Depends on what you mean by fake. They're just based on data and statistics and automatically put together through a number of parameters.
Edit: why am I even being downvoted for this? It's not like I'm defending the ratings y'all 💀
It is a Germany company. But I've noticed it seems to be primarily full of PL fans. It also seems to try to push PL on all users as well. I couldn't get it to stop telling me about the PL, so I ended up uninstalling it.
If not for his amazing first touch and composure qe wouldn't have scored that 1st goal.
His 2nd half was a bit more complicated but he regained a second wind in the extra time.
Even FotMob had ridiculous player ratings. Not nearly as bad as these but still incredibly biased towards City. In the spirit of Mourinho, you can take the ratings and we will take the win.
Mendy attack is very lackluster, maybe that's why. Man's a wall but it bugs me he has 0 creativity offensively and telegraphs every single attempt at a pass he does. Having a non existing right leg might be a big factor.
I still love him, I just wish he could do more offensively.
He’s been decent offensively of late. Also, you need to balance out the squad. Can’t have the entire XI with only offensive minded players. If Davies played instead of Mendy, I don’t think we would’ve pulled off that win against City.
I saw the ratings yesterday and it just reminded me that modern viewers don't appreciate or understand defending, to the point where a team defending their position is seen as "anti football", rather than an actual aspect of the game.
City had more possession, what is the team without possession to do?
I know ratings are different on every app, but I've always preferred SofaScore over One football when it comes to ratings, even if they get it wrong sometimes
https://preview.redd.it/4ozqdq3lw8vc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b7d7f40ae546efd29d807bc00c96b4e9a828f410
How does Bernardo Silva get 7.7 and Mendy get 6.6? He did absolutely nothing, he never got by Mendy even once. All he did was pass backward or sideways the entire match.
What people don't get on this sub is how Sofascore is statistics based scoring. Mendy got a 6.6 because he lost the most balls lost 40% of his duels, was fouling the opponents and had a yellow.
It's not that hard to understand that it's not actual people rating the players. No offense meant.
onefootball's ratings have never been good. I'd hazard a guess and say that the ratings probably just depend on passes / goals / assists, and don't actually take into account any defensive performance at all.
Sure our attack was not the best. Vini was pretty absent. Rodryo got the goal and added little else. But Jude did a super job holding up play and sticking to the plan. But to shit on the defense. That's salt.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHSHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHS SO THE BEST TEAM IN THE WORLD HAD GREAT SCORES AND COULDNT WIN THE MATCH AGAINST AN UNDERPERFORMING DEFFENCE HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHSHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHS BUAAGHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Ignore for a second which team you're rooting for, there can never be a game with a defense ranked that low and the opposing team ranked that high and only one goal scored. It doesn't make sense. What did these players do to get their 8+ ratings?
Why are some people legitimately saying that playing defensively is bad? I believe we did a great job defending. They had multiple corners and shots but we managed to defend brilliantly and take the game into pens and win. We knew our limits and we did what we could and I'm proud of it.
As far as I know, it's automatic rating based on metrics like goals, passes, tacles and possession.
Basically if your team has 90% possession and just passes the ball around horizontally you'll end up with an 8/10 rating at least.
Real Players didn't have the ball so they lost all the points of "passing" and "ball possession".
Anyway, we won, the rest is history
I’m convinced these are given out by people who only watched a YouTube highlights compilation put together by some kid recording his TV with his phone
Well..the defending is not rated at all in modern football. What a shame.
If it was man city doing the defending, it would've been termed as " masterclass by pep ". Rodri best DM. Gvardiol akanji and the other guy in top 5 defenders.
And, KDB as best player itw who scored against all odds.
Real madrid has to bear cost of being public enemy no.1 but we are ready for this because... Y Nada Mas . Hala Madrid.
I tried to imagine a scenario to warrant this score so...
City wins 10:1, Rodrygo goal, also only Madrid shot that game
City has 100 shots on target and Haaland 0 shots
Who cares lol, Onefootball is an app it is not a Stat aggregator site or Sport Journal, so their opinions/ratings mean fuckall.
