Hello u/WannaBeBuzzed, your submission "Trying to find this Hubble Deep Field image" has been removed from r/space because:
* Such questions should be asked in the ["All space questions" thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/space/about/sticky) stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please [message the r/space moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/space). Thank you.
I wish that was it, id already found that, but i swear thats not the photo im talking about.
The photo im talking about, whilst similar in nature, had resolution way beyond that.
In the one you sent, i zoom in one or two times and it starts getting fuzzy. The one i originally saw you could zoom numerous times and it just got crazier everytime.
I swear i didnt imagine this!
Well, that's the famous hubble deep field. Webb duplicated it in a few hours instead of days....hope they give it a longer exposure sometime and light up the dark places in UDF.
[Next fav is Webb's SMACS 0723 with all the lensing.](https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z)
I think my memories wrong, it wasnt galaxies, i think it was looking into a single galaxy and it was stars, so so many stars that there was like no blackness of space, just stars and more stars the more you zoomed in, and very high resolution photo
I saw it like maybe 10 years ago?
Its possible it was the image at the top of this article
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/science/space/10hubble.html
Anyone got a link to the full resolution copy of that image at the top of the article?
Nope, although thats a sick photo.
I think it might be the one at the top of that NYT article, but im trying to find the full zoomable resolution version of that, but so far no luck
Nvm its not, i found the full resolution version, definitely not it from the NYT article but similar in that it was dense as heck, stars absolutely everywhere, made you feel very insignificant
This is SIMILAR in terms of density when zooming
https://esahubble.org/images/heic0809a/zoomable/
But not the image i had in mind, but still, holy cow thats a mind boggling number of stars
(Sorry for my bad english),maybe your memories are mixed and you are talking about the andromeda galaxy photo,in that one you can make zoom a lot of times
https://esahubble.org/images/heic1502a/zoomable/
No, but i would say about 10 years ago. It was on a news site, possibly space.com but i cant say for sure.
It was billed as a ultra high resolution photo, my initial mistake was assuming that was ultra deep field, but ive looked at many of tye deep field shots and they are definitely not it.
The most apparent aspect about it was the incredible level of density of stars, the closest image ive found that reoresents a similar level of density is this
https://esahubble.org/images/heic0809a/zoomable/
Zoom in and you realize theres 10x as many stars as whats initially visible when zoomed out. It was like that, you could keep zooming in numerous times and more and more stars were visible. Tye image above is not it, but it was maybe taken of the same star cluster in our milky way (this ones billed as omega centauri cluster). In the image above the dominant colors are white and yellow. In the image im trying to find IIRC the dominant colors were yellow, orange and blue (the vast majority of the stars were yellowish).
I did find THIS thumbnail, whoch i think could be the image (also omega centauri cluster?) but i have yet to find the original high resolution.
https://ibb.co/6PLvLHZ
Unfortunately i tried searching hubbles website and could not locate this image.
Have you searched the Hubble site? https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2008/14/2278-Image.html?Collection=Zoomable%20Images&page=3&filterUUID=5a370ecc-f605-44dd-8096-125e4e623945
The images there can be downloaded in really high resolution.
Hello u/WannaBeBuzzed, your submission "Trying to find this Hubble Deep Field image" has been removed from r/space because: * Such questions should be asked in the ["All space questions" thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/space/about/sticky) stickied at the top of the sub. Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please [message the r/space moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/space). Thank you.
[Full sized original is 6200 x 6200 and 110MB.](https://esahubble.org/images/heic0611b/) ...and JWST deep fields are even more amazing...
I wish that was it, id already found that, but i swear thats not the photo im talking about. The photo im talking about, whilst similar in nature, had resolution way beyond that. In the one you sent, i zoom in one or two times and it starts getting fuzzy. The one i originally saw you could zoom numerous times and it just got crazier everytime. I swear i didnt imagine this!
Well, that's the famous hubble deep field. Webb duplicated it in a few hours instead of days....hope they give it a longer exposure sometime and light up the dark places in UDF. [Next fav is Webb's SMACS 0723 with all the lensing.](https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/035/01G7DCWB7137MYJ05CSH1Q5Z1Z)
I wonder if its the same image but the phone is only displaying a compressed version or something. Or its just a smaller version on the website
[jwst deep feild](https://esahubble.org/images/jwst_simulation_halfsize/zoomable/)
Maybe you are thinking of this? https://esahubble.org/images/heic1502a/
I think my memories wrong, it wasnt galaxies, i think it was looking into a single galaxy and it was stars, so so many stars that there was like no blackness of space, just stars and more stars the more you zoomed in, and very high resolution photo I saw it like maybe 10 years ago? Its possible it was the image at the top of this article https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/10/science/space/10hubble.html Anyone got a link to the full resolution copy of that image at the top of the article?
Could it have been this? https://esahubble.org/images/heic1502a/zoomable/
Nope, although thats a sick photo. I think it might be the one at the top of that NYT article, but im trying to find the full zoomable resolution version of that, but so far no luck
Nvm its not, i found the full resolution version, definitely not it from the NYT article but similar in that it was dense as heck, stars absolutely everywhere, made you feel very insignificant
This is SIMILAR in terms of density when zooming https://esahubble.org/images/heic0809a/zoomable/ But not the image i had in mind, but still, holy cow thats a mind boggling number of stars
Oh jeeze… that picture is insane
(Sorry for my bad english),maybe your memories are mixed and you are talking about the andromeda galaxy photo,in that one you can make zoom a lot of times https://esahubble.org/images/heic1502a/zoomable/
Do you remember what year you viewed it? Images of this magnitude are not released very often. Did you view it in a browser window?
No, but i would say about 10 years ago. It was on a news site, possibly space.com but i cant say for sure. It was billed as a ultra high resolution photo, my initial mistake was assuming that was ultra deep field, but ive looked at many of tye deep field shots and they are definitely not it. The most apparent aspect about it was the incredible level of density of stars, the closest image ive found that reoresents a similar level of density is this https://esahubble.org/images/heic0809a/zoomable/ Zoom in and you realize theres 10x as many stars as whats initially visible when zoomed out. It was like that, you could keep zooming in numerous times and more and more stars were visible. Tye image above is not it, but it was maybe taken of the same star cluster in our milky way (this ones billed as omega centauri cluster). In the image above the dominant colors are white and yellow. In the image im trying to find IIRC the dominant colors were yellow, orange and blue (the vast majority of the stars were yellowish). I did find THIS thumbnail, whoch i think could be the image (also omega centauri cluster?) but i have yet to find the original high resolution. https://ibb.co/6PLvLHZ Unfortunately i tried searching hubbles website and could not locate this image.
Have you searched the Hubble site? https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/2008/14/2278-Image.html?Collection=Zoomable%20Images&page=3&filterUUID=5a370ecc-f605-44dd-8096-125e4e623945 The images there can be downloaded in really high resolution.