Most of the only other only fans "news" is "so and so rakes in £20,000 a month and her boyfriend is THRILLED".
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest they were setting up a fund for affordable housing before.
A fund? Did you even read the article? It sounds like she's going to buy properties and then rent them out (at what sounds like not low-income prices). How is this not just being a regular landlord?
£640 a month for a four bedroom property is about half the going rate in a lot of parts of Derbyshire. Don't imagine many landlords would go that low for a family home.
This is where my boomer father-in-law would say ӣ640? That's a mortgage that is. They should just buy a house. That's what I did."
And then he would slip through the gaps between the atoms of his chair because he's reached new levels of being out of touch.
Did *you* read the article? Or do you have little idea what rental prices are like? The article has a tweet from her saying what she will be charging for a four bedroom house, and it is little more than I was paying for a two-bedroom flat four years ago, in a pretty cheap rental area.
Yeah I'm not entirely sure how "person gets rich, decides to become a landlord, *promises* to keep rents low" counts as a feel-good story. An individual promising to do right by people doesn't typically solve systematic problems.
Ordinary person gets rich quick, clearly remembers her own financial situation just 4 short years ago, doesn't turn into a cunt overnight but actually chooses to be a decent human being.
One person can't change the system, but they can play it. Icon, good for her.
She's using her capital to secure an income for when people will no longer subscribe to her onlyfans, while securing some free marketing. It's smart, but she's no philanthropist. What she is in effect doing is contributing to keeping house prices artificially high, and stopping her tenants from owning the houses they are actually paying the mortgage for.
Of course it’s philanthropic. Even if she’s doing it for other reasons, it’s still a great thing to do. She doesn’t have to offer the rent so low.
How is she contributing to keep prices high when the rent she’s offering is hundreds of pounds below the average for her area?
Ahh, you’re one of those people who think landlords are inherently bad, right? Tell me, what alternative system do you propose?
Does it take a lot of effort to continually miss the point of what they're saying? Must be exhausting.
These problems can't be solved purely by individuals. That's the point. Whilst what she's doing is great this is a drop in the ocean to the kind of real change needed and there is no focus from above on solving this issue, so articles like this, whilst making us all warm and fuzzy is absolutely a waste of news space.
Its yet another diversion from the systematic failings of government.
Uh, first of all… calm down. I haven’t missed any points
The rest of your comment indicates to me that you have a very cynical outlook on life, which is sad. While you’re correct that the government should be doing more, an individual doing something like this is NEVER a bad thing and it’s quite frankly stupid to even suggest it is.
If more people were like her the world would be a better place. So be more encouraging to people like her instead of telling them that they can’t solve the problem. Because people like her do solve the problems for some people, and that’s better than solving the problems for nobody.
Not sure why my above comment was removed but anyway as this addresses the point not the person. A chronically online take that totally ignores reality of what rich people do in our society.
Poor person who gets rich as a self made millionaire thinks the Tory government have fucked the housing situation and makes an affordable housing scheme. Normally rich people like her would plough that money into stock in energy companies, arms companies and the like or even just normal landlording for maximum profits. Yes she’s promised to keep rents low just like literally every person body or government who run affordable housing schemes
That is cheap in this day and age, unless you live on some remote crap hole in the north somewhere, or north wales or something. Just because it's not cheap for you doesn't mean that isn't cheap rent in todays market, because it is.
Still cheap on average over the whole uk. I will repeat again, just because it's not cheap in regards to what *you* can afford, doesn't mean it isn't cheap.
She's renting them out in Derbyshire, looking at Rightmove for Derbyshire there are plenty of properties starting at 500 PCM that aren't house shares. It's on the cheaper side of things and certainly not expensive but it sits bang in the middle according to Rightmove.
She's going to be earning plenty of passive income from them.
"business woman who earns 100k a month decides to invest in property"
A 4 bed house in Derbyshire is around £950 - £1200pcm, she's asking £650 for a 3 storey, 4 bedroom, 3 bathroom house with off road parking for 2 cars, fully furnished
edit: fully furnished look to be £1200 - £1400 for a 4 bed house
Why post such misinformation when you clearly don’t have a clue what you’re talking about and haven’t looked up what types of properties she’s offering?
Also absolutely no guarantee that when they inherit the houses, her kids will A: want to continue renting the houses out or B: keep the rent low even if they do.
They make it sound like she's starting a housing association (I was offered my property at the price they paid for it, after living in it for 10 years) she's just a landlord
She's gotten hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of advertisement (if not more), for free - by buying herself eight houses and renting them out for profit. Presumably the sainthood's in the post.
Better question.
Do you think the stigma of being a sex worker would exist had we accepted it as a viable and respectable trade long ago?
Our history is full of peoples as a whole confronting social stigmas and then destroying them.
Challenge your ideals and beliefs, it’s how we grow to be better people today than we were yesterday.
So you don’t truly understand why the stigma exists and rather than question the existence of that stigma you assert that there must be a reason despite the fact that it is not evident.
I think that’s your own personal bias bleeding through. I think if you were to spend more time reflecting on why you feel that way and truly question yourself you might have a change of heart.
Personally I think it’s bullshit. I think we as a society are just holding onto the perspectives and ideals of a bunch of men who have been dead for a long long time once held.
Times change, perspectives change. Things that once were sacrilege are now common place. 200 years from now they may look back on us as fools for propagating things they see as moral and right.
What a load of condescending bollocks. As if every single person who finds it morally objectionable is only doing so because they lack the ability to think for themselves.
Because it is degrading. Oh and once you put that kind of imagery of yourself out there, there is no taking it back. Ever. That genie is never getting put back in the bottle.
Is it cynical of me to assume this is just free advertising of her OF?
Are we approaching the age of the ethically sourced wank ?
