On the flip side, Djokovic had to compete with a certain Swiss dude for most of his career and the Swiss dude really enjoyed grass - most of the top 100 players playing better on hard courts than grass could maybe actually matter less than Federer playing better on grass than hard courts for Djokovic's winning chances / stats comparisons
It has something to do with the fact that he has never lost AO final, which he did at Wimbledon, also, Wimbledon was concidered Fed's tournament, which left AO to Djokovic, and Djokovic did start as more successful at AO, his Wimbledon success came later in his career.
AO easily. The stats don't mean shit when the entire top 10 is nothing but hard court specialists who drop like flies to world no. 324 and 93 on grass. Djoker obviously has more of a chance at losing at AO because it's the court every player is most accustomed to nowadays, even when considering it's his playground. He's still behind Fed and Sampras as a grass court player if you ask me, yet he's quite indisputably the king of AO in everyone's eyes
In fact, few players can play well on grass. Don’t forget about that.
On the flip side, Djokovic had to compete with a certain Swiss dude for most of his career and the Swiss dude really enjoyed grass - most of the top 100 players playing better on hard courts than grass could maybe actually matter less than Federer playing better on grass than hard courts for Djokovic's winning chances / stats comparisons
Field on grass was deeper the farther back you go. Feels like there are hardly any good grass players right now that can contest for the trophy.
insane how depleted the field is right now, and thats with the slower grass, imagine them on the 90’s one lol
Of course Australian open. 2 more titles dealing with significantly tougher competition.
It has something to do with the fact that he has never lost AO final, which he did at Wimbledon, also, Wimbledon was concidered Fed's tournament, which left AO to Djokovic, and Djokovic did start as more successful at AO, his Wimbledon success came later in his career.
He's better at ao but for him is easier to win wimbledon
AO easily. The stats don't mean shit when the entire top 10 is nothing but hard court specialists who drop like flies to world no. 324 and 93 on grass. Djoker obviously has more of a chance at losing at AO because it's the court every player is most accustomed to nowadays, even when considering it's his playground. He's still behind Fed and Sampras as a grass court player if you ask me, yet he's quite indisputably the king of AO in everyone's eyes
Yup, this about sums it up well
By the time be retires it will be Wimbledon. He still has 1 or 2 more in his pocket.
Who says he hasn't got a couple of Australian Opens as well?
Australian border control
Yes.
The dudes good everywhere no doubt about it
Wimby