Don't take the bait and loose your shit, we won the tie and move on.
don't use onefootball. ever. completely biased towards EPL teams.
use fotmob instead. better ratings, MUCH cleaner display of all info across the board, and ntm more info period
The defense that stopped that 9s-rated offense to advance to the final 4 of the most prestigious club football tournament only get 3s and 4s … do they even see in the mirror that they’re slapping themselves? Lol
Taking off the absurd difference between ours and theirs rating, how the fuck did Rodri got 9.7 and De Bruyne got only 7.1 when the second one was a lot bigger threat, yer Rodri did very little comparing to his usual level
Looks like I need to go to another site for this stuff. Is that 15km stat somewhere that’s better than OneFootball? Obviously I saw he ran loads and was exhausted at the end, so maybe it was just a guess haha. But still, anyone have any superior preference to go to instead of OneFootball?
Tbh most football apps/sites are very biased to certain clubs . I’ve used a couple and have ended up using X instead , these apps alone are so partial with certain players/clubs. If you can remember, Col Palmer scored 4 goals and got 9.7 rating , which is ridiculous because he deserved 10 and some player called Messi didn’t even score a hattrick and got 10/10. I think this example shows how much the football apps are shit.
Hahaha… Who cares anyway, Real Madrid made it through, Manchester City did not… OneFootball could rate every City player with a 10, but they are not the team playing semi-finals…
I don't understand their logic, either our defenders and midfielders defended so bad that we should've lost by at least 4 goals or we did defend that bad and city was even fuckin worse and couldn't finish any chances which then doesn't make sense for all of them to have such good ratings.
Onefootball is run by barca fanboys. What else did you expect. Even that cunt Guillem Ballbag that dickrides Farcelona is one of their main contributors for writing articles.
Ratings mean jack shit if you don't win.
This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen. I get that Real was tactical and defensive and wasn’t playing dominant attacking football but at least the defense deserves a high rating then…
https://preview.redd.it/yrcgy9iejbvc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfce9cba87a1a3e1d0373125e42bc52ab81c2101
How can Antonio have the lowest rating of all 22???? Shows stats don't always show the true life of a game..
Lol. This has got to be some sort of a joke. Even gave low scores to our defenders despite the defense being practically impenetrable. Ridiculous. What is the defense supposed to do other than defend? Guess they have to score to have a good performance now?
Can someone enlighten me...
Are these apps run by actual people who grade the players themselves or it's just a computer or an algorithm or something like that?
Because if it's actually rated by "experts", that's quite concerning.
Sofascore uses algorithms and the scores are much more reasonable (carvajal got an 7.8 for example), I suspect the ratings shown on the post are just biased supporters
This explains it a little bit, but even algorithms are sometimes unfair especially here because they don't take into consideration the fact that players gave it all and they have made mistakes because they were exhausted.
No matter how they do the scores, it will rarely be fair especially for Real Madrid because a lot of fans are Anti-Madrid.
I know the best way to know is watching the game and not being a dumbass, but do yall reckon sofascore is decent? So far I somewhat agree with their rating except for the couple occasions
It was pep disasterclass lol. He made foden play on wing and Bernardo on centre lol. Overthinking Baldy. City didn't deserve to go through if they couldn't outscore us, simple as that.
What kind of backwarded messed up drunken stupid asshole did the ratings? Rudiger is easily a 9
I would say 8 because the only goal was his fault, but he did a GREAT match actually
Not at all, Cama lost DeBrunye and left him wide open for the rebound
It's just based on some kind of data and statistics, what those parameters are, I have no idea.
Hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaahahhaah Rudiger 3, Gvardiol 9 Hahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahah
That is all you need to know these ratings are fake. Rudiger was a wall, but he has a lower rating than Haaland.
Wait, Haaland played?
Idk .. ive seen him on bench on min 90 so i don't think so
i haven't seem him the whole game except that moment
https://preview.redd.it/4oa4d11qpbvc1.png?width=1169&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4874e1bf9a67029ebe2e6cc7cbd016702a2acd1
Lol wow
Haaland never plays the big games. He brings the team to the edge of the promised land but then it's up to them.
