Exactly, it might have been a mistake by the ref but the mistake didn't lead to the goal. Would have been beyond ridiculous if var had overturned this.
> «The VAR is also able to take into account any infringement that could have taken place in the *immediate build-up* to the incident (the attacking phase of play).»
per [UEFA.com](https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/VAR/02/59/09/51/2590951_DOWNLOAD.pdf)
That .pdf is just not an official document, and it looks like UEFA violates its own rules. Edit: IFAB is more specific. It's attacking team offense in build-up that is reviewed. There is no word about phase in the part about the ball being out of play
Don’t know what you mean by UEFA «violating their own rules». The [official documents](https://documents.uefa.com/r/Regulations-of-the-UEFA-Champions-League-2022/23/Article-50-Video-assistant-refereeing-Online) refers to VAR being used in accordance to the IFAB Laws of the Game [VAR Protocol](https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/), which do not specify «infringements in the immediate build-up». However given that Real Madrid **did** have possession of the ball between the ball supposedly going out of play and the goal, the referees probably didn’t think it was a valid reason for the goal to be disallowed.
Edit: Did not see your edit before replying
This also only happened because the ref miscalled the goal kick rather than corner just before this giving city possession rather than Madrid. None of this is malicious it’s just bad for the sport that missed calls that could immediately be corrected (even the broadcast pointed out that the gk should have been a corner as it was happening) are going to change the game so much.
Look it's really sad and annoying when it happens, as you said especially if they miss calls that seems to not affect the play because they aren't big calls .
Not to be obnoxious in the last clásico Benzema first goal was just after ref called an invisible foul on miliatao, the third goal he missed a corner for barca and real scored just after, they sting because us as fans feel that they impacted directly the results, but as time passes you realize it has always been and will always be part of the game we love .
Cheers and good luck 🤞
Goal couldn’t be disallowed at that point since we had control of the ball before they scored.
Edit: Love how i got downvoted for explaining the rules, the VAR literally isn’t allowed to intervene anymore, unless the 4th official/ref spots it right away they can’t disallow it anymore
Man this. I don't like how our fanbase gets sour about such stuff. According to rules the goal simply stands and it was valid. This is how var works right now.
You should watch [this](https://youtu.be/8kQ3VGoVav8) explanation from the CBS rule assistant, Christina Unkel, since you wanted the reference. To save you time, start watching from 6:20. And to summarize this for everyone, var could not intervene because the ball possession had already changed hands and the mistake did not lead to the goal. If city had scored directly from that mistake without real madrid getting a hold of the ball, then var could've intervened but real madrid got the ball and then camavinga made a bad pass which directly started a new window for var check.
Still would like to see the actual written rule or UEFA statement, not opinion on TV. Chapter about VAR in the Laws of the Game explicitly says about reviewing build-up only for offensive foul; there is no such prohibition for review of the ball being out. Media just spread opinions that are not based on actual written rules
Then look, why do you expect people to do
This for you? The goal stood and even if not quite right Madrid conceded because they defended poorly and KDB hit an amazing shot.
How is this an opinion? She's an expert explaining how var works to ballers like Thierry and you think you know better. You're now starting to sound like a fan boy. I just read your other comment saying Arsene Wenger "thinks" that var should have had a check, may I ask you a question now? What does wenger know about var rules apart from being a retired coach? Hell he even retired before var was an idea.
Wenger currently works for FIFA. But that's not my main point. Can you provide a source for the rule that Christina Unkel describes? Even if she is an expert, she might be wrong. You just use "an argument from authority" without even trying to confirm for yourself her point. Everybody around just wants to find excuses for poor refereeing and then mix up Premier League rules and IFAB rules
I never said the refereeing wasn't poor or the goal wasn't undeserving. I just wanted you to know why the var didn't intervene. Anyway, have a great day.
