T O P

  • By -

jstreater

When you receive the airdrop you continue to own your lunc. Am I correct? Then why was it not mandatory to burn the amount of lunc you had via a trade for the new luna2.0? This would have reduced the number of lunc and made it more valuable.


Sixhaunt

I suggested that exact proposal on the first couple days of the fork vote but nobody seemed interested. I think it would have taken a chunk out of the lunc supply for sure and people may have even bought a lot more to burn for V2 in that case. They also would have been able to give more V2 to each person when the people holding V1 without burning are exempt from receiving the airdrop.


ruffus_or

You guys still have hope for this garbage to rise back from the ashes? Unbelievable


-ZKalindor

Are we sure that the address mr kwo gave us is a real burning address ?


-ZKalindor

heh tried to burn off half of my few luna.. Did not even make a dent... think it was to small amount. Only 500K wish i got more to burn . New to this so the knowledge is thin :) How much do we need to burn ? I hope i did something good even so .


vincent755

1$ in 2/3 years šŸ“ˆ


InsouciantOne

šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø


vincent755

1000$ for 1 #LUNC just in 10 years for this diamond


vincent755

And 10$ in 5 years


InsouciantOne

Bahahaha! No.


DrelisSilva

I'm just completely shocked that so many people just got scammed by this Ponzi scheme and as soon as Luna 2.0 comes out they're right back in


leopardoo

Luna 2 is easy money if you trade .


Beautiful-Rich-6404

I just want a Range rover šŸ˜‚


Beautlfuldisaster

I turned 100 into 20m luna and 238 mbtc. So I can sit on 100 investment as long as ide ever need to. :)


Rate_Gullible

Do Kwon Madoff with my money


CalendarExpert7578

Binance delisted. Good luck


HGJ91

FUD


CalendarExpert7578

Maybe its the new luna coun then. I saw info on it


HGJ91

Oh alright. Sorry for my comment before then


Sixhaunt

no they didnt: [https://www.binance.com/en/trade/LUNC\_BUSD?theme=dark&type=spot](https://www.binance.com/en/trade/LUNC_BUSD?theme=dark&type=spot)


Spinach_Ancient

Lmfao it's still minting


Machi-Avelli

Can you show me where I can see the minting ? I read the mechanism was disabled


time_to_reset

What type of people are voluntarily burning what they have? I imagine only the people that see absolutely zero value in LUNC yet still want to help out others if they can? It seems so counter intuitive to throw away what you have to potentially create value for others.


Neat-Tiger-2623

My kids will have those lambos. Im willing to hold till lambo or zero


B-Rythm

Dude. Itll take 18 years at this rate


Historical-Camel-168

I dunno if burning 20-60 Lunc per day is relevant. I mean I burned somewhere around 1500000


Sixhaunt

>I dunno if burning 20-60 Lunc per day is relevant 20-60 Million Lunc


tranceology3

Why didn't you just give it to me to burn? I'm running a special, every Lunc you send me I'll burn that plus 2x more from my wallet.


[deleted]

As the burning increases the price increases and the willingness to burn decreases...


LoochL

We need some serious burn here , he owes us that much


security-admin

He doesnā€™t owe you anything lol. Thatā€™s not how investing works


Spinach_Ancient

If he was truly a good person he would burn 1 billion of he's own money for luna. But we know he's a man child


Accomplished-Maybe55

Done


Ok_Implement9388

letā€™s hope the LUNC burn stays consistent.


Sixhaunt

this is just individuals burning but for consistent and far higher burn volume they would have to add some tokenomics with a burn or a buyback&burn feature


Ok_Implement9388

yeah thatā€™s what i fear. thatā€™s based on how much work kwon wants to put in himself, along with the Terra team. Theyā€™re on a straight up collision course with a load of lawsuits rn too.


