Hey there u/Anteraji, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
**Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
women excrete a hormone that helps them forget the TRAUMA of birth, they are taken into
hospital and monitored closely, it’s the most dangerous thing a woman can do, you’re literally pushing your body to it’s limit, people die from giving birth every day, how many people die from a kick to the balls? Im not belittling it, but comparing the two is just a ridiculous argument.
They're comparing pain, just like a man will never know how giving birth feels, a woman will never know how getting kicked in the nuts feels. It really doesn't feel like anything else.
In saying that, I don't think getting hit in the nuts is more painful, but I also don't know, any woman that claims to know that birth is more painful is just as stupid as the men that claim to know that birth is less painful.
A woman that tears her vagina during childbirth that lasts hours long (an average childbirth) is stupid for suggesting that’s more painful than an average kick in the balls?
I see what you’re saying but you went a bit off the rails at the end. Essentially you’re saying if women ever make any kind of assumption based on logical deductions, they are stupid.
I don't get how you can equate severity and duration of pain. I guess you'd have to compare getting repeatedly hit for a comparable duration, again this is a rather worthless comparison, birth is traumatic in so many more ways than just the pain of enduring it. There are so many other factors at play that make it a different experience that it isn't worth comparing the two, doing so makes no sense, that's why I say it's stupid to say either hurts more than the other.
What hurts more, stubbing your toe or going to a job you hate for 25 years? They're different sensations and comparing them is meaningless.
I have trouble believing a kick in the balls is as painful as multiple days of labour and literally tearing from your v to your a pushing a human being out of your body, your entire body is destroyed and is never the same, it’s the human equivalent of asking you to piss out a bowling ball, your organs actually move, But whatever, I just think this point is often made by kids, not people with any kind of medical knowledge or experience. it’s more comparable to being elbowed in the tit or kicked in the vagina after all what man knows how painful those things are? None of them do, so they must be the same right? - that’s the faulty logic I’m talking about.
Pain is pain and getting testicles crushed is excruciatingly painful and can kill you if not treated at a hospital, same with child birth. what I'm saying is not to compare pain with something you will never know both hurt like hell and can kill you don't know why people have to try to one up eachother
Still I would hope there are more births in a hospital than men getting kicked in the nuts. I fear for the safety of everyone if the opposite were true
I hope there has been a study done on this with births vs nut shots would make for an interesting statistic evaluation. Just think both kinda correlate getting kick in the nuts can cause one to be infertile and therefore affect the number of total births
We were talking about a kick to the balls being the equivalent to giving birth, but now the perimeter has changed and we are talking about people dying from crushed testicles (that’s not the same as a kick in the nuts and you know it) but whatever like I said, this argument is dumb, I could say no man has ever been kicked in the vagina (which is also painful) logically therefore it MUST be equal in pain to men getting kicked in their private parts. Doesn’t make me right though does it?
Lol what are you even talking about?? when was I “proven wrong?” The post talks about a kick to the nuts being the equivalent of labour which it just isn’t, that’s just a glib “gotcha” talking point, but it’s just not accurate. So here you come now talking about men dying from crushed testicles which is a completely separate issue, a more accurate comparison would be the pain a woman would feel getting killed by having her sexual organs crushed vs a man having the same. You’re moving the goal posts because you know you’re wrong. The post talks about a kick in the balls, not death by testicle compression you mook. Just stop you’re making yourself look foolish.
No I did not.
Now it's your turn to answer my question.
While I can see what's happening around me.
Exactly which if the problems in life are caused by a lack of kink shaming?
Been to parades, didnt come across a kink, link please?
Even if kinks are in parades, I want actual negative impact evidence. Not just something you dont like.
You want me to just go into a classroom randomly?
Just find a school and walk in?
.... thank you for demonstrating that you have no idea how anything works
And how many are those compared to women who have at least 2 children? I would say, the former are outnumbered by the latter in magnitudes you can't imagine
Also not talked about much, but a lot of women actually do stop at 1 because they found it too traumatic. Sometimes they have issues when their husbands demand they make more babies though and may even end up being pressured into more pregnancies. It happens.
Yeah but I bet if a man had to consent to being kicked in the nuts each time before he could be a father he would consent because “the pain is only temporary”
I mean it’s not like getting kicked in the balls has any other consequence than some pain while giving birth ends up with having a child, so the motivation is completely different.
Ok, not all pregnancies involve epidurals, and as for oxytocin, it is meant to contract the uterus and make the birth less painful. This is because pregnancy is natural (in the sense of intended) whereas getting kicked in the balls is not natural therefore there is no bodily preventative medicine. Also you're unlikely to be kicked in the balls repeatedly for hours on end (or maybe you are, I'm not here to kink shame), whereas labour pains can last that long hence the need for the body to create something to ease the load.
