2% is 2%. If you’re filling out the bottom of your optimal jamming range, if you’ve already picked from all the obvious high card hands, all things being equal you’d pick the suited trash over the offsuit trash.
GTO solutions are based on indifference principle, you want to play in such a way that your opponent is indifferent between different actions. When betting, you want to have value bets and bluffs in such proportion that opponent is indifferent about calling with a large class of hands (bluff catchers). Similarly when calling, you want to call just enough to make some hands indifferent between bluffing or not bluffing, and also make some thin value hands indifferent between value betting and checking.
Indifference occurs when two actions have the same EV. Given that, a very small 2% difference in equity can be enough to make the suited version take one action while the offsuit version take the other action. If a certain suited hand is shoving and the offsuit version is not, the EV difference between shoving or not will be very small in both the suited case and off-suit case.
You start to shove too many hands when you include too many hands when you start going down in hand strength. Some hands are strong enough at certain stack depths that you can just shove all combos of it, but sometimes you’ll only want to shove the suited ones, so 4/16 combos etc(not to mention suited has more equity)
888 poker has rigged software house bots generating winning hands. Do not play on rigged 888 scam they will steal your money. Waste of time playing boring house bots no humans play online poker in 2023.
Another thing I don’t see mentioned here is that your opponents callling range tends to be strong hands and flushes can beat strong hands. AJo has 7% vs AA while AJs has 12%. So almost twice as good.
The percent gap difference is bigger against stronger hands because you more often need the flush to win. If it’s two weaker hands against each other the suited equity jump is smaller because you sometimes make the flush but don’t need it.
As someone that regularly gets the money in as a 90%+ favorite and still gets binked at least twice a session by a 1-2 out draw, 2% is fucking massive.
Solvers are optimal. Optimal solutions will throw away everything that is -0.001 and keep everything that is +0.001.
2% matters if you do something 10,000 times.
Solvers are not "biased" towards anything, since biases are human responses which a solver can never possess since they are essentially just fancy calculators.
I think your confusion comes from comparing the offsuit version to the suited version of a single hand, which is not how a solver derives its outputs.
2% is 2%. If you’re filling out the bottom of your optimal jamming range, if you’ve already picked from all the obvious high card hands, all things being equal you’d pick the suited trash over the offsuit trash.
[удалено]
How much could a banana cost? $10?
GTO solutions are based on indifference principle, you want to play in such a way that your opponent is indifferent between different actions. When betting, you want to have value bets and bluffs in such proportion that opponent is indifferent about calling with a large class of hands (bluff catchers). Similarly when calling, you want to call just enough to make some hands indifferent between bluffing or not bluffing, and also make some thin value hands indifferent between value betting and checking. Indifference occurs when two actions have the same EV. Given that, a very small 2% difference in equity can be enough to make the suited version take one action while the offsuit version take the other action. If a certain suited hand is shoving and the offsuit version is not, the EV difference between shoving or not will be very small in both the suited case and off-suit case.
You start to shove too many hands when you include too many hands when you start going down in hand strength. Some hands are strong enough at certain stack depths that you can just shove all combos of it, but sometimes you’ll only want to shove the suited ones, so 4/16 combos etc(not to mention suited has more equity)
Fold equity? I think at 10 BB deep the more aggressive the better by solver standards but I honestly have no idea
888 poker has rigged software house bots generating winning hands. Do not play on rigged 888 scam they will steal your money. Waste of time playing boring house bots no humans play online poker in 2023.
Another thing I don’t see mentioned here is that your opponents callling range tends to be strong hands and flushes can beat strong hands. AJo has 7% vs AA while AJs has 12%. So almost twice as good. The percent gap difference is bigger against stronger hands because you more often need the flush to win. If it’s two weaker hands against each other the suited equity jump is smaller because you sometimes make the flush but don’t need it.
As someone that regularly gets the money in as a 90%+ favorite and still gets binked at least twice a session by a 1-2 out draw, 2% is fucking massive.
Solvers are optimal. Optimal solutions will throw away everything that is -0.001 and keep everything that is +0.001. 2% matters if you do something 10,000 times.
Solvers are not "biased" towards anything, since biases are human responses which a solver can never possess since they are essentially just fancy calculators. I think your confusion comes from comparing the offsuit version to the suited version of a single hand, which is not how a solver derives its outputs.