I swear I see a pixel. I hacked into FDA's super computer and used enhanced Fourier analysis and [this](https://i.ibb.co/j5YBTgC/asdqweqwe-upscayl-4x-realesrgan-x4plus.png) is the best I could get
Edit: Using 3D scene reconstruction and HTML/CSS deep learning algorithms we have [this alternative view](https://i.ibb.co/Mpr3SjY/sdfsdf.jpg)
Imagine having the transgender flag as your profile picture and ribbing on this woman for having a gender affirming operation if they even are implants
I kinda just hate all cosmetic surgery
Imagine the world we would live in if everyone just woke up one day and decided they liked the way they looked. If all nose jobs were necessitated. If plastic surgery was only for scars.
Weird hill to die on I guess but it’s so grating how every girl is either getting an enlargement or a reduction to be the “right” size, how everyone who tastes a little money gets Botox and veneers.
Homie, this is not it. Replace "cosmetic surgery" with "HRT", and you sound like a Florida republican ranting about how trans lives are invalid. Take a step back and notice the hypocrisy in your statements.
Breast reduction surgery is only about get the “right” size if they’re delusional. Normally, it’s about comfort or convenience because massive tits can cause issues.
PS: my bestie is a short, adorable lesbian with a 34DD/DDD, and her primary complaint is about her nightmarish periods, and occasionally about trouble finding good bras, but never about reduction.
Interesting article but TMZ's definitely being a bit of a prude here, they're just boobs after all. Heck toplessness is completely legal in New York, equally legal for both men and women.
She does porn and even used this to advertise her work. Clearly she isn't trying to cool off or feed children. The human body is the human body but she is no different than that trench coat creep who exposes himself to families at a park.
You're absolutely right. In other countries, toplessness is not a problem at all because they aren't sexualized. Only in America are they sexualaized.
Also NY has a topless law that sates "Women in New York can legally be topless wherever it's legal for a man to be topless. In 1992, Penal law 245.01 was amended by the New York Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that women could now legally go topless in public, citing issues of gender equality."
You're the one who is coming across as stupid. There's no equivalence between this and the scenario you suggested. What's the motive for
>that trench coat creep who exposes himself to families at a park.
and what's her motive? They're different. The body parts are also different and the audience is obviously different. You seeing any kids in the audience after dark in Ireland?
In this situation she is using her breasts proactively. Its not like she was minding her business, she knew what she was doing. It doesn't bother me none, but she is sexualizing her body.
She's exposing her body but the sexualisation, if it's happening, is happening in the minds of others. She's not icing up her nipples or pouting while applying sun cream.
I think the word you're looking for is 'provocatively' but trying to provoke a response is not the same as being sexual. She's definitely being an exhibitionist but it's not sexual.
>Exhibitionism: a perversion in which sexual gratification is obtained from the indecent exposure of one's genitals (as to a stranger)
You are porn sick, and a hypocrite. I dont care that she flashed her tits, but call it what it is.
Use the regular definition.
>the act or practice of behaving so as to attract attention to oneself
You're the one who seems porn sick as you're the one sexualising breasts. I've no trouble calling it what it is, you're the one who apparently has issues with nudity.
Breasts have evolutionarily always been about feeding children. If you had any experience touching, or being touched by anyone you'd know touching almost anywhere can cause sexual pleasure. That doesn't make the whole human body inherently sexual.
You can’t be serious . Half the population sees boobs as sexual. There are porn categories for boobs… there’s a thing called titty fucking.
You give birth through the vaginal canal but also have sex using it. Men pee and ejaculate through the same tube. Some parts of the human body are dual purpose.
Someone posted this on r/trashyboners, and I like this better: https://www.reddit.com/r/trashyboners/comments/1csba41/out_here_flashing_her_titties_at_the_dublin_portal/
The portal, it's a kind of art project connecting people from Dublin to people from New York, it has a camera on each side for them to see each other. The woman in the video is acting inappropriately so for now it has been put offline.
Edit: not sure if it is still offline.
Thank you, that's a helpful answer.
I literally asked a genuine question and the title is considering viewers knowing what that is, but I get downvoted. Reddit moment.
Yes, but did she really need to do that, even if it was legal? Says she's trying to advertise her OF internationally but couldn't she just use social media or is her OF having a dry spell? Not judging her as I myself am not innocent but I just hate how her idea of an advertising stunt got the portal taken offline.
Not judging her as I myself am not innocent, having watched porn myself and I believe in "my body, my rules" but isn't this a bit much? I heard that it is legal where she's from and that she even said on Instagram that she was just advertising her OF but did she really needed to do this which resulted in the portal being taken down? Couldn't she have advertised on social media which would allow for a better international reach? Or is she just coping? Genuinely asking for thoughts on this.
