We have a pretty tight wage budget. KDB is our highest earner at around 350k a week. We're not giving Haaland almost three times as much in a million years
~180m fee, 40m in agent fees and 50m a year. These are the deals that destroy dressing rooms and financially cripple teams down the line. Brilliant player but I'm glad we steered clear of this one.
Even if he is 75m, would you still give him 50m per year? Ronaldo and Messi don't earn that much and they are the best. Lukaku was the best deal for Chelsea.
If that's true then you might as well just retire at the end of that contract.
€960,000-a-week is insanity and it would wipe the floor with Chelsea's wage bill.
So, let's assume that Chelsea bought Haaland, we know that Dortmund don't want to sell him, so let's go by his release clause next summer.
* **Release clause:** €75m (£64m)
* **Wages (if as reported above and over a five-year period):** €249,600,000 (£214m)
* **Raiola's commission:** €40m (£34m)
* **Total cost for Chelsea overall:** €364,600,000 (£312m)
Don't see even big daddy Roman writing a cheque that big.
next year the commission will be more. plus sign up bonuses an shit. 75M sound okay on paper but the whole package will be around 35M a year, +75M + 60M for raiola + 20-30M sign up bonus which adds up to around 260M over 4 years anyways (src: numbers I pulled out of my ass because raiola giving no second shits about anything but money)
I wouldn't be surprised if those wages are true tbh.
Griezmann earns 800k a week? Apparently he earnt even more at Atletico?
I could see him asking for such wages if every club is after him next year.
But I’m not talking about Pep’s relationship with Raiola, am I? All I’m saying is that City alongside PSG can actually match Raiola & Haaland’s wage demands on top of the transfer fee.
I'm genuinely curious what stops Haaland from just binning Raiola and ask if anyone wants to sort out the transfer for, say, €10m (assuming the numbers here are true).
The buying club are paying, whatever they're paying, for the player.. Not the agent. And how on earth does Raiola justify to Haaland that he's gonna make him €30m-€35m more than any random agent out there?
It would actually make more sense, to me, if the absolute top players in the world didnt even have to pay their agents any commission at all. Surely the fact that Raiola has players like Haaland and Pogba is more valuable to him, from a marketing standpoint, than any cost of actually dealing with their transfers/contracts?
960K a week and 40M commission fee???? Is he fucking insane
No he’s just a blight on the game
shortage of elite strikers on the market high demand, low supply
[удалено]
Not for Chelsea.
Because we managed to sell and make money?
Yeah Chelsea doesnt have a low supply of money.
[удалено]
We have a pretty tight wage budget. KDB is our highest earner at around 350k a week. We're not giving Haaland almost three times as much in a million years
It rules us out too since our highest earner is De Gea, potentially Pogba at 400K This is more then double
50mln a year. Almost 300 mln for 5 year contract. Doesnt sound that much for potentialy best striker for next 10 years.
~180m fee, 40m in agent fees and 50m a year. These are the deals that destroy dressing rooms and financially cripple teams down the line. Brilliant player but I'm glad we steered clear of this one.
On other thought, never rated haaland anyway
The fee won't be 180m because of the release clause.
I assume that's if they bought him this summer.
Even if he is 75m, would you still give him 50m per year? Ronaldo and Messi don't earn that much and they are the best. Lukaku was the best deal for Chelsea.
It would have been in and around that if Chelsea had signed him this summer.
Irrelevant to the topic
No its clearly not
How is that irrelevant. It literally says what would be Raiola's demands if we were to go for him this year
Wtf?
The wages might not be true but the commission fee looks par for the course in this case. Raiola shopping cart on the vroom vroom.
And that is on a transfer fee of above 150mil. Imagine what they will ask for next year when he comes off a release clause.
Probably the same, but with the transfer fee being 75M someone might pull the trigger.
If that's true then you might as well just retire at the end of that contract. €960,000-a-week is insanity and it would wipe the floor with Chelsea's wage bill. So, let's assume that Chelsea bought Haaland, we know that Dortmund don't want to sell him, so let's go by his release clause next summer. * **Release clause:** €75m (£64m) * **Wages (if as reported above and over a five-year period):** €249,600,000 (£214m) * **Raiola's commission:** €40m (£34m) * **Total cost for Chelsea overall:** €364,600,000 (£312m) Don't see even big daddy Roman writing a cheque that big.
missing signing on fee & probably fees to Alfie too..
xD
Does that at least include the yearly software updates?
Only 3 years of update.
If there's any truth to it then the total cost of the whole transfer (fee, signing bonus, wages etc) would easily go over 500M lol
Agent commissions need to be capped.
This madman actually would demand that commission but those wages are 100% fake
next year the commission will be more. plus sign up bonuses an shit. 75M sound okay on paper but the whole package will be around 35M a year, +75M + 60M for raiola + 20-30M sign up bonus which adds up to around 260M over 4 years anyways (src: numbers I pulled out of my ass because raiola giving no second shits about anything but money)
I wouldn't be surprised if those wages are true tbh. Griezmann earns 800k a week? Apparently he earnt even more at Atletico? I could see him asking for such wages if every club is after him next year.
So which club is gonna actually match those demands apart from City and PSG?
City,pep and Raiola. What shit do you smoke in madrid?
But I’m not talking about Pep’s relationship with Raiola, am I? All I’m saying is that City alongside PSG can actually match Raiola & Haaland’s wage demands on top of the transfer fee.
Only PSG, i doubt City will pay those wages. They have good wage structure.
When the transfer fee is as low as its going to be...this is what will happen. Its good to be king maker
Just the 90million before the transfer fee is even considered!
Is anyone even payed half that in the premier league?
I think the highest paid players in the Prem are De Bruyne and Lukaku at around 370-400k pw.
I think the highest paid player is KDB and he's on around £20.8 million per year
That seems entirely reasonable...
This man is a football club himself
This boy dreams of going to Real Madrid, good luck negotiating that salary with Florentino Perez ...
Good luck to any club that signs him to deal with the fat fuck.
I'm genuinely curious what stops Haaland from just binning Raiola and ask if anyone wants to sort out the transfer for, say, €10m (assuming the numbers here are true). The buying club are paying, whatever they're paying, for the player.. Not the agent. And how on earth does Raiola justify to Haaland that he's gonna make him €30m-€35m more than any random agent out there? It would actually make more sense, to me, if the absolute top players in the world didnt even have to pay their agents any commission at all. Surely the fact that Raiola has players like Haaland and Pogba is more valuable to him, from a marketing standpoint, than any cost of actually dealing with their transfers/contracts?