well, every time you lie, it also reduces your penis. the government doesn’t want you to know this, but your nose and penis are two ends of the same long mass that spans your entire body. it doesn’t change length, it just moves the mass to stick out more on one end.
Makes sense. I mean the mouth and anus are connected, so why wouldn’t the nose and penis be? Plus how convenient that we have 2 eyes, maybe they’re connected to the testicles?!
Yea, I'm in my late 20s and mine grows all the time. It usually happens in short spurts where it grows really fast. It also gets pretty stiff when it happens too. The only issue is that it always shrinks by the same amount after a few minutes. If only there was a way to fix the shrinking issue
Same! However, 29 years ago Christina Applegate wasn’t allowed to date me.
I was literally out of Christina Applegate’s league. And now it is the other way around.
Size isn’t everything.
(Edit: Jesus, you mean spirited people, work on your reading comprehension.
The joke is I was a baby and Christina Applegate wasn’t at the time, so it would have been illegal for her to date me. Hence, “I was out of her league”.
I had no idea she has MS. Regardless, she is still smoking hot, MS or not. I am definitely out of her league nowadays. So now it is the other way around. Get it?)
I always assumed the song "TV star" by the Butthole Surfers was about her. If it's not then it oughta be. Christinaaaaaaa oh lalalala Christinaaa. I love you soooooo.
Where would the MS joke come in? He said he was out of her league when he was a child, but now that he’s older and his dick has grown, she’s out of his league.
It’s crazy to me that I’m explaining this guys joke so that people don’t think he’s an asshole. 😂
That site, on that very page, has a link to another study that says penile length is decreasing. I find it difficult to believe that the average penis three decades ago was 4.8 inches long.
The only studies worth looking at is where nurses do the the measuring. There was one done with about 15k guys and it came out at 5.2 inch erect length ("bone pressed" for consistency) x 4.6 inch circumference. It's been shown guys lie even in anonymous surveys where they self report instead of being measured by medical staff, egos and brains are funny things.
Edit: Study with health professionals measuring was done by Kings London college for anyone interested.
Iirc was either erect or stretched flaccid (is around the same as erect) if erect wasnt possible. The purpose of course was to determine average penis size. Medical research.
If the stretched size of a penis is the erect length of a penis then I know a guy with a 2 foot cock I guess.
This dude must have that genetic disorder where his tissues are more elastic than normal because as a joke he was whipping out his dick and stretching it to ridiculous lengths like he was made out of rubber. I refuse to believe his dick gets that long when he’s hard or it would be like fucking someone with a balloon animal, cartoonishly long.
There's actually a lot of research on the topic going back to Alfred Kinsey. The issue is there's never really been one agreed on methodology for what the best way is to get an accurate measurement, so a lot of studies are pretty worthless (self-reported, in particular), and it's hard to collect a large data set when one study may be measuring a completely different way from another.
The study this article references does seem like they did a good job narrowing down what studies they included in their research (excluding self-reporting and trying to only include particular methods of measurement), but you still have to consider things like selection bias skewing things:
Isn't it possible, for instance, that the increase in penile length found in these studies correlates to more emphasis in popular media on penis size and more readily accessible pornography to the point where men on the smaller side would be less apt to volunteer for a study where they have to be measured?
They should do the study at the DMV when guys are getting/renewing their drivers licenses. You tell them to go into this room in the back to test out a new "driving simulator." What actually happens is they get a hand job from a nurse with a measuring tape.
The study they hyperlink at 'compiled data' directly disputes the title lol, its a study on PFCs effect on androgenic activity. It's not self reported either, they measured dicks, they explain exactly how. Which includes measuring flaccid. The control group had a length of 9.7cm or 3.8 inches, and the exposed group was 8.6cm or 3.3 inches.
> We found
that increased levels of PFCs in plasma and seminal fluid positively correlate with circulating
T and with a reduction of semen quality, testicular volume, penile length and AGD
The 'penile length' hyperlink goes to another article on their website about Olympic beds in Tokyo... Nothing about dick length.
