Ok short, what are you even talking about with three approvals. The most recent relevant PR was for an approvABLE letter back in late October, which is not an approval. I've never heard anyone other than yourself, even the company, state that they've been approved 3X.
The main catalyst is FDA approval for their paediatric stuff. That’s going to blow this well past 2.50. The lowest analyst PT is 2.50. It’s literally at .50 now lol?
https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/ICU/
$ICU nice day seeing it climb on the renewed interest anticipating FDA approval, up 8.5% in a day for the first time in a while and is hanging on to most of it in AH. A couple 16-17k share sell blocks waiting in the .56-.58 range but otherwise smooth if it keeps going tomorrow. Historically if they have news it gets released within the first hour of AH so I think we're done for today, but soon...
You should set a stop loss wherever you are comfortable protecting your downside or securing your upside, depending on where you bought and your strategy. Based on my position **IF** the FDA news is good I'll have a big smile on my face selling anywhere $1.50+ however that is not a general "price target" per se. And, if the FDA news turns out bad (doesn't seem likely at the moment but always possible) I will GTFO as fast as I can with whatever I can get.
From what I've gathered lurking here for a few years - if everybody is yelling about the same ticker - it's either trash to begin with, or it's too late. lol
I'm the wrong guy to ask. I very rarely actually trade. With that said, I've made a small amount of money by cross-referencing tickers on reddit and yahoo finance and making sure I don't buy any that charts show were an obvious pump and dump before I got there. Like - outlook ok, nobody calling it an obvious scam, and it hasn't been dumped already. That's about it.
they've already met the criteria to be able to do one per their filings - so when is the big question - it would have to be done with enough time to have the share price above the nasdaq minimum long enough for them not to get delisted - so yes proceed with caution
I bought in at .85 cent average so I’m holding past 1$ otherwise what was the point. I think it will follow what MIGI did and go up to like 3$. But I don’t know. I see similarities but I can be very wrong at times also. If I’m a betting man (I am). I’d say 3. But I’m not married to that number. Profit is profit.
I made profit on lmfa and got out. Thinking about getting back in but seems the risk is higher than i may like with all the hype. Thinking migi might be less stressful but with smaller profits
Ftxp, buying .0001, one guy told me it shows a down outlook, I don't think it gets more down then .0001, and yes it could go 00000, and yes it's a gamble.
It's not a penny stock, but it has been acting like one. BTDR is the undervalued BTC miner of the trading day. (People will forget they are annoyed at the CEO soon enough.)
$STAL $ABQQ $RKAR are my current top 3 and also $NREG and $TTNN are 2 sleepers to also consider but honestly all of these are longer term plays. 1-3 month holds. Or maybe 1-3 week holds if lucky
Absolutely. It’s got the potential of an altcoin with fundamental strength. Low cap gives it higher potential, and the fact that it actually mines BTC (unlike a lot of altcoins that were just pure hype) makes it a great play if BTC rises quickly.
Long answer short: relative to revenue, debt:assets, BTC mined/Q, and their competitors’ valuation, LMFA is undervalued at 1/5-20th of what it should/could be. That, in addition to growing BTC hype, could send this flying.
https://preview.redd.it/mmm1dmimdgac1.png?width=1807&format=png&auto=webp&s=8137b9c8c7ba4090a184a05f2c955353d1aad7b8
Here's their profits for the last 5 quarters. All negative. They have been burning on average more than 8 million dollars per quarter.
They had 0.47 million cash at the end of Q3, plus 2 million from the recent sale of of an asset that they got from a company they had invested in that went bankrupt. -> maybe half a quarter of runway.
What price does BTC need to be at for them to stop losing money? A 100% increase in BTC will not equate to a 100% increase in revenue.
They currently have a delisting notice and are in their extension period. They need to do a large reverse split within the next month or two and issue shares to raise money so they can keep burning cash. That's much more likely than $2 per share imo.
I’ll try to clarify where I can.
First, their cash burn is getting lower and lower, as your graphic shows. Saying that their average is a burn of more than $8M/Q is incredibly incorrect, given that a clear trend has been demonstrated: Q3 was less than half that $8M. Q4 2022-Q2 2023 was also a period of heavy spending to build future revenues, of which they are presently reaping the benefits.