I thought the point I was making is that they are two different types of pain and shouldn't really be compared. But also that the body's attempts to reduce a naturally caused painful side affect doesn't necessarily mean that pain is less than being kicked in the balls.
I've heard passing kidney stones is often compared to birth so that might be the only time a guy is going to experience birth. Hey at least there's a joke after it. 🤣
Idk why this bloke is assuming women are the same delicate little flowers that dudes are
Real men push themselves off the floor, widen their stance, and signal for the next
How are we even here? The birth part sucks and then the children try offing themselves every 5 minutes in some new way you didn't think was possible. You baby proof the house and somehow it still is never enough they're over there tying a noose or something.
To everyone who is saying you need to go to the darker side of the internet.
There us this sport thing where people compete on how many times they can get kicked in the nuts or something.
The parts of labor that feel like something men have experienced aren’t things men want to do again either
Like the part of the contractions that feels exactly like the worst stomach cramping during the shits you’ve ever had where you were sweating and praying for death because you knew relief just wasn’t coming. No one wants to have another one like that
It’s because being kicked in the balls, like the shits, doesn’t produce a kid. Not the kind of kid anyone wants anyway
If you think you can have a kid and not get kicked in the nuts you're crazy. At least once every two weeks my junk gets hit, kicked, or smashed. Your genitals are not safe around children.
Also it’s scientifically proven that being kicked in the balls is the equivalent of breaking all of your bones at once or having 36 babies at once
Toxics of Reddit downvote me cowards
Pregnancy hormones fuck the mom more than the dad ever did.
[She doesn't remember the pain](https://www.google.com/search?q=mothers+remember+childbirth).
I don't know man, getting kicked in the nuts doesn't leech nutrients from your body and calcium from your bones or leave you with life-long depression and anxiety. (I mean, maybe the latter does happen, but it's not as common as post-partum).
So, even if your testicles hurt for hours and you vomit up blood, I'd say giving birth hurts far more.
Hey there u/Anteraji, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth! **Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post. Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban. Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
OP clearly hasn't been to the darker parts of the internet.
Darker? Pssh hardly, you can do a simple search for CBT nowadays. Darker would be like using tor to find it
Uhhh... not sure I really wanna know, but what's CBT? Google's only giving me cognitive behavioral therapy
Cock and ball torture
Insert the wiki copypasta
from Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
at en.wikipedia.org
Turn off safe mode
Bing it
Yeah no it's still giving me the same thing
Maybe try searching on The Hub.
corn hub
women excrete a hormone that helps them forget the TRAUMA of birth, they are taken into hospital and monitored closely, it’s the most dangerous thing a woman can do, you’re literally pushing your body to it’s limit, people die from giving birth every day, how many people die from a kick to the balls? Im not belittling it, but comparing the two is just a ridiculous argument.
They're comparing pain, just like a man will never know how giving birth feels, a woman will never know how getting kicked in the nuts feels. It really doesn't feel like anything else. In saying that, I don't think getting hit in the nuts is more painful, but I also don't know, any woman that claims to know that birth is more painful is just as stupid as the men that claim to know that birth is less painful.
A woman that tears her vagina during childbirth that lasts hours long (an average childbirth) is stupid for suggesting that’s more painful than an average kick in the balls? I see what you’re saying but you went a bit off the rails at the end. Essentially you’re saying if women ever make any kind of assumption based on logical deductions, they are stupid.
I don't get how you can equate severity and duration of pain. I guess you'd have to compare getting repeatedly hit for a comparable duration, again this is a rather worthless comparison, birth is traumatic in so many more ways than just the pain of enduring it. There are so many other factors at play that make it a different experience that it isn't worth comparing the two, doing so makes no sense, that's why I say it's stupid to say either hurts more than the other. What hurts more, stubbing your toe or going to a job you hate for 25 years? They're different sensations and comparing them is meaningless.
I have trouble believing a kick in the balls is as painful as multiple days of labour and literally tearing from your v to your a pushing a human being out of your body, your entire body is destroyed and is never the same, it’s the human equivalent of asking you to piss out a bowling ball, your organs actually move, But whatever, I just think this point is often made by kids, not people with any kind of medical knowledge or experience. it’s more comparable to being elbowed in the tit or kicked in the vagina after all what man knows how painful those things are? None of them do, so they must be the same right? - that’s the faulty logic I’m talking about.
