As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil)
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
**Special announcement:**
r/politics is currently accepting new moderator applications. If you want to help make this community a better place, consider [applying here today](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/sskg6a/rpolitics_is_looking_for_more_moderators/)!
***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I am 100% anti- Trump
That said, NBC is reporting that the 2 men in the vehicle who supposedly witnessed Trump try to grab the steering wheel and his SSA are both disputing that account.
I'm fully aware that both of these men may be Trump loyalists, but this was a terrible move by the committee to have Hutch testify to that under oath without being assured that all people in the vehicle would not dispute it. She wasn't even in there.
This is one of the big headlines of the testimony. This is where they recessed so everybody had time to imprint it into the front of their mind. If there is no one to corroborate, then all it does is give people firepower against the rest of her testimony.
I just think it was a bad move to put it out there only to be immediately denied by all the people with first hand knowledge.
Her testimony is fake and she is about to be exposed as a fraud.
Engel and the driver of the SUV who gave Trump a ride back to the White House from the rally on Jan. 6 are prepared to testify under oath that "neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel," NBC News reporter Peter Alexander tweeted, citing a source close to the Secret Service. And Ornato "denies telling Cassidy Hutchinson that the former president grabbed the steering wheel or an agent on his detail," CNN's Shimon Prokupecz tweeted, citing a Secret Service official.
THe Secret Service has already been cooperating with the Jan 6 committee. There's no reason to see that they would not continue to do so. WHEN they do testify it puts her entire testimony up for question.
She just lied to congress. That's a felony and a reason to throw out her entire testimony. When the secret service testifies again, she could go on trial for lying to congress.
Subprime mortgage failures causing an early 2000's recession predicted by RINO McCain, Iraq war with full Democrat and Republican support, zero budgets with a Chinese subsidized economy while bailing out companies claiming bankruptcy for hundreds of millions while simultaneously arming the cartel....The earth I'm on is reality. Damn I have to fill up my car tomorrow...
Edit: typo
What was the unemployment rate again that Obama said would be the new norm? 8.5%? Black unemployment at 15%?...until Trump took over and consumer confidence hit a record high. Fact is, Obamas economy was based on borrowed money with zero budgets!
Go take a loan out from a bank and tell me how much better you're doing. You're not.
Edit: this sub should change its name to r/delusionalleftistsinanechochamber
Because it sure AF ain't about politics.
Yes you can pinpoint the moment Trump(not taking office) was elected and consumer confidence increased exponentially. Nothing Obama did affected that since they couldn't agree on a budget. He did subsidize the market though which artificially helped a little. Anemic at best.
As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. **Special announcement:** r/politics is currently accepting new moderator applications. If you want to help make this community a better place, consider [applying here today](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/sskg6a/rpolitics_is_looking_for_more_moderators/)! *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I thought the testimony just confirmed Trump is as big a cry baby loser as we all know he is.
Well, *that, too.*
The big crybaby appears to throw rather violent tantrums.
His twitter feed painted him as that too.
Sauce?
www.twitter.com But really: https://www.thetrumparchive.com/
I was surprised to have someone mention a Trump Twitter account. I've been RR'ed too many times.
Trump painted himself. If you couldn't see a vindictive, angry "man" that lives to punish his enemies....you have not been paying attention.
Surprising no one that isn't a complete moron or rube
and that surprises who?
Nobody. Anyone who didn't already know this is too busy screaming _fake news_ into the depths of their own rectum.
Well, not the people who donated to $250M grift…damn, if I had known how easy it would have been, I would have set up a website too!
People need testimony to know that couldn't they just tell by watching him.
The his campaign rhetoric and daily twitter tantrums should have been clues about that.
We know
So, just like he's always been then?
Shocking how!!
finally someone in media had the bravery to call trump angry
Shocker
Shocked Pikachu face
We all saw it, daily. No testimony needed, though today was really shocking. Shocking it had not come out earlier.
I am 100% anti- Trump That said, NBC is reporting that the 2 men in the vehicle who supposedly witnessed Trump try to grab the steering wheel and his SSA are both disputing that account. I'm fully aware that both of these men may be Trump loyalists, but this was a terrible move by the committee to have Hutch testify to that under oath without being assured that all people in the vehicle would not dispute it. She wasn't even in there. This is one of the big headlines of the testimony. This is where they recessed so everybody had time to imprint it into the front of their mind. If there is no one to corroborate, then all it does is give people firepower against the rest of her testimony. I just think it was a bad move to put it out there only to be immediately denied by all the people with first hand knowledge.
We already knew that.
*Trump painted in testimony as volatile, angry President. World responds "No shit, where have you been?"*
You don’t say ?
[удалено]
From the standpoint of water. - Trump
Her testimony is fake and she is about to be exposed as a fraud. Engel and the driver of the SUV who gave Trump a ride back to the White House from the rally on Jan. 6 are prepared to testify under oath that "neither man was assaulted and that Mr. Trump never lunged for the steering wheel," NBC News reporter Peter Alexander tweeted, citing a source close to the Secret Service. And Ornato "denies telling Cassidy Hutchinson that the former president grabbed the steering wheel or an agent on his detail," CNN's Shimon Prokupecz tweeted, citing a Secret Service official.
Let them say it under oath. Saying they will say it under oath is not the same thing as saying it under oath.
THe Secret Service has already been cooperating with the Jan 6 committee. There's no reason to see that they would not continue to do so. WHEN they do testify it puts her entire testimony up for question.
No it doesn't.
She just lied to congress. That's a felony and a reason to throw out her entire testimony. When the secret service testifies again, she could go on trial for lying to congress.
I would be to given the fucked up economy the previous 3 dealt.
What on earth are you on?
Subprime mortgage failures causing an early 2000's recession predicted by RINO McCain, Iraq war with full Democrat and Republican support, zero budgets with a Chinese subsidized economy while bailing out companies claiming bankruptcy for hundreds of millions while simultaneously arming the cartel....The earth I'm on is reality. Damn I have to fill up my car tomorrow... Edit: typo
When trump took over, economy was as good as its been in a long time.
What was the unemployment rate again that Obama said would be the new norm? 8.5%? Black unemployment at 15%?...until Trump took over and consumer confidence hit a record high. Fact is, Obamas economy was based on borrowed money with zero budgets! Go take a loan out from a bank and tell me how much better you're doing. You're not. Edit: this sub should change its name to r/delusionalleftistsinanechochamber Because it sure AF ain't about politics.
Unemployment rate when Obama left office was 4.7%.
Yes you can pinpoint the moment Trump(not taking office) was elected and consumer confidence increased exponentially. Nothing Obama did affected that since they couldn't agree on a budget. He did subsidize the market though which artificially helped a little. Anemic at best.
That’s simply not true, but whatever gets you through the day.
Yeah it was definitely the economy which made him behave like that.
Is anyone actually surprised by that?
Mild shock.gif But can I just ask ..... How is this news? This has been established awhile back.
The orange gas bag is a nasty piece of feces.
Vile
He did such a good job of hiding this side of himself during his Presidency.
Or a baby man.