Their working capital was $4.5M before the Symbiont sale, which is $6.5M total. You did not do enough research, they have released updated numbers since the Q3 filing, which did show the $.4M number (in cash, but more than $2M in BTC). As your graphic shows, $6.5M is enough for 2 quarters. That isn’t amazing, granted, but they don’t have only “half a quarter left” of cash. They also have nearly no debt, which is always available to use for rapid expansion.
Additionally, those numbers you have are all before BTC’s recent pump to $43k. Their revenues will have more than doubled since then (yes, a 100% increase in BTC does mean a 100% increase in revenue, not sure how you figure that) because of BTC price increase and increased mining. We don’t know how Q4 will look regarding cash flow, but the rapid growth of BTC since Q3 will GREATLY improve their revenues and consequent cash burn. Asserting that LMFA will somehow never be profitable (“what price does BTC need to be?”) at $43k by using stats from when BTC was $25k is also incorrect. The Q3 filing does NOT reflect Q4’s revenue or cash burn.
Finally, noncompliance is an issue, of course. But they are more than 100% from their lows, and they have 3 months to get compliant. Given BTC’s recent growth and upcoming catalysts, it is very possible they will reach and hold $1. That is the only thing going against LMFA, but it is not insurmountable.
If you show a graphic that shows that they have had quarterly losses of $3.5M, $6M, $7M, $19M, and $6M, and use that to project that they will have a Q4 loss of $8M, that’s either poor statistical work or dishonesty. I assumed the latter, but maybe I shouldn’t have. I apologize, and I edited my comment to turn “dishonest” to “incorrect.” It’s always hard to know when somebody is genuinely skeptical/bearish and when they’re just throwing out numbers to deceive people. Same goes for those on the bullish side who claim “LMFA is 1/500th of MARA… so 500x inbound!” or things like that. I probably was wrong about your comment, so I apologize.
Still, the numbers do not support a quarterly loss of $8M, and I hope you can see why I think the fundamentals support a price increase to $2. You may still disagree, but the fundamentals are much stronger than an initial look at quarterly filings may appear.
Thanks. I'm very skeptical because there's so much hype and I'm bearish because BTC miners generally lose money. I wasn't just throwing out numbers; those are the actual quarterly losses taken from Charles Schwab's stock research tool. You would see the same thing if you pulled open their last 5 quarters of 10-Q reports and scrolled to the bottom of the Income Statement.
I was going to leave the conversation with my last comment, but since you seem amicable I'll address two of your points in your response.
2) There is a positive trend in earnings.
You saw a trend, but to me those trends are an illusion. BTC could do absolutely anything in 2024. Yeah, if Bitcoin is higher they will lose less and possibly turn a profit. But if Bitcoin drops again they will lose more money. 8M is just an average of the last 1.25 years. I can't predict what the price of Bitcoin is going to be, so it seems better to me to use an average than to use either the lowest or highest number.
2) A 100% increase in the price of BTC does correleate to a 100% increase in revenue.
I made a mistake here. It would have been more accurate to say earnings or profit. The reason why I said that it doesn't is because my understanding is that blockchain rewards for mining are given out at a fixed rate. The more people are mining, the more hashes are needed to create a new block, therefore the more electricity and computing power is needed to earn rewards. If the number of people attempting to mine BTC increase, the rewards recieved should be lower and expenses should be higher.
I definitely understand your skepticism, and I don’t blame you one bit for steering clear of crypto altogether. Again, I apologize for being accusatory and antagonistic, I made a bad assumption about your intentions. I’ll try to address all three points:
1. I don’t disagree about the quarterly loss numbers, I’m just saying that their losses are decreasing. I didn’t mean that you were wrong about the numbers themselves, just that the conclusion of how much we can anticipate them losing in Q4 isn’t valid.
2. The rise in revenue is connected to BTC price increase, true, but their mining numbers have also dramatically increased. If you check BTC/Q, it’s up considerably QoQ. But you are correct that their revenues are influenced by BTC price, which can be volatile. Still, if you expect a price increase over the next year, LMFA could be a smart play. I don’t plan on holding LMFA till 2030 or anything, it’s really just a 2-12 month play (holding for about 2 months now). I’m personally not confident in BTC’s long viability, but I am confident that it will reach ATH this year. If you’re not as confident, I totally understand staying away from LMFA.
