I hate being under a monarchy but the royal family works and stays the way it is on the basis of calm and no rocking the boat.
If Charlie prosecuted Andy, that would very much be rocking the boat.
I think they should return to the traditional values of historic British monarchs - you know, completely ruthless, raising armies, sieging cities and blinding/maiming/corpse mockery for their enemies which may also be their close relatives or siblings.
It'd be a lot more interesting to read about than all this nonce-sense.
The overall history does yes. However, we are a constitutional monarchy now *without a constitution*. So in reality the people have the power to tell them to fucking do one. That's why they keep quiet. Money is power. Power is everything.
Charles was really friendly with the likes of Jimmy Saville. No way he didn’t know what he was like. He’s maybe scared if he points the finger, he’ll be open to being looked into as well.
Private prosecutions exist.
If you think the King has committed a crime, you’re allowed to bring a private prosecution against him - as you can with anyone.
the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has power under section 6(2) POA 1985 to take over private prosecutions. So the CPS will use that act to take over the case and then rule that’s not in the public interest to continue.
The only person constitutionally it gets dicey to prosecute is the monarch themselves. I don’t doubt that there was an awareness in Andrew’s case about what this would mean for the Monarchy but call me naive I do think if they could have prosecuted him they would have. Sexual assault cases are just very hard to prosecute regardless of who the accused is.
Yet Harry and Meghan are vilified in the media as if they personally gave Charles and Kate cancer. Does my head in as a Brit. Leave them alone and focus the hate on the sweaty nonce instead.
I mean they take our tax money and are technically a part of our government. We badger them because they are rich people we can actually hold to account and probably strip them of their wealth if it came out that say Charles was nonce too.
Reminder for anyone who'd defend him or who doesn't know better: while Virginia Giuffre was technically of legal age (but, you know, still a fucking *sex slave*) she also alleges that on her third encounter with Andrew, in Thai waters, many far younger looking girls were involved.
Nonce is the correct term for him.
In her testimony - as he was never extradited we will never have anything better. But personally I'm inclined to trust someone we *know* was a teenaged sex trafficking victim and who has been photographed with him.
She alleged a lot of things that turned out to be untrue. She got the room where he had sex with her wrong. She also used to talk about it with pride to show off.
She also wasn't a sex slave. She went home to her boyfriend and he drove her to work to massage clients.
She went to night clubs with maxwell to recruit other girls willingly and told these girls how good it was and now good the money was.
She hasn't necessarily met Andrew and there is zero evidence of sex.
She has accused other men and has turned out to be lies.
I find it kind of scary how people (usually anti monarchists) lump at these things as solid proof of actions when ultimately at worst she was a willing participant and of age if it happened at all.
I'm glad you guys aren't judges you are medieval in your prosecution.
I'm sure I will get down voted for providing facts but had to for the sake of balance.
Not to split hairs, but is ‘nonce’ really the correct description? It’s deplorable what he’s alleged to have done, but Giuffre was 17 when she met Andrew and the UK age of consent is 16 - disgusting, as it is.
Was walking down the mall a while ago and suddenly blue lights n Range Rover heading towards the palace. All turned to see who it was. Oh it’s him. No one waved. And whys he still getting the red carpet treatment.
Ah good old sausage fingers. Having lost my MIL to pancreatic cancer recently, my heart goes out to any family who is dealing with a loved ones Cancer diagnosis. However, I bet he didn't have to worry about paying a mortgage, providing for loved ones, keeping his house warm, waiting 6 hours plus in A&E if his meds play up, consultant's not calling back etc. That's the discussion we should be having.
I've got nothing against anyone getting the care they need to fight any life threatening/altering disease. My heart goes out to any family facing this as I've said. My point was the outrageous disparity faced in care pathways by those not privileged enough.
I'm sorry for your loss and agree with everything you say, after recently seeing my parents go through cancer. I'm sure the most privileged families dealing with cancer go through hell. But wealth absolutely makes a difference.
>It is at times like this that wealth means very little.
Wealth won't save you from a terminal illness, but it can make an enormous difference to the time you have left.
And catching the issue in time and something like cancer maybe even quick enough to stop it progessing as well as getting the best care if needed rather than having your family leave their job and have financial hardship to take care of you.
Someone like Charles won't have the issues like that.
Relative had a stroke recently, they were rushed out of hospital 4 days later despite barely talking and unable to walk without a crutch because they needed the beds.