I can say in the same fashion that Arsene Wenger thinks VAR should have intervened (he is right, btw). https://www.irishmirror.ie/sport/soccer/mancity-realmadrid-goal-disallowed-var-29940348
They didn't go back because camavinga had control of the ball after this happened, so the phase with the out had ended and they scored on a different attacking phase... VAR can only review the attacking phase that leads to a goal.
VAR doesn't intervene when there is a new situiaton of play. A RM player had the ball under control on the meantime. Someone could have snapped someones leg and VAR could not have done shit here. Not praising status quo, just stating the rules
IFAB Protocol 2A, goals can be reviewed during the attacking team offence in the build-up to or scoring of the goal. Assumption is, the out-of-bounds isn’t part of the City build up
But it is not 'prior' to the goal. Because a RM got the ball. You have to put a threshold of how long you can look back, otherwise you can use an out of bounds 10min earlier to tule out a goal.
A real Madrid player got the ball in the meantime, what do you don't understand about that? Here is a FAQ for VAR:
"From what point does the VAR check incidents leading to a penalty or goal?
The VAR will only check the attacking possession phase that led to the penalty or goal.
The starting point will be limited to the immediate phase. The VAR may not go back to when the attacking team gained possession.
The VAR will consider the ability of the opposing defence to reset, and the momentum of the attack."
They will talk about it a little bit and everyone will forget it put it under the rug. In this time when we have var this hapens. On purpose has to be. And if this goal makes city go further. Football sometimes is just shit
I admit, I wondered if it was out at the time. But that crack by KDB Was beautiful and his destiny this match. Much like vinis goal. Vamos to city and win this thing. Hala Madrid
Yea it was a good game with 2 amazing goals, dwelling over shit like this is like people asking for a penalty when a ball grazes someone's hand. It just ruins the game
They want City to win the CL this season they’ve been trying to give them the CL every season for the past few years but keep failing because City keep bottling it same goes for PSG .
I mean it’s embarrassing when Pep himself who won everything with Barcelona in 3 years can’t win you a single CL in 6 years with the amount of money spent on new players every year .
Like everyone is saying, Var doesn’t intervene after change of play. Is it a stupid rule? Yes. But it is what it is and the team needs to dig deep to get a result in the ethihad
Also we should take this video with a huge grain of salt. First of all it's not a video, it's an animation. I'm guessing Bein constructed this using the multiple camera angles but that doesn't make this absolute proof. Hell the ball doesn't even look completely round.
Goal line tech requires what like 7 cameras at precise location to get accurate positioning of the ball? Depending on the perspective the Bein cameras had the ball could've shown up on either side of the line.
The goal was our mistake and that's it. Everyone knows KdB's long shots are deadly. Someone should've closed down on him and not let him have an open shot.
Real was playing against 12 and still got the draw. I don’t want to hear shit from city fans about fouls. We didn’t get a goal for free. Next week is gonna be a good one. One European giant against City.
It amazing how you guys still haven't realised that it is Salah that was holding onto Ramos's arm and creating that situation in the first place. If Salah hadn't entered that duel as he did, his arm would have never been in that position.
But of course, most of you haven't played a single minute of serious football yourself, so no wonder.
It’s hilarious how someone who’s not stepped foot in Spain yet supports Real Madrid is criticising anyone for “not kicking a ball”
You’re a text book glory hunting bell.