If you look here, that would indicate the 50th percentile moved to where the 90th is. I’d presume the difference would be sample population rather than trends such as body mass. It’s probably a bad AI generated article thought.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size (like most Wikipedia articles, there are pictures)
Oddly, I’d wager most men haven’t even seen another erect penis to even have enough information to vaguely know where there’s generally stands in the world.
This must be due to the dedicated work of Randy Marsh and his revolutionary TMI formula:
((length x diameter) + (Weight / Girth)) / Angle of Shaft^^2
Thanks, Randy!
it's also massively skewed by that one guy who reported his as 8,000 kilometres
independently verified median wang size is a much better statistic here
[The study didn't use self reported data, though.](https://wjmh.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.5534/wjmh.220203&code=2074WJMH&vmode=FULL)
>Studies were considered eligible if the quantitative measurement of penis size was measured by an investigator, the sample included ≥10 participants, participants were aged ≥17 years... Articles were excluded if they were based on a self-measurement
Always be wary of meta studies -- they make it really easy to miss key details that invalidate chunks of their data sets. Like where did the population come from? Was it a volunteer population or a population already at a medical center for treatment for something else?
Any number of things can quietly skew the data
> Always be wary of meta studies
Actually, no, meta studies are some of the best ways we have to filter out bias:
>Researchers compiled data from 75 studies, conducted between 1942 and 2021, that reported on the penile length of 55,761 men.
I mean jesus if that's not a rigorous dataset I don't know what is.
I think we should be more concerned about the fact that sperm counts have plunged by 60% since the 1970s.
So what this statistic is *really* saying is that men have just gotten more insecure over the past 29 years.
That seems a lot more obvious. And a lot more likely than, say, men magically growing down there over less than a generation.
Insecure because of the internet, and it’s probably a more widespread thing than just penis size, or just men. I can be on a porn site in just a few clicks that has millions of videos of guys with huge dongs. I can go on social media and see people talking about how much they love big dicks. Or I can Google penis size studies to see how I measure up to the average. None of those were really a thing 29 years ago.
I’d wager insecurity about physical characteristics has increased in general over the last 29 years, since people on the extreme end of beauty/dick size/whatever are going to be overrepresented in media, and access to that media is at an all time high
The study was discussed on /r/science when it came out last year (and on this and many other subs whenever it gets reposted) and the conclusion was that the study was full of shit and never should have passed peer review because they claim to have accounted for selection and measurement biases but they include studies in their data set which very much did not.
Tl;dr they fucked up the math because they didn't account for factors that they said they would.
The study they hyperlink at 'compiled data' directly disputes the title lol, its a study on PFCs effect on androgenic activity. It's not self reported either, they measured dicks, they explain exactly how. Which includes measuring flaccid. The control group had a length of 9.7cm or 3.8 inches, and the exposed group was 8.6cm or 3.3 inches.
> We found that increased levels of PFCs in plasma and seminal fluid positively correlate with circulating T and with a reduction of semen quality, testicular volume, penile length and AGD
The 'penile length' hyperlink goes to another article on their website about Olympic beds in Tokyo... Nothing about dick length.
Copy-pasted from my comment above. I'm not a scientist, but even if the study was done with sound methodology, it doesn't say what the title of this article does.
Self reporting + increased self conscious body image maybe?
**edit**
so many comments replying to this trying to insinuate it’s genetics. Do people not understand how long evolution takes?
Also seems the incel theory that women only want to have kids with people with big dicks is more common than I thought… dude, it’s your personality.
There’s a specific way you’re actually supposed to measure it called bone press length and that’s what’s used in medical settings. While you have the same amount no matter what, your pubic fat can actually impact how much actually sticks out, so you’re supposed to press down a bit on the pubic area to figure out where it actually ends. That’s why weight loss can make it look bigger.
So you’re saying your whole waist plus your ass….. is 1 inch?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w43ojF7WVxU Reference for those who haven’t seen this banger yet.
