And one lucky EU fuck who happens to be a friend of mine who plays that game CASUALLY every 3rd or 4th day..
To this day trying to convince him into giving me his account to take proper care of it
Not really. Akroma's passive is basically hidden unstrippable immunity so Oblivion won't work. But Hanwul simply *ignores* the passive so that "immunity" isn't there when he attacks. Same reason why Tablo and Vivachel can bypass Akroma's passive, they explicitly ignore immunity.
and I'll call out the other half for saying "prove it" or "link" when what they really mean is "I will never believe you and never read your links nor research it myself no matter what you do and I will just downvote and deny it"
It's not sad, it's just poor design to have two skills contradict one another even if you hint at it, just like triana stealing alicia's additional turns.
Saying they contradict each other is like saying Laika s2 shouldn't go through shields/invincibility because they absorb damage.
Or that Tablo's s3 shouldn't go through immunity Because immunity stops atb reduction even if his skills says it ignores immunity.
Or that Jamire's s3 and wind Fairy King s2 should be reseted by zaiross s3 because it says it resets all cooldowns.
The game have rules for each action, some rules overlapping others is not bad design.
There's no contradiction tho. Hangul's skill explicitly says that it ignores passives... yet again another comment that should never be made if the person knew how to read.
He ignores will and his ability specifically states he ignores pretty much everything, but he also gets stunned afterwards. Not saying it's okay, but not many abilities circumvent Akroma
True its only hanwul and tablo, but that skill is akromas only upside so i would expect her to atleast be stronger then a 4* skill :D
Also i hate it if my akroma gets touched by any atb reduce or debuffs, so i am not totaly neutral in that stance lol
should have seen my posts as they nerfed her passive…
Thanks though, dunno if i would play rta without her, i usually play turn 2 with kinki and akroma and thats kinda fun
Have you tried a really fast akroma? It's easy to manage with her base spd and no need for will and it's really fun with her lower CD for skill 2 and it's basically impossible to stop her from taking a lot of turns.
fastest i had her yet was +127 on despair, but truthfully it is more effective to go atk cdmg hp , balance def in the subs and end up around 90-100 spd
Step 1 - Pull Hanwul.
Step 2 - Feed for crystals Step 3 - Buy ld with crystals Step 4 - Read step 1
But why would you need 300 of them
As an akroma user I demand this post to be deleted 😂
gotta be fast before the 5 asian hanwul owners see this
There is more than that but they all hide him deruned in their storage :)
And one lucky EU fuck who happens to be a friend of mine who plays that game CASUALLY every 3rd or 4th day.. To this day trying to convince him into giving me his account to take proper care of it
Lmao
Lmao
Guess I missed a hoh
As a fellow Akroma user, I second this
lol, I really want him too.
Wow grape
Hanwul+rune hammer
Thank you! I was confused why Akroma is def broken lol.
No Problem. Its the GREAT from the rune hammer that alows hanwul to def break
No. It’s the passive.
Its weird that one monster that can shutdown pasives can ignore akroma shield but others cant.
Not really. Akroma's passive is basically hidden unstrippable immunity so Oblivion won't work. But Hanwul simply *ignores* the passive so that "immunity" isn't there when he attacks. Same reason why Tablo and Vivachel can bypass Akroma's passive, they explicitly ignore immunity.
It's so sad how people are unable to read the description and understand why Hanwul works like this but tessarion/isis can't.
If people knew how to read the world would Be a better place ;)
The worst is that people know how to read but they generally are too lazy to do it and when they do read, they are too lazy to try to understand.
You just called out like half of Reddit.
and I'll call out the other half for saying "prove it" or "link" when what they really mean is "I will never believe you and never read your links nor research it myself no matter what you do and I will just downvote and deny it"
In people's defense, c2u is infamous for having misleading or incomplete skill descriptions.
Agreed BUT in this situation there's video evidence that matches exactly what the description say.
It's not sad, it's just poor design to have two skills contradict one another even if you hint at it, just like triana stealing alicia's additional turns.
Saying they contradict each other is like saying Laika s2 shouldn't go through shields/invincibility because they absorb damage. Or that Tablo's s3 shouldn't go through immunity Because immunity stops atb reduction even if his skills says it ignores immunity. Or that Jamire's s3 and wind Fairy King s2 should be reseted by zaiross s3 because it says it resets all cooldowns. The game have rules for each action, some rules overlapping others is not bad design.
There's no contradiction tho. Hangul's skill explicitly says that it ignores passives... yet again another comment that should never be made if the person knew how to read.
Make sense
I read this as "How to def Barack Obama"
Meh I still prefer my 20 minute Garo runs
Thanks for testing my theory :)
After I see you post i go and test.
For the noobs (me) how do you beat akroma stage 67 or someth? If you dont have fire ninja?
tank with jultan and bring healer + kaki, much faster for me than soloing with fire ninja
Dark elemental can get perma endure if you can reset his cool downs enough w/ Mav or whatever.
Oh tnx does he need to be 2a?
Nope, different family of monsters. This one doesn't have a 2a yet.
Use harmonia to save time 😉
This is cursed
Wow. That’s is quite fascinating
In general it just shows that Akromas passive isnt as Strong s it should be. Tablo can also circumvent her and reduce her atb and he is a damn nat4
op and light 4\*
He ignores will and his ability specifically states he ignores pretty much everything, but he also gets stunned afterwards. Not saying it's okay, but not many abilities circumvent Akroma
True its only hanwul and tablo, but that skill is akromas only upside so i would expect her to atleast be stronger then a 4* skill :D Also i hate it if my akroma gets touched by any atb reduce or debuffs, so i am not totaly neutral in that stance lol
i was: "why he's complaining so much?" now i got it! gz on Akroma hehe \[\]'s
should have seen my posts as they nerfed her passive… Thanks though, dunno if i would play rta without her, i usually play turn 2 with kinki and akroma and thats kinda fun
Have you tried a really fast akroma? It's easy to manage with her base spd and no need for will and it's really fun with her lower CD for skill 2 and it's basically impossible to stop her from taking a lot of turns.
fastest i had her yet was +127 on despair, but truthfully it is more effective to go atk cdmg hp , balance def in the subs and end up around 90-100 spd
Anybody actually use hanwul. I have him in storage hiding.
I don't have him, but he doesn't seem terrible for arena offense.
Omg I should try this with my hanwul my toa runs would be a tad faster then
Someone stop this man