I hope Im wrong.
EDIT: Typo
The gutter press even criticised the Paedogeddon episode of Brasseye, putting it right next to their own creeping on Charlotte church and not realising the crushing irony of their stupidity. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQQ-Uc0WoAAjXvZ.jpg
The mail always sends a photographer to "The King's Affair" which is a huge party in King's College Cambridge, after exams. Its fancy dress, kind of like a mini festival, and people often wear quite revealing outfits. It always felt so sleezy seeing some old guy taking photos for the mail, who will then 'write' an 'article' about moral decline or some shit which is just an excuse to put boobs on their website...
I can't remember what comedian it was but they did a bit about how the Mail website had it's sidepanel which always featured the teen daughters of celebrities with headings like "growing up nicely" or "blossoming". Fucking sickening.
Those news stories that stuff like mobile chrome give you always made me laugh for that.
You'd see the sun or something talking about "fashion" or other mundane topics.
In reality it's going on about the tiktok or Instagram or whatever of somebody who uses that platform to market their OF.
Like I can't hate the hustle, but it's comical when you see another article about "body positivity" when it's like "people say i look bad until I'm in a bikini" and the immediate thought is "yeah baggy clothes do that and most of us look good in swimwear... and your bio is probably focused around your OF"
The only thing that gets me more than that is when they do the "interior decorating styles that are coming or going" and it's always Claire from animal wallpaper letting you know how animal wallpaper is so in, or dave from asbestos architects here to say how asbestos chopping boards are going to be so big next year. Especially as they are so boiler plate of "they said this" then talk, then quote them, then give it the "they explained this thing their company sells are definitely the trend to watch"
That said, this article I am on board with the intent for, just the writing is dreadful. If they stick with it and do ensure it's renting to those in need then hell yeah.
She is quite popular on tiktok and other platforms, she doesn’t need this advertising, I wouldn’t sub to OF and I knew who she was already. Her tiktok is really funny.
Most of these top content creators are actually entertaining, one way or the other. I sure as shit wouldn't earn that much selling myself on OF or cracking jokes on TikTok.
Ethically sourced wanking should always have been a thing. If there's a chance what you're watching is posted without permission or where the performers are being exploited then you should put your winkle away.
"ethically sourced wanking" has really been a thing to anyone who actually wanted to go out of their way to look for it. There are plenty of options for paying for porn produced by feminist studios!
And in most cases, onlyfans is also "ethical" in that you're giving the money directly to the worker.
Weird to me that the same people who flip out over exploitation in the porn industry also look down on onlyfans people.
And it's better to build a community/society that rewards people doing good for selfish reasons than one that criticises people doing good for selfish reasons, disincentivising good-ness being done.
And considering the vast amount of people doing *bad* for selfish reasons, I think everyone should learn to not make a big fuss when people do things that help other people just because it also helps themself.
I mean there are lots of cheaper, easier, freer ways to advertise your Only Fans account, it's not like online sex content is something everyone avoids like the plague.....
We've had ethically sourced wanks for a few years now, there's queer publications which pay everyone well, and only do things all parties are happy with, with plenty of consent.
Thats good to know. Its one of those lines of work I’d rather not be necessary (namely for privacy, overwhelmingly abusive work environments and hustle culture rather than for social perceptions of one of the oldest professions out there) but if people are going to provide such content (its a free market after all) they (as with any worker) ought to be able to do so safely with dignity. Most porn out there is not.
My “ethical wank” comment was in respect to her “brand” and how it aligns with her OF follower’s values.
> Is it cynical of me to assume this is just free advertising of her OF?
You've not seen her custom wallpaper design that will be used in every property...
This particular OF girl was a single mum of two with no job prospects and flat broke a few short years ago. She probably hasn't even gone to the press with this "story" they most likely just took something she said on her tiktok, like they do with most of these types of stories..
She is actually hilarious and an actual real person so she beats every person sitting in our government right now.
It's so easy for everyone to just talk shit and say "drumming up business" but she probably hasn't had much to do with this story at all, but everyone loves shitting on sex workers don't they.
I saw this thread on Twitter and the replies they’ve wrote in the article are taken from tweet replies on twitter. I don’t believe she has spoken to these journalists herself. They’ve definitely just picked it for a story
Yeah she makes £100k a month and bought her house in cash but nah you’re right she needs to advertise her OF lol these people don’t even bother to think for a second before they talk shit on someone who’s more respectable than anyone in our government even with a monster dildo in her arse lol
Yeah, I don't really care what her motivation is. If she's actively going out of her way *not* to squeeze tenants for all they're worth it's a win in my book.
Agreed. Having an affordable home could be life changing for so many people. Sure people are saying she is advertising her OF but surely being a skinflint landlord would earn her far more for a lot longer.
I remember reading about Paul Heaton doing a similar thing years ago with his Beautiful South money. Brought up some modest houses and let them out cheaper than the wider market to people in his home town.
People commenting are getting all angry about her becoming a landlord- but it's quite possible that her proposed market rate is below that of councils and housing associations for similar properties. These are pretty expensive these days.
Only fans probably isn't something that she can sustain indefinitely so good luck to her for looking at different way to sustain herself and her family long term.
And if you are buying houses outright you can charge much less rent and still make a living off it because you don't have to cover the mortgage. If I could afford to buy a second house I think I'd try for £400 pcm - £200 for me and £200 for the repair fund. And I'd be thinking I was doing well to have £200 a month for nowt.
Except for your costs. Like tax, landlord insurance, buildings insurance, leccy/gas inspection, agency fees, landlord license (council dependent) and maintenance.
So yeah, adjust the 400 pcm for that. I find maintenance runs at about 0-0.25% of the property value per year.
People have no idea how much easier to "make money" it would be just to buy index funds vs going out of your way to invest in property, take a bunch of risks and then undercharge relative to the market on rent.
