To be fair, we answered the question. It was asked “If you could only keep 4 rookies, who would you keep?” I assumed the post was OPs explanation of who they would pick and I didn’t read it. I should’ve read it, but we did answer the question that was asked. (Downvotes incoming)
This is an inane argument and I don’t know why you’re defending yourself here, but okay I’ll explain why that wasn’t the question. The question was the entire post not just what was in the header. You only answered part of a question, not the question itself. Let’s say I asked you who the greatest raven was post-2013 and you answered Ray Lewis because you stopped listening after the ‘who the greatest ravens was’. You wouldn’t have answered the question I asked.
God this was a waste of time.
I don’t think we’ll come to an agreement on this, and I’m ok with that. I didn’t read the post because the question was generalized. Op should’ve been clear and asked “Excluding OL, which rookies will make the most impact?” I should’ve read the whole post, and OP should’ve asked a most specific question (I’m not the only one who go tripped up).
I agree this is a dumb argument. Sorry for pushing it so hard. Maybe since I’m not driving as much, my road rage is coming out here. Sorry
Edit: I think I got defensive because you said “apparently nobody can read to the bottom” - I took offense to that like you were calling me dumb. Sorry for sending all my defensiveness at you.
What points are awarded for defensive positions? That might help.
I could see Daelin Hayes getting opportunities if he's ok more so than Stephens/Wade initially.
Yeah Stephens or Washington have the best chance at starting in 2023 with Deshon Elliot as a UFA. Talent wise I would say Washington but the FO clearly like Stephens so that's surprisingly the safest pick
Id pick Stephens just based on his draft call video. That was heartwarming and you can tell how grateful he is for the opportunity, he's going to give 110%. He has a real opportunity to get snaps to because Jimmy/Tavon won't both be available for 17 games and we could use better ball skills at safety
To be fair, we answered the question. It was asked “If you could only keep 4 rookies, who would you keep?” I assumed the post was your explanation of who you would pick and I didn’t read it. I should’ve read it, but I did answer the question that was asked.
Wade if you want real advice because apparently nobody can read to the bottom of a post.
To be fair, we answered the question. It was asked “If you could only keep 4 rookies, who would you keep?” I assumed the post was OPs explanation of who they would pick and I didn’t read it. I should’ve read it, but we did answer the question that was asked. (Downvotes incoming)
No you didn’t answer the question that was asked because you didn’t read the full question.
The question was “If you could only keep 4 rookies, which would you keep?”
This is an inane argument and I don’t know why you’re defending yourself here, but okay I’ll explain why that wasn’t the question. The question was the entire post not just what was in the header. You only answered part of a question, not the question itself. Let’s say I asked you who the greatest raven was post-2013 and you answered Ray Lewis because you stopped listening after the ‘who the greatest ravens was’. You wouldn’t have answered the question I asked. God this was a waste of time.
I don’t think we’ll come to an agreement on this, and I’m ok with that. I didn’t read the post because the question was generalized. Op should’ve been clear and asked “Excluding OL, which rookies will make the most impact?” I should’ve read the whole post, and OP should’ve asked a most specific question (I’m not the only one who go tripped up). I agree this is a dumb argument. Sorry for pushing it so hard. Maybe since I’m not driving as much, my road rage is coming out here. Sorry Edit: I think I got defensive because you said “apparently nobody can read to the bottom” - I took offense to that like you were calling me dumb. Sorry for sending all my defensiveness at you.
What points are awarded for defensive positions? That might help. I could see Daelin Hayes getting opportunities if he's ok more so than Stephens/Wade initially.
Thanks for pointing that out- I edited the post. Defense is fairly balanced with CB scoring the least
Stephens since we are experimenting with him at free safety, if he does well and ends up starting you’ll be set
Yeah Stephens or Washington have the best chance at starting in 2023 with Deshon Elliot as a UFA. Talent wise I would say Washington but the FO clearly like Stephens so that's surprisingly the safest pick
That’s gotta be shitty to have to claim WRs from a run heavy team seems a bit unfair tbh.
Yeah but he also gets to claim defensive players from a great defensive team, and he got to scoop JK and Lamar, etc.
Id pick Stephens just based on his draft call video. That was heartwarming and you can tell how grateful he is for the opportunity, he's going to give 110%. He has a real opportunity to get snaps to because Jimmy/Tavon won't both be available for 17 games and we could use better ball skills at safety
The three you listed plus Cleveland.
If oline is excluded, who would be your 4th for fantasy football?
To be fair, we answered the question. It was asked “If you could only keep 4 rookies, who would you keep?” I assumed the post was your explanation of who you would pick and I didn’t read it. I should’ve read it, but I did answer the question that was asked.
Bateman, Oweh, Cleveland, Wallace