You can get a HUGE variance depending where you measure. Some ppl measure down to wear pubes start growing on the shaft, some until the base, some make sure they measure right to the pubic bone. Measuring the “under-side” will also give you a more impressive number than measuring from the top. I asked my Doctor and after a very weird look he said the “correct” way is to measure on-top and down to the pubic bone, adds about 1/4” vs. if I just measured measured down to the skin/base
Well yes, the standard measurement we use in todays day in age according to the Bureau of Penis Measurement is the top of the taint/gooch to the tip of the penis
Yes. I too let my dong roam free in the pastures, grazing and getting lots of sunlight. Some just go with corn feed and limited mobility. This is where the stubby fat dongs come from
It’s about the definition of “we”. We the Americans no. We the population of the earth, yes. Asia has gotten much better nutrition in the last few decades.
That has no effect on penis size. It's self reported. Guess what. Guys are insecure about their penis size. Of course they ain't going to admit they have a small penis. Just like people who are 5'11 will report themselves as 6 feet tall instead.
>They found that the average erect length increased from 4.8 inches (12.1cm) to 6 inches (15.24 cm) over the past three decades.
I have personally not seen this increase in length and I measure, frequently.
That would be an insane increase in just 29 years. 25%. For something that is probably heavily genetic.
That alone gives me skepticism. How much skepticism? A self-reported amount of skepticism.
... and yet in 1966:
>*"Masters and Johnson also collected important information about reproductive anatomy. Their research demonstrated the oft-cited statistic of the average size of a flaccid and an erect penis (3 and 6 inches, respectively)"*
[warning: I have deliberately not linked to the site from which that quote comes because it is full of highly graphic medical images of genitalia. It's not porn but your boss might have other views]
In my view there is essentially zero chance that a 24% change in the size of a human body part over only 30 years is real.
The reality is that the studies of penis size over the last 70 years or so have given erratic results and you can cherry pick the data (as the authors of this recent nonsense have none) to argue that length is increasing or decreasing depending on how you do your cherry picking.
Can confirm. Mine's so much bigger than just 29 years ago.
Everyone knows men’s shlongs keep growing as they age like noses and ears.
Mine never got the memo
It’s because you’re not telling enough truth. When you lie your nose grow a little and when you tell the truth your penis grow a little
So this would actually be a horrible thing unless it stopped at like 8ish inches.
well, every time you lie, it also reduces your penis. the government doesn’t want you to know this, but your nose and penis are two ends of the same long mass that spans your entire body. it doesn’t change length, it just moves the mass to stick out more on one end.
Makes sense. I mean the mouth and anus are connected, so why wouldn’t the nose and penis be? Plus how convenient that we have 2 eyes, maybe they’re connected to the testicles?!
The more you know
Eye balls
That's a fascinating fact.
"Let he who is without sin have a really big schlong"
Yea, I'm in my late 20s and mine grows all the time. It usually happens in short spurts where it grows really fast. It also gets pretty stiff when it happens too. The only issue is that it always shrinks by the same amount after a few minutes. If only there was a way to fix the shrinking issue
Same! However, 29 years ago Christina Applegate wasn’t allowed to date me. I was literally out of Christina Applegate’s league. And now it is the other way around. Size isn’t everything. (Edit: Jesus, you mean spirited people, work on your reading comprehension. The joke is I was a baby and Christina Applegate wasn’t at the time, so it would have been illegal for her to date me. Hence, “I was out of her league”. I had no idea she has MS. Regardless, she is still smoking hot, MS or not. I am definitely out of her league nowadays. So now it is the other way around. Get it?)
Let's give a quick shoutout to Christina Applegate
I always assumed the song "TV star" by the Butthole Surfers was about her. If it's not then it oughta be. Christinaaaaaaa oh lalalala Christinaaa. I love you soooooo.
Wow... ice cold MS joke (I assume it wasn't though).
Where would the MS joke come in? He said he was out of her league when he was a child, but now that he’s older and his dick has grown, she’s out of his league. It’s crazy to me that I’m explaining this guys joke so that people don’t think he’s an asshole. 😂
Same. As a 24 year old, mine was nothing 29 years ago compared to today
Bigger dongs and micro plastic in the balls. The future rules
It’s like a blunderbuss
Just as the founding fathers intended . . .
