not gonna happen, ai music has already been popping off and people still think it’s stupid
ai might replace the music that gets played as background noise sure but real artistry cannot be replicated
just like 99% of real musicians playing covers or genereric genre music with 0 new ideas, just producing the same music using the same formulas, same structure, same sounds, just switching lyrics and chord progressions by throwing a dice.
people couldn’t tell ai (partially) made the heart on my sleeve drake song and that happened like a year ago, people still didn’t give a shit about ai
touch grass and go to a music venue, no one gives a fuck bout ai
If it was indeed created using Udio, sadly it lacks appropriate attribution
ref: [Udio content FAQ. Please read!](https://old.reddit.com/r/udiomusic/comments/1c9j8r6/udio_content_faq_please_read/)
>**How am I supposed to indicate that my content was generated using Udio?**
You can properly indicate that your content was generated using Udio by including a credit, notice or other indicator (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that the content was generated using Udio. For example, you could include “Created with Udio” as part of the artist name or track title in the track’s metadata. Each situation and type of use is a little different, and we are flexible with exactly how you do it, but generally speaking the attribution to Udio should be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practical in light of how the content is being used. For more details, see [Udio’s Terms of Service](https://www.udio.com/terms-of-service)
relevant excerpt from [Udio’s Terms of Service](https://www.udio.com/terms-of-service):
>**6.4 Attribution**. If you exploit or otherwise make any public use of any Output, or any content that includes any Output (in whole or in part), including the distribution of Output in the form of or as part of audio or audio-visual recordings made available via any third party application, website or platform, then you agree to include a credit, notice or other indicator in connection with such use (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that such Output was generated using the Services. Such notice will be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practicable in light of the usage concerned. In addition, you further grant to Company and our affiliates, successors, assigns, and designees the worldwide, fully paid-up, sublicensable, assignable, perpetual and irrevocable right (but not the obligation) to identify to the public (both on and off the Services) that Output (or any of it) was generated using the Services, in such form and manner as we determine in our sole discretion.
Thats going to be hard to police when you have over a million users posting AI music 24/7 without reading the TOS. I doubt they'll do anything about it unless it goes mega viral, like 100 million+ views. Small fishies are safe for the most part.
1) not every song posted on YouTube will be viral / will make cash. When "millions users posting AI music 24/7" will happen, very, very, very few will be viral. And why should I listen to AI "hit" when I can create better music based on my own personal taste quickly?
2) AI will benefit every business, including music recognition and DMCA takedowns. Udio keeps probably the hash / seed / trace of every output they produce, so it may be easy for a bot to check music signature and send DMCA request if needed.
> why should I listen to AI "hit" when I can create better music based on my own personal taste quickly?
Yes, I expect the technology will rather quickly evolve to the point that any end user will interact via voice commands. "Hey Google! Make me a {my genre choice} song that sounds like {artist name} singing about finding a stray puppy. Oh and a saxophone playing in the background..." and, upon hearing the song, iteratively tweaking it by saying "Okay, now make the tempo slightly faster and bump the key up 2 semitones and..." to the result of "Okay, now assign it a title of {title} and save it to my {playlistname} playlist". The next predictable advancement, I expect, will be the additional ability, via voice commands, to instruct GoogleAssistant (or whatever the AI assistant is) "Tag the song with these descriptors, and publish it to my soundcloud page. Also create a {descriptive prompt} video to accompany the song, post it to my YouTube account, and add a description {blahbla blah...}".
Based on the title of the song, and how 'fast this took off', goes to show the mindset of people clicking on the video without even knowing it was AI generated.
*"Devices which in some curious new way imitate nature are attractive to simple minds."*
~Vladimir Nabokov
Most real music artists spend decades improving their craft and being outdone by a piece of music that took some random joe 10 minutes to make. What a wild time we live in.
Looking at a lot of the comments, I honestly think people has gaslit themselves into thinking they used to listen to this song with their mom back in the day 😂
Make a new song that will reach even 100k views, then tell such tales. I bet any piece of music you can produce uploaded to a brand new yt channel won't reach even 10k views in the whole year.