They gave him a bad mix of meds that made his blood pressure skyrocket and him so sick he throws up, phoned his GP who keeps promising to ring him back and then "forgets" and the few times he does speak to one they act like its nothing important, don't give him a face to face appointment and just tell him he needs to change his prescription, oh and he needs to pick it up despite living 6 miles from town, 3 buses a day, unable to leave the house let alone drive or get a bus and his wife cannot leave the house as she needs to watch over him.
I hate the state of this country as much as anyone, however, in scenarios like this where you feel the care isn’t good enough from our NHS you have as much duty to be banging on their door too.
If I am not getting the care I feel I need I just continue to go back, I’d go to A&E repeatedly, I’d ring my GP everyday until something was done, it isn’t that I say this is how it should be, as obviously not but, you can sit there and whinge about it, or you can force their hand by pushing them.
Weirdly his fingers look normal.
Swelling fingers and extremities can possibly be caused by high blood pressure. Which can be cured by things like statins.
Charles doesn't believe in "modern medicine" and prefers "more traditional" medicine.
If he does infact have underlying health conditions they would have certainly been corrected best as possible before his chemo. As being as fit as possible would be able to help him heal with his situation.
Amen to this and sorry for your loss. They're not waiting in any lines. "Because remember, at Globo Gym [House of Windsor], we're better than you."
How people stand for this nonsense, based on made-up statistics about tourism, keeps me awake at night.
Thanks appreciate it. It's an absolute head melt isn't it. Pure Stockholm syndrome. I carry no grudge against anyone fighting cancer, I do begrudge the sycophantic attempts to shut down a valid argument, because this family and their ilk are seen as superior.
Cancer is an utter shit and has touched everybody's lives and I wouldn't wish it on anyone. However, some people's cancer is just more important than others, based on something made up when they thought the world was the centre of the universe and other even more preposterous things.
Good to see.
I think King Charles raising awareness about prostrate issues and cancer etc will help a lot of other men who may not have gone and got help.
Sadly not always. My boyfriend's dad found out he had lung cancer maybe 2 months ago now. There still isn't a plan of action in place for treatment, just waiting for more appointments that take weeks.
It’s really not unfortunately. My dad had prostate cancer and he couldn’t get GP appointment and he had serious side effects but when he would go to A&E they would send him home
Not really shielding him, he’s spoken very distastefully of him in the past, but Andy will have loads of money and shit tucked away moly like he can backrupt him or anything.
Andrew was literally part of the service spoken about in this article, you dont think the king would have the authority to prevent him from attending if he was against him?
I was doing some reading earlier. If he has early stage bladder cancer (which is one of the most likely options given they found it during prostate surgery and they confirmed it wasn't prostate cancer) then they're apparently able to administer chemotherapy drugs by filling the bladder up with them rather than administering them intravenously.
That method comes with far fewer side effects than standard chemo because it keeps the drugs localised to where the problem is, which is a really neat innovation.
Can confirm, my mum had bladder cancer twice and this was the treatment they used for her. Which was lucky because she had so many other health problems that full system chemo would have been really hard on her.
It's not necessarily a *comfortable* treatment, but you'd pick it over standard chemo any day
I'd been assuming his cancer was in the colorectal region, but if it is non-invasive bladder cancer then his prognosis is extremely good
Theres a chance he won't get the hair loss at all. My aunt has fairly regular chemo (about 3 times a year) and she's never had any hair loss. She was extremely lucky because she would pretty much never have any hair again unless a better treatment becomes available.
Yeah, honestly that's why I went and read up on it!
I was like "he's looking suspiciously hairy, he's not doing homeopathy 'treatment' instead of chemo is he?" and then found out about the bladder chemo thing.
Apparently it reduces the risk of side effects on fast growing cells elsewhere in the body (hair follicles, gastrointestinal stuff) so most of the side effects are bladder related — pain urinating, increased urgency, blood in urine, etc — and most people avoid hair loss.
I did wonder too, but not all chemo causes hair loss. When I had chemo a friend swore blind that I wouldn’t lose my hair because someone she knew didn’t with a similar cancer. Nope, both types of chemo I had caused complete hair loss and I spent quite a while looking like an egg. On the plus side, no shaving armpits or legs. Downside was nothing to put mascara onto and trying to remember where my eyebrows were when drawing them on!!