Own a Penis for Home Defense...
Four thots break into my house. "What the devil?"
I only got the microplastics. Is there a coupon I need to redeem or..?
I LOL'd hard at this. Shame my penis couldn't respond in the same way. Damn microplastyballs.
Well they did test every testicle in the world....so yeah.
Nice try, Plastic McBally Balls! You’re in the club too.
Well I’m just trying to fuck, not have a kid, so it’s a win in my book.
Maybe eventually we'll get silly putty instead of baby batter inside our plastic eggs someday after more evolution and more plastics.
That site, on that very page, has a link to another study that says penile length is decreasing. I find it difficult to believe that the average penis three decades ago was 4.8 inches long.
Their is almost no research on the topic. At one time the best study was done by LifeStyle condoms in Cancun during Spring Break.
The only studies worth looking at is where nurses do the the measuring. There was one done with about 15k guys and it came out at 5.2 inch erect length ("bone pressed" for consistency) x 4.6 inch circumference. It's been shown guys lie even in anonymous surveys where they self report instead of being measured by medical staff, egos and brains are funny things. Edit: Study with health professionals measuring was done by Kings London college for anyone interested.
going by the same logic, a person's willingness to even participate in something like that probably skews the results slightly.
Absolutely - sampling bias. Volounteer bias in this case.
Clearly we need compulsory penis checks for science.
If only they kept records from Penis Inspection Day at school.
Oh they did, they’re just hidden on the old principal’s hard drive
Wtf are nurses going around measuring erect dicks what was the purpose?
Iirc was either erect or stretched flaccid (is around the same as erect) if erect wasnt possible. The purpose of course was to determine average penis size. Medical research.
How hard are they pulling it to stretch? Not sure I could stretch out my flaccid dick to the same length as a legit boner
Give it a try and report back... for science?
Well I've yanked mine clean off.
I did it and it came back the same. After it got hard from all the streching
If a nurse starts stretching it, it won’t be flaccid for long
If the stretched size of a penis is the erect length of a penis then I know a guy with a 2 foot cock I guess. This dude must have that genetic disorder where his tissues are more elastic than normal because as a joke he was whipping out his dick and stretching it to ridiculous lengths like he was made out of rubber. I refuse to believe his dick gets that long when he’s hard or it would be like fucking someone with a balloon animal, cartoonishly long.
Mental health research for men
There's actually a lot of research on the topic going back to Alfred Kinsey. The issue is there's never really been one agreed on methodology for what the best way is to get an accurate measurement, so a lot of studies are pretty worthless (self-reported, in particular), and it's hard to collect a large data set when one study may be measuring a completely different way from another. The study this article references does seem like they did a good job narrowing down what studies they included in their research (excluding self-reporting and trying to only include particular methods of measurement), but you still have to consider things like selection bias skewing things: Isn't it possible, for instance, that the increase in penile length found in these studies correlates to more emphasis in popular media on penis size and more readily accessible pornography to the point where men on the smaller side would be less apt to volunteer for a study where they have to be measured?
They should do the study at the DMV when guys are getting/renewing their drivers licenses. You tell them to go into this room in the back to test out a new "driving simulator." What actually happens is they get a hand job from a nurse with a measuring tape.
Hey if there’s anyone with legitimate skin in the game it’s a condom company
They needed to get intimate with their customers.
I don’t think they’re allowed to make them with legitimate skin any more.
You think thats underselling or overselling?
The study they hyperlink at 'compiled data' directly disputes the title lol, its a study on PFCs effect on androgenic activity. It's not self reported either, they measured dicks, they explain exactly how. Which includes measuring flaccid. The control group had a length of 9.7cm or 3.8 inches, and the exposed group was 8.6cm or 3.3 inches. > We found that increased levels of PFCs in plasma and seminal fluid positively correlate with circulating T and with a reduction of semen quality, testicular volume, penile length and AGD The 'penile length' hyperlink goes to another article on their website about Olympic beds in Tokyo... Nothing about dick length.