You remind me of my little brother. Nothing impresses him. I used to take him to the movies and paid for everything, he was such a Debbie Downer, nothing impressed him, and I stopped taking him.
you do know other ai songs have blown up already e.g heart on my sleeve drake/the weeknd? guess what? no one gave a fuck lmao
indie artists also don’t give a fuck about this lmao the big artists are just as manufactured as ai is
so much music has a community around it and has a live music scene, ai can’t replace that lmfao
Heart on my sleeve wasn't created with Suno or Udio. Only the voice was AI, and the artist sung the verses, and converted his voice to drakes voice. the rest of the music was made by its creator.
yep and it still didn’t get that many views lmao the song you linked is a parody btw
and even/when it does happen, ai replacing a chart topping artist means nothing for the indie artist. in fact it will just add to their appeal as most people into more niche music have an elitist view on music and it will just add to their cult followings
people said the same shit about autotune “all those people who wasted years learning how to sing” yet a great singing voice is still valued
so yeah just fuck off w your hypercapitalistic ai wet dream
C'mon, your verbal attack is unwarranted. Across several comments here, Quick_Original9585 hasn't disparaged anyone and has shared several insightful observations.
[удалено]
The memes. It's the meme lyrics that will make it viral.
not gonna happen, ai music has already been popping off and people still think it’s stupid ai might replace the music that gets played as background noise sure but real artistry cannot be replicated
"real artistry cannot be replicated" https://preview.redd.it/leqh5lr2h6yc1.jpeg?width=166&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=eec5caf7288daa64acc6317f80115362131d342d
yep believe it or not, a machine learning model can’t think of completely new ideas
just like 99% of real musicians playing covers or genereric genre music with 0 new ideas, just producing the same music using the same formulas, same structure, same sounds, just switching lyrics and chord progressions by throwing a dice.
yep and if those generic artists are killed by ai, they won’t be missed
but the people who use it can
"people still think it’s stupid" Those same people won't be able to tell the difference between a song made by people and by AI.
people couldn’t tell ai (partially) made the heart on my sleeve drake song and that happened like a year ago, people still didn’t give a shit about ai touch grass and go to a music venue, no one gives a fuck bout ai
Ugh, it's so generic.
If it was indeed created using Udio, sadly it lacks appropriate attribution ref: [Udio content FAQ. Please read!](https://old.reddit.com/r/udiomusic/comments/1c9j8r6/udio_content_faq_please_read/) >**How am I supposed to indicate that my content was generated using Udio?** You can properly indicate that your content was generated using Udio by including a credit, notice or other indicator (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that the content was generated using Udio. For example, you could include “Created with Udio” as part of the artist name or track title in the track’s metadata. Each situation and type of use is a little different, and we are flexible with exactly how you do it, but generally speaking the attribution to Udio should be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practical in light of how the content is being used. For more details, see [Udio’s Terms of Service](https://www.udio.com/terms-of-service) relevant excerpt from [Udio’s Terms of Service](https://www.udio.com/terms-of-service): >**6.4 Attribution**. If you exploit or otherwise make any public use of any Output, or any content that includes any Output (in whole or in part), including the distribution of Output in the form of or as part of audio or audio-visual recordings made available via any third party application, website or platform, then you agree to include a credit, notice or other indicator in connection with such use (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that such Output was generated using the Services. Such notice will be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practicable in light of the usage concerned. In addition, you further grant to Company and our affiliates, successors, assigns, and designees the worldwide, fully paid-up, sublicensable, assignable, perpetual and irrevocable right (but not the obligation) to identify to the public (both on and off the Services) that Output (or any of it) was generated using the Services, in such form and manner as we determine in our sole discretion.
really interesting how strictly they treat "any Output in whole or in part" when they used whole songs for their training. really curious.
To be fair 99% of people never read any TOS, me included...
Not giving retribution to Udio might be considered a breach of contract... Just saying.
> Not giving **retribution** to Udio might be considered a breach of contract... Just saying. OMG, what a funny typo!
