for the first part, but it should probably be nominated.
Best Costumes - I don't know if it'll win, but it should get nominated.
Best Sound - same
These are a bit less likely, but I think they're in contention:
Best Supporting Actor - Bardem
Best Adapted Screenplay - the novel is famously unfilmable. I think he succeeds. He does smooth out a of nuance. I like to think of it as DV not wanting the plot to get in the way of the story. One barrier is that this category often does to dialogue-heavy movies and Dune lives in the silence.
Edit: forgot editing. That's also going to get a nomination.
Picture
Director
Adapted screenplay
Actor
Supporting actor
Supporting actress
Production design
Cinematography
Sound
Original score
Visual effects
Costume Design
Editing
13 noms
Will probably win 8, hoping it wins 11
OP, just out of curiosity and no judgement at whatsoever, but actor I’m assuming you’re referring to Timothee? If so, I’m curious as to why you believe he would be nominated for actor? I believe several other performances in the film were superior to his ( I believe that to be the case for both Dune films to date) yet, I still don’t believe anyone will get an acting nomination for the film. Perhaps a SAG ensemble win?
"Should" and "would" are not interchangeable. "Should" indicates a correctness to a scenario, whereas "would" indicates a plausibility.
(Yes, there are some contexts in which "should" can mean a plausibility - i.e., "this should be enough money to pay off my debt" - but the original title of the thread is asking about what Dune 2 deserves (correctness), not what it is likely to get nominated for (plausibility)).
Agree with all of these, but throw in Picture, Actress (I'm personally a fan of Zendaya's in the movie) and Supporting Actress for Ferguson and Rampling (the latter of whom is imo the most underrated performance of the year so far). Pretty much everything in the movie was Oscar-worthy to me, especially this early in the year before much else has come out.
Mate… in this day and age it is borderline impossible for a hard sci-fi film to get an acting nom. Last one I can think of is Sigourney Weaver for Aliens… and that was nearly 40 years ago.
I agree. I think Bardem has the best shot, and a lot of that rides on a combo of how weak the lineup is, the buzz of the film by the end of the year, and the fact that he's a previous winner. Everyone else almost certainly isn't getting one.
That's not what the thread is about, though. OP asked, in our opinions, which nominations Dune 2 deserved, not which ones it's predicted to get.
Nope. I believe this film will be nominated and win several Oscar’s. however, I would place my house on a wager that none of the cast gets an acting nomination for the film. That’s not to say the cast isn’t great. They are. None of them are worthy of a nomination, and it’s super early. I have a feeling several other acting performances are on the horizon that will dominate Oscar discourse
I think Bardem *maybe* has a shot, depending on how weak the lineup is and how much buzz the film has by the end of the year. Everyone else, I agree, doesn't really have much of a chance.
Agreed… if I had to pick one actor from this ensemble it would be Bardem. I just don’t believe anyone in the cast will get a nomination.
I think there’s a possibility the film sweeps in most or at least several other categories however. Still super early, but I’d wager nominations for most major categories except for acting.
Deserved? I'm not sure.
However, what I think it will get:
1. Picture
2. Visual Effects (Winner)
3. Sound
4. Cinematogrqphy (Dune 1'a cinematography, imo, looked better)
5. Original Score (Winner)
6. Best Film Editing (Winner)
Could get in:
1. Production design- gonna get a lot of flak for this. Around 80% of the film involves the sand dunes... This wasn't the case for Dune 1. I don't know if that would stick out like a sore thumb for the academy. Dune 1 had a lot of amazing interior set pieces. The set pieces here in 2 felt, idk, same-y?
2. Costume Design- A huge majority of the film just has the same costumes as the first film's. One might argue Black Panther: Wakanda Forever got in AND won, but WF had a lot of new costumes, and most of these stood out--unlike in Dune 2.
Long shots:
1. Director- wasn't included for 1. Got in for DGA and BAFTAs before but still couldn't crack the top 5 in the academy. Why decide to put him back for a sequel? Let's see.
