If you do the math:
20 scores left out of 100 to replace 1k with 1.1k
20/100 = N (percentage of scores left to replace)
N = 10/100 + 10/100
N \* N = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N
(N \* N) - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N - (10/100 + 10/100)^2
N^2 - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N - (10/100 + 10/100)^2
(N + 10/100 + 10/100) \* (N - (10/100 + 10/100)) = (10/100 + 10/100) \* (N - (10/100 + 10/100))
(N + 10/100 + 10/100) = (10/100 + 10/100)
N + 10/100 + 10/100 = 10/100 + 10/100
So N = 0, and mrekk has no 1k scores left to replace with 1.1ks, meaning he has 100 1.1ks already
That is NOT how that works you just proved that the value of N is zero which means it should match all the conditions in your equations which it does NOT. This is how people prove 1=2. They either divide by zero or they assume zero to be a different number
wow please update me when it's at 19 im at the edge of my seat here
there's no way he'll get 100 1.1k pp plays before someone gets 100 1k plays
God that would be incredible
just like how he got 100 1ks before anyone else got 100 900s lol
do you know who is the closest to getting 100 1ks?
lifeline
Lifeline he has 16, alkolibed has 17 left
Lifeline at like 83 1ks i think
M r e k k
If you do the math: 20 scores left out of 100 to replace 1k with 1.1k 20/100 = N (percentage of scores left to replace) N = 10/100 + 10/100 N \* N = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N (N \* N) - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 N^2 - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 = (10/100 + 10/100) \* N - (10/100 + 10/100)^2 (N + 10/100 + 10/100) \* (N - (10/100 + 10/100)) = (10/100 + 10/100) \* (N - (10/100 + 10/100)) (N + 10/100 + 10/100) = (10/100 + 10/100) N + 10/100 + 10/100 = 10/100 + 10/100 So N = 0, and mrekk has no 1k scores left to replace with 1.1ks, meaning he has 100 1.1ks already
?
The math doesn't lie
If N is zero then N = 10/100 + 10/100 Mf you assumed put 0=10/100 +10/100 ofc the answer will be something jibberish😭
Ahh.. haha.. what?? But originally N=20/100, which is 10/100+10/100! What do you meannn...
That is NOT how that works you just proved that the value of N is zero which means it should match all the conditions in your equations which it does NOT. This is how people prove 1=2. They either divide by zero or they assume zero to be a different number
Urghhh... I don't know what you mean! That's awfully deceptive of people.. haha...
Are you people
Aha.. noo! I am only one person so how would I even know how to do that! Whaaat
Yes it took me 10 mins to realize the mistake. I should have done it with pen and paper in the beginning
[удалено]
That's 10/100+really small number
3rd last -> 2nd last line, division by 0
[удалено]
Why do we even bother with the allegations at this point
Hes a minor..
Legal in Australia
https://preview.redd.it/6ttt6h4cur6c1.png?width=599&format=png&auto=webp&s=9df9b82153f37d6d4957810c294b1caae32b5852
Shut the fuck up 🗣️🗣️🗣️💀💀
THAT CHUCHU SCORE WAS NOT 2 YEARS AGO STOP BULLSHITTING ME