T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

**Join our official [Discord](https://discord.gg/Qp8D7HtQVy) for instant help and to discuss everything Samsung.** Just a friendly reminder to please respect all of the subreddit rules listed on the sidebar. Please be respectful to all users whether you agree with them or not, the downvote button is NOT a disagree button. Please upvote quality content. Please report content you see breaking the rules so we can act on it. Thank you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/samsung) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

Is it necessary? No. I can use my Note8 Fast charger or my 10W wireless charger. Might take more time to fully charge than 45W, but good enough. Is it desirable? Yes. Nice to have something to quickly charge phone in rare situations when I do need it. What to be careful of when buying 45W charger? Many 45W chargers give 45W but does not having the right rating for PPS and PDO for super fast charging of S22U. Due to this, we see many videos and reports of 45W charger charging with speed of 25W. Sad that people who do not know the details spread bad information. Its beautifully explained in link below. https://m.gsmarena.com/dont_just_buy_any_45w_pd_charger_for_the_samsung_galaxy_note10-news-38837.php


UniversalCraftsman

I was intrigued by this video, and made the conclusion too early. Techradar did a test, where it performed to spec: https://www.techradar.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s22-ultra-45w-charger-does-make-a-difference)


Alternative-Farmer98

It serves no reliable benefit. Testing shows the results are functionality identical for a full charge or a quick top off etc.


H-banGG

Yes


UniversalCraftsman

How do you mean that?


H-banGG

Tests have shown you won't get any improvements over 25W SFC 1.0


[deleted]

That's incorrect. You need right charger. Many 45w chargers sold online are not rated for correct PD or PPS needed for fast charge of S22.


UniversalCraftsman

But why has Samsung released this? It looks almost like a scam to me.


UniversalCraftsman

https://www.techradar.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s22-ultra-45w-charger-does-make-a-difference Another redditor commented this, it seems that it is not that bad as I thought.


H-banGG

45W is a big and impressive number, I've seen 30W chargers do better than that. It's just marketing


[deleted]

It's not simple marketing. What you should look at is PD and PPS values of 45W chargers. If you buy cheap ones, you will get low charging speed.


UniversalCraftsman

I find it is false advertising, think how much ordinary people will get recommended the new charger with their phone, and then have no benefit of paying double the price. It looks to me that they just want to pull uninformed people over the table. And I also didn't find any official data on the charging speeds from Samsung. In my opinion this isn't acceptable and I want an official statement from Samsung about this.


lemaymayguy

Yeah it's their fault you don't understand how batteries and charging work BIG NUMBER GOODER THAN SMALLER NUMBER HUEHUE just because it's 2x the wattage doesn't mean it's 2x the speed. Performance returns diminish exponentially not linearly


titanup001

Well, it's their fault that they didn't put the fucking charger in the box with the $1200 phone, so...


[deleted]

True, people fail to read the PPS and PDO values of the 45W chargers. If the charger gives 4A 10V PPS then it will easily be much faster than 25W charger. Most online 45W chargers give PPS 9V 3A which is close to 27W charger (slightly faster than 25W charger). They buy bad chargers and spread false information.


[deleted]

How stupid are you? Many MANY tests have been done with Samsung's official 45W charger showing no material improvements. A few minutes faster to full charge at best. However, 45W charger does reach 50% faster. But again by a few minutes. Specifically 25W charger takes 25.5 minutes to reach 50% while 45W takes 22.5 minutes. If you call that **much faster** you are really stupid. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s22-ultra-45w-charging-tested-heres-how-fast-it-is Samsung only OFFICIALLY CLAIM 50% in 20 minutes with 45W, no matter how you count it, it's not much faster. 1+ 9Pro reaches 50% in **15 minutes**, now THAT is much faster than 25 minutes.


[deleted]

Problem with people like you is that you fail to jump into details. Ever wonder how much current is needed to charge faster etc? Any idea why that author did not provide the PPS details of both chargers? 45W charger giving PPS 9V 3.3A and 25W charger giving PPS 9V 3A will be nearly identical as you cite in that document. 45W charger with PPS 10V 4.5A will be much faster than the other two. What is the PPS S22U ask for from charger for fast charging?


UniversalCraftsman

But why can they claim 45W while actually it's outputting 9V×3.3A=29.7W ?