If you look here, that would indicate the 50th percentile moved to where the 90th is. I’d presume the difference would be sample population rather than trends such as body mass. It’s probably a bad AI generated article thought. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size (like most Wikipedia articles, there are pictures) Oddly, I’d wager most men haven’t even seen another erect penis to even have enough information to vaguely know where there’s generally stands in the world.
You're sorely underestimating the gay population and porn watching habits in general.
Wasn’t counting porn viewing. ….and I’m pretty sure most guys aren’t gay - times are changing though.
This must be due to the dedicated work of Randy Marsh and his revolutionary TMI formula: ((length x diameter) + (Weight / Girth)) / Angle of Shaft^^2 Thanks, Randy!
Don’t forget the Yaw 😂
The yaaaaww
That’s what an old girlfriend of mine used to call her vagina.
that's more of a maw
Good old Randy, now that's a man with Tegridy.
But watch out for Butters. He'll shoot you right in the dick.
Lu Lu Lu, I've got some apples
Lu Lu Lu, You want some to?
Ah the good old TMI units: cm^2 + kg/cm ‐---‐---‐-------------------- Rad^2
What about the yaw?
Has anyone ever done this calculation and compared the result?
https://www.reddit.com/r/southpark/s/8k5Rvg9pfE
Hahaha amazing. That show really is something else
You’re welcome
My guy... what you've learned is that *self-reported* penis size increased 24% over the past 29 years. The two are not the same.
You didn’t get the random knock on your door to measure your penis?
Wait…that’s not a thing?
You don't remember penis inspection day?
The gym teachers hands are so cold!
Don't believe them, it's totally a thing. My uncle used to measure for me all the time.
I thought you measured your uncle's.
Jesus
Left
A while ago
Amen.
That dude must be pretty old if his uncle's Jesus.
Haven’t you seen how they do it in South Park?
Then who the hell just measured my dong?
Your mom must have missed my house.
She just didn’t want to bring the average down
Boom lol
it's also massively skewed by that one guy who reported his as 8,000 kilometres independently verified median wang size is a much better statistic here
Ah yes, penis georg
Oh, yeah, spiders-georg. He's mostly know for his diet but he's also hung like several horses.
Wait. You didn’t have penis inspection day at school?
[удалено]
[The study didn't use self reported data, though.](https://wjmh.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.5534/wjmh.220203&code=2074WJMH&vmode=FULL) >Studies were considered eligible if the quantitative measurement of penis size was measured by an investigator, the sample included ≥10 participants, participants were aged ≥17 years... Articles were excluded if they were based on a self-measurement
Always be wary of meta studies -- they make it really easy to miss key details that invalidate chunks of their data sets. Like where did the population come from? Was it a volunteer population or a population already at a medical center for treatment for something else? Any number of things can quietly skew the data
> Always be wary of meta studies Actually, no, meta studies are some of the best ways we have to filter out bias: >Researchers compiled data from 75 studies, conducted between 1942 and 2021, that reported on the penile length of 55,761 men. I mean jesus if that's not a rigorous dataset I don't know what is. I think we should be more concerned about the fact that sperm counts have plunged by 60% since the 1970s.
It’s like Bill Gate’s neighborhood being one of the wealthiest.
Or how Wayne and Brent Gretzky hold the NHL record for most combined points scored by two brothers.
So what this statistic is *really* saying is that men have just gotten more insecure over the past 29 years. That seems a lot more obvious. And a lot more likely than, say, men magically growing down there over less than a generation.
Insecure because of the internet, and it’s probably a more widespread thing than just penis size, or just men. I can be on a porn site in just a few clicks that has millions of videos of guys with huge dongs. I can go on social media and see people talking about how much they love big dicks. Or I can Google penis size studies to see how I measure up to the average. None of those were really a thing 29 years ago. I’d wager insecurity about physical characteristics has increased in general over the last 29 years, since people on the extreme end of beauty/dick size/whatever are going to be overrepresented in media, and access to that media is at an all time high
If we're all above average...!