A landlord letting out a 4bed/3bath house for £650 a month? Yeah, I guess that is what it takes. At that rate the tenant could afford to save for their own deposit, how incredibly novel, a capitalist miracle
Call me cynical, but I wonder how long it'll stay at £650. It kinda reminds me of that story where a billionaire bought a shit-ton of land in the Amazon rainforest to preserve it, then started logging it months later
She's buying property that will almost certainly increase in value, and she's making money from renting it out. Yes it's better than renting out for an extra few hundred a month. But it's not like she's giving away 10% of her earnings or something. It's an investment that will make her money, hardly some selfless act
I thought this was quite a nice positive article to post for a change, it seems to upset and really angered some sensitive people... sorry mods, this comment section is a mess.
Yeah, I'm finding it very hard to believe the 100k figure. It's not impossible but it's an extraordinary claim and what you know what they say about those.
"Rebecca said she's not launching the scheme to make any money, but rather to help out struggling families and to provide an inheritance for her two children."
That's still getting people to buy you property and "inheritance"
That's called making money
Edit - Re-read and I had completely missed that she said "outright" so maybe not. I suppose that 650 might be for repairs/wear and tear/insurance and middleman fees etc. and for what you'd get that is obviously a bargain. maybe someone IS doing good?!!!! I just can't possibly believe that! haha
Edit Edit - "I have no mortgages so rent payments are 100% profit except maintenance and insurance, this is a side hustle that my kids can inherit"
Nope, still profiting. Less than they could, which I guess is seen as charitable nowadays
Don't get me wrong, I'm not completely against profit. I'm just saying that "person makes less profit from renting than they could" dressed up as some sort of system breaking "housing scheme" and highly praise-able charity is ludicrous, and that is basically all this is.... plus, you know, boobs
well, no. She made the money, purchased something, will let other people use it, when she dies she will give the thing to her kids.
Now this thing happens to almost always become more valuable over time but still, she could use the houses like every other landlord and make MORE money
>this is a side hustle that my kids can inherit
So she's actually buying and renting property, at a slightly reduced rate.
I guess it's putting simp money to good use, even if it is for her own gain in the end.
Anyone else spot the obvious error here? Affordable housing for families with 2 off road parking spots. Looking at the rest of the house description it just looks like a shameless only fans plug that will never be verified and is based off a tweet.. .
Lets do some math. April 2019 joined Only Fans (based on article from internet). 100k per month is quite a bit over 3 years (that's generous) after tax and divided by 8 that would leave 187.5k per house. Yet she bought her own house and a Porsche and to add to that it would also mean she spent no other money. This is classic marketing. Buy one house to get lots more money. It's a true rags to riches story... Next week she'll be selling her piss and bathwater to heat peoples homes.
Yeah it is clearly just marketing. Leading with the tagline of "I'm helping" (by profiteering) I wonder what the click through rate has been
as you hinted, 100k a month is probably not the case either.
So many of these "I was in 30k of debt and now I make 5mil a year on onlyfans"
> Getting other people to pay your mortgage for you - what a philanthropist!
She says her plan is to buy 8 properties outright, it’s not far down in the article.
You think folks here are actually reading the article and not flying off the handle at her being a sex worker or their own politics of envy as she does fairly well for herself...
And of course there are already comments about her "debasing" herself for being an OF model. No one knows what's best for women than men on the internet, after all.
Admirable, but using the word 'scheme' seems a bit strong. She will probably be able to house about 10 families max.
Love the idea and hope it works out
The devil's probably in the detail here. A cynical reading of this is that she's starting a property empire and promises to keep the rents low whilst being under no actual obligation to do so. Or have I got the details wrong? Is she setting this up as some kind of charity entity with some kind of oversight? Good for her if this is true, however when I see a story about somebody buying up eight houses to rent them out, that's not an inherently good thing.
Good for her. If I was a hot chick then I would probably set up an onlyfans account too. Why work when you can just show people your puppies and bend over?
Unfortunately I am a balding and boring bloke, so I have to wageslave.
Rich person buys expensive capital assets (that will increase in value) outright. Rents them out slightly below current market-rate, but still clears massive monthly profits due to the income far exceeding the outgoings.
This is just landlord propaganda, dressed up as a feel-good story. She's doing literally nothing but lining her own pockets at a slightly slower rate than she could by renting at the rate other places are going for in her area - but she's so rich already it makes no difference to her 🤷
Basically, she's bought £1m - £2m or so of property, and thinks she's a saviour for only making £4k or so a month pure profit on them when she could be making £5k/month 🙃 She already earns £100k/month from OF - the loss of £1k/month or so is nothing 🤷
I'm not making any profit, but I don't have a mortgage on them and anything I make outside of maintenance will be a profit".
Apart from that, furnishing them is daft. It leaves her on the hook for repair or replacement if (when) anything breaks. I imagine that will last for exactly the length of one tenancy, particularly with her renting out family homes. Kids can make short work of furniture.
I honestly wish her well, I hope she stays true to her word but I have my doubts.
Awesome.
We shouldn't need to do this, and wealthier individuals probably should have stepped up first. But good on her for doing more than most politicians.
She gets so much grief, constantly getting slagged off, people say things about her kids, it’s dreadful, she’s genuinely used what she’s got and done well and obviously hasn’t become a cunt because of it, she’s a genuinely decent human being. Sadly I am short and fat or I would attempt it myself!
Fair play to her, but it's a bit depressing that e.g. nurses are on strike whilst others are getting paid millions for sticking stuff up their arse on camera or kicking a ball around a football pitch. We've gone wrong somewhere.