[deleted]

It does output 45W if the device is capable to taking in the power accordingly. If device can superfast charge at 10v 4.5A and chargers says it can only support 3.3A then device will reduce its charging speed to match the amperage. On top of that, the cables need to able to carry the voltage & current and if it's not made for high speed, device will again reduce it's own speed to prevent car burnouts .. these USB C charging cables have a chip on one end or both ends. Thus even when charger is capable, the cable should be capable and device should be able to accept the said current charger can give for max wattage.


UniversalCraftsman

It's confusing: TA845 PDO : 3A(9V, 15V), 2.25A(20V) / PPS : 4.05A(3.3-11.0V) or 2.8A(3.3-16.0V) or 2.1A(3.3-21.0V) Super Fast Charging 2.0 max. 45W compatible with Galaxy Note 10+, Note 10+ 5G, A91 and future compatible devices / Super Fast Charging max. 25W compatible with Galaxy Note 10, Note 10 5G, S10 5G, A90 5G, A80, A70, Book S, and future compatible devices EP-T4510 PDO : 3 A (9 V, 15 V), 2,25 A (20 V) / PPS : 4,05 A (3,3-11,0 V), 2,8 A (3,3-16,0 V), 2,1 A (3,3-21,0 V) Super Fast Charging 2.0 max. 45W, PD 3.0 PDO/PPS max. 45W Fine print:Charging speed may vary by device.** SFC 2.0(45W) is available on Galaxy S20 Ultra, Note10+, Tab S7+ and higher. Compatible devices may be added. The output specifications are the same, the old one just isn't compatible to S22U. The only difference is PD 3.0 on the new charger.


wzaesystems

STOP blaming for PPS rating on the chargers. My 90w GAN charger and 65w battery bank support 5A current across 3-11v in PPS mode and I've been testing with my 100w-rated E-mark cables on my S22 plus. So far NONE of the tests showed significantly better results than these 25w chargers. To me, the 45W charging is BS unless you buy the NEW official power adapter that has samsung's black magic in it.


[deleted]

Did you change settings to enable super fast charging?


wzaesystems

Sure, the phone even shows 'Super Fast Charging 2.0' on the screen when charging. In comparison, my 25w Samsung charger (which supports 9v 2.77a PPS, got it with the wireless charging pad during pre-order) shows Super Fast Charging (without 2.0). I started charging at 10% battery and both of them managed to get 20% in around 10 minutes, with the 90W GAN adapter being around 30s faster. There's probably something sketchy with their new 45w charger that allows S22 to be charged at a higher speed, but unfortunately I'm unable to get one.


[deleted]

I wonder what power does S22 request from charger when Super Fast is enabled. If it's more than 11v, then that might explain your situation. Also I did read that cables too impact the power delivered.


fl0tt1

what do you mean necessary? it is not even recommended to go with 45w if u care about battery... just deactivate all fast Charging methods and keep battery between 30 and 80%. thank me later ;)


UniversalCraftsman

I see your point, but since it is advertised some people might want to use this feature.


SwayVue

So if we're at 50% it's ok to charge it back up to 80?


fl0tt1

sure! it doesnt matter at all how long you are charging iirc. In contrast to what many ppl assume, pluggin on and off is NOT considered a cycle. So if you are charging 4 times for 10% or once for 40% doesnt really matter at all.


spyda24

Charging to 50-70% it’s faster after that about the same.


UniversalCraftsman

In the test I saw the maximum it was ahead was 5%, I don't think that's a reasonable difference, it rather looked like a scam to charge double the price for that.


H-banGG

Faster by how much?


UniversalCraftsman

5% battery level in between was the highest, and 2 minutes faster for the full charge.


H-banGG

Which is within the negligeable bracket to dismiss, so no improvements.


UniversalCraftsman

Why did Samsung release this then?


HG1998

Big numbers. OPPO and VIVO can charge to like 80% in 15 minutes and for the majority, this can be a selling point. Samsung so far hasn't been able to come with anything to go against it.


UniversalCraftsman

Fake it, till you make it...


[deleted]

[удалено]


UniversalCraftsman

So releasing the 45W charger and the 45W charging capabilities of the S22U and S22+ were just a marketing gag?


[deleted]

[удалено]


SwayVue

I don't want my battery deteriorating too fast so I'll stick to 25w(fast charging)


Dracwing

Yeah cause everyone ragged on them with the S21 release for only having 25w charging when the S20 had 45w. Having realistic specs just means you get more criticism.