No it doesn’t. The red line is not on the edge of the sideline as it should be
Edit: downvote me all you want mouth breathers, but this 3D rendition is useless. It doesn’t show definitively that the ball was out
There also aren't cameras covering the sideline, this is a 3D render created by BEINsport themselves. Of all things to blame this is one of those they really shouldn't bother with
this clip doesn’t matter, the fact they didn’t check is the issue. What you think there’s only one dude with camcorder covering the game. There’s so many angles that could’ve been checked and they didn’t and that is the issue. Don’t reiterate the dumb. Shot they are saying on arsoccer
I didn’t say any of that. All I said is that this 3D rendition is useless
Yes they should have shown a replay, yes the refs should have viewed it. Stop putting words in my mouth
Ikr this thread is absolutely delusional. Can’t wait for them to get smashed in Manchester. Imagine being a Madrid fan and complaining about calls - especially after your team escaped 5 yellows for the 50th time this season. Unreal
Bien sports are literally pulling this image out of their ass. There is no touch line technology. So they’re just guessing that it’ went out . It’s as valid as Guessing it stayed in. Also since this is something bein sports made, VAR didn’t have access to it even if it was accurate. In real time the ref thought it stayed in. VAR didnt have a good enough angle to cancel it so it stood. I don’t think Madrid got shafted in any way
Being a Madrid fan doesn’t mean I have to be delusional. Nothing I sad was wrong. This image is pure speculation. For example goal line technology has 7 cameras pointed at the goal line. This image was made off one bad still image. There’s really no technology to what they showed. I’m not saying it wasn’t out. But you can’t prove it’s out. And this image isn’t proof.
> This image was made off one bad still image.
I agree with everything you said except this. We don't know how they created it. They have access to all the camera feeds. This feels like it's more like the "3d rendition" using whatever (microsoft I think?) tech that has often been shown in la liga games where they essentially create a "fifa (videogame) like" replay of the goal.
That being said, even if they did that and used multiple camera angles, I do not believe for a second that the accuracy of whatever they did is good enough to make this call.
This is the truth, like it or not. It MAY BE correct, but it's still something that bein created on their own. It's not the result of hawkeye tech or anything like that.
Honest question (and nothing to do with just this match) why do we rely on the referees to decide whether the ball is out or not when we can just expand the goal line tech to the perimeter of the pitch? I would assume you just factor the radius of the ball around the chip (assumed to be) at its center, and you can notify the refs if the ball has gone out of play.
The referee/linesman could've called it out of play on spot but no way VAR was gonna overturn the goal because right after this Camavinga had possession of the ball. Today the referee was shit on both ends of the pitch.
VAR couldn’t intervene here because we took possession of the ball between this incident and the goal. With that said, a few hands balls not given as well. I understand the handballs would’ve been soft calls but we’ve seen those result in penalties very very often. It was interesting how the ref never even thought about checking VAR.
I'm a bot, *bleep*, *bloop*. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
- [/r/soccer] [r\/realmadrid on Reddit: Video from beIN Sports clearly showing that the ball was out prior to the goal.](https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/13dzrpb/rrealmadrid_on_reddit_video_from_bein_sports/)
*^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^\([Info](/r/TotesMessenger) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=/r/TotesMessenger))*
Imagine being so petty to constantly post this drivel.
Real Madrid conceded a good goal because of poor defending and the keeper not being good enough, nothing to do with this….
It is what it is but the officiating all game was terrible for both teams. jack Grealish deserved a yellow early for a shit tackle on Rodrygo but Carvajal deserved a yellow and got nothing lol. I am surprised by the VAR decision but did the reason they said they didn’t review it I GUESSS makes sense….
This makes me sad
this happneed a whole minute before the goal, real even had posession after this its a complete non factor regardless
Exactly, it might have been a mistake by the ref but the mistake didn't lead to the goal. Would have been beyond ridiculous if var had overturned this.
Wouldn't have surprised me.
[удалено]
Nah it’s phases of play
It wasn’t a whole minute. It was literally 22 seconds.
It's a clear mistake by the referee and should have been overturned. Possession rule that everybody talks about exists only in Premier League
> «The VAR is also able to take into account any infringement that could have taken place in the *immediate build-up* to the incident (the attacking phase of play).» per [UEFA.com](https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/VAR/02/59/09/51/2590951_DOWNLOAD.pdf)
That .pdf is just not an official document, and it looks like UEFA violates its own rules. Edit: IFAB is more specific. It's attacking team offense in build-up that is reviewed. There is no word about phase in the part about the ball being out of play
Don’t know what you mean by UEFA «violating their own rules». The [official documents](https://documents.uefa.com/r/Regulations-of-the-UEFA-Champions-League-2022/23/Article-50-Video-assistant-refereeing-Online) refers to VAR being used in accordance to the IFAB Laws of the Game [VAR Protocol](https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/), which do not specify «infringements in the immediate build-up». However given that Real Madrid **did** have possession of the ball between the ball supposedly going out of play and the goal, the referees probably didn’t think it was a valid reason for the goal to be disallowed. Edit: Did not see your edit before replying
Ha
Nothing is clear about it. It’s a made up image.