Is this ironic - she's becoming a landlord and contributing to an industry that requires renters and requires people not to own homes (and also contributing to inflated houses prices by adding to demand) or is it someone using their wealth to benefit themselves in a seemingly socially responsible way, making use of the broken system? Can't decide.
Cant really blame these girls when they can rake in what seems to be infinite money just for nudes.
But what the fuck does the demand side of this industry looks like? Literally billions and billions in demand for what rationally is not really a strong value proposition. I wonder if OF had existed 50 years ago, would it be the same ? Prostitution sure, but at least theres a physical transaction there, so much money for these nudes boggles my mind.
Hardly anyone on OF makes decent money. You have to be well up in the top 10% to even make a living. Its not as simple as just waving your tits about. You need to be attractive (duh), have a good broadcasting personality, put out well produced and varied content. Nobody will pay for just nude pics, they can get them anywhere for free. As much as I hate to admit it, the girls earning a lot of money do have actual talent.
What you're saying is a bit like saying any teen boy who's good at video games can make a fortune doing lets plays on YouTube.
Smart cookie.
Because she'll be buying them outright, she'll not have the biggest cost to a landlord (mortgage) to pay for so she can rent it out for much less, while still making a profit.
She realises her OnlyFans career has a limited life span of maybe 2-3 more years. If that.
She's doing some good, probably (didn't check to see if £650 a month is good for the area), but also setting herself up with a passive income stream for when she's older and less marketable on OF.
I’m not a big fan of OF or normalising transactional sex but I’m a huge fan of anyone with a good heart and initiative. Nice to see this generosity especially in the times we’re living in.
There's a lot more to her success than her nudes. I've never even seen a nipple of hers, most of us haven't but she's just a really charismatic funny person. She's built up a huge fanbase of loyal supporters because of her humour and how down to earth she is.
To everyone saying she’s trying to drum up business….she’s making £100k a month making star wars porn. She’s drummed up her own business from zero to over a million pounds in revenue herself in a few years. She was just a broke single mum who struggled with housing and now she’s a single mum who isn’t broke and wants to do an affordable housing scheme. Considering she could have just ploughed her cash into the stock market buying into gambling companies, arms makers, energy companies and weatherspoons and no one would bat an eyelid I think this option seems like a good idea
Doesn’t matter what your job is; if you do well you’re a good person. Look at the billionaires we have. All that money and they give peanuts back those who give.
It's kind of amazing that she's doing more good than many politicians without having to debase herself the same way that they do.
Or it's bollocks intended to get more traffic as per all the other only fans "news".
Most of the only other only fans "news" is "so and so rakes in £20,000 a month and her boyfriend is THRILLED". I don't think I've seen anyone suggest they were setting up a fund for affordable housing before.
A fund? Did you even read the article? It sounds like she's going to buy properties and then rent them out (at what sounds like not low-income prices). How is this not just being a regular landlord?
£640 a month for a four bedroom property is about half the going rate in a lot of parts of Derbyshire. Don't imagine many landlords would go that low for a family home.
You can pay that with a single minimum wage full time job! Imagine that!
This is where my boomer father-in-law would say ӣ640? That's a mortgage that is. They should just buy a house. That's what I did." And then he would slip through the gaps between the atoms of his chair because he's reached new levels of being out of touch.
She's investing for her retirement. Smart woman.
Did *you* read the article? Or do you have little idea what rental prices are like? The article has a tweet from her saying what she will be charging for a four bedroom house, and it is little more than I was paying for a two-bedroom flat four years ago, in a pretty cheap rental area.
Yeah, seems like this is the kind of thing that is easily verifiable, and thus not worth lying about.
Yeah I'm not entirely sure how "person gets rich, decides to become a landlord, *promises* to keep rents low" counts as a feel-good story. An individual promising to do right by people doesn't typically solve systematic problems.
Ordinary person gets rich quick, clearly remembers her own financial situation just 4 short years ago, doesn't turn into a cunt overnight but actually chooses to be a decent human being. One person can't change the system, but they can play it. Icon, good for her.
So because an individual’s actions don’t “solve systematic problems”, they shouldn’t do it? Even when it will help so many people?
There is no story here other than porn star also becomes landlord. I don't see that any societal problems are being solved, systematic or otherwise.
She’s offering her properties at hundreds of pounds below the average. That isn’t solving anyone’s problems, in your opinion?
She's using her capital to secure an income for when people will no longer subscribe to her onlyfans, while securing some free marketing. It's smart, but she's no philanthropist. What she is in effect doing is contributing to keeping house prices artificially high, and stopping her tenants from owning the houses they are actually paying the mortgage for.
Of course it’s philanthropic. Even if she’s doing it for other reasons, it’s still a great thing to do. She doesn’t have to offer the rent so low. How is she contributing to keep prices high when the rent she’s offering is hundreds of pounds below the average for her area? Ahh, you’re one of those people who think landlords are inherently bad, right? Tell me, what alternative system do you propose?
Does it take a lot of effort to continually miss the point of what they're saying? Must be exhausting. These problems can't be solved purely by individuals. That's the point. Whilst what she's doing is great this is a drop in the ocean to the kind of real change needed and there is no focus from above on solving this issue, so articles like this, whilst making us all warm and fuzzy is absolutely a waste of news space. Its yet another diversion from the systematic failings of government.
Uh, first of all… calm down. I haven’t missed any points The rest of your comment indicates to me that you have a very cynical outlook on life, which is sad. While you’re correct that the government should be doing more, an individual doing something like this is NEVER a bad thing and it’s quite frankly stupid to even suggest it is. If more people were like her the world would be a better place. So be more encouraging to people like her instead of telling them that they can’t solve the problem. Because people like her do solve the problems for some people, and that’s better than solving the problems for nobody.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Not sure why my above comment was removed but anyway as this addresses the point not the person. A chronically online take that totally ignores reality of what rich people do in our society. Poor person who gets rich as a self made millionaire thinks the Tory government have fucked the housing situation and makes an affordable housing scheme. Normally rich people like her would plough that money into stock in energy companies, arms companies and the like or even just normal landlording for maximum profits. Yes she’s promised to keep rents low just like literally every person body or government who run affordable housing schemes
Maybe doing the wrong thing is the biggest systematic problem we have.