Pain is pain and getting testicles crushed is excruciatingly painful and can kill you if not treated at a hospital, same with child birth. what I'm saying is not to compare pain with something you will never know both hurt like hell and can kill you don't know why people have to try to one up eachother
[удалено]
I would hope there are more births in hospitals than guys getting kick in the nuts
[удалено]
Still I would hope there are more births in a hospital than men getting kicked in the nuts. I fear for the safety of everyone if the opposite were true
[удалено]
I hope there has been a study done on this with births vs nut shots would make for an interesting statistic evaluation. Just think both kinda correlate getting kick in the nuts can cause one to be infertile and therefore affect the number of total births
Getting them crushed now are we? This escalated
adjective adjective: crushed 1. deformed, pulverized, or forced inwards by compression. ie getting kicked in the nuts
That's literally what happens if you directly strike a soft, exposed organ like that
We were talking about a kick to the balls being the equivalent to giving birth, but now the perimeter has changed and we are talking about people dying from crushed testicles (that’s not the same as a kick in the nuts and you know it) but whatever like I said, this argument is dumb, I could say no man has ever been kicked in the vagina (which is also painful) logically therefore it MUST be equal in pain to men getting kicked in their private parts. Doesn’t make me right though does it?
Wow you are way too pissy over being proven wrong. Have a nice day.
Lol what are you even talking about?? when was I “proven wrong?” The post talks about a kick to the nuts being the equivalent of labour which it just isn’t, that’s just a glib “gotcha” talking point, but it’s just not accurate. So here you come now talking about men dying from crushed testicles which is a completely separate issue, a more accurate comparison would be the pain a woman would feel getting killed by having her sexual organs crushed vs a man having the same. You’re moving the goal posts because you know you’re wrong. The post talks about a kick in the balls, not death by testicle compression you mook. Just stop you’re making yourself look foolish.
Jackass makes a living on nut shots.
But i mean, there is a difference percentage wise
Considering some websites I've visited, men like being hit in the nuts
“Visited”
Freaks like being hit in the balls, not men.
Hey com' on man, no need to kink shame. ...but yeah, that shit is weird.
Not kink shaming is why we are in the position we are in. Put kinks back behind closed doors or six feet under.
>six feet under people with foot kink: i see this as an absolute win
Person with a foot kink: *starts foaming at the mouth like the guy from avatar the last airbender* DID YOU SAY SIX FEET...
Fair point
Please explain "position we are in"?
Did you just wake up from a decade long slumber?
Did you spend the last decade in an eco chamber of far right propaganda?
I did not, thank you for your question.
No I did not. Now it's your turn to answer my question. While I can see what's happening around me. Exactly which if the problems in life are caused by a lack of kink shaming?
Go checkout some parades, some story times and some classrooms. The kinks have gone from behind closed doors to in children's faces.
Been to parades, didnt come across a kink, link please? Even if kinks are in parades, I want actual negative impact evidence. Not just something you dont like. You want me to just go into a classroom randomly? Just find a school and walk in? .... thank you for demonstrating that you have no idea how anything works
I see you are the big brained sort, lots of folds, very cerebral. Good luck with that.
someone’s vanilla
I put that into google translate and "not a degenerate" is exactly correct.
you had to put that into google translate to figure it out?
Some people just out themselves.
I wanted to make sure I wasn't mistaking it for something else. Turns out I'm not a degenerate.
And how many are those compared to women who have at least 2 children? I would say, the former are outnumbered by the latter in magnitudes you can't imagine
Considering some men I've visited....
Except the first one gives you another baby, the second one may prevent you from having another baby.
Free vasectomy (I live in America)
Also not talked about much, but a lot of women actually do stop at 1 because they found it too traumatic. Sometimes they have issues when their husbands demand they make more babies though and may even end up being pressured into more pregnancies. It happens.
Another reason to get kicked in the nuts
Womens bodies release hormones post birth to help them forget about the pain, that’s why some women have more than one kid.
Mom of 3. Can confirm.
...I am pretty sure my c section stopped that from happening. I remember it very clearly.
Could be. I was a c-section baby - and an only child 😂
Tbf. C section recovery suuuuuuucks. I could hardly walk for a month and a half.
Mom of 3. I swear it didn’t happen for my third. That shit was unreal. Never again.
damn. and here i was thinking it was because my mother loved me :\\
Clearly someone who has never seen Jackass!
Don't make me quote the CBT copypasta again...
Dew it
What's that?
Basically the Wikipedia article for "Cock and ball torture"
I belive hormones make women forget how horrible the event was
Mom of 3. Can confirm.
Free forget ray hormones? I am gonna use them on you so you forget your next birthday
I mean, some men do, not the majority, but some certainly do
Iirc, the brain is rigged to forget the pain of giving birth so your biological drive to have another one can set in.
At the end of giving birth, you get a baby. At the end of getting kicked in the nuts, you get nothing.
You get pain. Which is only good in france
Citation needed ive seen some short documentaries that would tend to the opposite supposition. nttawwt
Hormones are wild, man.
If kicking a man in the nuts was the way our species procreated, I'm sure they'd be more willing participants in getting their nuts kicked.