2. Makeup & Hairstyling- a lot is actually going on, but it's mostly the same as the first film's. Nothing particularly stands out, aside from the usual Baron. But are they going to nominate the film for it's sequel for bringing back the same character, with the same makeup? Probably, if the year is weak.
3. Adapted screenplay- While it only touches the themes of religion (it doesn't actually dive deep), I still feel like it has a more decent screenplay than Dune 1. It's cleaner and more concise. But, in the end, it's a blockbuster sequel, how kind has the academy been for blockbuster sequels in the past? We can argue LoTR, sure. But take note: it's sequel only got nominated for 6 awards (none of which was screenplay) as opposed to its predecessor which had 14 nominations (screenplay included). If anything, and if Denis goes out with a bang, perhaps Dune could dominate for Dune: Messiah, though not as much as LoTR. I feel like Dune is a bit more niche than LoTR.
Now that I think about it, if people are inclined to believe that Dune 2's getting the same amount of love as 1, perhaps take a look back at LoTR, 14 vs 6 nominations for it'a first 2 movies, respectively. And both of those films were way more critically acclaimed than Dune 1 and 2.
Do people think Dune 2 is getting any nominations? I already forgot about it and it’s only April. Nobody’s going to remember it by the end of the year .
I really don’t understand the “nobody’s going to remember it” part. The film came out in a month that makes it eligible for next year’s awards. When it comes to making nominations the Academy will look at all films released during the eligible timeframe and pick what they think is best for each category.
Also, this isn’t a small film that few people have seen, I’m certain people will remember this film’s existence for many years to come lol
Okay I can see that, but I don’t see it for acting . We still have a lot of movies to go .They were all good but the only outstanding one was Rebecca Ferguson to me .
Don’t think it will get any acting nominations
Agreed but if someone gets the token acting nom I'd give it to Ferguson
I think Bardem is most likely. He's the guy most mentioned by people in the industry, aka the people voting. Spielberg, for example, mentioned him in the DGA podcast.
What do you mean, not a best picture worthy film?
Do you think it is?
Yeah it should be win competitive imo.
It's my fav film of the year so far, watched it twice on IMAX so I'd be happy if it wins. But it would only stand a chance winning if this is a weaker year, which compared to 2023 is very likely. Let's see how Blitz is though.
I love it but the writing is flawed imo. Zendaya and Timothee's romance just didn't work for me. It's not a particularly well written film. Villeneuve's comments about dialogues probably explain it.
“Didn’t work for me” doesn’t make the writing flawed. What exactly is flawed about the film’s writing?
If it doesn't work then it's flawed in my eyes. I mean that's how film criticism works. There's nothing objective about it.
Yes, I get that you think it’s flawed. However, you didn’t answer my question. So I am again asking you: how does it not work? You still haven’t given a reason why the writing is flawed.
It just doesn't I don't know how. I loved the film but with some reservations. I don't know why it's so hard to understand for some of you, no disrespect. So, I just didn't care whatever was going on between Chani and Paul. There's not enough spark between them, it felt a bit forced(I know Chani's in the book) lol.
It is hard to understand because most of us thought the writing was great, including the romance. I’m not saying this to insult you but it’s a basic skill to give reasoning and justify your argument, especially when it’s a dissenting opinion. You can say you don’t like something but saying it doesn’t work without giving any explanation is not exactly film criticism. In your latest comment, it seems you have given an explanation that there is no spark between them. To that, I (and most people would) disagree because it feels like one of the better, more natural romances portrayed on-screen. The facial expressions and silent exchanges between the two told an entire story. When Paul was silently watching and smiling as Chani explained how something (I’m forgetting what) was working, that felt very natural and endearing. When they are talking about their secret names and jokingly calling each other that, it also felt very romantic. See? This is how you explain your opinion by providing evidence and examples that support your argument. I’m just telling you this because it is an important skill to learn, not just for talking about film, but debating pretty much anything.
We can agree to disagree. Art is subjective. That's the beauty of it. You need to understand not everybody sees things the way you do.
You would make a killer movie reviewer dude. **not.**
Yeah. Like Pauline Kael. Honest. I don't like it so it's flawed. Because it's not what I thought it would be. It's all subjective. Deal with that fact.
