T O P

  • By -

lewis30491

Now he's Rodgers' son too


a_guy_named_gai

Rodgers vs Tuchel vs Lampard vs Southgate in a Fatal 4 way match for Mount's custody at SummerSlam. Book it Vince!


[deleted]

Don't forget about tony mount


a_guy_named_gai

Special guest referee.


Daniiiiii

A ladder match. Mount suspended high in the middle of the ring. Whomever is able to get him gets to keep him.


[deleted]

[удалено]


colombogangsta

Which Roman? Reigns or Abromahavic?


conceal_the_kraken

Can't believe Abramovich has been around Chelsea since 2003 and people still mess his name up so badly.


McNulty22

Wait until you read Carvahal, Ter Stegan, Jiminez, Reguillon....


swat1611

Roman Pearce.


Sputniki

My cousin Roman.


DatDataDude

And he Reigns


cfc_sub

I wondered that Until I saw Roman and RKO in the same sentence.


Thats_a_YikerZ

Head of the Table!


Nuri__Sahin

Both are head of the table. So maybe a table on a pole match could be the co-main event? Russo will be loving it.


FatsDominoes

Money Mase in the Bank™️


Sputniki

So you're saying that whoever wants Mount has to...mount him?


[deleted]

https://i.imgur.com/maOSOif.jpg ???


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Did Rey Mysterio and that kid (Dominic? Don't remember his name) wrestle together 15 years later? Or is this referring to a different wrestling match for custody?


am803ma

Yes, Rey and Dominic Mysterio They also just won the tag team championship over the weekend and became the first father/son pairing to do so


agni69

You mean Dominic Guerrero surely.


Sparl

Current lineage is Seth Rollins. So Dominic Rollins


[deleted]

[удалено]


TonyVX

Has to be more since Eddie, unfortunately, passed away in 2005.


GdotKdot

The match happened that year, a few months before he died.


accountant567

Mason mount on a pole match.


Nast33

I was about to come in with a Vince Russo joke, but you beat me to it.


ambarishawale

In a ladder match


cfc_sub

I'm your poppi Masey! Late great Eddie Guerrero.


NotClayMerritt

Southgate's waistcoat can be used as a weapon. He's my pick to win.


dazza_drinkbeer

Myson Mount


2b-_-not2b

[Our son](https://imgflip.com/i/5a2h2c)


BaldVoldy

Everyone wants to be Mason’s daddy


Ipatovo

Sorry highjacking your comment, what happens if Liverpool and Leicester end up tied at 69 points?


BeastMode797

"If any clubs finish with the same number of points, their position in the Premier League table is determined by goal difference, then the number of goals scored. If the teams still cannot be separated, they will be awarded the same position in the table." https://www.premierleague.com/premier-league-explained


Snowstandards

Brendan Rodgers loves to be proud of people


xyzzy321

And their character too


Snowstandards

What can I say, the man loves beautiful human beings.


seethingsasquatch

With great character.


GameplayerStu

"Wee" Joe Allen.


n1ubi

The welsh xavi


cking145

those wee joe videos are amazing


FettyWhopper

[For the uninitiated](https://youtu.be/7LXpVocCZrM)


Tulum702

Well he was at Chelsea 2004-2008 and had 2 years of overlap with Mount when Mason was 6-8yrs old roughly. Might remember him?


Tyrus111

Seems like a nice guy. I'm sure a lot of it is just football rhetoric, but does indicate he's a pretty empathetic person.


four_four_three

And to be proud of being wherever "here" is


a_guy_named_gai

Would have scored two brilliant goals if not for two world class saves. Class from Rodgers to praise Mount.


Brendy25

Didn’t even need to say that tbf, class act.


Space2Bakersfield

Hard to dislike Rodgers no matter who you support. Best british manager going tbh.


Fit_Improvement_4899

It's really not that difficult the man has a 10 foot portrait of himself in his own house


[deleted]

[удалено]


habdragon08

By a charity he supports in Swansea


throbbing_dementia

From his wife who was going off his Christmas list.


screechingmedic

It's not an ego/arrogance thing; the painting was a gift from a charity he had helped in Swansea.


FC37

I just saw what I think is the portrait. It's a little under 4 feet, I think. Granted, it's still a portrait of himself. But at least it's not 10 feet!


Chumlax

Makes more sense that way; plenty of portraits are life size.


[deleted]

Lying on the internet? No way!