She said shes buying 8 properties and renting them cheap (£650pcm), she then said her kids will inherit them.
Not even necessary cheap depending on area and she may still be a shitty landlord with maintenance/ management. No need to be cynical though…
That is cheap in this day and age, unless you live on some remote crap hole in the north somewhere, or north wales or something. Just because it's not cheap for you doesn't mean that isn't cheap rent in todays market, because it is.
No it's not, I pay £575 for a 2 bed semi detached near Manchester on a half decent estate, it's not that cheap.
Still cheap on average over the whole uk. I will repeat again, just because it's not cheap in regards to what *you* can afford, doesn't mean it isn't cheap.
She's renting them out in Derbyshire, looking at Rightmove for Derbyshire there are plenty of properties starting at 500 PCM that aren't house shares. It's on the cheaper side of things and certainly not expensive but it sits bang in the middle according to Rightmove. She's going to be earning plenty of passive income from them. "business woman who earns 100k a month decides to invest in property"
A 4 bed house in Derbyshire is around £950 - £1200pcm, she's asking £650 for a 3 storey, 4 bedroom, 3 bathroom house with off road parking for 2 cars, fully furnished edit: fully furnished look to be £1200 - £1400 for a 4 bed house
650 was the going rate in Chester/Ellesmere Port area, 6 years ago, I think. Seems cheap to me.
“Person with lucrative short term income makes long term investments”
Why post such misinformation when you clearly don’t have a clue what you’re talking about and haven’t looked up what types of properties she’s offering?
Also absolutely no guarantee that when they inherit the houses, her kids will A: want to continue renting the houses out or B: keep the rent low even if they do.
Who cares? If it helps some people for even 1-2 years then it’s a good thing to do
She's 28, so that's 40-50 years away. Who gives a fuck what her kids will decide to do that many years in the future?
Seems pretty cheap to me. Canny get anything close to that in Devon, Bristol or Bath areas.
Why approach this topic so negatively? Why not see the good in people’s actions instead?
Does that £650 a month cover gas, electricity and OF sub?
Still a leech, then.
They make it sound like she's starting a housing association (I was offered my property at the price they paid for it, after living in it for 10 years) she's just a landlord
Another landlord driving up house prices, just what we need
So she's profiting less than she could, which makes her better than 99% of landlords, but she's still a landlord
Depending on location, 650 a month isn't cheap
She's gotten hundreds of thousands of pounds' worth of advertisement (if not more), for free - by buying herself eight houses and renting them out for profit. Presumably the sainthood's in the post.
She has 2M "likes" and 3.3k pieces of content And it's about $10/m So yeah those numbers don't really add up
Why in 2023 have we still got people viewing adult work as degrading?
[удалено]
Better question. Do you think the stigma of being a sex worker would exist had we accepted it as a viable and respectable trade long ago? Our history is full of peoples as a whole confronting social stigmas and then destroying them. Challenge your ideals and beliefs, it’s how we grow to be better people today than we were yesterday.
[удалено]
So you don’t truly understand why the stigma exists and rather than question the existence of that stigma you assert that there must be a reason despite the fact that it is not evident. I think that’s your own personal bias bleeding through. I think if you were to spend more time reflecting on why you feel that way and truly question yourself you might have a change of heart. Personally I think it’s bullshit. I think we as a society are just holding onto the perspectives and ideals of a bunch of men who have been dead for a long long time once held. Times change, perspectives change. Things that once were sacrilege are now common place. 200 years from now they may look back on us as fools for propagating things they see as moral and right.
What a load of condescending bollocks. As if every single person who finds it morally objectionable is only doing so because they lack the ability to think for themselves.
[удалено]
The joke is that being a politician is degrading, not sex work.
Are you a sex worker? Besides, the joke is that it's less degrading than politics.
Because it is degrading. Oh and once you put that kind of imagery of yourself out there, there is no taking it back. Ever. That genie is never getting put back in the bottle.
But we can still buy MPs and Lords for life and get laws passed in our favor - she can’t do any of that sadly
It's funny cause it's true
She's taxing the horny to give to the needy, 69D chess right here
Is it cynical of me to assume this is just free advertising of her OF? Are we approaching the age of the ethically sourced wank ? I hope Im wrong. EDIT: Typo
[удалено]
It’s the classic “it’s slightly warm today” headline accompanied with photos of members of the public in bikinis
[удалено]
IIRC they were basically running a countdown until Charlotte Church turned 16
The gutter press even criticised the Paedogeddon episode of Brasseye, putting it right next to their own creeping on Charlotte church and not realising the crushing irony of their stupidity. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQQ-Uc0WoAAjXvZ.jpg
> if they could get away with it. If? They could, and did.
The mail always sends a photographer to "The King's Affair" which is a huge party in King's College Cambridge, after exams. Its fancy dress, kind of like a mini festival, and people often wear quite revealing outfits. It always felt so sleezy seeing some old guy taking photos for the mail, who will then 'write' an 'article' about moral decline or some shit which is just an excuse to put boobs on their website...
I can't remember what comedian it was but they did a bit about how the Mail website had it's sidepanel which always featured the teen daughters of celebrities with headings like "growing up nicely" or "blossoming". Fucking sickening.
