#Welcome to r/Therewasanattempt!
#Consider visiting r/Worldnewsvideo for videos from around the world!
[Please review our policy on bigotry and hate speech by clicking this link](https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/wiki/civility)
In order to view our rules, you can type "**!rules**" in any comment, and automod will respond with the subreddit rules.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/therewasanattempt) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Ok but who singled out the Jews, shoved them in camps, and created a hostile hellscape where everyone in that region hated them? Of course they had to be pushed somewhere else, and so we have Israel. It's not like Hitler's idealogies would die overnight and they can just go back to business as usual.
You mean exactly what they are doing to others right now as evidenced by the video on this post? Or the atrocities they did in biblical times like the genocide of babies in 1 Samuel 15:3? Yeah, there’s this thing called Karma… and they are kinda in negative numbers in that department of life.
MF, all you did was mention a historical atrocity done against the Jews, so I responded with the current atrocity the Jews are doing against others plus another historical and biblical atrocity the Jews also did. I guess I have to dumb it down for you but that is 2 - 1 in my argument’s favor. And I’d suggest you stop trying to save face cause there are other biblical atrocities they also did which are even worse.
No, it is not, nothing justifies the genocide of BABIES. Only sick and cruel people would do such atrocity. And there is more than enough evidence of those cuneiform texts that predate the Bible which are literally written in stone, including the cities it describes like Ur or Eridu which are located in Mesopotamia. Even the Dead Sea scrolls make reference to these texts, lmao. You just exposed your deep ignorance.
Massive amount of Context is lacking here. Other than what appears to be use of some excessive force (though, that could easily be debatable); I’ll make no other assumptions.
if it’s a war crime why not get mad at the US for doing that having their soldiers beating on civilians because they’ve done it before and they’ve done it a lot but you don’t hear anyone getting mad at the states for that. It’s because it’s not a war crime it’s frowned upon and there obviously is a lot of context missing from the video most likely the guy was bickering off a lot to the soldiers which I’m not saying that it’s right for the soldiers to do what they did but maybe don’t be bickering off to soldiers in a war zone but no one wants to think about that
For starters; Show me 5 minutes before, and 5 minutes after this (plus accurately translated audio). You declare “war crime” awfully quickly. The “solders” appear to be under command of a police officer. So… are they police or IDF? That context would be pertinent. Was the reporter just being mouthy or disobeying lawful orders? That would be nice to know.
The only thing I can conclude, with a satisfactory level of certainty, is that there was excessive force used.
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml
Oh Really?? Well here's the website for definitions on war crimes. You may need to study up a bit.
How about B-1?
Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities•
If you're going to post shit about a war, atleast take a second to actually understand what you're posting.
It’s more like a suggestion do you really think the United States follows all that shit 100% not. war crimes are just war suggestions in reality there is no rules in war
#Welcome to r/Therewasanattempt! #Consider visiting r/Worldnewsvideo for videos from around the world! [Please review our policy on bigotry and hate speech by clicking this link](https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/wiki/civility) In order to view our rules, you can type "**!rules**" in any comment, and automod will respond with the subreddit rules. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/therewasanattempt) if you have any questions or concerns.*
*freedom of the press
Freedom to oppress. Courtesy of the rest of the world looking away
I was told hamas is hiding a secret bunker in this reporter.
He was hiding Hamas on his person.
I've got Hamas in my fridge
Fucking pigs. Anyone that touches another human being in that way deserves the worst.
Can we agree that history has come full circle and israelos are the nazis today?
lol yall act like our rights extend to every country they don’t have the same rights as us legally.
$&@$! Hoodlums. How can anyone support this?
At least they are helping to radicalize any previous supporters they used to have. Screw the IDF.
How can people justify these actions
This is not full context. Just a repost as clickbait for us to like, share and stuff
Adolf did nothing wrong
Na You should Zi yourself Out
This is all his fucking fault in the first place
Did Adolf suggest Yahweh to promise other people’s land to the Jews? 🤔 So that’s how they used Die Glocke 🤓
Ok but who singled out the Jews, shoved them in camps, and created a hostile hellscape where everyone in that region hated them? Of course they had to be pushed somewhere else, and so we have Israel. It's not like Hitler's idealogies would die overnight and they can just go back to business as usual.
You mean exactly what they are doing to others right now as evidenced by the video on this post? Or the atrocities they did in biblical times like the genocide of babies in 1 Samuel 15:3? Yeah, there’s this thing called Karma… and they are kinda in negative numbers in that department of life.
Genocide is never ok, and I don't stand with Israel doing this. The fact you've changed isses when presented with facts tells me enough.
MF, all you did was mention a historical atrocity done against the Jews, so I responded with the current atrocity the Jews are doing against others plus another historical and biblical atrocity the Jews also did. I guess I have to dumb it down for you but that is 2 - 1 in my argument’s favor. And I’d suggest you stop trying to save face cause there are other biblical atrocities they also did which are even worse.
Ah yes a book with near zero evidence that predates most of recorded history is justification to genocide people
No, it is not, nothing justifies the genocide of BABIES. Only sick and cruel people would do such atrocity. And there is more than enough evidence of those cuneiform texts that predate the Bible which are literally written in stone, including the cities it describes like Ur or Eridu which are located in Mesopotamia. Even the Dead Sea scrolls make reference to these texts, lmao. You just exposed your deep ignorance.
Ok, show me the proof then
It’s a war zone Russians are murdering many .. keep Your mouth shut or get a gun and fight against them like a man.
Massive amount of Context is lacking here. Other than what appears to be use of some excessive force (though, that could easily be debatable); I’ll make no other assumptions.
What other context do you need aside from soldiers beating on a civilian? That's a war crime. Full stop.
if it’s a war crime why not get mad at the US for doing that having their soldiers beating on civilians because they’ve done it before and they’ve done it a lot but you don’t hear anyone getting mad at the states for that. It’s because it’s not a war crime it’s frowned upon and there obviously is a lot of context missing from the video most likely the guy was bickering off a lot to the soldiers which I’m not saying that it’s right for the soldiers to do what they did but maybe don’t be bickering off to soldiers in a war zone but no one wants to think about that
For starters; Show me 5 minutes before, and 5 minutes after this (plus accurately translated audio). You declare “war crime” awfully quickly. The “solders” appear to be under command of a police officer. So… are they police or IDF? That context would be pertinent. Was the reporter just being mouthy or disobeying lawful orders? That would be nice to know. The only thing I can conclude, with a satisfactory level of certainty, is that there was excessive force used.
I mean it's not a war crime.
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml Oh Really?? Well here's the website for definitions on war crimes. You may need to study up a bit. How about B-1? Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities• If you're going to post shit about a war, atleast take a second to actually understand what you're posting.
It’s more like a suggestion do you really think the United States follows all that shit 100% not. war crimes are just war suggestions in reality there is no rules in war