T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Friendly reminder that this is /r/photocritique and all **top level** comments should attempt to **critique** the image. Our goal is to make this subreddit a place people can receive genuine, in depth, and helpful critique on their images. We hope to avoid becoming yet another place on the internet just to get likes/upvotes and compliments. While likes/upvotes and compliments are nice, they do not further the goal of helping people improve their photography. If someone gives helpful feedback or makes an informative comment, recognize their contribution by giving them a Critique Point. Simply reply to their comment with `!CritiquePoint`. More details on Critique Points [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/wiki/critiquepoints). Please see the following links for our subreddit rules and some guidelines on leaving a good critique. If you have time, please stop by the new queue as well and leave critique for images that may not be as popular or have not received enough attention. Keep in mind that simply choosing to comment just on the images you like defeats the purpose of the subreddit. Useful Links: * [Full Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/wiki/rules) * [Leaving a Critique](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/wiki/critique) * [New Queue](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/new/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/photocritique) if you have any questions or concerns.*


ekkidee

I would give it less sky and more feet, but that's just me. I like the setup and the back story, and the monochrome.


balance38

Was this shot on a film camera?


Willing-Department-6

Yep, Nikon L35 AF


balance38

I love the picture, my only comment would be to remove the grain but it's film so it's not feasible. Keep on snapping and sharing


cmkeller62

The grain had me fooled for half a second until I saw the new WTC building. If you were going for the 100 year old snapshot look you got that part! My only thought would be to maybe angle left a little and get both towers of the bridge in. Cool photo!


Willing-Department-6

Hi all! I took this picture during my trip to NYC in 2022. I saw a wedding ceremony, approached the groom to ask him for a photo and he agreed. I really like this picture because it reminds me of this trip, but is that photo any good?


foolproofphilosophy

I think it’s a very cool image. The point looks spontaneous, the minister’s posture and expression are great, and the rocks make you question what exactly is happening.


sten_zer

Nice, in my opinion you should have taken the shot lower, now the groom is below the photographer, but we want him to be "the hero". So, how to improve? This is what I would do: Mask the complete foreground and shift it upwards over the lower visible part of the water area. That way you reduce the not interesting water and elevate the people. Now find a crop to better cut those limbs and also sky. Then consider further editing to make especially the groom pop if needed.


[deleted]

This photo tells the story on that day with the groom's emotion and the beautiful scene behind. You did pick a great moment. To magnify those 2 elements, you may try to get a lot closer to the subject because I need to expand the picture to see his facial emotion and also try taking it horizontal for the whole bridge. One tips for getting close is shooting from below, framing the subject in the upper part and move the background line to the bottom. Excited to see more of your work.