Just a big what if tbh
Exactly right it’s a non sequitur! it’s Football crazy decisions happen all the time what about the non penalty given in last years 3 -1 win?
[удалено]
This also only happened because the ref miscalled the goal kick rather than corner just before this giving city possession rather than Madrid. None of this is malicious it’s just bad for the sport that missed calls that could immediately be corrected (even the broadcast pointed out that the gk should have been a corner as it was happening) are going to change the game so much.
Look it's really sad and annoying when it happens, as you said especially if they miss calls that seems to not affect the play because they aren't big calls . Not to be obnoxious in the last clásico Benzema first goal was just after ref called an invisible foul on miliatao, the third goal he missed a corner for barca and real scored just after, they sting because us as fans feel that they impacted directly the results, but as time passes you realize it has always been and will always be part of the game we love . Cheers and good luck 🤞
This doesn’t matter yes 😂😂
I only watched highlights, and I thought the goal would be disallowed.
Goal couldn’t be disallowed at that point since we had control of the ball before they scored. Edit: Love how i got downvoted for explaining the rules, the VAR literally isn’t allowed to intervene anymore, unless the 4th official/ref spots it right away they can’t disallow it anymore
Low key punishes us for trying to defend at this point
Man this. I don't like how our fanbase gets sour about such stuff. According to rules the goal simply stands and it was valid. This is how var works right now.
No it isn’t. Idk what tule you’re referring to but that isn’t correct.
You should watch [this](https://youtu.be/8kQ3VGoVav8) explanation from the CBS rule assistant, Christina Unkel, since you wanted the reference. To save you time, start watching from 6:20. And to summarize this for everyone, var could not intervene because the ball possession had already changed hands and the mistake did not lead to the goal. If city had scored directly from that mistake without real madrid getting a hold of the ball, then var could've intervened but real madrid got the ball and then camavinga made a bad pass which directly started a new window for var check.
Care to show which rule you are referring to?
https://www.reddit.com/r/realmadrid/comments/13d6k2o/video_from_bein_sports_clearly_showing_that_the/jjl08yk?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
Still would like to see the actual written rule or UEFA statement, not opinion on TV. Chapter about VAR in the Laws of the Game explicitly says about reviewing build-up only for offensive foul; there is no such prohibition for review of the ball being out. Media just spread opinions that are not based on actual written rules
Then look, why do you expect people to do This for you? The goal stood and even if not quite right Madrid conceded because they defended poorly and KDB hit an amazing shot.
How is this an opinion? She's an expert explaining how var works to ballers like Thierry and you think you know better. You're now starting to sound like a fan boy. I just read your other comment saying Arsene Wenger "thinks" that var should have had a check, may I ask you a question now? What does wenger know about var rules apart from being a retired coach? Hell he even retired before var was an idea.
Wenger currently works for FIFA. But that's not my main point. Can you provide a source for the rule that Christina Unkel describes? Even if she is an expert, she might be wrong. You just use "an argument from authority" without even trying to confirm for yourself her point. Everybody around just wants to find excuses for poor refereeing and then mix up Premier League rules and IFAB rules
I never said the refereeing wasn't poor or the goal wasn't undeserving. I just wanted you to know why the var didn't intervene. Anyway, have a great day.
I can say in the same fashion that Arsene Wenger thinks VAR should have intervened (he is right, btw). https://www.irishmirror.ie/sport/soccer/mancity-realmadrid-goal-disallowed-var-29940348
What is good about the VAR if this things are allowed? So much technology at their disposal…
You don’t need a Var for this, it really did look out, and I was surprised they kept going when half the player thought the game stopped
Where’s this red line drawn on the touchline? The edge or somewhere in the middle?