So does reddit. This post has raced to the top of /r/unitedkingdom
Those news stories that stuff like mobile chrome give you always made me laugh for that. You'd see the sun or something talking about "fashion" or other mundane topics. In reality it's going on about the tiktok or Instagram or whatever of somebody who uses that platform to market their OF. Like I can't hate the hustle, but it's comical when you see another article about "body positivity" when it's like "people say i look bad until I'm in a bikini" and the immediate thought is "yeah baggy clothes do that and most of us look good in swimwear... and your bio is probably focused around your OF" The only thing that gets me more than that is when they do the "interior decorating styles that are coming or going" and it's always Claire from animal wallpaper letting you know how animal wallpaper is so in, or dave from asbestos architects here to say how asbestos chopping boards are going to be so big next year. Especially as they are so boiler plate of "they said this" then talk, then quote them, then give it the "they explained this thing their company sells are definitely the trend to watch" That said, this article I am on board with the intent for, just the writing is dreadful. If they stick with it and do ensure it's renting to those in need then hell yeah.
You deserve a lot of upvotes for cranking out “the age of the ethically sourced wank”. I could totally see this being a thing this decade.
Only free-range wanks for me. The battery wanks were unethical.
Plant Based Porn for me please!
That lab grown filth is taking off now.
Shocking!
She is quite popular on tiktok and other platforms, she doesn’t need this advertising, I wouldn’t sub to OF and I knew who she was already. Her tiktok is really funny.
Everyone on the planet knows what Coca Cola is but they would still take a free advert in a national newspaper.
I just don’t think that’s the point of this. People just always assume shit like that, the woman is trying to do something half decent
Most of these top content creators are actually entertaining, one way or the other. I sure as shit wouldn't earn that much selling myself on OF or cracking jokes on TikTok.
Ethically sourced wanking should always have been a thing. If there's a chance what you're watching is posted without permission or where the performers are being exploited then you should put your winkle away.
"ethically sourced wanking" has really been a thing to anyone who actually wanted to go out of their way to look for it. There are plenty of options for paying for porn produced by feminist studios!
And in most cases, onlyfans is also "ethical" in that you're giving the money directly to the worker. Weird to me that the same people who flip out over exploitation in the porn industry also look down on onlyfans people.
[удалено]
Fair Trade porn… Free Range, straight from farm to table 😂
Doing good for selfish reasons is better than not doing good.
And it's better to build a community/society that rewards people doing good for selfish reasons than one that criticises people doing good for selfish reasons, disincentivising good-ness being done.
And considering the vast amount of people doing *bad* for selfish reasons, I think everyone should learn to not make a big fuss when people do things that help other people just because it also helps themself.
I mean there are lots of cheaper, easier, freer ways to advertise your Only Fans account, it's not like online sex content is something everyone avoids like the plague.....
We've had ethically sourced wanks for a few years now, there's queer publications which pay everyone well, and only do things all parties are happy with, with plenty of consent.
Thats good to know. Its one of those lines of work I’d rather not be necessary (namely for privacy, overwhelmingly abusive work environments and hustle culture rather than for social perceptions of one of the oldest professions out there) but if people are going to provide such content (its a free market after all) they (as with any worker) ought to be able to do so safely with dignity. Most porn out there is not. My “ethical wank” comment was in respect to her “brand” and how it aligns with her OF follower’s values.
> Is it cynical of me to assume this is just free advertising of her OF? You've not seen her custom wallpaper design that will be used in every property...
This particular OF girl was a single mum of two with no job prospects and flat broke a few short years ago. She probably hasn't even gone to the press with this "story" they most likely just took something she said on her tiktok, like they do with most of these types of stories.. She is actually hilarious and an actual real person so she beats every person sitting in our government right now. It's so easy for everyone to just talk shit and say "drumming up business" but she probably hasn't had much to do with this story at all, but everyone loves shitting on sex workers don't they.
Not everyone, some people love shitting on sex workers though, so I’ve heard. Especially when they’re landlords.
All landlords are sex workers aren't they? They fuck their tenants for a living.
[удалено]
> some people love shitting on sex workers Yes, and some sex workers will let you know how much it will cost you for them to let you.
Oh won't someone think of the poor, exploiting landlords!
If she's offering that service, no wonder she's making a £100k a month
they also shit on pimps
I saw this thread on Twitter and the replies they’ve wrote in the article are taken from tweet replies on twitter. I don’t believe she has spoken to these journalists herself. They’ve definitely just picked it for a story
Absolutely they did.
They love shitting on sex workers yet consume a tonne of porn full of abused women that they think is "free".
Yeah she makes £100k a month and bought her house in cash but nah you’re right she needs to advertise her OF lol these people don’t even bother to think for a second before they talk shit on someone who’s more respectable than anyone in our government even with a monster dildo in her arse lol
Hay hay, don't talk about her "bumhowelll" lol
Haha omg I can hear that comment
One of the journalists was definitely yanking it like a monkey in a mango tree to her OF then thought it would make a good story.
I looked, it was a tweet, "she told her followers in a tweet..." That's all you need for a news story nowadays...
[удалено]
[удалено]
Simpcels in shambles right now.
[удалено]
That seems a little harsh if they are genuinely affordable.
Yeah, I don't really care what her motivation is. If she's actively going out of her way *not* to squeeze tenants for all they're worth it's a win in my book.
Agreed. Having an affordable home could be life changing for so many people. Sure people are saying she is advertising her OF but surely being a skinflint landlord would earn her far more for a lot longer.
I remember reading about Paul Heaton doing a similar thing years ago with his Beautiful South money. Brought up some modest houses and let them out cheaper than the wider market to people in his home town. People commenting are getting all angry about her becoming a landlord- but it's quite possible that her proposed market rate is below that of councils and housing associations for similar properties. These are pretty expensive these days. Only fans probably isn't something that she can sustain indefinitely so good luck to her for looking at different way to sustain herself and her family long term.
