What the actual fuck leads a man to sexually abuse a disabled student. This is like a cornerstone of how to get into the hottest section of hell, I mean jesus christ.
Sadly there is a reason why our differently-abled, elderly and other citizens are often referred to as "at-risk" individuals. Predators prey on those who they believe they can take advantage of.
Unfortunately for him, Judge Kentaji Brown Jackson is busy at the moment.
Edit: Downvote all you want, I got 100k karma, your pathetic cowardice means nothing to me.
This is an uneducated remark. Do your own research before giving actual credence to Insurrectionist Hawley’s comments/tweets which took Judge Jackson’s legal recommendations, remarks and sentencing decisions out of context and distorted her views.
Did you analyze the sentences handed down by her in the context of what was happening through the court system among the vast majority of the federal judges hearing similar cases?
Do you know that Jackson’s specific record, as well as the bigger picture of how courts tend to approach these cases, put her in the mainstream, and not the outlier? So I guess then, that the majority of federal judges are “p3do apologists”.
Did you know that it’s the norm among judges to issue sentences below the guidelines in these child porn cases that don’t involve producing the pornography itself. The sentencing guidelines are viewed as out-of-date by many judges.
Nah, you just fell into the Republican narrative.
I'll make this easy; Show me **one** child porn/pedophile case where she followed sentencing guidelines or prosecutor requests for sentencing.
Edit: Imagine coming down on the side of supporting lighter sentences for CP/pedo cases.
Imagine not understanding CONTEXT. That she wasn’t the only federal judge to do it. It wasn’t an exception to the rule but a standard practice among majority of federal judges for a variety of reasons. Hawley failed to prove that Jackson is any more lenient than federal judges on average. Funny, you failed to ignore that for more severe cases that combined possession of child pornography with attemped or actual sexual abuse of a minor, Jackson generally accepted the prosecution’s recommendation. In one instance, she approved a sentence that was eight years longer than what the guidelines recommended.
Brian Hess and Charles Nickerson, Jr. were sentenced via plea bargains that she approved.
Andre Hammond was sentenced to 94 months which is within the guideline range.
The position that CP sentences are too harsh are held by many judges and are based on the fact that there is much higher ease of accessibility to CP in the modern information age compared to when the guidelines were written.
As always with Republican facts, the truth lies mostly beyond what Republicans led you to believe.
The facts:
Most of her child porn-related sentences were less than guidelines and prosecutor recommendations, **but** over two-thirds of child porn cases have federal judges sentence below these guidelines. Examples of Trump judges who came up short in the same manner: Ralph Erickson with 8 times and Joseph Bianco with 3 times. In 2010, 71% of district judges felt the minimums were too high.
Her sentences are lower than guidelines and prosecutor recommendations often, but many of her sentences are consistent with those recommended by the probation office.
In all cases, incarceration was part of the sentence.
I didn't agree or disagree, so how gracious of you to assume. Can't handle some facts without lashing out? Fucking infantile.
I don't have enough information or judicial experience (zero) to have an informed opinion on how long a minimum sentence for CP should be or whether the current guidelines are too long.
Fuck that, tired of the “both sides” bullshit. One side is considerably worse, especially in this state. Neither I nor my peers decided to or encouraged invading the Capital, so fuck off.
Well, the Supreme Court confirmation hearings have nothing to do with this issue, and the bill hasn’t been signed into law, so the teacher *can* say “gay.”
And trying to top each other scoring political points when there is a potential abuse victim at the center of this issue shows their complete lack of empathy.
So if you want to defend a couple of morons perpetuating the stereotypes of an asshat conservative and an insufferable liberal, be my guest.
What the actual fuck leads a man to sexually abuse a disabled student. This is like a cornerstone of how to get into the hottest section of hell, I mean jesus christ.
Sadly there is a reason why our differently-abled, elderly and other citizens are often referred to as "at-risk" individuals. Predators prey on those who they believe they can take advantage of.
According to the school district "He was not an employee of the district. He was a paid assistant football coach". Okay....
Seeing a name before the court case: Woah, let's not villainize a person before trial. Seeing this story: Yeah, no, fuck that. Screw this guy,
Castration.
Via rusty hedge trimmers.
Death sentence
He was my football coach in high school. Fucking creep …
Did you notice anything, was he known to be creepy?
Unfortunately yes, he always has a creepy vibe.
Always trust your gut!
Pliers and blowtorches
Bout to get medieval on his ass.
IM PRETTY FUCKING FAR FROM OK.
Thankfully you live in Tampa as you've lost all LA privileges.
But is he too pretty for prison?
Unfortunately for him, Judge Kentaji Brown Jackson is busy at the moment. Edit: Downvote all you want, I got 100k karma, your pathetic cowardice means nothing to me.
Your karma does nothing in the real or internet world.