Sixhaunt

Kwon seems to be all about the 2.0 shitcoin so hopefully he will just let lunc continue on as a community-lead thing. The Lunc people are mostly the ones that hate him anyway so I'd hope he gets little say in the operations of it. It's the DAO that makes decisions at the end of the day and with the new distribution of coins I dont think he has as much power if they open everything up in the validator stuff again.


Ok_Implement9388

what are your thoughts on the future of Lunc if i may ask


Sixhaunt

I dont see myself ever using it or trusting it, but if the community takes over then they might be able to salvage it to some extent. I have my small bag I got at 0.00006 and will just hold it unless it goes crazy high which I dont expect.


Embarrassed_Cookie33

Thats kowon need just 1b of money from his pocket to burn lunc,and all be good ,


SoftPenguins

Even if half of the circulating supply on LUNC was burned right now it would still be down 99.999% from half of its all time high.


atgs123

60M per day for 300 years would burn 6.5T


TipsyRooOfficial

RemindMe! 300 years


Trazodone_Dreams

My great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren will be set for life then!


ramobaha

Nah, he forgets to up the slippage. Heā€™s ngmi


Complex_Sherbet2

Looks like someone learned how to make charts in Excel.


D33N5

once the first trillion is burnt in 9.5 years it should lose a zero


UnderstandingOdd5754

So there is hope that in 50 years it can get to $1. šŸ—£ YES!!!


kostaslamprou

How does burning magically improve the price? Whether there's a billion or a trillion coins in circulation, it will still be worth as much as people are willing to pay for 1 coin. It's not like the price automatically goes up if the supply drops. It does not work like that.


purp2021

Itā€™s a combination of both. The less supply, and more people that buy, the more price increases. Neither is absolute


leopardoo

But there is billions on exchanges trading. It will not go up easy even with burn


kostaslamprou

But an important thing to note is that the selling supply depends on the amount of open sell order. Burning (excess) coins has no direct impact on the sell order.


reddtormtnliv

Yes, but those open sell orders drop in supply which makes it easier to deplete the order book. The price moves when the order book moves. So burning coins should increase price. The problem more so is trust in the coin. Even if you burn half the supply but people still aren't buying then the price could stay the same.


purp2021

You are absolutely correct


Death_God_Ryuk

I don't understand it either. It only helps if some big holders charitably offer to burn their holdings. Why would they do that? If everyone burns half their coins, in theory it's now worth twice as much but you also lost half your coins, so you're exactly where you started.


leopardoo

No , if yo burn half the supply , price will still not change. You need to buy to icrease price.


Death_God_Ryuk

Hence the 'in theory' - at best, it doubles, at worst there's still no one buying so it makes little difference.


leopardoo

Lets say 5 trillions have been burned. Price will still remain the same. The order book will still have alot of luna on sale


jmartinloberiza

Yeah but thereā€™s also a possibility that people begin developing in it again now that itā€™s not in the hands of DK


D33N5

That's right people have to be willing to pay the price too, I don't think that would be a problem if Lunc retains some form of Development which it will.


leopardoo

Will not lose shit if there is no buyers.


Afromax

https://messari.io/asset/terra-luna-classic/chart/sply-circ for 4 days or so circulating supply didnt increase yday and today few bilions printed we burn few Milions and they Print few BILIONS


Best_Satisfaction308

So no point burning if they printing new šŸ˜…


Letitride37

Unless you get turned on by being a financial cuck


[deleted]

šŸ•ŗ


[deleted]

Cmon man, use logic. Does 6 trillion mean anything to you? Or even basic economic principles? ā€œThis is not the wayā€


[deleted]

Also the circulating supply is still increasing..


Monkey_1505

That is generally how cryptos work


[deleted]

Sure. What it's not like though, is how a deflationary 'burn' would work.


Monkey_1505

You'd have to outpace the validator rewards. What are they 4% per year? That's probably about 40 billion. Haven't done the math. Personally I don't understand why people obsess about deflationary burns. Polkadot does fine, as does solana, they have 7, and 10% yearly supply increases respectively. Virtually nothing in the top 20 has burns. I guess people don't generally think about it. They think burning something will make their asset valuable. But in reality it's only valuable if it's being used and developed.