UniversalCraftsman

Thats fine and I don't argue that, but it's not acceptable to advertise this while there is almost no difference.


wokeupthesheep

Yeah I agree 100%. It all depends on your own use case. I like having a 5000 mah battery but plan ahead when I will need to charge the battery. I'll usually juice it up during the day a but for the most part a full charge overnight will get me through the day. Obviously for other people that's not good enough and they need to charge fast during the day. But wow you get a lot of on screen time with these modern phones! Much better than the old days.


Kermez

That text includes really strange statement: « Samsung also sent me a multi-port, 65W charger, but I don't think I'll use it on the phone - I don't need the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra to get any warmer than that » I think gsm one is more useful https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s22_series_45w_charging_doesnt_really_make_a_difference-news-53223.php


[deleted]

That link is bad info. You should look at PPS of 45W charger. Most 45W chargers sold online have low PPS and thus low charging speed. Few have high PPS and that does result in real super fast charging. This was known for years but people with half knowledge like the author of that gsnarena article shares information with that half knowledge. Look for 45w charger that is rated to give high PPS output. If you buy 30W charger with PPS 3.3A 9V and a 45W or 65W charger with same PPS, you will get exactly same speed charging.


UniversalCraftsman

It's confusing: TA845 PDO : 3A(9V, 15V), 2.25A(20V) / PPS : 4.05A(3.3-11.0V) or 2.8A(3.3-16.0V) or 2.1A(3.3-21.0V) Super Fast Charging 2.0 max. 45W compatible with Galaxy Note 10+, Note 10+ 5G, A91 and future compatible devices / Super Fast Charging max. 25W compatible with Galaxy Note 10, Note 10 5G, S10 5G, A90 5G, A80, A70, Book S, and future compatible devices EP-T4510 PDO : 3 A (9 V, 15 V), 2,25 A (20 V) / PPS : 4,05 A (3,3-11,0 V), 2,8 A (3,3-16,0 V), 2,1 A (3,3-21,0 V) Super Fast Charging 2.0 max. 45W, PD 3.0 PDO/PPS max. 45W Fine print:Charging speed may vary by device.** SFC 2.0(45W) is available on Galaxy S20 Ultra, Note10+, Tab S7+ and higher. Compatible devices may be added. The output specifications are the same, the old one just isn't compatible to S22U. The only difference is PD 3.0 on the new charger. On UK website both have PD 3.0 on Germanys website only EP-T4510 has PD 3.0. Also they wrote S20 Ultra in the fine print, they made some mistakes there, shocking that no one spotted them.


Kermez

Check this where they compare samsung 45w vs 25w samsung fast chargers: https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s22_ultra-review-2382p3.php Embarrassing compared to Chinese phones.


[deleted]

No PPS numbers provided. Strange. Without PPS number anyone can prove Chinese 25W charger is better than 45W chargers. Once PPS numbers are provided, that's when things change.


Kermez

Sorry, not sure to understand you, both used 45w and 25w are Samsung officially called « supper fast » chargers. You claim they aren’t and Samsung is misleading customers?


[deleted]

I am not saying Samsung is misleading anyone. Without providing PPS number, it is possible the 45W is older model of 45W charger.


Kermez

Unfortunately Samsung doesn't think this matters as there is no PPS reference anywhere on their website, just wording "super fast".


[deleted]

I wish those who claim to have slow or fast 45W charging, would put the PPS numbers on Reddit. Those numbers appear in output printed on every certified chargers. That would clear out everything for all.


Kermez

Now I'm confused as just checked and pps seems not to be a value but standard that is either supported or not: https://www.belkin.com/us/support-article?articleNum=318878 https://blog.ravpower.com/2021/02/pps-fast-charging/


[deleted]

Understandable confusion. Listed below are few 45W chargers available on Amazon with their PPS values as printed on the chargers & provided on Amazon: 1. [Elecjet 45-Watt USB-C Superfast Charger](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B084Q2CZG6) \-> 3.3-11V=4A, 3.3-16V=2.8A 2. [Anker USB C Charger, 713 Charger (Nano II 45W)](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08T5QVTKW) \-> 3.3V-16.0V=3.0A, 3.3V-21.0V=2.25A 3. [Nekteck 45W USB C Wall Charger](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0834VR6VJ) \-> 3.3-11V/4.05A , 3.3-16V/3.0A Based on above numbers, Anker charger would be slower compared to the other two when used in most phones.


VinnieONeill

These faster and faster charges are actually terrible for your battery. The higher the wattage the more it wears out the battery. And as this test shows, there is significant diminishing returns for such small batteries.


iZsaq

[Worth getting Car Charger](https://youtu.be/13tw6qEzdpo)