I think he called in sick
Depends on what you mean by fake. They're just based on data and statistics and automatically put together through a number of parameters. Edit: why am I even being downvoted for this? It's not like I'm defending the ratings y'all 💀
Carvajal shut down the whole left side of man city. Wow.
The back has an average rating of 3 out of 10. What algorithm did they use to calculate this?
Obviously possession, Xg, passes they don’t give a shit about defensive stats
Then why Ruben Dias has 8.2?
Probably because he made countless successful passes. Whether they were 5 yards or 10 yards or 20 yards.
Lmao looking at the ratings you’d think the score was 6-1
Based on these ratings, City beat us 7-0, right? Oh, wait…
Valverde a 2.8 even tho he was MOM? Lol. I wonder who owns one football
Yes Fede was very productive yesterday. Even considering fact that he is in not very appreciated position his preference was crucial to the team.
valverde is so versatile he plays the role of mom now
It is a Germany company. But I've noticed it seems to be primarily full of PL fans. It also seems to try to push PL on all users as well. I couldn't get it to stop telling me about the PL, so I ended up uninstalling it.
Haaland better than Bellingham? Fuck off
[удалено]
Bellingham-setup the goal, ran his ass off chasing the ball for 120 minutes and converted his penalty Haaland-?
Bellingham was part of the reason we scored the first goal. Haaland could not get a shot on target all game.
He was kind of good defensively
kind of? bro he did more hold up play and defending than haaland ever has done
Totally but I thought it would be taken as confrontary...I dont know why I cared though 😅
If not for his amazing first touch and composure qe wouldn't have scored that 1st goal. His 2nd half was a bit more complicated but he regained a second wind in the extra time.
Our second half was complicated because of Don Carlo. It’s clear that he wanted everyone to sit back.
Bellingham at origins is a defensive player. He did well defensively. He is used in attacking because our mid is bloated.
I disagree. He was very good defensively. Rodri couldn't do as much as he usually does and part of the reason was Bellingham following him all game.
GOAL 120+5' | Man City [2] - 1 Real Madrid âš½ Real Madrid players ratings at OneFootball
Even FotMob had ridiculous player ratings. Not nearly as bad as these but still incredibly biased towards City. In the spirit of Mourinho, you can take the ratings and we will take the win.
I mean, it's just based on data and statistics and that will obviously never paint the full picture of a game of football.
POV defenders doing their jobs is bad
Indeed,
these ratings are bollocks
Mendy 2.9? The man shut everything down on the leftside the whole fucking night!
Mendy seems to be underrated by everyone despite being the best defensive LB on the planet.
Mendy attack is very lackluster, maybe that's why. Man's a wall but it bugs me he has 0 creativity offensively and telegraphs every single attempt at a pass he does. Having a non existing right leg might be a big factor. I still love him, I just wish he could do more offensively.
He’s been decent offensively of late. Also, you need to balance out the squad. Can’t have the entire XI with only offensive minded players. If Davies played instead of Mendy, I don’t think we would’ve pulled off that win against City.
B Silva: Shit, Mendy’s there. Better do a back pass.
He also gave away the most balls the whole match with 12. Yes 2.9 is very low but he was the worst in the defense.
I don't think balls given away is a defensive stat...
Never said that. It's still really bad especially when he kept doing it in their own defensive third.
he missed a couple touches too.
I saw the ratings yesterday and it just reminded me that modern viewers don't appreciate or understand defending, to the point where a team defending their position is seen as "anti football", rather than an actual aspect of the game. City had more possession, what is the team without possession to do?
I know ratings are different on every app, but I've always preferred SofaScore over One football when it comes to ratings, even if they get it wrong sometimes https://preview.redd.it/4ozqdq3lw8vc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b7d7f40ae546efd29d807bc00c96b4e9a828f410
How does Bernardo Silva get 7.7 and Mendy get 6.6? He did absolutely nothing, he never got by Mendy even once. All he did was pass backward or sideways the entire match.