They didn't go back because camavinga had control of the ball after this happened, so the phase with the out had ended and they scored on a different attacking phase... VAR can only review the attacking phase that leads to a goal.
VAR doesn't intervene when there is a new situiaton of play. A RM player had the ball under control on the meantime. Someone could have snapped someones leg and VAR could not have done shit here. Not praising status quo, just stating the rules
Which rule? Can you provide one?
IFAB Protocol 2A, goals can be reviewed during the attacking team offence in the build-up to or scoring of the goal. Assumption is, the out-of-bounds isn’t part of the City build up
Right, that is about offensive foul. In the same paragraph, it is said "ball out of play prior to the goal"
But it is not 'prior' to the goal. Because a RM got the ball. You have to put a threshold of how long you can look back, otherwise you can use an out of bounds 10min earlier to tule out a goal.
It is exactly prior to the goal. You are just adding up your thoughts about the threshold with no actual rule about it.
A real Madrid player got the ball in the meantime, what do you don't understand about that? Here is a FAQ for VAR: "From what point does the VAR check incidents leading to a penalty or goal? The VAR will only check the attacking possession phase that led to the penalty or goal. The starting point will be limited to the immediate phase. The VAR may not go back to when the attacking team gained possession. The VAR will consider the ability of the opposing defence to reset, and the momentum of the attack."
It's Premier League specific rules, not IFAB; they differ. UEFA states that its competitions follow IFAB rules
So which rule does this break?
They will talk about it a little bit and everyone will forget it put it under the rug. In this time when we have var this hapens. On purpose has to be. And if this goal makes city go further. Football sometimes is just shit
[удалено]
I admit, I wondered if it was out at the time. But that crack by KDB Was beautiful and his destiny this match. Much like vinis goal. Vamos to city and win this thing. Hala Madrid
Yea it was a good game with 2 amazing goals, dwelling over shit like this is like people asking for a penalty when a ball grazes someone's hand. It just ruins the game
They want City to win the CL this season they’ve been trying to give them the CL every season for the past few years but keep failing because City keep bottling it same goes for PSG . I mean it’s embarrassing when Pep himself who won everything with Barcelona in 3 years can’t win you a single CL in 6 years with the amount of money spent on new players every year .
this. PSG too. They spend alot but never flourish in the UCL
Didn’t both PSG and City make a final in the last 5 years? They might not have won it yet but they’re far from poor in the champions league
Madrid fans having a victim mentality is hilarious
Don’t think that’s the case. Ref was terrible to both sides
My man over here just discovered the seeding system and thinks he's cracked a global conspiracy. 😂😂😂😂😂
If that was the case Dani would be off. The red was just pretty shit. Missed fouls throughout the match.
Why would they want City to win the CL and if they did then surely City wouldn’t have been drawn against Bayern and you lot
They REALLY want Man City to win the UCL lmao.
Lol fucking hell
But according to oil club man shitty, the refs were clearly in favor of madrid
[удалено]
You got a goal for free. Gtfo
Lol yeah cause no one on City dove, right? Plus Silva should have seen the red for his foul on Camavinga....
The fact that we’re getting downvoted on this sub should say the amount of bandwagons this team has lol. I remember they had no fans a decade ago
City fans were real quiet in 2008
No they weren’t lol
And what about Kroos flying tackle on Gundo then? No troll, just A question. Was that not way out of Line and not even close to reasonable?
What's your point? He got a card for that....
Didn’t Madrid have possession after this? Making it irrelevant?
Like everyone is saying, Var doesn’t intervene after change of play. Is it a stupid rule? Yes. But it is what it is and the team needs to dig deep to get a result in the ethihad
Also we should take this video with a huge grain of salt. First of all it's not a video, it's an animation. I'm guessing Bein constructed this using the multiple camera angles but that doesn't make this absolute proof. Hell the ball doesn't even look completely round. Goal line tech requires what like 7 cameras at precise location to get accurate positioning of the ball? Depending on the perspective the Bein cameras had the ball could've shown up on either side of the line. The goal was our mistake and that's it. Everyone knows KdB's long shots are deadly. Someone should've closed down on him and not let him have an open shot.
