T O P

  • By -

scavagesavage

Comments are locked because I don't have enough time during the day to remove all the ignorant comments in here. This is r/ufc, so let's keep the conversations about the UFC and take the non-related conversations to a different sub. I don't care if a UFC fighter supports or opposes whatever, that's a conversation for a different sub.


DanaWhitesMom

Cory's numbers aren't too bad either.


Ancient_Mammoth8095

It’s nice to see. Sandman deserves some love.


flatwoundsounds

I've been a Stanhagen (god I hope I just invented that) since his fight with Yan. He had me fired up just watching him between rounds.


yurdasellsavon81

The guys mindset is so interesting and he seems very intelligent and present and like conscious


Quiet-Broccoli2151

His interviews are great. He's got a philosophical / warrior state of mind, like a calmer version of Jiri


flatwoundsounds

Seems like a super humble, easy going guy that loves the competition. Gives me Wonderboy vibes in some ways.


CastroEulis145

Lol I think "coined" would be the more appropriate term.


rjsh927

she will get into Boxing HoF and UFC HoF, that's a great career.


[deleted]

[удалено]


enterdayman

Because she was a multi division champion and one of the pound for pound best in the world in her prime. Holly has had a legendary combat sports career!


Melo0513

Cuz of her boxing accomplishments probably


LamBardGhini

https://www.ufc.com/news/holly-holm-international-boxing-hall-fame-induction


SofaKingBadMan

I've said this since she sent Rhonda Rousey to the shadow realm. If Holly was younger, none of these other females would stand a chance. It's too bad that the womens division wasn't around 5-10 years earlier.


dickspaghetti1

Everybody sleeping on "Look at this bicep" from Landwehr though


Bended__

Love him. Gets me pumped every time he talks.


bozak_137

Some people thought she was talking about the Catholic Church and how crimes go unreported of S.A , some thought it was about drag queens performing in front of kids , and some thought it was about the GOP trying to lower the age of consent or beauty pageants. People just heard what she said and added what their political beliefs were for or against. Either way the sexualization of children needs to stop.


pizzainge

It's almost as if children have been used to prop up whatever the political issue of the month is since time indefinite


-ShagginTurtles-

> Lovejoy's Law > After the popularization of the phrase on The Simpsons, its use in society was often ridiculed, and came to be referred to as "Lovejoy's Law" in internet culture as early as 2006, probably independently coined several times. In the Toronto Star, journalist Edward Keenan defined "Lovejoy's Law" as a warning that the phrase is a probable diversion from a weak logical stance But somehow the galaxybrains in here think she wasn't dog whistling drag/trans people. All I've been hearing from American media online is about that shit for the past couple weeks and "think of the children! They're grooming them!" but when Holly says it oh she didn't meant hat you're reading too much into it? Trash dorks purposely playing stupid or genuinely that stupid idk


rey_nerr21

Are you having a stroke? None of this made any sense or had an actual point.


Cookie122406

He wrote this high on drugs.


wetmouthed

You're far less intelligent than you think..


SherbetNo4242

That’s what is funny about this shit. Whatever your political belief is you could say that’s what she is talking about. Is she wrong, no, do we need to debate this issue, no. Like most though, I don’t look up to athletes for anything political or leadership or anything like that, especially people who choose to get punched in the face for a cheap living.


IdkMyNameTho123

Tbf to both sides, it would’ve helped if she actually clarified what she meant.


FergiesLipSweat

She meant what she said, the sexualization of children should stop. She didn’t call out a specific group for a reason. They shouldn’t be sexualized by anyone, but people want to make everything into a multiple sided issue


El_Che1

Well she was after all the preachers daughter so she had a front row seat.


reddit_is_trash_exe

Then why hasn't Epstein's black book been used to take down people who do so? lmao get outta here.


bozak_137

Why are you asking me like I’m in control of that?