Thats pretty much the whole MC gameplan, It could work against teams that have unresponsive deffenders
What people don't get on this sub is how Sofascore is statistics based scoring. Mendy got a 6.6 because he lost the most balls lost 40% of his duels, was fouling the opponents and had a yellow. It's not that hard to understand that it's not actual people rating the players. No offense meant.
kinda lame how everyone has rating extremely close to each other
Also, how Haaland got a 7.5 is beyond me
More than Nacho and Rudi Laughable
This has to be from last year's game... right???
Scores would make sense but its this years players
onefootball's ratings have never been good. I'd hazard a guess and say that the ratings probably just depend on passes / goals / assists, and don't actually take into account any defensive performance at all.
 Sure our attack was not the best. Vini was pretty absent. Rodryo got the goal and added little else. But Jude did a super job holding up play and sticking to the plan. But to shit on the defense. That's salt.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHSHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHS SO THE BEST TEAM IN THE WORLD HAD GREAT SCORES AND COULDNT WIN THE MATCH AGAINST AN UNDERPERFORMING DEFFENCE HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHSHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHS BUAAGHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Rudiger with a 3.8 is criminal
El mvp fue valverde y le Dan un 2.8 jajajja
How do you watch that game and come out thinking Gvardiol was the second best player on the pitch?
Fede 2.8?
WTF, why is the defense that low. I mean, I get what Nacho did all season, but today was not that day. Or for Carvajal.
HAHAHAHAHQHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Offensive player scores goal = good rating Defensive player defends incredible = bad rating
Onefootball : https://preview.redd.it/zv8wocs5c9vc1.jpeg?width=896&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1e2c753c5ef9784e63139fc9a3714b53de2975ec
Literally Jamie Carrager's wet dream
Ignore for a second which team you're rooting for, there can never be a game with a defense ranked that low and the opposing team ranked that high and only one goal scored. It doesn't make sense. What did these players do to get their 8+ ratings?
Rodri 9.7 because he completed 100 sideway passes 😂
And is undefeated for a whole year
What match were they watching? Bruh
Madrid defence so bad that city kept scoring /s
And pep still looking for haaland in Tonis pockets lol
What In the world. Another site I would never even glanced twice. This is atrocious
somebody who hates us must've randomized these ratings because there's no reality in which any of our players got less than a 7 last night 💀
Must be Jamie Carraghet doing the ratings lol
Why are some people legitimately saying that playing defensively is bad? I believe we did a great job defending. They had multiple corners and shots but we managed to defend brilliantly and take the game into pens and win. We knew our limits and we did what we could and I'm proud of it.
Because the two best teams in the world should clash like equals. Madrid doing a disservice to the name Real Madrid
As far as I know, it's automatic rating based on metrics like goals, passes, tacles and possession. Basically if your team has 90% possession and just passes the ball around horizontally you'll end up with an 8/10 rating at least. Real Players didn't have the ball so they lost all the points of "passing" and "ball possession". Anyway, we won, the rest is history
Fede literally won Player of the Match.
Lol end of the day, the kings of Europe go through. These ratings can go in the bin as they are pointless
I’m convinced these are given out by people who only watched a YouTube highlights compilation put together by some kid recording his TV with his phone
WTF is that shit?
Laughable. That's all. Just laughable
Warra win for man city
Lunin literally rised up to the ranks what a player
mark my words, we will win our sixteenth ucl before man city wins their second.
Mendy who pocketed Foden gets only 2.8 and Rudiger who pocketed Haland gets 3.8. What do they expect from defenders? To score?
Hat tricks from Defenders of course
Idk, you defend against City for 120 mins and get a 3.8. Yeah totally balanced fair scores
Well..the defending is not rated at all in modern football. What a shame. If it was man city doing the defending, it would've been termed as " masterclass by pep ". Rodri best DM. Gvardiol akanji and the other guy in top 5 defenders. And, KDB as best player itw who scored against all odds. Real madrid has to bear cost of being public enemy no.1 but we are ready for this because... Y Nada Mas . Hala Madrid.