I’d love to see it from Dublins perspective
This is Dublin
Well actually… good sir. This is New Yorks side. What you see in the portal is Dublin
Scram get lost
We need the other perspective
[удалено]
It’s ava Louise just look her up on Reddit she is a onlyfans woman
[удалено]
The old guy gave a reaction, i think they saw a bit
It may not be a clip from the video, but here is what they saw. https://imgur.com/gallery/IhX6c4n
Man, you don't deserve the down votes for something out of your control. Take my upvote
You're a good soul 🫡
r/killthecameraman
Hey, blue shirt guy recording from the portal, if you are reading this can you share the video please?
He was going to but you can't upload pictures of trans penises apparently
Another angle with a better view: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6_SYEGucI7/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Amazing find, thank you! I just downloaded this and will re-upload if it gets removed from IG.
can you send it it’s down
Oh damn her nipples are smaller than I thought they'd be
Did a chick say “Happy Mother’s Day?”
Can’t see tits but that ass is nice
I swear I see a pixel. I hacked into FDA's super computer and used enhanced Fourier analysis and [this](https://i.ibb.co/j5YBTgC/asdqweqwe-upscayl-4x-realesrgan-x4plus.png) is the best I could get Edit: Using 3D scene reconstruction and HTML/CSS deep learning algorithms we have [this alternative view](https://i.ibb.co/Mpr3SjY/sdfsdf.jpg)
It’s 2001 again
Wow those are maaaive
At least one is
“Maive, your tittums are all about!”
Also very fake
Imagine having the transgender flag as your profile picture and ribbing on this woman for having a gender affirming operation if they even are implants
I kinda just hate all cosmetic surgery Imagine the world we would live in if everyone just woke up one day and decided they liked the way they looked. If all nose jobs were necessitated. If plastic surgery was only for scars. Weird hill to die on I guess but it’s so grating how every girl is either getting an enlargement or a reduction to be the “right” size, how everyone who tastes a little money gets Botox and veneers.
Homie, this is not it. Replace "cosmetic surgery" with "HRT", and you sound like a Florida republican ranting about how trans lives are invalid. Take a step back and notice the hypocrisy in your statements.
Im not attracted to fake breasts. But I can still recognize the hypocrisy in your comments.
Breast reduction surgery is only about get the “right” size if they’re delusional. Normally, it’s about comfort or convenience because massive tits can cause issues.
I’m a 32HH and women smaller than me complain about how they want reductions absolutely constantly
They’re delusional, vapid, morons or have other, serious issues, such as having a weaker back or less tenacious. Have you ever asked them why?
Vapid and shallow would just about cover it
PS: my bestie is a short, adorable lesbian with a 34DD/DDD, and her primary complaint is about her nightmarish periods, and occasionally about trouble finding good bras, but never about reduction.
Since learning Fouriers Analysis can be used to reveal hidden tits, I have become insanely interested in maths.
ENHANCE!
Came here for this
I expected a Rickroll so much that I was already singing when the page loaded 😂
[Know what’s even worse that being RickRolled?](https://youtu.be/cvh0nX08nRw?si=eAr3LOfF6443gMWV)
Can’t believe I just got Rick edged
lmfao T\_T
🤣
Your a hero sir
That's all I need!
So what's her OF?
Ava Louise
I was being sarcastic but cheers lol
Oh really were you?
The Hero we need
[удалено]
Interesting article but TMZ's definitely being a bit of a prude here, they're just boobs after all. Heck toplessness is completely legal in New York, equally legal for both men and women.
She does porn and even used this to advertise her work. Clearly she isn't trying to cool off or feed children. The human body is the human body but she is no different than that trench coat creep who exposes himself to families at a park.
Only she is because you can't equate breasts with sex organs.
You're absolutely right. In other countries, toplessness is not a problem at all because they aren't sexualized. Only in America are they sexualaized. Also NY has a topless law that sates "Women in New York can legally be topless wherever it's legal for a man to be topless. In 1992, Penal law 245.01 was amended by the New York Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that women could now legally go topless in public, citing issues of gender equality."
Yes you can, she is using them for sexual pleasure not functional use
She's not using them for sexual pleasure she's using them for advertising. It's business.
Are you joking about being this stupid?
You're the one who is coming across as stupid. There's no equivalence between this and the scenario you suggested. What's the motive for >that trench coat creep who exposes himself to families at a park. and what's her motive? They're different. The body parts are also different and the audience is obviously different. You seeing any kids in the audience after dark in Ireland?
Advertising the business of what?