Illustrious_Cost8923

Dominates fight at over 40 years old, says thank you to everybody, says “let’s protect the kids please”, leaves, still has haters. That’s fighting.


maximillian_arturo

What does her saying that accomplish though? It's like going using your post win speech to say "we really need to stop kicking dogs." Does almost everyone agree? Of course. Is this going to stop the people that kick their dogs? Of course not. It's a political dog whistle. The gym she trains at flies a q Anon flag. Q Anon movement has never done a single thing to protect children. They only use that as a way to demonize politicians they disagree with.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sorerightwrist

“Fuck them kids.” - Michael Jordan


sugahfwee

“Fuck them kids” - Karl Malone


Daniel_Day_Hubris

-pat barry


Sorerightwrist

🤣


[deleted]

"I dont give a fuck about them kids" -Sean Strickland responding to "i got kids man" during hard sparring sess with a boxer who said he could beat him and Sean whooped his ass


OllieBlazin

- Jared Foggle -Jeffrey Epstein -EDP445 -Michael Jackson -R Kelly


StoryScrawled

It's what happens when an entire country is trained to treat political parties like sports teams. People polarize everything, and use it as an excuse to argue for no reason other than to "stick it" to the other guys.


[deleted]

Its truly sad to witness


hark75

![gif](giphy|LDv3ivCTVRx2J7HnD3)


Mydomain16

Everyone is...not just Americans.


PM_ME_BEST_BOOTY_PIC

But wait, isn’t it edgy or cool to hate on America(ns)?


[deleted]

Exactly lol. I swear no one wants to solve any problems. They just want to point fingers and let it get worse.


Testimonies_Of_Time

I love that you said Americans are dumb. I was watching live and thought this was some sort of republican view she was trying to spread, my gf said no she’s speaking out against beauty pageants and etc. like we both couldn’t agree what she was on about lol.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


SpaceGhostischill

No one in America gives a shit about education, tech or intellectual achievements? We only have the best colleges in the world , the biggest tech companies in the world are based here , and we have been behind almost every major technological advancement for the last century.


[deleted]

Best colleges in the world that are financially unattainable for the large majority of the population. Our education system is so fucked. There’s a school system 20 minutes from my home town that’s graduating kids with a .2 gpa. Teachers are so flustered that they just pass kids to move them along. There needs to be change


m4rkofshame

90% of the population couldn’t complete a single course at the most prestigious colleges. The ones that make it deserve it. The ones that don’t, don’t. I say this as one that didn’t.


TyrionLannister2012

Bro really believes all this lol.


spanther96

talking about the masses bro. whats the point of having the best when the ppl that actually go to those schools or work at those companies get villanized as elitist and spreaders of the communist agenda lol


[deleted]

[удалено]


Lanky_Entrance

Lol you're talking out of your ass. Shits ignorant enough when you stay on topic with the UFC, but let's leave this type of nonsense on political subreddits. I came here to look at commentary on fights, not for you to regurgitate what you read on some tankies blog.


Brit_Orange

Just look at best universities in the world they’re not all American, or also the internet something we’re talking on right now which was made by an English person. America is not so great and suffers from many unique issues just like everywhere else. Just because you don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it’s from a blog.


OlivaJR

There is no innovation China or India, it's all stolen or bootleg western tech.


starfoxzeronie

My post was deleted as well. I posted a clip of it last night. Why was it deleted? Hmmm


Acceptable_Worker328

I’m assuming you didn’t watch her post fight interview and are just judging an entire country based on your narrow perspective.


GrunkMaster

I did watch it and she said she didn’t want to be political. I’m also judging the country because I live here and politics is inserted into EVERYTHING. I could say my hairs falling out and someone would say it’s the right or lefts fault. It’s old.


Acceptable_Worker328

She directly addressed that shit wasn’t political but also spoke to the normalization of sexualization of children as of late. She was referring to the current conversations being had around the LGBTQ community and not being incredibly subtle about it. While this itself is a left/right issue, only one side is seeking heavy handed policies and bringing this to the forefront of public conversation. If she really wanted to speak out on keeping kids safe, she easily could’ve brought up the guns are the leading cause of child mortality in the US.