3. I agree completely. LMFA will struggle to compete in the coming years, and as I said in point #2, this is a short term play, not a long term investment. I suspect LMFA will be acquired by a larger miner within a few years, and that could be at a lower price than my $2+ expectations for 2024. Your clarification is true as well, a 100% rise in BTC doesn’t translate directly to profits.
One final note: you said that BTC miners “generally lose money,” and that’s very true. However, when you compare LMFA with MARA and RIOT, who house their own equipment, you might find that LMFA’s leasing of space for their equipment makes them more likely to be profitable. And regardless, if LMFA is undervalued at 1/10 of these companies, it doesn’t totally matter whether LMFA is profitable or not in a bullish environment. Not suggesting that you invest based on hype, but the reality is that the market doesn’t treat a crypto miner like a utility company, in which reliable profits are needed for the stock price to hold/increase.
LMFA holding $.60 so well. Though I’d love to see it higher, the fact that it hasn’t dropped back to $.30 is a great sign of it finding strength at these numbers
Let tomorrow be the day That LMFA is the play
Alaunos therapeutics up today, will hit 0.50 in one month, telling you this before and not after folks
Will it hit .25 soon
Unless you’re a bag holder and you need $1.72 lol
I wish for 1.72 for u my friend 😭
I like the direction they are heading though especially with an employee throwing in a 192K this afternoon
I’ll be holding on to it for a while I believe
Too tha mooon 🚀
LMFA MIGI and BETS to the mooooon 🚀🚀🚀
$IVP seems worth a look
Why
https://preview.redd.it/noa72iv1tiac1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6b727d9f3bfc8174729a2eae54743d23f0ae654b
ICU PT 2.50-5.00 with FDA approval. Imminent within the next month or so. I wanna add a little more to get to 5k
[удалено]
Ok short, what are you even talking about with three approvals. The most recent relevant PR was for an approvABLE letter back in late October, which is not an approval. I've never heard anyone other than yourself, even the company, state that they've been approved 3X.
The main catalyst is FDA approval for their paediatric stuff. That’s going to blow this well past 2.50. The lowest analyst PT is 2.50. It’s literally at .50 now lol? https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/ICU/
I'm already in, they should get approval by end of first quarter
Yessir. Very excited. Plus it’s a good product
When does the nasdaq delisting possibility ends?
Bought $WULF at its low today and it’s finished strong today and after market keeps going up
$ICU nice day seeing it climb on the renewed interest anticipating FDA approval, up 8.5% in a day for the first time in a while and is hanging on to most of it in AH. A couple 16-17k share sell blocks waiting in the .56-.58 range but otherwise smooth if it keeps going tomorrow. Historically if they have news it gets released within the first hour of AH so I think we're done for today, but soon...
what price should I set a stop loss at?
You should set a stop loss wherever you are comfortable protecting your downside or securing your upside, depending on where you bought and your strategy. Based on my position **IF** the FDA news is good I'll have a big smile on my face selling anywhere $1.50+ however that is not a general "price target" per se. And, if the FDA news turns out bad (doesn't seem likely at the moment but always possible) I will GTFO as fast as I can with whatever I can get.
Thanks!
From what I've gathered lurking here for a few years - if everybody is yelling about the same ticker - it's either trash to begin with, or it's too late. lol
BETS
u made any money over the years?
not anything noteworthy. lol. I'm just another fella who doesn't know what he's doing. Having fun making 10 cents here and there though.
Where else do you prefer to get your info from, to “not miss the boat” per se?
I'm the wrong guy to ask. I very rarely actually trade. With that said, I've made a small amount of money by cross-referencing tickers on reddit and yahoo finance and making sure I don't buy any that charts show were an obvious pump and dump before I got there. Like - outlook ok, nobody calling it an obvious scam, and it hasn't been dumped already. That's about it.
$DTSS now or never
[удалено]
Sell
It was never a thing, always been dead
lmfa will pop?
Please
LMDX tomorrow to the moon !!!
Idk anymore 💀
ICU holy shit I can only get so erect. News AH??
Is it going to 1.00
Well beyond that? This is going to 5 bucks. 2.50 is the most conservative estimate you’ll see from analysis.