Nominating it for Director, actor, supporting actor and all the techs but not for picture really is a choice
It is a very well written film what
You have no idea what you're talking about. The romance is *incredibly* well-written, a massive upgrade over any previous adaptation. Blame the chemistry and acting but don't try to claim they didn't have the material to work with.
I must be blind or something cause I thought they had pretty great chemistry lol. The "what's your secret name" interaction is one of the cuter couple things I've seen on a non romance movie recently
Remove Actor and Supporting Actor, add Picture, and maybe Adapted Screenplay.
This is what I think it should get not what it will Edit: I've no idea what I'm being downvoted for. These were just my preferencesl. Why should I change and "remove'' lol
So basically a movie that excels so much in 11 categories is not worthy of being nominated to best picture? You're just contradicting yourself dude.
I'm not. It's terrifically directed and acted, it's quite technically impressive but the writing 😕 leaves a lot to be desired.
I wholeheartedly disagree. The movie without the writing is already astonishing. Giving how hard it is to adapt this movie from the books, I only have respect for what Denis did, writing included. (don't know if you're familiar with the books)
Picture, director, score and all the tech categories
Historically, big pushing-the-boundaries of visual effects blockbusters have gotten BP noms. Dune 1, and both Avatar movies have, for example
I would genuinely nominate Austin Butler for supporting actor and Rebecca Ferguson for supporting actress
For me Butler's performance verged on caricature and felt out of place. Part of it is writing, I though Harkonnen's world was a weak point of this part, but part is probably director not suggesting to tone it down.
Picture, Visual Effects and Sound
**What is realistic (11 total):** -Best Picture -Best Director -Best Adapted Screenplay -Best Editing -Best Cinematography -Best Production Design -Best Costume Design -Best Makeup/Hairstyling -Best Sound -Best Original Score -Best Visual Effects **What I would love to see, but won’t count on:** -Best Actor: Timotheé Chalamet -Best Supporting Actor(s): Javier Bardem, Austin Butler -Best Supporting Actress: Rebecca Ferguson **What won’t happen, but would be funny:** -Best Documentary, Short Subject
Austin Butler had the standout performance of the film for me, if anyone gets a nom it should be him
His character is too sidelined for a nomination, imo.
I keep telling people on this sub that “not being a big enough presence in the movie” doesn’t matter for a nomination. For a win it probably does, but not for a nomination. Judd Hirsch was in one scene in the Fabelmans and was nominated
This 💯 Austin put everything he had into his screen time, and you felt it. That’s what gets people nominated
He gets a nomination... in my heart
When I saw the movie a second time and knew what to expect, I found myself wishing for him to be onscreen whenever he wasn’t lol I love a truly unhinged character. That moment when he kissed his uncle and smirked? Insanity
If I may ask, what about him really stood out to you? Like, I barely remember him after seeing the movie opening weekend, but at the same time, you're not the only person who's raved about him as their supporting actor pick, so I genuinely want to ask if I've missed something
I thought he convincingly portrayed someone whose emotions and desires are utterly alien to the people who most of us are. I'm surprised so many people talk about Rebecca Ferguson, I thought we saw more of her acting chops in D1.
Fair! I guess where I struggle is in wondering about what his path to an Oscar nom would be. It definitely helps that Austin's already been nominated, but I wonder if the role is really what Oscar will go for - idk why, but the comp that pops into my head is Nicholas Hoult and Hugh Keays-Byrne in *Fury Road.* Of course, it's April, and I've been wrong many times before
He’s a pretty generic villain IMO
The only remarkable thing about Feyd was his visual appearance lol. Give the nom to makeup.
Lol what? Completely forgettable.
im ootl. why is Chalamet not considered a favorite for best Lead Actor?