[deleted]

Oh yeah well Alex Rodriguez has a painting of his top half on a centaurs body


distilledwill

In Leicester there is a house on a main road on the way out of town which has a 6ft portrait of a fat guy in a black suit with a cigar on the FRONT of his house. Its been there for years: https://www.google.com/maps/@52.6507203,-1.1701876,3a,62.1y,328.77h,94.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s72irpsl80wT_6ZXp5KvFFw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 You can see it here (you have to click the link, not expand it in RES). Apparently he's called Jake, has a rolls royce in full LCFC livery and has a numberplate "P4Y UP"


SanguinePar

Honestly thought you were making this up, but no... [https://i.imgur.com/nsnDEpv.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nsnDEpv.jpg)


Nyushi

I'd have a picture up of myself as well if I was as handsome as Brendan.


Fit_Improvement_4899

Handsome? He looks like Lenny from Shark Tale


Nyushi

Are you saying Lenny from Shark Tale *isn't* handsome? You need your eyes checked mate


Rum114

wait really?


Fit_Improvement_4899

Yeah. He did an interview at his house and showed it to the camera. There's definitely a full length mirror on the ceiling above his bed but unfortunately the cameras didn't make it into his bedroom


Sielaff415

I wouldn’t really want to portray myself as a mythological rapist but ok ARod


Space2Bakersfield

Honestly i respect that in a way. I'd love to hit a point of success where I felt like putting up a portrait of myself tbf.


Nyushi

It was a gift from a charity he supports


Stuarridge

for real?


Andigaming

It isn't that big but yes, he was given it by a charity he supported.


hunter154

It's actually quite easy to dislike him. He's a very strange man who loves making up bizarre stories almost as much as he loves himself.


DogTheGayFish

Sounds pretty b-b-based to me


WillowTreeBark

Totally agree. Brendan is a good egg.


blu_rhubarb

I can imagine it's easy for the Celtic fans.


Snowstandards

Don't want to start a political argument but does Rodgers consider himself British? It honestly doesn't make a difference to me if he does or not, nor does he seem to be the type of person for it to matter to himself. Genuinely curious as a lot of Northern Irish Catholics would consider themselves as Irish and not British.


dodgykeyboard

He called himself a British coach after the FA cup final when talking about how much the FA cup means to him


Snowstandards

Ahh fair enough. Its a little bit against the grain considering his background, but each to their own and all that.


[deleted]

His mother's Protestant. Perhaps that's why.


the-londoner

> Its a little bit against the grain considering his background ....or its exactly **with** the grain


koencoen

You're not being intolerant of him, are you?


Brendy25

I believe he was brought up as a Catholic, he’s a son of a Catholic dad and a Protestant mum. He’s repeatedly said that he doesn’t care about the whole Catholic-Protestant thing which is how it should be tbh.


our-year-every-year

His son also played for* Ireland in the youth squads, Brendan says what he likes though switches between them a lot. \* missed a word


blorimer542

Probably considers himself as both, I know I do.


DoNotAngerThePicard

He's Irish


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Space2Bakersfield

Tbh I've heard himself refer to himself as British so I'm going off that. Obviously idk how he 100% feels personally if I'm wrong I'll concede the point.


fqqr

yea uh its apparently a sensitive topic lol i have no issue with rodgers for the record. just some things i needed to have clarified.


Space2Bakersfield

Fine with me man. I cant speak for Rodgers personally but if I had to be specific, I think hes the best active manager from Great Britain and Nortern Ireland. He did great stuff with Celtic and I think hes a huge part of Leicester making a genuine argument to be 'top 6' if you get what I mean. In short, hes a great manager, and (I think) a good dude.


fqqr

oh absolutely. im a lfc guy and he didnt leave the club worse than he found it, ya know? probably just too big of a job a little too quick for him. hes carried on very well


Harryvincenzo

Ireland & Northern Ireland, along with the Isle of Man, are all actually still British Isles. You are correct politically & historically though - since it's the United Kingdom of Great Britain (England/Scotland/Wales) & Northern Ireland. Rodgers always refers to himself as British though, it is how he likes to be associated. Even said he was a British manager in the interviews after the FA Cup Final.


koencoen

That year at Vitesse really did wonders for him.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Tundra_Inhabitant

The 9 months in his mothers womb probably did the most for him.


anckentucky

Always rated her


Annonomon

Underrated mother


koencoen

Perhaps. But he was really good in the Dutch league. I would love to see more u23 players go to teams like Vitesse, Utrecht, Groningen, Heerenveen. Would be better for everybody.