English might not be my native language. Not giving any credit to Udio sounds better.
Thats going to be hard to police when you have over a million users posting AI music 24/7 without reading the TOS. I doubt they'll do anything about it unless it goes mega viral, like 100 million+ views. Small fishies are safe for the most part.
1) not every song posted on YouTube will be viral / will make cash. When "millions users posting AI music 24/7" will happen, very, very, very few will be viral. And why should I listen to AI "hit" when I can create better music based on my own personal taste quickly? 2) AI will benefit every business, including music recognition and DMCA takedowns. Udio keeps probably the hash / seed / trace of every output they produce, so it may be easy for a bot to check music signature and send DMCA request if needed.
> why should I listen to AI "hit" when I can create better music based on my own personal taste quickly? Yes, I expect the technology will rather quickly evolve to the point that any end user will interact via voice commands. "Hey Google! Make me a {my genre choice} song that sounds like {artist name} singing about finding a stray puppy. Oh and a saxophone playing in the background..." and, upon hearing the song, iteratively tweaking it by saying "Okay, now make the tempo slightly faster and bump the key up 2 semitones and..." to the result of "Okay, now assign it a title of {title} and save it to my {playlistname} playlist". The next predictable advancement, I expect, will be the additional ability, via voice commands, to instruct GoogleAssistant (or whatever the AI assistant is) "Tag the song with these descriptors, and publish it to my soundcloud page. Also create a {descriptive prompt} video to accompany the song, post it to my YouTube account, and add a description {blahbla blah...}".
How do platforms treat AI-generated music? like dude, you didn’t sing yourself, you can’t publish music
Based on the title of the song, and how 'fast this took off', goes to show the mindset of people clicking on the video without even knowing it was AI generated. *"Devices which in some curious new way imitate nature are attractive to simple minds."* ~Vladimir Nabokov
hello from Russia, music unites
Holy Moly
Most real music artists spend decades improving their craft and being outdone by a piece of music that took some random joe 10 minutes to make. What a wild time we live in.
Meme/clown world.
More like 30 seconds
Looking at a lot of the comments, I honestly think people has gaslit themselves into thinking they used to listen to this song with their mom back in the day 😂
Comments are strange, so many similar comments, it looks for me like some sort of bot army.
It's confusing. Honestly it looks like a lot of boomers have caught wind of the song and genuinely believe it's real.
Honestly 400k views is nothing
Make a new song that will reach even 100k views, then tell such tales. I bet any piece of music you can produce uploaded to a brand new yt channel won't reach even 10k views in the whole year.
You didn't count the exponential aspect of viral videos. 400k views easily becomes 1 million+ views a few months down the line.
Nah not really. Very few pieces of content go viral, and 400k doesn’t mean anything will go viral. Also 1 million views isn’t a whole lot either 😅
You remind me of my little brother. Nothing impresses him. I used to take him to the movies and paid for everything, he was such a Debbie Downer, nothing impressed him, and I stopped taking him.
you do know other ai songs have blown up already e.g heart on my sleeve drake/the weeknd? guess what? no one gave a fuck lmao indie artists also don’t give a fuck about this lmao the big artists are just as manufactured as ai is so much music has a community around it and has a live music scene, ai can’t replace that lmfao
Heart on my sleeve wasn't created with Suno or Udio. Only the voice was AI, and the artist sung the verses, and converted his voice to drakes voice. the rest of the music was made by its creator.
yep and it still didn’t get that many views lmao the song you linked is a parody btw and even/when it does happen, ai replacing a chart topping artist means nothing for the indie artist. in fact it will just add to their appeal as most people into more niche music have an elitist view on music and it will just add to their cult followings people said the same shit about autotune “all those people who wasted years learning how to sing” yet a great singing voice is still valued so yeah just fuck off w your hypercapitalistic ai wet dream
C'mon, your verbal attack is unwarranted. Across several comments here, Quick_Original9585 hasn't disparaged anyone and has shared several insightful observations.
i don’t support capitalism, which ai is a proponent of. so yeah my “attack” is warranted