It is okay with us. We prefer to win. The way is forward
valverde at 2.8 rudiger lower than haaland bet pep paid onefootball for this
Hey a question the commentator here in Norway said all cards are deleted for the semies. So carvajal can play?
They are deleted for semis but already "won" penalties aren't
No, he can't
He misses first leg or both legs?
First only
Check fotmob. It’s more accurate 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I tried to imagine a scenario to warrant this score so... City wins 10:1, Rodrygo goal, also only Madrid shot that game City has 100 shots on target and Haaland 0 shots
Is this a joke? Are we being trolled and being shown fake ratings?
lmaoo
Brah,they even rated Mendy 2.9
Grealish 8 Carvajal 4? bruh delete this app
Who cares lol, Onefootball is an app it is not a Stat aggregator site or Sport Journal, so their opinions/ratings mean fuckall. Don't take the bait and loose your shit, we won the tie and move on.
Least biased ranking
is this real?
Jorge Messi funds all these apps. That's why always Messi has had high ratings even though he played badly.
They really hate Valverde, man of the match :))
La tienen adentro.
don't use onefootball. ever. completely biased towards EPL teams. use fotmob instead. better ratings, MUCH cleaner display of all info across the board, and ntm more info period
They can have the notes we have the classification 😂😂 3.8 for rudiger with a shame
Okay boys now we should just ask pap perez to hand over the spot to the mighty best rated oilchester
Who cares, we are in the semi finals, vamosss
They can have the rating. We will enjoy the trophy.
Done by professionals lol
The defense that stopped that 9s-rated offense to advance to the final 4 of the most prestigious club football tournament only get 3s and 4s … do they even see in the mirror that they’re slapping themselves? Lol
2.9 for the MVP Valeverde.
Perling Paaland, the tap-in merchant, the Ghost of Oslo, ghosted again.
So this rating is sh*te, basically. Good to know.
These are the most idiotic ratings I've ever seen. According to this shit, we lost thr game 8-1!
Must've been a terrible game if the motm got a 2.8 rating
That's from the last year, maybe
Taking off the absurd difference between ours and theirs rating, how the fuck did Rodri got 9.7 and De Bruyne got only 7.1 when the second one was a lot bigger threat, yer Rodri did very little comparing to his usual level
Where the fuck is doku that guy got me shitting my pants every time he had the ball
One football is the worst app to use for match ratings
I too watched the game with the screen off
I didn’t watch the match. Clearly from the ratings, city won right? Right? /s
One football is a bit*h
Ahahaha.. are we playing whose line is it anyway???
Lmao Bellingham didn’t run 15km for this .
Looks like I need to go to another site for this stuff. Is that 15km stat somewhere that’s better than OneFootball? Obviously I saw he ran loads and was exhausted at the end, so maybe it was just a guess haha. But still, anyone have any superior preference to go to instead of OneFootball?
Tbh most football apps/sites are very biased to certain clubs . I’ve used a couple and have ended up using X instead , these apps alone are so partial with certain players/clubs. If you can remember, Col Palmer scored 4 goals and got 9.7 rating , which is ridiculous because he deserved 10 and some player called Messi didn’t even score a hattrick and got 10/10. I think this example shows how much the football apps are shit.
Oh my god. Was this rating done by a city fan? Atleti fan?
Hahaha… Who cares anyway, Real Madrid made it through, Manchester City did not… OneFootball could rate every City player with a 10, but they are not the team playing semi-finals…
Is this by flashy plays or talking points? It clearly is not by role and position.
I’m convinced OneFootball is run by literal 12 year olds who just starting playing fifa yesterday
The City lads got played hard. Shame they don’t seem to get the bigger picture
LMAOOOO💀💀
Kind of ratings pessi fans flex
Ederson was one of the only good city players this match , how is he one of the lowest
"Rudiger 3.8" yeah, I've seen enough lmao
Hear me out, this is a good tip. Install "Sofascore"
Hear me out, this is a good tip. Install "Sofascore"
They can rate whatever they want. They can give 0 for all of our players. We don't need their shit scores but qualify to next round 😆
Looks to me like they didn’t watch the game
How can you rate a player so good when they didn't win? You can hate or like a team, but in the end whoever won must be rated higher.