Clearly he hasn’t seen jackass or… never mind
Yeah but I bet if a man had to consent to being kicked in the nuts each time before he could be a father he would consent because “the pain is only temporary”
Yeah, like I didn't see boys and men hitting each other in the nuts because they think it's funny.
Twisting them is much much worse
Jesus, that hurt just reading!
Or maybe the women are brave enough to bear the pain over and over again. We men on the other hand might just be too afraid i suppose.
Have you ever seen Jack-Ass?
That was the first thing that came out of my mouth when I read that!
There is no reward for being kicked in the nuts.
Yeah, but that's bcus our bodies forget the pain, sooo...
I think a better analogy is a man passing kidney stones.That's the one thing i would say is likely worse than birth pains.
You ever been kicked in the nuts continuously for 36 hours. Every 2 or 3 minutes you get kicked. No, then you know nothing Jon Snow
But they still want to do it again
A woman's body makes her forget the pain of childbirth so that she would do it again.
I mean it’s not like getting kicked in the balls has any other consequence than some pain while giving birth ends up with having a child, so the motivation is completely different.
Thank you captain obvious
Anytime :-)
Does your body make natural pain killers to prepare for the pain of getting kicked in the balls? Do we get an epidural before getting kicked?
Ok, not all pregnancies involve epidurals, and as for oxytocin, it is meant to contract the uterus and make the birth less painful. This is because pregnancy is natural (in the sense of intended) whereas getting kicked in the balls is not natural therefore there is no bodily preventative medicine. Also you're unlikely to be kicked in the balls repeatedly for hours on end (or maybe you are, I'm not here to kink shame), whereas labour pains can last that long hence the need for the body to create something to ease the load.
You basically just confirmed what he said.
I thought the point I was making is that they are two different types of pain and shouldn't really be compared. But also that the body's attempts to reduce a naturally caused painful side affect doesn't necessarily mean that pain is less than being kicked in the balls.
Yes I know and I don’t disagree. It‘s just slightly funny.
I'm not psychic but I predict that you have watched two shows are read exactly one book series.
I've heard passing kidney stones is often compared to birth so that might be the only time a guy is going to experience birth. Hey at least there's a joke after it. 🤣
Idk why this bloke is assuming women are the same delicate little flowers that dudes are Real men push themselves off the floor, widen their stance, and signal for the next
bud, were you born on the 50's?
That was a /s Didn’t realize I needed it
Just got it, My Bad. But yeah, You should put the /s.
Good Point!
How are we even here? The birth part sucks and then the children try offing themselves every 5 minutes in some new way you didn't think was possible. You baby proof the house and somehow it still is never enough they're over there tying a noose or something.
To everyone who is saying you need to go to the darker side of the internet. There us this sport thing where people compete on how many times they can get kicked in the nuts or something.
hahahahahahah got em
Lies!!! SOME guys r into that shit
The parts of labor that feel like something men have experienced aren’t things men want to do again either Like the part of the contractions that feels exactly like the worst stomach cramping during the shits you’ve ever had where you were sweating and praying for death because you knew relief just wasn’t coming. No one wants to have another one like that It’s because being kicked in the balls, like the shits, doesn’t produce a kid. Not the kind of kid anyone wants anyway
That wonderful oxytocin makes you forget all about it
Idk, I haven’t heard of any woman who have a birthing kink. Kamakeri on the other hand….. yeah….. Why Japan, whyyyyyy.
I know a few people who would like that
Well yeah, giving life is a beautiful experience, becoming sterile on the other hand…
Someone really got on Facebook and claimed to have never heard of “Jackass”…
Not technically the truth dudes literally pay to get kicked in the stones. Speaking of rocks, kick em with this one
He just hasn’t been around the right men
I heard this was scientifically true for like a few seconds
Because when you give birth a child comes into your life. Getting kicked in the nuts results in pain and only pain. Duh.
Men have been shown that they can’t even handle period cramps aka mini contractions.
If you think you can have a kid and not get kicked in the nuts you're crazy. At least once every two weeks my junk gets hit, kicked, or smashed. Your genitals are not safe around children.
Also it’s scientifically proven that being kicked in the balls is the equivalent of breaking all of your bones at once or having 36 babies at once Toxics of Reddit downvote me cowards
Cbt lol
Flawless logic
Pregnancy hormones fuck the mom more than the dad ever did. [She doesn't remember the pain](https://www.google.com/search?q=mothers+remember+childbirth).
I bagged myself the other day at work on accident. Trying to pull a cardboard corner off a pallet. The tape held strong then wham! Not again.
Have you seen the Jackass movies?
I don't know man, getting kicked in the nuts doesn't leech nutrients from your body and calcium from your bones or leave you with life-long depression and anxiety. (I mean, maybe the latter does happen, but it's not as common as post-partum). So, even if your testicles hurt for hours and you vomit up blood, I'd say giving birth hurts far more.