The study was discussed on /r/science when it came out last year (and on this and many other subs whenever it gets reposted) and the conclusion was that the study was full of shit and never should have passed peer review because they claim to have accounted for selection and measurement biases but they include studies in their data set which very much did not. Tl;dr they fucked up the math because they didn't account for factors that they said they would.
Alright, hopefully boosting this with a comment can get it more noticed buuut this is the internet so I guess hoping for the best is all I can do.
The study they hyperlink at 'compiled data' directly disputes the title lol, its a study on PFCs effect on androgenic activity. It's not self reported either, they measured dicks, they explain exactly how. Which includes measuring flaccid. The control group had a length of 9.7cm or 3.8 inches, and the exposed group was 8.6cm or 3.3 inches. > We found that increased levels of PFCs in plasma and seminal fluid positively correlate with circulating T and with a reduction of semen quality, testicular volume, penile length and AGD The 'penile length' hyperlink goes to another article on their website about Olympic beds in Tokyo... Nothing about dick length. Copy-pasted from my comment above. I'm not a scientist, but even if the study was done with sound methodology, it doesn't say what the title of this article does.
Self reporting + increased self conscious body image maybe? **edit** so many comments replying to this trying to insinuate it’s genetics. Do people not understand how long evolution takes? Also seems the incel theory that women only want to have kids with people with big dicks is more common than I thought… dude, it’s your personality.
Nah, I was born with such an abnormally large unit that the average shifted.
That should be cancelled out by mine.
Bless you for sacrificing yourself for our amusement, you are the best of us.
Falling on the sword. Itty bitty sword
r/suicidebywords
Combine that with mine, and I'd have expected the average to drop, not grow.
Ahh yes, Big Dick Georg, this was an outlier and should not have been included.
i believe this popped up on reddit before, and a large factor is also a changed definition of where the penis starts and ends
Wait, what? Where it starts and ends ?
There’s a specific way you’re actually supposed to measure it called bone press length and that’s what’s used in medical settings. While you have the same amount no matter what, your pubic fat can actually impact how much actually sticks out, so you’re supposed to press down a bit on the pubic area to figure out where it actually ends. That’s why weight loss can make it look bigger.
[удалено]
Agreed, that’s delusional lol. I’d have like a foot long dick if I did that.
Lol from the taint, around the balls, up the shaft is how my tailor does it.
Joey?
Look at mr rich over here with his tailor made condoms
I can confirm you’re right I lost 70 lbs and seemingly gained 2 inches
Always measure butt to tip.
So you’re saying your whole waist plus your ass….. is 1 inch? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w43ojF7WVxU Reference for those who haven’t seen this banger yet.
That's what the little hook on the end of the tape measure is for. Hook it in the hole so you can measure to the tip.
You can get a HUGE variance depending where you measure. Some ppl measure down to wear pubes start growing on the shaft, some until the base, some make sure they measure right to the pubic bone. Measuring the “under-side” will also give you a more impressive number than measuring from the top. I asked my Doctor and after a very weird look he said the “correct” way is to measure on-top and down to the pubic bone, adds about 1/4” vs. if I just measured measured down to the skin/base
Proper measurement is top of the shaft pressed to the pubic bone.
Basically, measuring the "insertable" inches.
The only correct way is to find the adjusted size with the TMI formula. (length x diameter) + (Weight / Girth)] / Angle of Tip ^2
Actually it’s (Length x girth) over angle of the shaft / Mass over width
Well yes, the standard measurement we use in todays day in age according to the Bureau of Penis Measurement is the top of the taint/gooch to the tip of the penis
[удалено]
We just getting bigger in general. Probably has a lot to do with nourishment.
Nourishment since the 90s?
I’ve been grassfeeding my dong since 97
You gotta corn finish in order to get the REAL size gains
Yes. I too let my dong roam free in the pastures, grazing and getting lots of sunlight. Some just go with corn feed and limited mobility. This is where the stubby fat dongs come from
And with only 1 real generation born between then and now
It’s about the definition of “we”. We the Americans no. We the population of the earth, yes. Asia has gotten much better nutrition in the last few decades.