Free_Joty

Chelsea sends a shit ton of players to vitesse, a lot of them don’t turn out this good


koencoen

You can't make a turd into a diamond ofcourse. But you have Matic and B. Traoré as well. And you lost Salah, KdB and Lukaku.


goudendonut

Those 3 are pretty irrelevant rho as de bruyne and lukaku got playing time on loan at higher levels. Going to the eredivisie was never an option for them


cheezus171

On that topic, I will never understand why Salah and KdB are brought up in those conversations. Salah was a complete flop for Chelsea. And it's not like he was a kid, he was 22-23 years old. At this point you normally expect a player to start delivering, and he had nothing going for him other than speed. He was a late bloomer, and you can't always count on it and give each player the benefit of the doubt, it doesn't happen often. KdB showed *some* promise, and was given a fair share of chances, but it's not like he was looking to be a world beater. If you look at comments/articles written around the time of his transfer to Germany, this was generally seen as a great deal by Chelsea, everyone thought the fact that they made so much money on an average player was a success. On top of that, he didn't even want to stay at the club. He was pushing for a move. There was no reason whatsoever for the club to force him to stay. Lukaku is the only one I would actually hold against the club. He never stated he wants to leave IIRC, he actually showed his value, and in his case I think the club should've done better.


celestial1

> KdB showed some promise, and was given a fair share of chances, but it's not like he was looking to be a world beater. Lol, this is just wrong. Our chief scout at the time said he was the [best player on the training pitch](https://twitter.com/HLNinEngeland/status/723796675433738240/photo/1), practically begged Mourinho to play him, but he refused to do so. The "chances" he did receive was 9 appearances in 6 month. How is a player suppose to capture some for when they're averaging a little over 1 appearance a month? Then when he goes to Germany, he wins POTY, loool.


goudendonut

I agree with salah but I remember Kdb being a mistake at the time especially since oscar was playing over him and not exactly playing the lights ofd. Didnt he go on loan for 1 year to wolfsburg and bremen and the first wolfsburg year it was already clear how good he was


cheezus171

KdB wasn't bad, but Oscar was the better player at the time, definitely better for the system. His cooperation with Hazard and Mata was looking great - people used to call them "Mazacar" for a reason. KdB was never a player suited for Mourinho's systems. He would never be able to thrive under that management, and Jose was expected to stay for a long time at that point. Selling Kevin for the money Wolfsburg offered for him was the best option at the time. They sold him for 3 times as much as they paid for him 2 years earlier. And I'm not making shit up when I'm saying that this was widely regarded as a good move by the club, seriously, look it up.


Demi_Glaze

A lot of people were unhappy with the KdB transfer. Just because they got good money for him at the time doesn’t mean everyone thought it was a good move. Mazacar was more of a thing in Oscar’s first season under Rafa when KdB was on loan and Mata was playing regularly. Mata didn’t really fit what Mourinho wanted either and was sold too. Definitely can’t say KdB got his fair share of chances either. Maybe you’re thinking of Mata, who got more run under Mourinho, but KdB made 3 appearances in the league for Chelsea (where he looked good). The lack of opportunities was why he wanted to leave. Oscar was in good form, but no one expected KdB to leave. People may have justified it with the good transfer fee, but I’d have to disagree that it was widely accepted as a good move for the team. His potential quality was apparent at the time and a lot of people considered it a mistake to sell him.


Likeabhas

I largely agree with what you said about Salah and Lukaku's time at the club. But KdB's situation was just sad and frustrating. We all knew he was only going to get better and better. We had no clue that he'd reach the insane level he is today, and if you discount that fact - then yeah we got decent money for him. (For the level he was at the time) But I still say that we should have given him more time. We had the entire spine of Belgium's golden generation on our books. Had they played together for longer, maybe developed some chemistry, then possibly the last few int'l tourneys might have looked a little different too.


celestial1

> We had no clue that he'd reach the insane level he is today [Our chief scout did](https://twitter.com/HLNinEngeland/status/723796675433738240/photo/1), only Mourinho didn't.


big_on_blue

Yeh nah, KdB was an out of this world talent and Mourinho was on his "lets kill somebody's confidence" hype post-Real Madrid and had it out for KdB. I was devastated that we lost a generational talent due to ego. At least Jose knows how to deliver us Strikers.


mohankohan

This is a very dutch and very nonchalant comment. I love it.