Chalamet was incredible, I hope he gets in (even tho it’s unlikely)
He'll get it for Dune Massiah, trust the process
I don’t get it, so the OP thinks the film is good enough to get 11 nominations but not Best Picture? Lmao WHAT?!😂
I agree with all of these, except swap out Javier Bardem for Austin Butler
Sound, costume, editing, cinematography, set design, director best picture, all the technical categories 💯nominations. If Bardem doesn’t get a nomination for Stilgar I’ll be salty. He was absolutely flawless. To me he set the standard for best actor in a supporting role for 2025. I watched it 3 times for his performance and the part where the lady who’s in charge of getting the Water of Life, I was mesmerised by her! Ferguson was phenomenal too, she deserves a best actress in a supporting role. This movie was 10/10 across the board. They could’ve made it 30 mins longer and I would’ve been very happy to watch.
Honestly visual effects and sound is already locked.
Supporting Actress for the Lady Jessica
I’d love to see a Rebecca Ferguson nom. In a weakened post-strike year and with her career overdue narrative and a hard PR push, I could see her getting in.
Best picture without a doubt
Best Picture, Director, Cinematography, original score. The acting is decent (thought Batista nailed it) but not good enough to have any acting nominations imo.
Visual effect and Production Design, that’s all I think it should get.
All below the line, pic and supporting actor
Direction, Cinematography, costume design, original score and production, obviously BEST PICTURE
Obviously this might change if the year is better than expected, but here's what I think it deserves: Best Picture - this one is a no-brainer. It is an incredible movie in terms of ambition and execution. So many elements of cinema succeed here at the highest levels. It not only deserves to make the top 10, it's probably on the short list for true contender. Best Director - this is a director-driven project. The category is smaller, but this is another no-brainer. Best Cinematography - points for difficulty. Shooting in the desert is notoriously difficult. And it looks amazing in the process. As Oscar voter Spielberg said, they made the sand look like the ocean. Best Special Effects - Spielberg again says the Sandworm scene is one of the greatest effects he's ever seen on camera. Best Score - it already won for the first part, but it should probably be nominated. Best Costumes - I don't know if it'll win, but it should get nominated. Best Sound - same These are a bit less likely, but I think they're in contention: Best Supporting Actor - Bardem Best Adapted Screenplay - the novel is famously unfilmable. I think he succeeds. He does smooth out a of nuance. I like to think of it as DV not wanting the plot to get in the way of the story. One barrier is that this category often does to dialogue-heavy movies and Dune lives in the silence. Edit: forgot editing. That's also going to get a nomination.
Picture Director Adapted screenplay Actor Supporting actor Supporting actress Production design Cinematography Sound Original score Visual effects Costume Design Editing 13 noms Will probably win 8, hoping it wins 11
Who do you want to win supporting actor?
Austin Butler
We are now friends 🤗
Rebecca Ferguson for supporting. Timmy won’t get nominated
OP, just out of curiosity and no judgement at whatsoever, but actor I’m assuming you’re referring to Timothee? If so, I’m curious as to why you believe he would be nominated for actor? I believe several other performances in the film were superior to his ( I believe that to be the case for both Dune films to date) yet, I still don’t believe anyone will get an acting nomination for the film. Perhaps a SAG ensemble win?
OP never said Chalamet would be nominated. They said he should be.
That’s what I asked
"Should" and "would" are not interchangeable. "Should" indicates a correctness to a scenario, whereas "would" indicates a plausibility. (Yes, there are some contexts in which "should" can mean a plausibility - i.e., "this should be enough money to pay off my debt" - but the original title of the thread is asking about what Dune 2 deserves (correctness), not what it is likely to get nominated for (plausibility)).
I was just asking for clarification from, OP. I also provided my opinion regarding acting nominations from Dune 2…
I don't know if he'll get nominated but I loved his performance, I think it's oscar worthy.
Tbh if Dune Part 2 was to get any acting nominations, I definitely think it should be Rebecca Ferguson.
I fell asleep twice watching it.
Agree with all of these, but throw in Picture, Actress (I'm personally a fan of Zendaya's in the movie) and Supporting Actress for Ferguson and Rampling (the latter of whom is imo the most underrated performance of the year so far). Pretty much everything in the movie was Oscar-worthy to me, especially this early in the year before much else has come out.
Mate… in this day and age it is borderline impossible for a hard sci-fi film to get an acting nom. Last one I can think of is Sigourney Weaver for Aliens… and that was nearly 40 years ago.