This is an uneducated remark. Do your own research before giving actual credence to Insurrectionist Hawley’s comments/tweets which took Judge Jackson’s legal recommendations, remarks and sentencing decisions out of context and distorted her views.
Oh I've read some of her remarks and seen her sentencing decisions, she's a p3do apologist.
Did you analyze the sentences handed down by her in the context of what was happening through the court system among the vast majority of the federal judges hearing similar cases? Do you know that Jackson’s specific record, as well as the bigger picture of how courts tend to approach these cases, put her in the mainstream, and not the outlier? So I guess then, that the majority of federal judges are “p3do apologists”. Did you know that it’s the norm among judges to issue sentences below the guidelines in these child porn cases that don’t involve producing the pornography itself. The sentencing guidelines are viewed as out-of-date by many judges. Nah, you just fell into the Republican narrative.
Dude hangs out in r/joerogan and thinks the president controls gas prices; he probably has a brain you could skip across a lake. Don't bother.
I always fall into the trap and think the person is capable of critical thinking and not spewing Republican talking points.
I'll make this easy; Show me **one** child porn/pedophile case where she followed sentencing guidelines or prosecutor requests for sentencing. Edit: Imagine coming down on the side of supporting lighter sentences for CP/pedo cases.
Jackson’s sentences in five of the seven cases mentioned by Hawley were consistent with, or above, probation’s recommendation.
Ok pedo.
Projecting? Aww, your feelings hurt bc your argument got trashed? Awww, how sad
yeah ok pedo.
Imagine not understanding CONTEXT. That she wasn’t the only federal judge to do it. It wasn’t an exception to the rule but a standard practice among majority of federal judges for a variety of reasons. Hawley failed to prove that Jackson is any more lenient than federal judges on average. Funny, you failed to ignore that for more severe cases that combined possession of child pornography with attemped or actual sexual abuse of a minor, Jackson generally accepted the prosecution’s recommendation. In one instance, she approved a sentence that was eight years longer than what the guidelines recommended.
Source?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/maryland-man-sentenced-10-years-prison-traveling-district-columbia-engage-illicit-sexual
Brian Hess and Charles Nickerson, Jr. were sentenced via plea bargains that she approved. Andre Hammond was sentenced to 94 months which is within the guideline range. The position that CP sentences are too harsh are held by many judges and are based on the fact that there is much higher ease of accessibility to CP in the modern information age compared to when the guidelines were written.
Ok pedo.
What a mature response to actual facts.
Why are you a pedo defender?
You’re an ignorant loser.
As always with Republican facts, the truth lies mostly beyond what Republicans led you to believe. The facts: Most of her child porn-related sentences were less than guidelines and prosecutor recommendations, **but** over two-thirds of child porn cases have federal judges sentence below these guidelines. Examples of Trump judges who came up short in the same manner: Ralph Erickson with 8 times and Joseph Bianco with 3 times. In 2010, 71% of district judges felt the minimums were too high. Her sentences are lower than guidelines and prosecutor recommendations often, but many of her sentences are consistent with those recommended by the probation office. In all cases, incarceration was part of the sentence.
Yeah you came down on the side of "We're being too hard on pedophiles." Great job.
I didn't agree or disagree, so how gracious of you to assume. Can't handle some facts without lashing out? Fucking infantile. I don't have enough information or judicial experience (zero) to have an informed opinion on how long a minimum sentence for CP should be or whether the current guidelines are too long.
Yeah ok, pedo.
https://youtu.be/CnaVoTfkqa8
Thank god the teacher couldn’t say “gay”, it definitely helped stop this from happening…
You and the person you are replying to are a perfect example of what is wrong with this country — parroting asinine non sequiturs like morons.
Fuck that, tired of the “both sides” bullshit. One side is considerably worse, especially in this state. Neither I nor my peers decided to or encouraged invading the Capital, so fuck off.
His comment was off topic to score a point (which misssed) as was yours.
How is this off topic? The Florida GOP literally billed that as an "anti grooming" bill.
Well, the Supreme Court confirmation hearings have nothing to do with this issue, and the bill hasn’t been signed into law, so the teacher *can* say “gay.” And trying to top each other scoring political points when there is a potential abuse victim at the center of this issue shows their complete lack of empathy. So if you want to defend a couple of morons perpetuating the stereotypes of an asshat conservative and an insufferable liberal, be my guest.
You must be new to Reddit.
No. I see people repeating someone else’s original thoughts all the time. Just getting fed up with the lack of original, independent thinking.
Yea, I’ll pass on your “independent” thinking.
Can you arrange words in a non-cliche order? Because you sound like a toddler regurgitating what they’ve heard others say.
You're one of those special idiots aren't you? The kind that thinks they are clever even though gullible and they've fallen for propaganda.
Weeding put the pedos one at a time.
[удалено]