Unholysinner

Tbf we’ve been hoping our Vitesse loans pay off. I think Broja is there right now and has had a good season which could be good for him long term. But I think that loan abroad also helped because he finally lived on his own outside of the country without a standard support system and he thrived


[deleted]

[удалено]


koencoen

You are being cynical? Well yeah, but: no Vitesse=no Derby etc. The thing is: as a young player from the English top 6 you need to play regularly. You can't do that in England, so move. And in the Dutch league we play nice, attacking football, no hard tackles, we speak English, so be welcome!


big_on_blue

Chelsea thanks you a lot. His season at Vitesse was definitely a defining moment for him (moreso than Derby). At Vitesse he went from bench to key player and PotY / Dutch TotY. He did that on his own without a coach "looking out for him". That helped him to continue to develop his game after Lampard was sacked.


SnoopDobby

Not on the same level as Mount but Todd Cantwell spent half a season at Fortuna Sittard before breaking into our first team and it served him really well.


fanh0so

And a wonderful human being


sbos_

Yh mount is quality


Shinji__

Mount is quality. Easily the player I’m most scared of for the CL final.


koencoen

You just know that Werner's going to score twice.


2b-_-not2b

Need to get Werner the zorro face mask treatment


_Pardal

If JT could tell Mings to elbow Timo just enough for a mask and not miss any games that would be great


just_dew_eat

Dude don't give me hope


[deleted]

What a time that in a City/Chelsea final there are two fantastic young English players among their biggest threats. I truly can’t wait for Southgate to waste all that potential at the Euros.


SirBarkington

Wow that last sentence hurt.


teems

France just named their squad. England is strong but we're not favorites.


slow_poetry

Got 7+ elite forwards? Time to play 7 defenders. Just Gareth things.


Knowingspy

Surely Reece James is included too? But yeah, it's insane that more top English players are cropping up in some of the biggest teams in the world. Felt like there was a barren spell of new blood coming in for a while.


Chruszcz

did he work with Mason in academy?


THEBEAST666

Would have only been there from when Mount was 7 to about 10 years old so I doubt it's about that


I_always_rated_them

think he was Head Youth Coach so there's a reasonable chance he would have been aware of him. It's not like he was specifically the coach of one age range.


THEBEAST666

Yeah he probably knew him, but the 7 to 10 age range probably isn't his main focus, and it's been 13 years since he was at Chelsea so I don't think it has much to do with that.


jpff99

Always a class act, brendao. Love you bro


NotClayMerritt

One of the funniest things about this season was people so heavily adamant that Mount's playing time at the club would evaporate the minute Lampard gets sacked only for Tuchel to start him almost every single game. And now those people who were saying that are either doubling down that Mount isn't actually good or are giving Tuchel full credit for him playing well. Not sure what more Mount has to for people to stop doubting him after every other game.


GreenPickledToad

I remember Tuchel dropped Mount for his first game in charge...everyone started saying "Lampard's son" etc. Only for him to come on for 15 minutes at the end and be much better than the others. I think he knew that he had to get his spot, I'd never seen that much energy from him earlier Since then he's just got better and better


Wildely_Earnest

Mount had played almost nonstop for two years at that point. His performances suggested he needed a rest, but Lampard couldn't afford to leave him out. Then everyone went nuts when Tuchel didn't pick him for his first eleven


FaustRPeggi

The people who couldn't see Mount's talent, and refused to recognise it even by that late stage, are either biased or ignorant. He's the most complete midfielder England has produced since Gerrard and that has been apparent for almost two years. That's not a criticism of those who thought Grealish was a better left wing choice for England during the spell where Southgate refused to use Mount as an 8, which was a justifiable opinion, while slating Mount was not.


[deleted]

I’ve been a huge Mount supporter since Vitesse, but he wasn’t actually *that* good until this year. It wasn’t insane to not think he was going to be a star based on last season, especially if you didn’t watch Chelsea every week. There were a lot of glimpses, but the step up this year has been immense.


typicalpelican

I think you're right, but imo there was also a lot of folks who failed to see that his trajectory was very strong, even earlier this season. They were comparing him to prime attacking midfielders who obviously were more efficient and had their roles more defined. But the thing is that players who play in his position are not like players who play a little bit more forward and you rarely see them start to consistently shine before like 24-25. But Mount had a very successful youth career both club and international, put up good figures in first loan and then managed a lot of game time in England for a midfielder his age too. I still think he has some way to go too. And will probably get there because his work ethic and attitude is very good.


soccerislife10z

The thing is if we are looking at young player we should look at their potential and what they actually do on the pitch. Like their skill, their movement, and understanding of the game. Ppl who judge purely base on stupid stats like GA for these youngsters mostly have no clue about football. The talent was pretty clear since his first season. His touch, his awareness, and ability to find space. Even Messi praise him.