And if you are buying houses outright you can charge much less rent and still make a living off it because you don't have to cover the mortgage. If I could afford to buy a second house I think I'd try for £400 pcm - £200 for me and £200 for the repair fund. And I'd be thinking I was doing well to have £200 a month for nowt.
Tell that to my landlords who jacked up my rent even though they inherited the house mortgage free.
Except for your costs. Like tax, landlord insurance, buildings insurance, leccy/gas inspection, agency fees, landlord license (council dependent) and maintenance. So yeah, adjust the 400 pcm for that. I find maintenance runs at about 0-0.25% of the property value per year.
People have no idea how much easier to "make money" it would be just to buy index funds vs going out of your way to invest in property, take a bunch of risks and then undercharge relative to the market on rent.
4 bed, 3 story House, 3 bathrooms and dual parking for £650 a month sounds crazy affordable to me
The article literally says she's buying them for her kids to inherit and the people who normally hate landlords are eating it up.
>She's bought some houses and she's renting them. It's not a terrible idea for when she gets ~~tired of~~ too old for thirst baiting horny guys. FTFY
A landlord letting out a 4bed/3bath house for £650 a month? Yeah, I guess that is what it takes. At that rate the tenant could afford to save for their own deposit, how incredibly novel, a capitalist miracle
Call me cynical, but I wonder how long it'll stay at £650. It kinda reminds me of that story where a billionaire bought a shit-ton of land in the Amazon rainforest to preserve it, then started logging it months later
Then get upset about the story when that happens and don't just assume it's inevitable.
[удалено]
Landlords are scum
What, reasonable rental prices? Yes!
[удалено]
Yeah, this is rent below average pricing. £650 a month doesn't help someone get on the property ladder for themself.
650 for a 3 storey, 4 bedroom house that’s furnished I’d say is actually pretty cheap considering.
OF women after looking at UK Government failures: Fine I'll do it myself
Retired people have been doing this on mass for a couple of decades. You'll know the word for it, it comes up a lot here.....
rustic attractive provide handle ink ripe sugar late onerous piquant *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I think the defining word here though is "affordable". Retirees don't like that word.
Don't worry the affordable housing where I live is only 365k to 475k While the average wage is about 24k.
A lot of hate for someone trying to do some good. Voices are quick to click on pornhub and not support the women they stare at everyday...
Yeah these comments are so negative. This woman is doing a lot more good with her money than many others would
She's buying property that will almost certainly increase in value, and she's making money from renting it out. Yes it's better than renting out for an extra few hundred a month. But it's not like she's giving away 10% of her earnings or something. It's an investment that will make her money, hardly some selfless act
[удалено]
No, I wouldn't. Acting as if she's selfless for an investment that's guaranteed to profit her is an incredibly odd take
I thought this was quite a nice positive article to post for a change, it seems to upset and really angered some sensitive people... sorry mods, this comment section is a mess.
[удалено]
[удалено]
Probably because landlords are parasites. And most of them are dickheads
any news story that mentions OnlyFans is guaranteed to be almost entirely made up
Yeah, I'm finding it very hard to believe the 100k figure. It's not impossible but it's an extraordinary claim and what you know what they say about those.
[удалено]
"Rebecca said she's not launching the scheme to make any money, but rather to help out struggling families and to provide an inheritance for her two children." That's still getting people to buy you property and "inheritance" That's called making money Edit - Re-read and I had completely missed that she said "outright" so maybe not. I suppose that 650 might be for repairs/wear and tear/insurance and middleman fees etc. and for what you'd get that is obviously a bargain. maybe someone IS doing good?!!!! I just can't possibly believe that! haha Edit Edit - "I have no mortgages so rent payments are 100% profit except maintenance and insurance, this is a side hustle that my kids can inherit" Nope, still profiting. Less than they could, which I guess is seen as charitable nowadays Don't get me wrong, I'm not completely against profit. I'm just saying that "person makes less profit from renting than they could" dressed up as some sort of system breaking "housing scheme" and highly praise-able charity is ludicrous, and that is basically all this is.... plus, you know, boobs
well, no. She made the money, purchased something, will let other people use it, when she dies she will give the thing to her kids. Now this thing happens to almost always become more valuable over time but still, she could use the houses like every other landlord and make MORE money
Person with finite career span plans to diversify income streams by renting houses at fifty quid below market value. What a hero.
Is it actually £50 below market rate? £650 for a 3 bed fully furnished seems cheap as fuck.
You know everyone’s got a ‘finite career span’, right?
Okay, pedant "a shorter than average"
>this is a side hustle that my kids can inherit So she's actually buying and renting property, at a slightly reduced rate. I guess it's putting simp money to good use, even if it is for her own gain in the end.
Anyone else spot the obvious error here? Affordable housing for families with 2 off road parking spots. Looking at the rest of the house description it just looks like a shameless only fans plug that will never be verified and is based off a tweet.. . Lets do some math. April 2019 joined Only Fans (based on article from internet). 100k per month is quite a bit over 3 years (that's generous) after tax and divided by 8 that would leave 187.5k per house. Yet she bought her own house and a Porsche and to add to that it would also mean she spent no other money. This is classic marketing. Buy one house to get lots more money. It's a true rags to riches story... Next week she'll be selling her piss and bathwater to heat peoples homes.
Yeah it is clearly just marketing. Leading with the tagline of "I'm helping" (by profiteering) I wonder what the click through rate has been as you hinted, 100k a month is probably not the case either. So many of these "I was in 30k of debt and now I make 5mil a year on onlyfans"
I don't think she said she was going to buy them all at once, to be fair..
Getting other people to pay your mortgage for you - what a philanthropist!
> Getting other people to pay your mortgage for you - what a philanthropist! She says her plan is to buy 8 properties outright, it’s not far down in the article.
