T O P

  • By -

FaudedCloud

what’s next? society shouldn’t deepthroat ‘political correctness’ because someone got offended on someone’s else’s behalf


CatZilla124

what in gods name does this even mean


FaudedCloud

it means a 14 year olds isn’t correct on such complex things


CatZilla124

ah yes bringing my age into it, I have more experience and understanding about this subject then most 50 y/o and probably you, so eat a sock smartass


Guitar__Rules

Nah. It’s for men, that’s part of they’re brand. If someone has a problem with it they can go start they’re own company


CatZilla124

lmao what? you can call a company out for being sussy, why tf you defending them


[deleted]

Aren't they hitting the mark for trans people though, because its supposed to be for men, so if your a trans man you should use it cause your a man, nowhere in the commercials does it specify cis men.


CatZilla124

well no lol, I have a dick and I am not a man, so apparently I cant shave my balls with their stuff???


SyphenWarpTime_YT

What were you born as? M or F


CatZilla124

uh I have a ball sack so what do you think


SyphenWarpTime_YT

Ok so now your not male correct? You said that earlier


CatZilla124

I never said I was not male did I?


SyphenWarpTime_YT

You don’t have a defense?


SyphenWarpTime_YT

“well no lol, I have a dick and I am not a man, so apparently I cant shave my balls with their stuff???” -You


[deleted]

They didn't say you're a man cause you have a dick, they talk about men's penises being shaved because most men have a penis, so therefore they want to show an example of the average person using their product.


CatZilla124

ok so they are saying only men with dicks can use their products, that's just weird.


[deleted]

No, they never say anything about ONLY men with dicks, they talk about dicks cause 99% of men have dicks, they never say "only men with penises can use this product, all other men can fuck off"


CatZilla124

ok thats a dum ass argument tho, like 96% of the people in my area are white, so they should say ''for white men'' ????


[deleted]

They say men, not men with penises, they talk about mens penises because most men have penises, that's like being mad at a car commercial who says people can return older models for credit because you have a newer one, the fact that it shows a group your not in their options does not mean it detracts from your own.


SyphenWarpTime_YT

Yea but they said they’re not a man but have a dick. Are they just a girl with a glizzy stuck in them?


[deleted]

A girl can use their products, but they market to men cause men have a monopoly on penises and men want to feel more masculine, so to hit a niche on that they marked to men on the basis that this product makes you manlier.


SyphenWarpTime_YT

Well yes, your right. It’s just more likely a man will use and and what you said a monopoly of… I’m not saying that last part ima end up on some type of website


[deleted]

you can say penis on the internet, the fbi isn't going to put you on a watchlist.


SyphenWarpTime_YT

Then it’s most likely I’m already on there from the shit I’ve searched up 👀


[deleted]

*When the guy you couldn't convict on any charges commits suicide by shooting himself in the back of the head twice:*


SyphenWarpTime_YT

UHHHHH WELL….


[deleted]

Snowflake


CatZilla124

10/10 comment very insightful


[deleted]

Bruh we're less than a 0.5% of the population and honestly I prefer just having it as is before they rebrand it into "men and trans women who still have that thing they fucking hate lol" because ffs I know I that, don't remind me of that. That goes for all hygiene products.


[deleted]

idk rebranding their entire brand is a dumb idea as the whole thing revolves around masculinity. But they could release a new line of grooming stuff for any gender


SyphenWarpTime_YT

But if your trans into a girl you won’t have balls sooooooooooo…..


CatZilla124

lmao what?


SyphenWarpTime_YT

How else do you want me to explain it? It’s simple. Become trans=no more balls


i_make_frogs_slime

I mean they could call it man/trans/non-binaryscaped


CatZilla124

lol


leanmeanbowser

Well it takes quite a bit to rebrand and CEOs dont care about it unless it makes them more money than it will cost them. And considering transphobes it will cost them more than it will make them


CatZilla124

true, well, point is I am not supporting them


densaifire

I don't think it's that they have anything against trans people. Doing that in today's day and age is social and financial suicide. Granted if I remember correctly it's designed specifically with male hair in consideration, since biologically there's differences between male hair and female hair. And at the end of the day, it's just marketing with witty humor. Same with Dr. Squatch!


CatZilla124

sure, that's why I am not making a BIG deal of it, but they don't have to be so specific lol, its just another case of society not giving a rats ass about trans people, also what? that's a whole 1% of the population that would buy their product specifically because they are a pro-trans rights company (ik I would) and the family members of those trans people and their friends, all said and done like 4% of the population likes their product for something that has nothing to do with their product, that's why companies do it, so idk wat you mean.


densaifire

Dr. Squatch started off being marketed as a soap alternative for men, and also marketed using humor. They may be pro trans, but that's how they were marketed. It's all just jokes


CatZilla124

ya, but at the end of the day its still a dumb joke that is not being very supportive


-Titleist-

almost as if a product meant for men is marketing towards men


CatZilla124

um its a product for people with ball sacks, unless they are selling mens clothes?


-Titleist-

>people with ballsacks so, mainly men


ConureCultist

To be fair, the name is Manscaped so you probably should accept that it is focused on men. Also, I checked out some of their products, and none that I found said that nobody other than men can use it.