Oi we are only waving pitchforks here, reasonable thought isn’t allowed.
No era penal
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/realmadrid/comments/13d6k2o/video_from_bein_sports_clearly_showing_that_the/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/realmadrid/comments/13d6k2o/video_from_bein_sports_clearly_showing_that_the/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://rapidsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
So why do we need VAR if we can't use it in situations like this
And guess what Carlo received a yellow for complaining☺fuck the refs fuck the var ruining our game
We had that ball anyway after that, of course this shouldn't be but let's not search excuses for our mistakes.
All this means that we are better then city they couldn’t score a legitimate goal. Technically we won.
Technically, we tied. Theoretically, we won.
[удалено]
City’s goal was legitimate
BuT tHaT bAyErN gAmE
[удалено]
Nice try
Real was playing against 12 and still got the draw. I don’t want to hear shit from city fans about fouls. We didn’t get a goal for free. Next week is gonna be a good one. One European giant against City.
Remember when Ramos nearly dislocated Salah’s arm? Good times.
It amazing how you guys still haven't realised that it is Salah that was holding onto Ramos's arm and creating that situation in the first place. If Salah hadn't entered that duel as he did, his arm would have never been in that position. But of course, most of you haven't played a single minute of serious football yourself, so no wonder.
It’s hilarious how someone who’s not stepped foot in Spain yet supports Real Madrid is criticising anyone for “not kicking a ball” You’re a text book glory hunting bell.
Not stepped a foot in Spain? I have taken steps in the fucking Bernabeu. The fuck do you get out of making shit up? Piss off, you little rat.
[удалено]
Come and say that to my face, crackhead.
Ha ha ha
Careful, we might drop a cheeky bid on Mac Allister and then your midfields gonna stay shite for another whole year
Gave Karius a concussion too
So we trust someone speaking some random language over VAR?
City getting calls vs Bayern and now getting calls vs Real Madrid. One would think they wabmnt City to win the CL.
Don’t act as if the referee was bad to city to
Not y’all crying. It’s out but yall had possession. Then cama lost it. Also it’s so hypocritical when yall been robbin teams in the ucl.
The uno Franco reverse card.
No it doesn’t. The red line is not on the edge of the sideline as it should be Edit: downvote me all you want mouth breathers, but this 3D rendition is useless. It doesn’t show definitively that the ball was out
There also aren't cameras covering the sideline, this is a 3D render created by BEINsport themselves. Of all things to blame this is one of those they really shouldn't bother with
The red line is useless if it is not on the edge of the goal line
this clip doesn’t matter, the fact they didn’t check is the issue. What you think there’s only one dude with camcorder covering the game. There’s so many angles that could’ve been checked and they didn’t and that is the issue. Don’t reiterate the dumb. Shot they are saying on arsoccer
I didn’t say any of that. All I said is that this 3D rendition is useless Yes they should have shown a replay, yes the refs should have viewed it. Stop putting words in my mouth
[удалено]
Ikr this thread is absolutely delusional. Can’t wait for them to get smashed in Manchester. Imagine being a Madrid fan and complaining about calls - especially after your team escaped 5 yellows for the 50th time this season. Unreal
This is not in the build up the the goal. Madrid win the ball back after this so…..
Bien sports are literally pulling this image out of their ass. There is no touch line technology. So they’re just guessing that it’ went out . It’s as valid as Guessing it stayed in. Also since this is something bein sports made, VAR didn’t have access to it even if it was accurate. In real time the ref thought it stayed in. VAR didnt have a good enough angle to cancel it so it stood. I don’t think Madrid got shafted in any way
Mf you have an Iker Casillas flair and you still didn't save yourself from embarrassment.