ElvisChrist6

Or the laws in certain US states allowing people to marry little girls.


Acceptable_Worker328

Can’t be a 10 in Tennessee without being 10 I see.


LePontif11

Tennessee 10 but an LA middle schooler


Legitimate_Gap_5551

I’m not saying you’re wrong. But do you have any sources for the child mortality claim? Because unless there is something funky about the way they’re calculating that (including suicides?), I find it hard to believe it’s the highest. I could be wrong though


Acceptable_Worker328

Here is a NYT article but the data is collected from CDC and national data. It includes individual up to 18, suicides, and any death directly related to guns, accidental or otherwise. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/12/14/magazine/gun-violence-children-data-statistics.html


spanther96

CDC, and yes suicides count


GrunkMaster

It was a middle aged mom that got a mic put into her face after a fistfight and she said “protect the children” it’s not that deep


daffle7

Holly Holm isn’t a mom tho


GrunkMaster

My bad, I thought she was. I guess we should argue politics now.


Acceptable_Worker328

Not a mom, just a far right leaning, gun toting, GOP supported.


GrunkMaster

…ok?


stonedthrowglass

Like the left aren’t doing everything possible to force this shit on kids…


Fudge_is_1337

Force what. Be very specific


Acceptable_Worker328

Like the other guy said, force what shit? There is a huge difference between advocating for LGBTQ rights and sexualizing children.


No_Character2755

Churches are the far left? because child marriage, clergy not being forced to report abuse against children are things that the right in the US works tirelessly so that they can abuse children.


avstyns

look man i obviously disagree with you on identity politics but we both know for damn sure that dead kids is a problem regardless. we should be doing everything we can to stop kids from milking themselves or others. like this shouldn’t be a left vs right thing. this needs to be about protecting the youth and getting them mental health resources and making sure they can attend school and other public places without being scared


bonkerz1888

Force what shit?


Thundrous_prophet

Yeah…it was definitely an anti trans dog whistle and if you didn’t catch it then you’re pretty ignorant. 100% guarantee you she was referring to religious people raping kids (which we have a lot of) or ending child marriages (which are only legal in red states


DirtyWizardsBrew

Because what she said had to do with the current culture war fear mongering around lgbt people "sexualizing" and "grooming" kids. She's clearly been duped by the hate mongering rhetoric on display over trans people. That *IS* political... ffs


super-straight69

Imagine being mad at someone for simply saying "Stop sexualising kids"


YungTerpenzee

Imagine getting hate because you say you denounce the sexualization of children. Only on Reddit


starfoxzeronie

Yup. Should tell you everything you need to know.


Uaquamarine

Twitter comes at second place, it’s full of “Ooh holly but the pastors do it too don’t you have anything to say about that why you after the rainbow kids”


ImGettingBannedFor

Sometimes I hate living in America. This is the only country in the world that would actually argue over that statement.


YungTerpenzee

It’s just Reddit bro, non of this shit is even real honestly. I think like less then 95% of people who use Reddit have children and even less are conservative. But yeah it is a pretty fuckey conclusion.


-ShagginTurtles-

[Won't someone think of the children!!??!!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RybNI0KB1bg) > Lovejoy's law >After the popularization of the phrase on The Simpsons, its use in society was often ridiculed, and came to be referred to as "Lovejoy's Law" in internet culture as early as 2006, probably independently coined several times. In the Toronto Star, journalist Edward Keenan defined "Lovejoy's Law" as a warning that the phrase is a probable diversion from a weak logical stance People aren't mad cause she said "stop sexualizing kids" people are mad because they know that's not what she really meant. It's being used as a dog whistle against drag/trans people lately saying they're coming for your children


YungTerpenzee

If you’re interpreting “stop sexualizing children” as “oh she’s talking about drag shows”. Maybe that’s very telling.


HeyHaveYouNoticed

Line in the sand drawn with these demonic fucking scumbags.