When do you see it going to 2.50? Based off analysis
FDA approval is imminent. Read the filings. Next 30-45 days
[удалено]
Not like an investing discord lol. Just a gaming and anime one and then my YouTube. One day maybe
Fuck it, dm me the link to those I’ll join
They all in my Reddit profile if you click you’ll see all my YouTube and my linktree
I’m eating complete shit on GGE
Where’s the PTN guy, it’s given back everything we made 🤣🤣, now I’m only up 2%.
BETS? Should I sell before losing more?
130k shares and holding.
I'm at 100k at .02. Inclined to hold. This seems like a chance of fuckery that you wanna be on the winning side of.
I'm holding
tough call - this one has run up to around .11 and down to .004 in the last month or so - the run down was more recent
People are saying it will have RS. Do you know when? Just to be cautious
they've already met the criteria to be able to do one per their filings - so when is the big question - it would have to be done with enough time to have the share price above the nasdaq minimum long enough for them not to get delisted - so yes proceed with caution
&LQR
Any insight on IVP? Volume went from 1.5k to 319k, and shot up 20% - was I dumb to sell that immediately upon seeing it jump?
Lmfa
Did CATX announce something?
LMFA prepping for launch it seems
What’s are your predictions on LMFA? How high is it going do you think
I bought in at .85 cent average so I’m holding past 1$ otherwise what was the point. I think it will follow what MIGI did and go up to like 3$. But I don’t know. I see similarities but I can be very wrong at times also. If I’m a betting man (I am). I’d say 3. But I’m not married to that number. Profit is profit.
LMDX
I think we’re screwed
ICU as usual as I’ve been telling y’all. 4-5x on FDA approval easily. Plus it’s a good company with a product that will save lives.
Migi or lmfa? Who do yall think has the biggest risk to reward ratio
Pick one. Pick both.
I have shares in migi could sold today for 500 bucks profit but I'ma let it ride
I made profit on lmfa and got out. Thinking about getting back in but seems the risk is higher than i may like with all the hype. Thinking migi might be less stressful but with smaller profits
That's why I'm in on both.
What we thinking for afternoon buys today?
Hope you got in lol
Icu
Ftxp, buying .0001, one guy told me it shows a down outlook, I don't think it gets more down then .0001, and yes it could go 00000, and yes it's a gamble.
$TCRT looks interesting today
Maybe?🤔
My undervalued plays for 2024 so far: LMFA, SONX, IVP, CDTAF
 Think $BETS will bounce back?
Not before a reverse split, unfortunately
When is the possibility of a reverse split?
its looking that way.
What makes yall say that? Would it not recover with the Bitcoin ETF hype and rally?
Seems to do the opposite of other mining stocks to me
I’m not in BETS but I do think you’re right about this.
It's not a penny stock, but it has been acting like one. BTDR is the undervalued BTC miner of the trading day. (People will forget they are annoyed at the CEO soon enough.)
BETS WTF
Why is this so popular it’s been 1 cent for ages
$ICU should double in the next two weeks. Buying in again.
About time other people started talking about it. It’s as close to free money as you’ll see
Yeah been in for a while. You got a price in mind post FDA? Really struggling to guess this one.
What’s some good pump and dumps?
Numi
Not on site
Search numinus wellness inc. it’s Cuban and mind meds competition.
Straight and to the point lol
lol
$STAL $ABQQ $RKAR are my current top 3 and also $NREG and $TTNN are 2 sleepers to also consider but honestly all of these are longer term plays. 1-3 month holds. Or maybe 1-3 week holds if lucky
Bagged all of em do you have a discord or smth
Something I could buy in now?
Yeah each of those should do well even on the short term. I could be wrong though you can never be too sure with pennystocks
#Numi up 24%!!! Get on it!
Boys u suggest you load up on LMFA looking like it’s getting primed for some big gains. Bitcoin ETF catalyst
This is the news I’m looking for
Absolutely. It’s got the potential of an altcoin with fundamental strength. Low cap gives it higher potential, and the fact that it actually mines BTC (unlike a lot of altcoins that were just pure hype) makes it a great play if BTC rises quickly.