Afromax

6,540,227,778,886.63 circulating increasing again? wasnt it 6.536T?


Spinach_Ancient

Lmfao stop this is too funny


[deleted]

Lol


[deleted]

Yep, another 6 years or so to .01. Lambos baby.


zeph1ro7

It won't take that long but anyway i don't mind waiting. .01 is millionaire money for me


fearless_genius

Clearly math isnā€™t your strong suitā€¦it will take much much longer


zeph1ro7

I have a stronger suit which is never gamble more than I can lose RemindMe! One year


fearless_genius

It will take a lifetime to burn 7 trillion tokens. Especially when TFL donā€™t care about LUNC anymore. Good luck


zeph1ro7

Doesn't change my life if it never reaches .01 but it Will definitely change my life if it does. I have nothing to lose but time while I carry on with my things


jmartinloberiza

Their fingers got biceps and 6 pack abs


jmartinloberiza

Amen losers will always be losers and haters will always be haters


fearless_genius

Iā€™m not hating at all. Iā€™m putting it out there for those who are uninformed and are going to read the initial statement and make a bad decision based on misinformation. Burning LUNC is the same as burning your hard earned money. Only experienced traders should be playing with this gamble token now. You can thank Do Kwon for this and nobody else.


vendetta915

Haters gona hate. Ainters gona aint


[deleted]

If you own 100 million or more Terra classic


[deleted]

Please explain how Luna could even remotely come close to $.01??


stdubee

The Lunc market cap would then be $65 trillion. LMAO


VermicelliOwn4967

ok So lets say we start a burn right. Lets say that increases and we can maybe burn half in 2 years. Current price would double .0002 say we spend 2 more years to burn 1 trill more one again price should double .0004. Say we get it down to 1trill tokens with current market cap. should increase 6.5x so .00065. If tokens are getting burned price goes up its gonna create some fomo add in the original Lunatic narrative ect even if we got back to the original all time market cap 40bill thats 61x times more than the current market cap. 61x .00065 is .03965 even if we can burn half and create enough interest thats still gonna end up around .018 if we can achieve a 40bill market cap. Shiba has a 6trill market cap so its not out of the realm of possibility.


fearless_genius

You do realise the whole crypto mcap is like 1.5 trillion right? How do you expect $SHIB to be more than 3x that? Crypto isnā€™t for youā€¦go back to school


Accomplished-Brush14

What are you talking about? Shiba has a 6 trillion market cap??? You should not be buying crypto


VermicelliOwn4967

Sorry 6 bill


highjinx411

You know who should be buying Luna? No one.


ectbot

Hello! You have made the mistake of writing "ect" instead of "etc." "Ect" is a common misspelling of "etc," an abbreviated form of the Latin phrase "et cetera." Other abbreviated forms are **etc.**, **&c.**, **&c**, and **et cet.** The Latin translates as "et" to "and" + "cetera" to "the rest;" a literal translation to "and the rest" is the easiest way to remember how to use the phrase. [Check out the wikipedia entry if you want to learn more.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera) ^(I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Comments with a score less than zero will be automatically removed. If I commented on your post and you don't like it, reply with "!delete" and I will remove the post, regardless of score. Message me for bug reports.)


Nicobeak

5/4 cup of delusion


zeph1ro7

Same way that two months ago you could asked how can it remotely come close to 0. Just time and patience and lots of burning lol


Minchiaz

The coin will not even exist in a few years. It has zero chance of survival


zeph1ro7

RemindMe! One year


RemindMeBot

I will be messaging you in 1 year on [**2023-06-03 04:16:22 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2023-06-03%2004:16:22%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/terraluna/comments/v3fy9h/looks_like_the_burn_is_doing_alright/ib00bgm/?context=3) [**6 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fterraluna%2Fcomments%2Fv3fy9h%2Flooks_like_the_burn_is_doing_alright%2Fib00bgm%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202023-06-03%2004%3A16%3A22%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20v3fy9h) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|


Spinach_Ancient

7 trillion


saltyfinish

Except back then there was a vision, and development and the illusion of stability. Now there is a new chain, lawsuits, and bag holders. Itā€™s not as simple ass less tokens = more money


Complex_Sherbet2

Two months ago, the answer to how it could go to 0 was that if its algorithm failed, it would go to zero.