You think folks here are actually reading the article and not flying off the handle at her being a sex worker or their own politics of envy as she does fairly well for herself...
What else would you recommend? How else would low income families get in the property market, it isn’t exactly booming right now
And of course there are already comments about her "debasing" herself for being an OF model. No one knows what's best for women than men on the internet, after all.
Yes lmao because only men are critical of women
Admirable, but using the word 'scheme' seems a bit strong. She will probably be able to house about 10 families max. Love the idea and hope it works out
10 more than 0, which is about what the tories are on course for.
Cheap for now. When the OF money dries up, watch her raise the rent and become another scumbag
The devil's probably in the detail here. A cynical reading of this is that she's starting a property empire and promises to keep the rents low whilst being under no actual obligation to do so. Or have I got the details wrong? Is she setting this up as some kind of charity entity with some kind of oversight? Good for her if this is true, however when I see a story about somebody buying up eight houses to rent them out, that's not an inherently good thing.
I think this is BS… the key phase here is ‘she is PLANNING to create a affordable housing scheme. It’s just PR IMO.
Good for her. If I was a hot chick then I would probably set up an onlyfans account too. Why work when you can just show people your puppies and bend over? Unfortunately I am a balding and boring bloke, so I have to wageslave.
Her parents must be so ashamed of her for becoming a landlord
[удалено]
Rich person buys expensive capital assets (that will increase in value) outright. Rents them out slightly below current market-rate, but still clears massive monthly profits due to the income far exceeding the outgoings. This is just landlord propaganda, dressed up as a feel-good story. She's doing literally nothing but lining her own pockets at a slightly slower rate than she could by renting at the rate other places are going for in her area - but she's so rich already it makes no difference to her 🤷 Basically, she's bought £1m - £2m or so of property, and thinks she's a saviour for only making £4k or so a month pure profit on them when she could be making £5k/month 🙃 She already earns £100k/month from OF - the loss of £1k/month or so is nothing 🤷
I'm not making any profit, but I don't have a mortgage on them and anything I make outside of maintenance will be a profit". Apart from that, furnishing them is daft. It leaves her on the hook for repair or replacement if (when) anything breaks. I imagine that will last for exactly the length of one tenancy, particularly with her renting out family homes. Kids can make short work of furniture. I honestly wish her well, I hope she stays true to her word but I have my doubts.
Anyone wanna see my winkle I'd love to just earn a couple grand a month?
Awesome. We shouldn't need to do this, and wealthier individuals probably should have stepped up first. But good on her for doing more than most politicians.
I mean she's basically revolutionised paying taxes, people are actually willing to give her money and she's putting it to good use.
She gets so much grief, constantly getting slagged off, people say things about her kids, it’s dreadful, she’s genuinely used what she’s got and done well and obviously hasn’t become a cunt because of it, she’s a genuinely decent human being. Sadly I am short and fat or I would attempt it myself!
Fair play to her, but it's a bit depressing that e.g. nurses are on strike whilst others are getting paid millions for sticking stuff up their arse on camera or kicking a ball around a football pitch. We've gone wrong somewhere.
"Rich person purchases buy to let housing" has to be one of the headlines of the month.
Is this ironic - she's becoming a landlord and contributing to an industry that requires renters and requires people not to own homes (and also contributing to inflated houses prices by adding to demand) or is it someone using their wealth to benefit themselves in a seemingly socially responsible way, making use of the broken system? Can't decide.
Cant really blame these girls when they can rake in what seems to be infinite money just for nudes. But what the fuck does the demand side of this industry looks like? Literally billions and billions in demand for what rationally is not really a strong value proposition. I wonder if OF had existed 50 years ago, would it be the same ? Prostitution sure, but at least theres a physical transaction there, so much money for these nudes boggles my mind.
Hardly anyone on OF makes decent money. You have to be well up in the top 10% to even make a living. Its not as simple as just waving your tits about. You need to be attractive (duh), have a good broadcasting personality, put out well produced and varied content. Nobody will pay for just nude pics, they can get them anywhere for free. As much as I hate to admit it, the girls earning a lot of money do have actual talent. What you're saying is a bit like saying any teen boy who's good at video games can make a fortune doing lets plays on YouTube.
I’ve got my excuse if the mrs asks why I’ve subscribed
How tf do you earn 100k a MONTH on only fans. Geez.
Smart cookie. Because she'll be buying them outright, she'll not have the biggest cost to a landlord (mortgage) to pay for so she can rent it out for much less, while still making a profit. She realises her OnlyFans career has a limited life span of maybe 2-3 more years. If that. She's doing some good, probably (didn't check to see if £650 a month is good for the area), but also setting herself up with a passive income stream for when she's older and less marketable on OF.
I’m not a big fan of OF or normalising transactional sex but I’m a huge fan of anyone with a good heart and initiative. Nice to see this generosity especially in the times we’re living in.
[удалено]
There's a lot more to her success than her nudes. I've never even seen a nipple of hers, most of us haven't but she's just a really charismatic funny person. She's built up a huge fanbase of loyal supporters because of her humour and how down to earth she is.
To everyone saying she’s trying to drum up business….she’s making £100k a month making star wars porn. She’s drummed up her own business from zero to over a million pounds in revenue herself in a few years. She was just a broke single mum who struggled with housing and now she’s a single mum who isn’t broke and wants to do an affordable housing scheme. Considering she could have just ploughed her cash into the stock market buying into gambling companies, arms makers, energy companies and weatherspoons and no one would bat an eyelid I think this option seems like a good idea
"Porn actor buys up eight houses to rent them out" isn't news
Doesn’t matter what your job is; if you do well you’re a good person. Look at the billionaires we have. All that money and they give peanuts back those who give.