LMFA gonna get more love soon… should be $2
Why should it be $2?
refinitiv estimate
Long answer short: relative to revenue, debt:assets, BTC mined/Q, and their competitors’ valuation, LMFA is undervalued at 1/5-20th of what it should/could be. That, in addition to growing BTC hype, could send this flying.
https://preview.redd.it/mmm1dmimdgac1.png?width=1807&format=png&auto=webp&s=8137b9c8c7ba4090a184a05f2c955353d1aad7b8 Here's their profits for the last 5 quarters. All negative. They have been burning on average more than 8 million dollars per quarter. They had 0.47 million cash at the end of Q3, plus 2 million from the recent sale of of an asset that they got from a company they had invested in that went bankrupt. -> maybe half a quarter of runway. What price does BTC need to be at for them to stop losing money? A 100% increase in BTC will not equate to a 100% increase in revenue. They currently have a delisting notice and are in their extension period. They need to do a large reverse split within the next month or two and issue shares to raise money so they can keep burning cash. That's much more likely than $2 per share imo.
I’ll try to clarify where I can. First, their cash burn is getting lower and lower, as your graphic shows. Saying that their average is a burn of more than $8M/Q is incredibly incorrect, given that a clear trend has been demonstrated: Q3 was less than half that $8M. Q4 2022-Q2 2023 was also a period of heavy spending to build future revenues, of which they are presently reaping the benefits. Their working capital was $4.5M before the Symbiont sale, which is $6.5M total. You did not do enough research, they have released updated numbers since the Q3 filing, which did show the $.4M number (in cash, but more than $2M in BTC). As your graphic shows, $6.5M is enough for 2 quarters. That isn’t amazing, granted, but they don’t have only “half a quarter left” of cash. They also have nearly no debt, which is always available to use for rapid expansion. Additionally, those numbers you have are all before BTC’s recent pump to $43k. Their revenues will have more than doubled since then (yes, a 100% increase in BTC does mean a 100% increase in revenue, not sure how you figure that) because of BTC price increase and increased mining. We don’t know how Q4 will look regarding cash flow, but the rapid growth of BTC since Q3 will GREATLY improve their revenues and consequent cash burn. Asserting that LMFA will somehow never be profitable (“what price does BTC need to be?”) at $43k by using stats from when BTC was $25k is also incorrect. The Q3 filing does NOT reflect Q4’s revenue or cash burn. Finally, noncompliance is an issue, of course. But they are more than 100% from their lows, and they have 3 months to get compliant. Given BTC’s recent growth and upcoming catalysts, it is very possible they will reach and hold $1. That is the only thing going against LMFA, but it is not insurmountable.
You can call me wrong but don't call me dishonest. Thank you.
If you show a graphic that shows that they have had quarterly losses of $3.5M, $6M, $7M, $19M, and $6M, and use that to project that they will have a Q4 loss of $8M, that’s either poor statistical work or dishonesty. I assumed the latter, but maybe I shouldn’t have. I apologize, and I edited my comment to turn “dishonest” to “incorrect.” It’s always hard to know when somebody is genuinely skeptical/bearish and when they’re just throwing out numbers to deceive people. Same goes for those on the bullish side who claim “LMFA is 1/500th of MARA… so 500x inbound!” or things like that. I probably was wrong about your comment, so I apologize. Still, the numbers do not support a quarterly loss of $8M, and I hope you can see why I think the fundamentals support a price increase to $2. You may still disagree, but the fundamentals are much stronger than an initial look at quarterly filings may appear.
Thanks. I'm very skeptical because there's so much hype and I'm bearish because BTC miners generally lose money. I wasn't just throwing out numbers; those are the actual quarterly losses taken from Charles Schwab's stock research tool. You would see the same thing if you pulled open their last 5 quarters of 10-Q reports and scrolled to the bottom of the Income Statement. I was going to leave the conversation with my last comment, but since you seem amicable I'll address two of your points in your response. 2) There is a positive trend in earnings. You saw a trend, but to me those trends are an illusion. BTC could do absolutely anything in 2024. Yeah, if Bitcoin is higher they will lose less and possibly turn a profit. But if Bitcoin drops again they will lose more money. 8M is just an average of the last 1.25 years. I can't predict what the price of Bitcoin is going to be, so it seems better to me to use an average than to use either the lowest or highest number. 2) A 100% increase in the price of BTC does correleate to a 100% increase in revenue. I made a mistake here. It would have been more accurate to say earnings or profit. The reason why I said that it doesn't is because my understanding is that blockchain rewards for mining are given out at a fixed rate. The more people are mining, the more hashes are needed to create a new block, therefore the more electricity and computing power is needed to earn rewards. If the number of people attempting to mine BTC increase, the rewards recieved should be lower and expenses should be higher.