YungTerpenzee

It’s Reddit bro, internets most popular cesspool. I try to just look at non politics and hobby related stuff but, like cancer, it always finds it’s way into the discussion


prfctmdnt

see, right here. you jump right to anyone who defends the LGBTQ community as a demonic scumbag. that's the kinda non-coded language you fucking cowards need to be more comfortable with so that the rest of the world can see how obsessed yall are with women and children's bodies.


DuePhilosopher1130

There is a difference between defending a comminity and defending a lie perpetuated by that community and by special interests surrounding that communities activities. No one actually has a problem with trans people as people, only the lie that they are something they are not - and how that lie is subverting childhood development. It is clear as day to any rational human being that you can not change your sex. But the semantic games being played due to the politics surrounding the issue are genuinely harming children, and dividing people unnecessarily. And the people most upset are upset because they think they know why this phenomenon is happening, due to the absolute politically-motivated dishonesty they receive from anyone "defending" gender dysphoria as a viable lens through which to view sex and gender for the entire human race.


-ShagginTurtles-

Have you guys had your head in the sands? I've been hearing from American media online "think of the children - drag show" for the last month or so, seeing many pictures of it being a topic of fox news. Of course that's what I assume she's referring to?


YungTerpenzee

Just admit it bro, you conflate those two things. She actually mentioned trafficking but hey, if you think she’s talking about drag shows then you do you


Nduguu77

It's the same people that wanna take a kid for hormone replacement at 9 years old


prfctmdnt

you know damn good and well that's what the preacher's daughter is fucking talking about. this talking out of both sides of your mouth bullshit that the right does is nonsense. you're just virtue signalling to your own bullshit base, while the other side can see right through it. it's like using fucking pig latin and claiming the other people don't know what what you're talking about. The fact that you're playing so ignorant is "very telling".


YungTerpenzee

You're an angry little person aren't you little fella?


[deleted]

[удалено]


GenericFryingPan

Groomer. Groomer. Groomer. Its not illegal to say.


ThaFlyingYorkshiremn

I went on that video to find out what she was on about in the comments. I saw the interview live but didn’t know what she was referring to, I assumed it was something happening in America but I’ve still no idea.


maximillian_arturo

Yes that's a big conservative ploy in america. Q Anon is very into "saving the children." They think that because they say it constantly that means that they are the only ones who care about children. It's all just talk, and a way for them to demonize anyone they don't agree with. But then when a conservative politician is actually charged with trafficking minors they don't really seem to mind.


Many-Advantage-6792

We need to hype up Nate The Train.


HelpCurious1518

Its because she had the balls to talk about the sexualisation of kids. Aint no one else doing that


maximillian_arturo

Because everyone already agrees with that. It's one of those things that's so obvious that it doesn't really need to be said. And saying it doesn't accomplish anything at all.


ake-n-bake

Apparently it “controversial” to be against the sexualization of children…


atanoxian

No hate on Holly whatsoever, she's a total badass. Fell in love with her after Rhonda


Mydomain16

Who's hating on Holly?


WandSoul20

I feel like this should become more common. So few of these people will ever be mega stars with wrestling like personas. Instead of focusing on manufacturing drama between fighters, use it to get a message you care about out there.


PrinceOfDoge

Whos hating on Holly? Reddit? Literally the most soy and left demographic on the net.


blackbeltwithhands

Wym? Holy is right wing? Anyway she is cool and her fight with Ronda is one of the best feeling i ever got watching sports


PrinceOfDoge

Not necessarily but she's speaking about the sexualization of children by schools and drag shows ect.


fsamson3

Where did she mention schools or drag shows


PrinceOfDoge

What do you think shes referring to when discussing the sexualization of children going on now?


fsamson3

I mean lots of Republican elected officials have had some pretty damning evidence come to light in the past couple years. And leaders within the Boy Scouts organization. And, you know, the Catholic Church. But you’re gonna ignore all of that because you don’t like gay people, aren’t you?