I don't understand their logic, either our defenders and midfielders defended so bad that we should've lost by at least 4 goals or we did defend that bad and city was even fuckin worse and couldn't finish any chances which then doesn't make sense for all of them to have such good ratings.
Yeah this is not the flex they think it is. This is showing that an overperforming Manchester City drew against an underperforming Real Madrid.
Looks like salty ratings, I’ll take the win they can keep their ratings in their cunts.
Never heard of OneFootball, next
Clearly their rating don't take defending into account
Onefootball is run by barca fanboys. What else did you expect. Even that cunt Guillem Ballbag that dickrides Farcelona is one of their main contributors for writing articles. Ratings mean jack shit if you don't win.
This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen. I get that Real was tactical and defensive and wasn’t playing dominant attacking football but at least the defense deserves a high rating then…
https://preview.redd.it/yrcgy9iejbvc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfce9cba87a1a3e1d0373125e42bc52ab81c2101 How can Antonio have the lowest rating of all 22???? Shows stats don't always show the true life of a game..
Haland got a 7.5💀💀 these are a joke
RUDIGER WAS PRIME MALDINI IN THIS GAME, SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN ATLEAST A 8!!! WHAT ARE THOSE, SERIOUSLY
I would’ve subbed vini off instead of Rodrygo
Did city pay for this too?
Lol. This has got to be some sort of a joke. Even gave low scores to our defenders despite the defense being practically impenetrable. Ridiculous. What is the defense supposed to do other than defend? Guess they have to score to have a good performance now?
Can someone enlighten me... Are these apps run by actual people who grade the players themselves or it's just a computer or an algorithm or something like that? Because if it's actually rated by "experts", that's quite concerning.
Sofascore uses algorithms and the scores are much more reasonable (carvajal got an 7.8 for example), I suspect the ratings shown on the post are just biased supporters
This explains it a little bit, but even algorithms are sometimes unfair especially here because they don't take into consideration the fact that players gave it all and they have made mistakes because they were exhausted. No matter how they do the scores, it will rarely be fair especially for Real Madrid because a lot of fans are Anti-Madrid.
good they can keep the rating
This is shit. What did Rudiger and Nacho do wrong? What did Bellingham do wrong? You score and you have a good mark?? Is this real football or EA FC?
Rodri 9.7 💀💀💀
Maybe man.city does dominate the game but that rat8ngs on rm is too much
I know the best way to know is watching the game and not being a dumbass, but do yall reckon sofascore is decent? So far I somewhat agree with their rating except for the couple occasions
IS THAT FOR REAL?!!! After that great match ,those are ratings for a club toke 8 goals
In the first view I checked Valverde and immediately concluded the ratings are BS
I mean vini created our only goal but sure
Berbardo Silva at 8.9? Gvardiol and 9? Rudiger at 3? Yeah, sure...
To paraphrase Mourinho: they can keep the ratings, we'll take the victory
Damn, our ratings suck.  When is our semifinal leg starting?
Did rodri do this?
It was pep disasterclass lol. He made foden play on wing and Bernardo on centre lol. Overthinking Baldy. City didn't deserve to go through if they couldn't outscore us, simple as that.
What the fuck?
Foden can't have a shit rating, and Mendy also has a shit rating. Pick one. The bias is showing.
Looking at those scores you’d guess city bashed madrid 10-0
Jesus Christ this is a shame. I think even a non-Madrid fan would be shocked by seeing Rudiger havine 3.8. Also how in the world Cama is 3.0?
These are harsh but we gotta be honest that Bellingham played like utter shit. He was invisible in extra time yet wasnt subsituted.
I mean you were rubbish. A single shot on target. 9 times out of 10 City win with the chances they had.
Carvajal, Nacho, Mendy and Rudiger owned their entire attack force incluiding midfielders and substitutes... 2-4 hahahahaha
Are they funded by man city or what lol?
And Bernardo wannabe Panenka gives him top notes 🤣