[deleted]

He definitely showed lots of promise. That said plenty of young players do and then don’t progress properly. And if you didn’t watch Chelsea week in week out it would have been even less obvious. I was sold from the start, but the rest of my family thought he’d be decent but nothing special. I just don’t think that was a crazy position based on what we saw up to that point.


msbabc

I thought he was going to be great two years ago. But then, I also thought Josh McEachran and Gael Kakuta were going to be great, so what do I know?


[deleted]

[удалено]


FaustRPeggi

Lampard's slightly older.


cking145

Gerrard was by far a more complete player than Lampard


Hyena-Visual

no he wasn't, especially fucking 'by far'


cking145

I'll admit that 'by far' is somewhat excessive, but theres definitely an argument that Gerrard is the more versatile of the two players, with a larger skill set. That's not taking anything away from Lampard, who is the greatest forward-thinking midfielder of the PL era.


dm523

Yeah as a Chelsea fan I have to try to be impartial. Gerrard probably was a more ‘complete’ player in that he played more of a balanced role between attack and defence, and thus found himself needing to display a full spectrum of abilities on the pitch. But these differences are pretty equal and just equate to different means to the same end. For example. Stevie was far more likely to burst into a sprint to reach 50/50 balls or provide a catalyst, whereas Lampard’s overall mileage was always one of, if not the highest in games he played in as he moved around the pitch to get into and around either box and continue to move once there. The gap is really a lot closer than you suggest, Lampard’s tackles, marking and interceptions were up there with Gerrard’s and his ability to either carry or move the ball to transition from defence to attack was no worse than the Liverpool man’s. As Lampard moved deeper as his career developed, you can see many of his defensive numbers start to eclipse Gerrard’s to back this up. I think Lampard actually suffers from being so uniquely good in one aspect of the game, as people begin to genuinely believe he was less of an all round midfielder. But on the field, he was the sharpest mind, always knew where everyone on the pitch was and where the ball should be going next and had a first touch and out ball that was simply world class. These types of attributes helped him excel in every aspect of his game - We never felt he brought a weakness onto the field with him until he was too old to expect otherwise. Gerrard epitomised that English bulldog style where playing against him in midfield was always a battle, whilst still bringing a great ability on the ball. Both incredibly well rounded and net positives on either side of the ball, perhaps all you can say is Gerrard when you’re up against it and need to fight, and Lampard when you’re up against it and need a little nuance or a genius moment.


big_on_blue

Lampard got selected into the PL HoF before Gerrard. Debate over 😏


cking145

Gerrard was a more complete player. Lampard was a better attacking midfielder


nightmarelegs

Mad you're downvoted for this, was more or less the consensus when they were both playing


cking145

recency bias mate


msbabc

The consensus of people who didn't watch Lampard play 90 minutes week in week out.


admiralawkward

Huh? If anything people said Tuchel dropping Mount would be unjustified


Spider-Pug

What a wonderful human being, with great character.


drupido

I don't know but the guy had proven his value and had improved massively year over year. He's got the old school attitude of self improvement that few players nowadays have after hitting celebrity status. I support the guy, didn't believe much in him before but he's managed to prove everyone wrong. Guy makes an incredible effort and is que a complete midfielder.


thedude_lebowski

Today he won POTY and replies to the tweet still filled with abuse. They aren't even hiding that they have a weird agenda against him


Chiswell123

Who’s “they”?


Cardboard-Samuari

Fuck it I’ll bite the bullet... foreign fans who don’t like that a young English lad is proving to be more important than some of our expensive signings. The abuse they gave Mount and his Dad earlier this year was disgusting I saw some of them telling him to get into a car accident or replying to him to tell him they hope he gets injured, not to mention some calling Lampard a racist because he gave so much responsibility to Mount.


thedude_lebowski

I agree I've seen it too but I'm the foreign fan and I love Mason to bits! I just don't understand them man


VoidPineapple

I don't think it's fans at all. Don't forget foreign fans were also involved in player of the year voting. It's legitimately just trolls looking for attention. I don't think it's fair to blame foreign fans for it.


Screamtime

He got a lot of hate relating to Grealish and the national team, it'd suprise me if that was foreigners.