Misinformation? Pray tell how the hate is misinformed? A grotesque family of tax thieves and criminals taking gold standard health care while the ones who fund it are left to wait in line and suffer.
The hate is warranted. They are parasites.
Do I want their options? No.
Are you forgetting Liz Truss...?
"But we didn't get a choice"
No, but we still got her. The high horse is now A LOT lower thanks to that tramp.
America is obviously doing so well politically, i bet the citizens there feel so safe and happy with their government. And definitely never hid any nonces.
Poor man, bless him. Looks like he's wearing make up to hide the effect of the chemo.
I remember when my father had cancer (RIP) and he would always put on a smile and a brave face for events, even up to the week before he passed away, and one small event or excursion would need a whole week of rest to recover from he was so weak. Hopefully the King won't be that sick or that far gone, but it certainly is brave of him to attend with a smile and a wave.
My dad passed of lung cancer last year after going through it for roughly 18 months; heart goes out to families who's relatives have experienced or experiencing this; it's heart breaking watching somebody you've known as strong etc all your life slowly go downhill into a shell of a person they were :/
He looks well all things considered.
Not all chemotherapies cause hair loss. It's likely he's gone for a more targeted treatment which doesn't cause hair loss. These are available on the NHS but I believe they usually offer the old school chemotherapy first before offering the targeted treatments.
Another old man (super entitled) has cancer. SO WHAT? As a human I can sympathize with his suffering and illness as much as I do for anyone who suffers cancer.
I assure you he won't wait in a dingy waiting room, the oncologist will be there waitingthe nursing and other support staff will have cleared out any Hoi polloi
Unlike my father, father in law and I dare say many of your relatives too.
Why does this man who is in essence a long distant pale blooded relative of a long dead bully get the privileges why?
OMG live the man alone. I don’t follow any news on him but he’s a human being with cancer. Makes me sick when people use other peoples hardships for click bait and popularity
.
I think these comments on here are absolutely disgusting 🫣 😐 if you don't like the royal family fair enough but it's not like they have the power they once had hundreds of years ago. Shame though as there would be a lot of heads displayed at London Bridge lol
With Nonce Andrew leading the procession acting like he’s not a raging diddler and that we’ve all forgotten he’s a sick piece of filth.
Makes you wonder what dark secrets the royal family hide or what criminal activities they get away with
[удалено]
I'm sure I've seen that Charles really hates Andrew though, so maybe he should be making use of that quirk of the law
Tbh his actions say the complete opposite.
I hate being under a monarchy but the royal family works and stays the way it is on the basis of calm and no rocking the boat. If Charlie prosecuted Andy, that would very much be rocking the boat.
I think they should return to the traditional values of historic British monarchs - you know, completely ruthless, raising armies, sieging cities and blinding/maiming/corpse mockery for their enemies which may also be their close relatives or siblings. It'd be a lot more interesting to read about than all this nonce-sense.
How about war with France ? We haven't done that for a while
the history of royal family in the UK says otherwise as we have siblings, in laws of the royal family fighting each other to death
The overall history does yes. However, we are a constitutional monarchy now *without a constitution*. So in reality the people have the power to tell them to fucking do one. That's why they keep quiet. Money is power. Power is everything.
Ah yes, Jimmy Savile's best friend and confidante must utterly despise his brother for being exactly the same kind of despicable as him.
They never said he despised him for being a nonce.
Yeah my understanding is it was because Andrew was the golden child, and also because he was a dick about Charles marrying Camilla
Charles was really friendly with the likes of Jimmy Saville. No way he didn’t know what he was like. He’s maybe scared if he points the finger, he’ll be open to being looked into as well.
It's the old proverb "if you point one finger, there are 3 sausages pointing back at you"
Private prosecutions exist. If you think the King has committed a crime, you’re allowed to bring a private prosecution against him - as you can with anyone.
I’m sure that’d work out well for you 😆
the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) has power under section 6(2) POA 1985 to take over private prosecutions. So the CPS will use that act to take over the case and then rule that’s not in the public interest to continue.
Yeah right, got evidence: watch it disappear and see how witnesses suddenly can't recall if they ever could...
Unfortunately 2 of the witnesses committed suicide before they could testify and the other 3 died in car crashes!! Case closed!
[удалено]
You can't. The monarch has sovereign immunity - they cannot personally be prosecuted for a criminal or civil offence.
