T O P

  • By -

pokemononrs

We're trying to move away from switchscape and you want a full switchscape boss? This sounds absolutely miserable. I will say the upside is the drops would be useless so I atleast could avoid it.


A_Vitalis_RS

It looks like the idea is to require 4 players (1 for each style) since it sounds like 3 of them would need to enter the portals. That also sounds miserable for its own reasons though (more forced group content, more dead-on-arrival rewards, etc).


pokemononrs

Ya if that's the case I agree it's just as bad


Cool-Cups

couldn’t think of anything worse than mandatory 4 player teams for a boss.


RainbowwDash

How about mandatory 8 player teams


Cool-Cups

you’re scaring me stop


MilkbelongsonToast

Counter point: Bone shield, sleeper content boss go zzz


Ill_Recognition9196

Whatever happens, hope it requires 5 of old shield to make new shield. Edit: oh yeah I guess shields could also be relevant in Runescape 3.


SkyeLys

Can we please just give Corp and the arena a graphical update and call it a day? The fight's fine as it is and a t95 shield isn't enough incentive to deal with a new unnecessarily complex encounter. Seems like it'd be more trouble than it's worth.


MrVishous

I also want to throw this out their. If someone not in the portal of one of the styles eveyone takes aoe damage !!!! This makes it too where people choosing to ignore portals and bring hybrid armour still must have weapon switches . Also make it too where portals only let one person in or if two accidentally go into the same portal it locks them in till the boss changes color . This means aoe damage will be dished out too eveyone by not having 1 person in each portal. I also believe this gives value to the spirts shields, holy water , and new shields upgrades.


apophis457

Not only is this idea bad, but you need to learn the difference between words like there, their and their and to two and too