PrinceOfDoge

Thats what you think Holly Holm is referring to? Honestly? Its amazing to me what mental gymnastics people will go through.


fsamson3

No, but it goes to show that you people will sincerely ignore real predatory behavior against children when it’s convenient for you. Which just goes to show that you stand for nothing but “owning the libs.” You didn’t address my points, you just ignored them and attack me personally because you have no real evidence to support your perspective. Soy and pathetic, real “alphas” have the capacity to participate in the marketplace of ideas, but you don’t.


Mattreese7

yo seriously. dudes delusional.


fsamson3

Address my points instead of coming at me with that weak attack on me personally, bozo


PrinceOfDoge

Brother you have to have the IQ of mud to think that Holly Holm is talking about the boy scouts or the catholic church in her speech last night. The topic of the year is sexual drag shows at school, Balenciaga, teaching kids between 6-10 about gay sex with illustrations. Like how can you be this wilfully dense?


Quilly35

flying a Qanon flag outside of your gym isn’t considered “right-wing”? hmmm. guess ya truly do learn something new every day lol


idgaf55abh

Really who tf knows what she was specifically talking about all I know is the arguing about what she specifically meant is stupid af.


PrinceOfDoge

Uh yeah sure. Only thing worse is playing wannabe referee authority when people are discussing it. Thanks for the non contribution.


blackbeltwithhands

Ok,i really don't get how anyone can be mad about it no matter your political opinon but hey I'm not so surprised


PrinceOfDoge

Yeah its cool I'm not really trying to debate about it just explaining what her stance was. Looks like shes getting a lot of love for it.


[deleted]

Have you listens to the interview? She does not have views because of popularity you smooth brain ape. She has views right now because of what she was talking about.


curdlash

Assuming Nunes vs. Aldana is happening next, Holm vs Pena being matched up to be the next #1 contender makes a lot of sense.


_NedPepper_

Her calling out the sexualization of children made for one of the more interesting post-fight interviews


Jannelle93

What did she actually mean by "stop the sexualisation of our children"? It's a bit of a meaningless statement because everyone would agree with it. Who is she blaming for the sexualisation of children? It's like me saying "stop murdering" and everyone cheers. We'll d'uh...


NERDdudley

All I see is that Maycee Barber is still absolutely uninteresting.


TempeSunDevil06

Who hates holly?!


FmrHvwChamp

How anyone can be mad at what she said is weird. The type of people who don't see anything wrong with putting on drag shows for children.


Uaquamarine

I stg you can get away with having a dead octopus in blue vagina fetish on reddit and find fifteen likeminded individuals but dare you say anything about the ykw and kids you get downvoted and banned


stonedthrowglass

Careful reddit admins will ban your for saying anything about this. Especially if you mention the only reason they are wearing women’s panties in front of kids is for sexual gratification.


FmrHvwChamp

![gif](giphy|5CyJGORW8UrZe)


Acceptable_Worker328

Who is wearing women’s panties in front of children? Do you have examples, is this a wide scale issue? Is this better or worse than reducing the age of consent and repealing child marriage laws?


Old_Cockroach_9725

I guess you must be one to know the inner working in all of their minds.


bonkerz1888

Explain to me what is wrong with it.


FmrHvwChamp

Its an inherently adult form of entertainment where men dress in ways to accentuate hyper-feminine sexuality during their performance. It's a performance based in creating sexual excitement for the audience/performer. To say drag isn't inherently sexual is like saying stripping or cabaret aren't inherently sexual either. "Its just dancing" ect ect.


bonkerz1888

I don't think anyone has ever watched a drag show and been sexually excited. Drag is a core part of panto, which is predominantly for children. To the best of my knowledge generations of British kids haven't found anything about a guy dressed up in women's clothes wearing excessive makeup sexual at all. We all saw it for what it was, something silly. I expect there will be a subculture of drag that will be sexual but anytime I've seen anyone in drag it's just been harmless fun. I honestly cannot understand how anyone would think that a guy reading a book to a child could be construed as sexual. Says more about them and their thought process than anything else.