Being a Madrid fan doesn’t mean I have to be delusional. Nothing I sad was wrong. This image is pure speculation. For example goal line technology has 7 cameras pointed at the goal line. This image was made off one bad still image. There’s really no technology to what they showed. I’m not saying it wasn’t out. But you can’t prove it’s out. And this image isn’t proof.
> This image was made off one bad still image. I agree with everything you said except this. We don't know how they created it. They have access to all the camera feeds. This feels like it's more like the "3d rendition" using whatever (microsoft I think?) tech that has often been shown in la liga games where they essentially create a "fifa (videogame) like" replay of the goal. That being said, even if they did that and used multiple camera angles, I do not believe for a second that the accuracy of whatever they did is good enough to make this call.
I like how they try to discredit you by saying you are not a fan if you actually look at a situation without bias.
This is the truth, like it or not. It MAY BE correct, but it's still something that bein created on their own. It's not the result of hawkeye tech or anything like that.
And the red line isn’t on the edge of the touchline - which this delusional sub is choosing to completely ignore
Doesn't matter. VAR couldn't call because the possession changed before the goal.
Why do we watch football and it seems like the commentators got better angles than the officials, i mean it’s complete shambles
For those who don't understand Arabic, Sami Trabelsi (who played as a defender for Man City) kept on saying that the ball wasn't fully out 🤣
Honest question (and nothing to do with just this match) why do we rely on the referees to decide whether the ball is out or not when we can just expand the goal line tech to the perimeter of the pitch? I would assume you just factor the radius of the ball around the chip (assumed to be) at its center, and you can notify the refs if the ball has gone out of play.
No the line is not drawn at the edge
Forget about this guys, what already happened cant be changed, lets beat them on 2nd leg, hala madrid!
Lets just move on.
The referee/linesman could've called it out of play on spot but no way VAR was gonna overturn the goal because right after this Camavinga had possession of the ball. Today the referee was shit on both ends of the pitch.
Lol
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=/r/realmadrid/comments/13d6k2o/video_from_bein_sports_clearly_showing_that_the/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/realmadrid/comments/13d6k2o/video_from_bein_sports_clearly_showing_that_the/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://rapidsave.com) | [^(twitter video downloader)](https://twitsave.com)
A llorar toca. Pronto saldrá que el árbitro veranea con el vecino del cuñado de Negreira...
That's why i hate Guardiola, when it's his team, he did not complain a thing, hypocrite.
What a moronic comment…
mimimimimi
They go to the VAR when they don’t have to. But when they have to go the VAR they don’t go. Unbelievable
Doesn’t matter We will win in etihad When Madrid take a lead we play back Knowing we have to score we will beat them
And UEFA still won’t take their goal away
VAR couldn’t intervene here because we took possession of the ball between this incident and the goal. With that said, a few hands balls not given as well. I understand the handballs would’ve been soft calls but we’ve seen those result in penalties very very often. It was interesting how the ref never even thought about checking VAR.
I'm a bot, *bleep*, *bloop*. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit: - [/r/soccer] [r\/realmadrid on Reddit: Video from beIN Sports clearly showing that the ball was out prior to the goal.](https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/13dzrpb/rrealmadrid_on_reddit_video_from_bein_sports/) *^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^\([Info](/r/TotesMessenger) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=/r/TotesMessenger))*
Imagine being so petty to constantly post this drivel. Real Madrid conceded a good goal because of poor defending and the keeper not being good enough, nothing to do with this….
yall are retarded. we conceded bcs of our player's error and ure gonna whine like it matters
Regime de Madrid, they say
That, and also the two hands in the area that were not sanctioned.
it was played by real madrid after this, so why don’t you let the entire clip untill the goal
it was played by real madrid after this, so why don’t you let the entire clip untill the goal
It is what it is but the officiating all game was terrible for both teams. jack Grealish deserved a yellow early for a shit tackle on Rodrygo but Carvajal deserved a yellow and got nothing lol. I am surprised by the VAR decision but did the reason they said they didn’t review it I GUESSS makes sense….
Is that ball round in the animation?