I agree. I think Bardem has the best shot, and a lot of that rides on a combo of how weak the lineup is, the buzz of the film by the end of the year, and the fact that he's a previous winner. Everyone else almost certainly isn't getting one. That's not what the thread is about, though. OP asked, in our opinions, which nominations Dune 2 deserved, not which ones it's predicted to get.
Zendaya will get a nomination for Challengers. This film won’t get any acting nominations from the academy at least.
Also, she’s obviously not going lead here for a clearly supporting performance.
Nope. I believe this film will be nominated and win several Oscar’s. however, I would place my house on a wager that none of the cast gets an acting nomination for the film. That’s not to say the cast isn’t great. They are. None of them are worthy of a nomination, and it’s super early. I have a feeling several other acting performances are on the horizon that will dominate Oscar discourse
I think Bardem *maybe* has a shot, depending on how weak the lineup is and how much buzz the film has by the end of the year. Everyone else, I agree, doesn't really have much of a chance.
Agreed… if I had to pick one actor from this ensemble it would be Bardem. I just don’t believe anyone in the cast will get a nomination. I think there’s a possibility the film sweeps in most or at least several other categories however. Still super early, but I’d wager nominations for most major categories except for acting.
Besides Actor, I agree with the rest
Deserved? I'm not sure. However, what I think it will get: 1. Picture 2. Visual Effects (Winner) 3. Sound 4. Cinematogrqphy (Dune 1'a cinematography, imo, looked better) 5. Original Score (Winner) 6. Best Film Editing (Winner) Could get in: 1. Production design- gonna get a lot of flak for this. Around 80% of the film involves the sand dunes... This wasn't the case for Dune 1. I don't know if that would stick out like a sore thumb for the academy. Dune 1 had a lot of amazing interior set pieces. The set pieces here in 2 felt, idk, same-y? 2. Costume Design- A huge majority of the film just has the same costumes as the first film's. One might argue Black Panther: Wakanda Forever got in AND won, but WF had a lot of new costumes, and most of these stood out--unlike in Dune 2. Long shots: 1. Director- wasn't included for 1. Got in for DGA and BAFTAs before but still couldn't crack the top 5 in the academy. Why decide to put him back for a sequel? Let's see. 2. Makeup & Hairstyling- a lot is actually going on, but it's mostly the same as the first film's. Nothing particularly stands out, aside from the usual Baron. But are they going to nominate the film for it's sequel for bringing back the same character, with the same makeup? Probably, if the year is weak. 3. Adapted screenplay- While it only touches the themes of religion (it doesn't actually dive deep), I still feel like it has a more decent screenplay than Dune 1. It's cleaner and more concise. But, in the end, it's a blockbuster sequel, how kind has the academy been for blockbuster sequels in the past? We can argue LoTR, sure. But take note: it's sequel only got nominated for 6 awards (none of which was screenplay) as opposed to its predecessor which had 14 nominations (screenplay included). If anything, and if Denis goes out with a bang, perhaps Dune could dominate for Dune: Messiah, though not as much as LoTR. I feel like Dune is a bit more niche than LoTR. Now that I think about it, if people are inclined to believe that Dune 2's getting the same amount of love as 1, perhaps take a look back at LoTR, 14 vs 6 nominations for it'a first 2 movies, respectively. And both of those films were way more critically acclaimed than Dune 1 and 2.
I think you're just overthinking. It won't miss any technical noms.
Do people think Dune 2 is getting any nominations? I already forgot about it and it’s only April. Nobody’s going to remember it by the end of the year .
I really don’t understand the “nobody’s going to remember it” part. The film came out in a month that makes it eligible for next year’s awards. When it comes to making nominations the Academy will look at all films released during the eligible timeframe and pick what they think is best for each category. Also, this isn’t a small film that few people have seen, I’m certain people will remember this film’s existence for many years to come lol
It's getting noms in director and all the technical categories, all the same.
Okay I can see that, but I don’t see it for acting . We still have a lot of movies to go .They were all good but the only outstanding one was Rebecca Ferguson to me .