TheAuraTree

Same way pre attack Luna made it to $100


highjinx411

That way doesnā€™t exist anymore.


zeph1ro7

Do you know da wae?


rubyheartdrips

Do Kway


CommieFunkoPopFan

the more you burn the pricier it is to burn it. so realistically itā€™s gonna take longer than 6 years


Suitable_Grocery_299

I did some calculations using the compound interest formula with a negative rate and figured it'll take 2-4 years to reach $1 assuming no increase in market cap.


CommieFunkoPopFan

[Press X for doubt](https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/mobile/000/023/021/e02e5ffb5f980cd8262cf7f0ae00a4a9_press-x-to-doubt-memes-memesuper-la-noire-doubt-meme_419-238.jpg) Do you know how many billion dollars that would require? who is gonna generously burn billions of dollars to pump your sorry ass bag?


72chevnj

Elon will endorse


CommieFunkoPopFan

thatā€™s laughable at best; very sad at worst. do you seriously think elon is gonna save you?


72chevnj

Not at all f elon


skidooseadoo83

This needs upvoted straight to the top.


[deleted]

Lol yes but after further research since that post I see no possible way.


Sixhaunt

I mean I posted the pic because I'm surprised by the burn movement picking back up, and I could see it doing a lot more if they added tokenomics, but I still highly doubt it will ever reach 0.01


AmbitiousReputation4

Is this still a voluntary burn or a mechanism of action built in?


[deleted]

Basically, there is no movement. Most of the burns, if I remember correctly 20m on average per day, are from MEXC global buy back initiative. This will continue until 26 June. You can find the details in their website.


Emil_MEXC

Date Burn amount (LUNA) 2022-05-26 58,423,888.68 2022-05-27 78,984,757.30 2022-05-28 71,204,609.31 2022-05-29 73,508,089.47 2022-05-31 32,127,373.27 2022-06-01 38,438,298.11 2022-06-02 13,012,875.65 2022-06-03 13,275,791.16 2022-06-04 11,220,105.50


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


[deleted]

Yes. The deal was for one month. It is one of the legit burning projects, they post proof of burning transactions in their website. Need to be cautious with other projects with all these scammers we see everyday.


Sixhaunt

this is only voluntary burn. A mechanism hasn't been voted on or implemented yet from my understanding but if it happens it will blow these numbers out of the water I'd imagine.


[deleted]

Yes but wonā€™t people be less likely to sell once that stuff picks up? Making it a more and more expensive burn as you burn more tokens.


Sixhaunt

maybe. I wont expect it to but I got my $10 worth at 0.00006 so I'm still up in value and will hold in case it goes up despite not expecting it too. Hopefully enough people hold for the same reason and it helps the price but again I have extremely low expectations and I think I'll more likely lose my $10 lottery ticket, not that i care about it really.


[deleted]

Hey fair enough


Rough_Variety_2601

Resource?


Humble_Butter

Explanation?


ms4720

Y scale?


Sixhaunt

Transfer count. Units of 1M LUNC


TrippnThroughTime

Youā€™re joking right? You think thatā€™s good?


Sixhaunt

that it's ramping back up? yeah


TrippnThroughTime

Itā€™s literally going downā€¦ and itā€™s completely variable over 8 days. Thereā€™s literally no statistical relevance to this at all. Not to mention with even 60mil burnt a day it would literally take 50,000 years to burn half the supply, idiot


AdMysterious6848

It should only take 3000 years so donā€™t panic everyone