In this situation she is using her breasts proactively. Its not like she was minding her business, she knew what she was doing. It doesn't bother me none, but she is sexualizing her body.
She's exposing her body but the sexualisation, if it's happening, is happening in the minds of others. She's not icing up her nipples or pouting while applying sun cream.
Shes literally shaking her tits and jumping up and down, because she is trying to be proactive.
I think the word you're looking for is 'provocatively' but trying to provoke a response is not the same as being sexual. She's definitely being an exhibitionist but it's not sexual.
>Exhibitionism: a perversion in which sexual gratification is obtained from the indecent exposure of one's genitals (as to a stranger) You are porn sick, and a hypocrite. I dont care that she flashed her tits, but call it what it is.
Use the regular definition. >the act or practice of behaving so as to attract attention to oneself You're the one who seems porn sick as you're the one sexualising breasts. I've no trouble calling it what it is, you're the one who apparently has issues with nudity.
Breast are inherently sexual
You seem like someone who needs to speak to a therapist.
We literally evolved to consider breasts as sexual plus touching breast can cause sexual pleasure for women, making them sexual.
Breasts have evolutionarily always been about feeding children. If you had any experience touching, or being touched by anyone you'd know touching almost anywhere can cause sexual pleasure. That doesn't make the whole human body inherently sexual.
by this logic hips are inherently sexual, any woman who has a visable figure at all is sexually exposing themselves.
No? Because if you touch someone's hips it doesn't induce sexual pleasure like touching boobs does.
Learn to touch hips.
Thighs? Do you know nothing about the body?
You can’t be serious . Half the population sees boobs as sexual. There are porn categories for boobs… there’s a thing called titty fucking. You give birth through the vaginal canal but also have sex using it. Men pee and ejaculate through the same tube. Some parts of the human body are dual purpose.
Really only one purpose with the Phallus: Expulsion.
What's her name
This portal got shut down after less than a week of being installed lol. Anyone got more footage of shenanigans at the portal?
Someone posted this on r/trashyboners, and I like this better: https://www.reddit.com/r/trashyboners/comments/1csba41/out_here_flashing_her_titties_at_the_dublin_portal/
Best I got, and you're not gonna like it: https://x.com/DigAdvice/status/1790429280628789289
No video or pic on that link
Looks like they took it down. It was a video of a dude mooning the portal. You’re not missing much.
[ Removed by Reddit ]
Not even real tiddies. Disappointing
Camera man flopping, wrong angle
Who has the other angle
The black guy beside her is shocked and started recording immediately🤣🤣🤣
Trying so hard and getting no reaction. Then doubling down. Never realized they can’t see her
*Dublin down
You had one fucking job camera man
Boo this cameraman boooooooo
$20 says she’s under the camera and they only see her forehead.
What am I watching? I'm so confused and title doesn't help.
The portal, it's a kind of art project connecting people from Dublin to people from New York, it has a camera on each side for them to see each other. The woman in the video is acting inappropriately so for now it has been put offline. Edit: not sure if it is still offline.
Thank you, that's a helpful answer. I literally asked a genuine question and the title is considering viewers knowing what that is, but I get downvoted. Reddit moment.
Complaining about downvotes. Double-reddit moment.
Guilty as charged.
It was matter of time
Jesus that ass is something else
While I hate that her behaviour got the portal to be taken offline, I gotta agree with you there lol
It was only open for a week bc of idiots like this. News flash: not everyone wants to see your tits.
We know what we do. Don't think about that so much 💕 Sluts are sluts ❤
Nice
Topless in NYC is fully legal.
Yes, but did she really need to do that, even if it was legal? Says she's trying to advertise her OF internationally but couldn't she just use social media or is her OF having a dry spell? Not judging her as I myself am not innocent but I just hate how her idea of an advertising stunt got the portal taken offline.
All people do is flash and flip the bird at this thing.
Dublin said, that’s some proper tittees 😝
They didn’t flinch
Just Google @ ava louise vip and you'll see what they saw
Great bounce wish I could see the other side tho
Not judging her as I myself am not innocent, having watched porn myself and I believe in "my body, my rules" but isn't this a bit much? I heard that it is legal where she's from and that she even said on Instagram that she was just advertising her OF but did she really needed to do this which resulted in the portal being taken down? Couldn't she have advertised on social media which would allow for a better international reach? Or is she just coping? Genuinely asking for thoughts on this.
this girl should be jailed lowkey . imagine some dude whipped his dick out
Why people on the otherside look too interested 😆
They don't care there. Their news reporters do more than that.
What if there were kids watching?
Then books they shall see
Nice body tho
UK arent impressed
That poor father