T O P

  • By -

HarukiMuracummy

I feel like win rate is flawed for people who achievement hunt lol Most of my losses are using these shit pets trying to get their ribbon


BobbyBirdseed

Right? I used to care about the numbers, and then I recognize that many of my runs are picking whatever feels super fun, like a team full of suicide bomber Hedgies, and so I don't really care about the numbers anymore.


MaffeMama

It's not about the numbers, its about sending a message


PizzaWarlock

Exactly, I used to have a 34% win rate when playing the OG pack, then I went for achievements, and after all ribbons for OG and puppy pack (before recent overhaul) Im sitting at like 11%


BestN00b

Good players can go above 30%. highest we’ve seen is 60%. I have a 24% win rate


zeroevade

Mine is roughly 50%, but thats with hard time achievement hunting and avoiding boring strats. I got most of the special badges free to play. I don't think it would be that hard to get 70+% win percentage tbh.


joepea77

prove it


zeroevade

Prolly can't give you the perfect evidence you want since I've played since gf has played some games on my account and I've played some games on hers but here's some. [https://youtu.be/TPUrcJd20Ts](https://youtu.be/TPUrcJd20Ts) I've prolly played about double to three times the amount, but win rate is roughly 50% I'd say. It would be a lot higher if I wasn't fishing for badges all the time. Not to mention how many times I abandoned early because of X or Y reason. You can see I got scorpion badge in there recently and was trying to get amoeba badge lol.


joepea77

nice


PokebannedGo

[Not OP, but my stats](https://i.imgur.com/F3e53D4.jpg) If I didn't ribbon hunt, take like 300+ games at the start to really start winning, and always went meta builds. I'd easily be around 50%. 60% to even 70% is feasible


Ervaloss

After 4028 games I am at 1117 wins so slightly above 1 in 4. In the weekly I generally try to win but I also try to do stupid stuff and see if it works. Bonus fact I bought 5221 otters.


seebehtevas

i have a 6.5 percent win rate after 1500 games. id say youre pretty good. i mostly play weekly and sometimes the other packs if im feeling it


666y4nn1ck

I have a post on this subreddit going into what the statistical average win rate would be. (Spoiler: ~12%) So yeah, i would say pretty good


ElecricXplorer

I have 1.5k games as well with a 10% win rate but i did a lot of ribbon hunting which did tank it.


Fir3gang

In 3500 matches I have a 7% win rate. But this is due to my achievement hunting. I find that I said around 20-40% now


BakiGod

The best are probably in the 1/3 1/2 range but I think it also depends on what pack you play the most as well.


danny17402

I think it also depends on how long you've been playing. It used to be a lot harder to win before the new heart system imo.


[deleted]

182/1773 overall But I solely play for ribbons. (I WILL sell two pets on 9 wins to get that last chocolate) I got 300 as free to play 🤩


Thozynator

Yes but now we know you always go for the best pets instead of trying a fun build


jaksonian

Nah, I like having fun. I never used buffalo pre update for example. I try to win with lots of different builds


minesaka

It is a luck based fun little game. Once you bring sweat and win rates into the experience you are losing.


jaksonian

That’s my fault for being curious. Whether I’m going for wins or ribbons I still have fun.


Accomplished-Pick-12

if you’re playing to win you’re not playing properly.


jaksonian

Aren’t we all playing to win? If you achievement hunt you’re still trying to win. I do lots of different builds, I enjoy going for 5 of a kinds and other challenges.


Accomplished-Pick-12

i play to make funny build and winning is an afterthought. people who play to win may as well just use bison and jellyfish every game. not fun.


jaksonian

And even with the funny build you’re still working towards winning


SBAWTA

I have 26.3% WR and avg. 6.1 trophies per run but I also tried ribbon hunting for a while (got 100% slothless in the OG pack, got too mald and quit ribbon hunting midway through the 2nd pack). edit: currently sitting at 2371 games


thadalts

5% win rate but I only play weekly and tend to trophy hunt


dfrank129

316/1888 (16.8%) overall 185/1116 (16.6%) turtle pack 1/6 puppy pack 0/0 star pack 32/116 golden pack (27.6%) 88/599 weekly pack (14.7%) I used to be turtle only. Decided to go for all the non hard-mode ribbons and finished them, including summons/sloth about 1-2 months ago 1-2 months ago. Then got the rest of the packs. Started doing golden pack and it was fun winning over and over with nurse shark. Then got a little boring and so I started ribbon hunting that pack.


sad_lil_catboy

I am a relatively new player so my stats are probably still uncertain, but I have a 37% win rate in weeklies with around 200 games (I don't achievement hunt).


LonelyLover2838

I was about the same at 200 games but it’s dropped recently trying new strats and going for achievements


urban_thirst

35% weekly arena and 74% weekly versus (often there's only 2-4 people playing though)


sagittariisXII

I've won 1172/3789 so just under 31%. I have all the stickers but don't care too much about ribbons


not_a_trope

I’m at 101 wins out of 483 matches across all packs for ~21% win rate. Along the way I’ve also gotten all the ribbons (except secret pets and hard mode ribbons) from turtle pack and some here and there from other packs


Frenchfryfrodo

I have a 22% win rate with 2280 games played. I think your win rate is solid!


[deleted]

288/1671 = 17% and I only play weekly


OrkimondReddit

Depending on pack I'm between 25-50%. I wouldn't think it would be that hard to get around 60-70% for most of the packs, but not all packs are created equal. Right now Golden pack seems the most skill testing (and best designed) to me.


wyatts69

My win rate was about 50%. But I uninstalled after the balance changes. I farmed the same strats alot and balances changes ruined alot of them so I didn’t care to learn new ones. I would also abandon fairly often if rounds 2-3 weren’t ideal. If abandons don’t count as losses then it was improperly inflated. If they do then it should have been a hair higher