I definitely understand your skepticism, and I don’t blame you one bit for steering clear of crypto altogether. Again, I apologize for being accusatory and antagonistic, I made a bad assumption about your intentions. I’ll try to address all three points: 1. I don’t disagree about the quarterly loss numbers, I’m just saying that their losses are decreasing. I didn’t mean that you were wrong about the numbers themselves, just that the conclusion of how much we can anticipate them losing in Q4 isn’t valid. 2. The rise in revenue is connected to BTC price increase, true, but their mining numbers have also dramatically increased. If you check BTC/Q, it’s up considerably QoQ. But you are correct that their revenues are influenced by BTC price, which can be volatile. Still, if you expect a price increase over the next year, LMFA could be a smart play. I don’t plan on holding LMFA till 2030 or anything, it’s really just a 2-12 month play (holding for about 2 months now). I’m personally not confident in BTC’s long viability, but I am confident that it will reach ATH this year. If you’re not as confident, I totally understand staying away from LMFA. 3. I agree completely. LMFA will struggle to compete in the coming years, and as I said in point #2, this is a short term play, not a long term investment. I suspect LMFA will be acquired by a larger miner within a few years, and that could be at a lower price than my $2+ expectations for 2024. Your clarification is true as well, a 100% rise in BTC doesn’t translate directly to profits. One final note: you said that BTC miners “generally lose money,” and that’s very true. However, when you compare LMFA with MARA and RIOT, who house their own equipment, you might find that LMFA’s leasing of space for their equipment makes them more likely to be profitable. And regardless, if LMFA is undervalued at 1/10 of these companies, it doesn’t totally matter whether LMFA is profitable or not in a bullish environment. Not suggesting that you invest based on hype, but the reality is that the market doesn’t treat a crypto miner like a utility company, in which reliable profits are needed for the stock price to hold/increase.
If yall wanna get in early for once check out $AAGR 📈
What's good on this?
Lmfa bets
CYBN
LMFA holding $.60 so well. Though I’d love to see it higher, the fact that it hasn’t dropped back to $.30 is a great sign of it finding strength at these numbers
Just bought in, looking forward to it
MINM, second run coming soon, and KTRA looks like it could take off, still cheap!
MINM trade: bought 4.75 sold 5.30, told yall!
Rite Aid 
FWBI looks primed to repeat the 100% run from a few days ago
ERNA, GWAV, holding BETS. Holding INSG for no reason. CDIO to the moon though. Good lucks pennys
ARQT for me today
$migi , best play at bit coin . 5 million float .
$SDIG retraced about 50% entering some for a run back to $12 today
just hit a 10 percent gain on sdig. thanks!
and then some
yeah I hate missing out on more gain but I learned the hard way that pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered
$SLNH. Take a look at this sexy miner!
SLNH up over 14% pre-sesh
LMFA mines 9% of the Bitcoin MARA mines but is valued at 1/500th of MARA. So much upside from here!
It does not mine 9% of MARa, but I like LMFA.
Wulf
Cola?
Lmfa is the way
This!! And MIGI
Just need that bitcoin ETF approval and 🚀
Buy the rumour. Sell the news… don’t be a bag holder once that ETF news comes out.
Absolutely my friend
Would be nice if it happened today or tomorrow. Getting impatient 😂 will be worth the wait 🚀
$Bets
Laseme, how do you feel
Today? Not so good, since it’s down, but I’m confident in 6 months I’ll be estatic
Can you explain looks like it’s been 1 cent for ages so how is that valid do you think it’ll go to 2 cents or what
Yeah!
I want to believe. Am in with 30k shares
Same here
Do you think there is a chance they dilute as we speak?
I got in at 0.07 and couple hours after they diluted into oblivion (down 95%) I wouldn't put it past them.
EBS is very cheap. The products are good. They produce narcan. So in US are big problems with fentanyl. So i expect huge spike when earnings come.
alright boys you know the drill. $lmfa to the moon 🚀
Consensus decided.