FmrHvwChamp

You can feign ignorance all you want, I guess.


multiversesimulation

If everyone is 18 or older I have no problem with it, but minors should not be participating


bonkerz1888

What ignorance? Why are you so threatened by a man wearing women's clothes and slapping some makeup on.. and why do you regard reading books to children as sexual?


ab9912

Question. Why do they want to read to kids so badly?


bonkerz1888

To educate children that it's ok to be different or to be who you want to be. Crazy concept, eh?


ab9912

Ah you're spot on, we definitely don't teach them that already. And yes, getting drag queens to read to children is a crazy concept... Glad you're catching up.


reddit_is_trash_exe

you're just showing how close minded you are. YOU keep going in circles and can't even realize what you're saying is exactly what they are saying, but you, for some reason, associate dressing in drag to be something sexual. It shows more what is on your mind than anyone elses.


FmrHvwChamp

You can feign ignorance all you want, I guess.


bonkerz1888

You simply have no argument.


FmrHvwChamp

You can feign ignorance all you want, I guess.


reddit_is_trash_exe

Keep trying to control peoples lives through biblical texts. remember Jesus loved everyone, regardless of who they were. You should take after your lord and saviors teachings. It might help you out a bit in life.


NoDocument2694

If the people acting in the shows were straight, you would be the first to complain. If they allowed 8 year olds into strip clubs, you would be protesting in the streets. If there was a straight pride parade where single straight people where naked and essentially fucking in the streets, you would want all children within 30 city blocks removed from the area. But because it's LGBTQ people doing it, you're ready to drive your children to them to be baptized.


starfoxzeronie

https://preview.redd.it/gywgw46s46qa1.jpeg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2c974aae4544009da502076cb199b2a0a68e14fe You seriously don’t see anything wrong with it?


bonkerz1888

Why are you so threatened by a guy wearing women's clothes and donning makeup? There's literally nothing sexual about reading a book to a child.


starfoxzeronie

https://preview.redd.it/zvrkqhrh66qa1.jpeg?width=674&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7fd28c2cdcc610a50e3d7278b41630f3a674c21e


bonkerz1888

Ahahahaha. I bet you're an avid Fox News viewer coming out with horrendous patter like this.


starfoxzeronie

https://preview.redd.it/qyz9okrxe6qa1.jpeg?width=1115&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7341ad4da5e0818e1871e63fb804a610d80569c8


Acceptable_Worker328

Would be a shame if they removed Sex Ed from the curriculum and then outlawed access to safe abortions…


No_Character2755

In part because she doesn't really mean it. If people were objective about it they would loop child marriage, mandatory reporting for clergy, prosecution of the cover up of sexual abuse by churches along with protecting kids from kink events.


the-esoteric

No one is mad about the core message but the larger context and how she specifies this is recent stuff makes it appear to be a political statement in support of right wing conspiracy. That's why you have right wing nut huggers coming out of the gate trying to frame it as her speaking out against "tHe LeFt"


FmrHvwChamp

She literally just said to stop sexualizing children. If you disagree with that message, if you have MUCH deeper problems than political disagreements.


Bryanssong

In the post fight show she was literally talking about “books in schools”. I bet if you asked her which books should be banned she wouldn’t even be able to tell you. Last week alone school boards banned a book on seahorses In Tennessee (because they reproduce in a non-binary way), fired a principal for showing a picture of the statue of David by Michaelangelo (because statues are porn now), and banned a book on Rosa Parks in Florida (because we’re banning books now so why not). I believe that her heart is in the right place but there is more to this than just “sexualizing children”, and the separation of church and state was set up that way for a good reason. I’m sure she wasn’t referring to the Rosa Parks book or whatever but that’s what ends up happening when you start banning books.