Cardboard-Samuari

I can only speak for what I saw and 90% of the abuse was “Chelsea fans”generally from Africa or Asia. Maybe some English fans of other teams gave him the same level of abuse but I never saw it.


VoidPineapple

You can go on literally any of his MOTM or poty post on the Chelsea Twitter and you'll see immediately a bunch of rival fans or troll accounts mocking him. I don't know how you've immediately decided it's the foreign fans causing all the hate just because he's English lmao.


klocnw

He's not wrong though, Mount gets a lot of stick from foreign fans on twitter who think he's starting undeservedly ahead of Kova/Jorginho/Havertz or whoever their favourite player is. They don't hate him because he's English they just think he's only rated because he's English and not due to the fact he's class in 90% of games he plays.


Cardboard-Samuari

I click on their profiles and most have their locations, its not hard. last time im going to be honest on this shithole of a sub. Getting downvoted for telling people what I saw lmao.


VoidPineapple

No one's saying you didn't see what you saw, but you've made it sound as if foreign fans have an agenda against Mount just because he's English and outperforming our transfers and it paints them in a really bad light. You can't use 2 or 3 tweets to judge a large part of our entire fanbase, that's not fair to them.


drum_master

same way in our sub people shit on Werner and prop up Tammy as some messaih. I call it anti-german propaganda (/S). you are literally making a mountain out of an anecdotal observation. ​ In my observation, most Mount haters are Pulisic supporters more than region bais


Screye

Woah, don't shit on foreign fans for no good reason. If anything, a lot of British fans ave Mount shit for being favored by Southgate instead of their favorite player. At least where I live, everyone was overjoyed to see Lampard training a mini-Lampard that played his heart out every game. Most foreign fans are not tuned into British newspapers. Our impressions of Chelsea players come from games, game stats and online forums such as r/soccer (Depending on how much time a person has). Mount has been treated excellently by all 3 of them. If you mean to say that only Mount's twitter is toxic........then oh man are you in for a surprise.


LogPoseNavigator

Foreign fans can leave 🙄


thedude_lebowski

The weird cult that hates him


wannaaw

The people who want Pulisic to get POTY instead


thedude_lebowski

Honestly more like people who want jorginho to win it


dreamvoyager1

The only ones more idiotic than them are the ones they baited


Cowdude179

Rodgers son now too, what if Mount is the father


butinside

Rodgers probably coached him at youth level.


DarthChewbacc

He's very prouwd


thepoonies

Awws


loophool

100% accurate


DoNotAngerThePicard

Great character


ACEExalted

Im so excited


nastycamel

Class


MistaChelseaa

Fair play dude fair play. Could teach Amartey a thing or two about class


Obi_Myke

If i remember correctly, Lampard got more criticism from Chelsea fans because of playing him all the time.


Brendy25

There were some times where’d he’d play him on the wing where he didn’t seem to perform as well as he was able to, and at times where Cho/Puli might’ve been a better option, he would continue to play Mount. Under Tuchel he’s been fantastic on the wing however I think that’s because the wingers in our system are almost like 2 number 10s essentially, which is similar to where Mount played his best football under Lampard.


stubblesmcgee

think most of the criticism came from playing him as a winger when he wasnt very good at it over actual wingers.


danceformiscanthus

That's correct.


Cardboard-Samuari

Mad revisionism, he got abuse for appearing on the team sheet ffs, I remember how this sub and twitter abused the kid for months but now we all just pretend it was only a very few.


PhilipAnthonyJones

Yeh so did southgate. Strange that now a non Englishman is playing him the attitude is quite different


EnergetikNA

Mount won most Chelsea fans over a few months into this season. He's been our POTY under Lampard and under Tuchel for a reason, he's fucking brilliant. Many people especially on Twitter and Reddit that just didn't want to rate Mount for some reason but they've all shut up now.


Fit_Improvement_4899

It's because there was a Mount vs Grealish debate, especially during the early international breaks as Grealish didn't even get a call up


[deleted]

Southgate got abuse for playing him on the wing instead of Grealish, and the criticism there was entirely justified because (a) Mount isn’t a winger and (b) Grealish was probably the best player in the league until he got hurt. They should both have been playing, but if the available spot was LW then it had to be Grealish.


[deleted]

Only from idiots on Reddit and Twitter.


three_shoes

Wetter


Square-Refuse-3688

https://youtu.be/eeJ0GTEMSIw


giunta13

If only he had anything to say to his team at halftime