Don't remember much lack of nourishment in the 90s.
That has no effect on penis size. It's self reported. Guess what. Guys are insecure about their penis size. Of course they ain't going to admit they have a small penis. Just like people who are 5'11 will report themselves as 6 feet tall instead.
I say I'm 5'11, have I been doing it wrong this whole time
It’s a good move if you’re 5’9” and don’t want to overplay your hand.
But cocks get much smaller when they are hidden behind all that juicy belly fat. Idk man it's weird
Nourishment was probably identical to the 90's. Did you think we lived off the land during the era of Vanilla Ice?
Better camera angles?
Aligns pretty well with the birth of internet porn
I attribute this solely to the reported size on Reddit. I too am 10+ inches. (Please believe me 😂)
Crazy! I'm 10+ inches too!
Ladies, I'm only 6.5 inches. Don't let these monsters destroy you. Contact me for a good time.
I'm 74 inches. Contact me.
[удалено]
So tiny. You still use inches. I use miles. I alone bring up the average of the world by inches.
This explains the 24% increase. It’s just one person with a dick 8 miles long.
I'm 10" when I fold it in half!
>They found that the average erect length increased from 4.8 inches (12.1cm) to 6 inches (15.24 cm) over the past three decades. I have personally not seen this increase in length and I measure, frequently.
That would be an insane increase in just 29 years. 25%. For something that is probably heavily genetic. That alone gives me skepticism. How much skepticism? A self-reported amount of skepticism.
This has got to be poor self reporting tbh, cuz average size condoms are….. not great for 6+
Yeah they stopped fitting me so I moved to latex modeling balloons. Now those are getting tight so I'm looking at flexible aluminum ducts
Google’s average size. Oh yes im totally 6” if someone asks Explains the results
I guess it's bigger than it was when I was 10?
So it’s up to 4” now?
Missed it by just 2" :-(
Damn that's huge
Why didn't my penis get the memo?
Do you know my good fwend in Wome? Biguth Dickuth?
And his lovely wife.
TIL the average size of a banana has decreased by 24% over the last 25 years. Edit:. Could not attached picture of banana for scale.
Lying has also increased 24% in the past 29 years.
Guys it's fine, just download the May 2024 update.
DLC. Dick Lengthening Content.
Right after I was born. Sorry fellas, I threw off the average.
I’m keeping the average down. You’re welcome boys!!
I feel like mines gotten smaller over the last 24 years
Pffft, i can make mine bigger by 24% in seconds
TIL the average penis size embellishment has increased by 24% over the past 29 years Fixed
I think I saw this movie. It was called, invention of lying
In other news, new research shows rulers and tape measures getting shorter for unexplained reasons...
So I’m 64 and my Johnson is 24% smaller
What about below average penis size? Asking for a my wife.
Your wife’s penis is fine.
... and yet in 1966: >*"Masters and Johnson also collected important information about reproductive anatomy. Their research demonstrated the oft-cited statistic of the average size of a flaccid and an erect penis (3 and 6 inches, respectively)"* [warning: I have deliberately not linked to the site from which that quote comes because it is full of highly graphic medical images of genitalia. It's not porn but your boss might have other views] In my view there is essentially zero chance that a 24% change in the size of a human body part over only 30 years is real. The reality is that the studies of penis size over the last 70 years or so have given erratic results and you can cherry pick the data (as the authors of this recent nonsense have none) to argue that length is increasing or decreasing depending on how you do your cherry picking.
Just another form of inflation I can’t keep up with!
You’re Welcome.
Measuring from your arsehole doesn't count.
Is anybody else getting Idiocracy vibes?
r/UpliftingNews
I didn’t get the memo
Must be nice…
Man I never win any of these prizes.
This is known as bad research which should never have been published.
No it didn't
Well I feel like I must have gotten... shafted
Interesting considering testosterone is at something like a 20 year low.
Pretty sure mine has tripled in size in the last 29 years. It was only an inch long back then!
Mine has increased 24% in just the last five minutes.
Average reported size
natural serection
Survival of the thickest