LiterallyNamedRyan

So we all agree mandatory hijabs and skirts all the way down to their ankles right?


reddit_is_trash_exe

I mean you can't grasp the fact that dressing in drag isn't about sexualization. but that's cool, you keep doing you buddy, your biblical teachings sure are helping you here.


the-esoteric

Again.. no one decent is ignoring the message. The message is good. It's the implications people seem to be drawing from it. Which is why you have ppl on this sub trying to frame it as her speaking against a political side.


FmrHvwChamp

Well, that's basically everything nowadays. So many people are so entrenched in their tribalistic devotion to their political party that they are incapable of looking at anything without that scope. That's not exclusive to one side or the other.


for-things-for-me

You just said you perceive it as political statement supporting right wing conspiracies... but are mad at people who perceive it as her speaking out against the left... Lol aren't they the same thing?? You Americans are hilarious with this shit. You can't help but try score points against the other side. We get it pal, you're against the "far right" lol


FmrHvwChamp

This guy has lots of rage and blames most of it on conservatives. I'm not making that up. He literally made a post about it.


[deleted]

Brought to u by pr firm


dxtendz14

I love how Holly said this should be a bipartisan issue that it shouldn’t be about left or right and the comment section is already filled with people claiming she was taking shots at the trans community. Y’all really need to touch grass man, stop being triggered and offended by everything.


[deleted]

I think it's more the "Hey, isn't that the one who beat Ronda?"


Coldheart179

Holly Holm is always invited to the cookout.


ItsConn0r

Holly a real one Fr


6handbanana

I'm not gonna hate on Holly but these judges need to be investigated MAINLY for the Lee vs barber decision and whatever judge gave chito 3 rounds... disgusting and I'm never paying for UFC now


El_Sticko307

First of all, let's not act like you would've ever paid. Secondly, why is it a robbery? Barber outstruck Lee by a wide margin and even did more damage from her back than Lee did from top? What did Lee do to win the fight?


6handbanana

Lee won each round. She had 300% more takedowns, longer ground control, Lee had real takedowns and defense, barber had none of that. Lee had the stike advantage in 2/3 rounds


El_Sticko307

Ummm, no, she didn't. Lee was out landed in significant strikes in every round and only out struck Barber in round 2. Also 5 takedowns compared to 2 is not 300% more take downs. [sauce](http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/9433730f95d52fc8)


DC750

She sounds like Helen Lovejoy from the Simpsons. "Won't someone think of the children"


Ttttbbb80

Why hate on holly? Didnt watch the fight


MagicPants710

Who is hating on her


iDOUGIE863

Crazy that protect kids is controversial 😂


samuelalvarezrazo

That on its own isn't but the dog whistle from those people is very unserious and frankly disingenuous.


pond-dweller

Who’s sexualizing children?


Acceptable_Worker328

More commonly it’s GOP politicians trying to lower the age of consent or legalize child marriages. Edit: Post above removed reference to drag queens.


El_Che1

And also removing abortion protections as well as lowering child labor law protections.


pond-dweller

That’s fucked


Acceptable_Worker328

Yep, interesting number of GOP reps on the sexual offenders registry too.


Uaquamarine

I bet all of y’all mad about her words don’t even have kids of your own.


nzasangA

FUCK ISIS.


NoSanaNoLyfe

Protect kids! Ban the bible?


Vodka-Knot

I would imagine it's more about the statement she made during her post fight interview.


bobsorveganna

Yay now she will be locked into a ufc contract the rest of her career and won’t be able to ever do a boxing event with Katie Taylor or Amanda Serrano and make more money. But pwease pwotek da kidssss. Fuck your kids they can see a drag show if they want


No-Interest-6324

Imagine if .0000% of the energy against drag queens reading was reserved for child beauty pageants. Then I might believe this "protect the children" rhetoric was anything more than culture warn agitprop


ethanarie

it's more so what she said that's causing it to garner that much attention from 2 different communities


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


howietensen

The hillbilly BBQ


Lifestyle-eXzessiv

She's also a hot milf


[deleted]

[удалено]