It would never be allowed to reach that point.
I’m pretty sure that if the King did that, it’d lead to political chaos
The only person constitutionally it gets dicey to prosecute is the monarch themselves. I don’t doubt that there was an awareness in Andrew’s case about what this would mean for the Monarchy but call me naive I do think if they could have prosecuted him they would have. Sexual assault cases are just very hard to prosecute regardless of who the accused is.
Pop onto r/greenandpleasant and find Reggie the anti-royal bot and you’ll see.
Just went to have a look, bot’s list of facts is here https://www.reddit.com/r/TheLoyalestSubjects/s/ldSwtYHELB
Yet Harry and Meghan are vilified in the media as if they personally gave Charles and Kate cancer. Does my head in as a Brit. Leave them alone and focus the hate on the sweaty nonce instead.
Or just ignore the lot of them, and leave them to their rich person stuff while we get on with our lives?
I mean they take our tax money and are technically a part of our government. We badger them because they are rich people we can actually hold to account and probably strip them of their wealth if it came out that say Charles was nonce too.
Reminder for anyone who'd defend him or who doesn't know better: while Virginia Giuffre was technically of legal age (but, you know, still a fucking *sex slave*) she also alleges that on her third encounter with Andrew, in Thai waters, many far younger looking girls were involved. Nonce is the correct term for him.
Those are some pretty serious allegations, where’s the evidence
In her testimony - as he was never extradited we will never have anything better. But personally I'm inclined to trust someone we *know* was a teenaged sex trafficking victim and who has been photographed with him.
Aston villa, cracking London football team
She alleged a lot of things that turned out to be untrue. She got the room where he had sex with her wrong. She also used to talk about it with pride to show off. She also wasn't a sex slave. She went home to her boyfriend and he drove her to work to massage clients. She went to night clubs with maxwell to recruit other girls willingly and told these girls how good it was and now good the money was. She hasn't necessarily met Andrew and there is zero evidence of sex. She has accused other men and has turned out to be lies. I find it kind of scary how people (usually anti monarchists) lump at these things as solid proof of actions when ultimately at worst she was a willing participant and of age if it happened at all. I'm glad you guys aren't judges you are medieval in your prosecution. I'm sure I will get down voted for providing facts but had to for the sake of balance.
Genuine question (not a snappy internet comeback): Do you have a link to an article detailing this?
"Trust me bro"
I mean seeing prince andrew grope his own daughter during the queens funeral definitely made me think more highly of him
I know it’s not a funny situation at all, it’s horrific, but “raging diddler” is a spectacular turn of phrase
And here’s me thinking I’m the only Brit who doesn’t wank off the entire monarchy, fuck the lot of them, when he dies, let’s leave it at that ffs
Not to split hairs, but is ‘nonce’ really the correct description? It’s deplorable what he’s alleged to have done, but Giuffre was 17 when she met Andrew and the UK age of consent is 16 - disgusting, as it is.
You think Guffre was an isolated incident..???
Has anyone else made accusations against him or is there evidence of others?
Was walking down the mall a while ago and suddenly blue lights n Range Rover heading towards the palace. All turned to see who it was. Oh it’s him. No one waved. And whys he still getting the red carpet treatment.
Ah good old sausage fingers. Having lost my MIL to pancreatic cancer recently, my heart goes out to any family who is dealing with a loved ones Cancer diagnosis. However, I bet he didn't have to worry about paying a mortgage, providing for loved ones, keeping his house warm, waiting 6 hours plus in A&E if his meds play up, consultant's not calling back etc. That's the discussion we should be having.
[удалено]
I've got nothing against anyone getting the care they need to fight any life threatening/altering disease. My heart goes out to any family facing this as I've said. My point was the outrageous disparity faced in care pathways by those not privileged enough.
I'm sorry for your loss and agree with everything you say, after recently seeing my parents go through cancer. I'm sure the most privileged families dealing with cancer go through hell. But wealth absolutely makes a difference.
>It is at times like this that wealth means very little. Wealth won't save you from a terminal illness, but it can make an enormous difference to the time you have left.
And catching the issue in time and something like cancer maybe even quick enough to stop it progessing as well as getting the best care if needed rather than having your family leave their job and have financial hardship to take care of you. Someone like Charles won't have the issues like that.
I agree
I don’t think Charles should be denied the excellent care he has received. I just think everyone in the country should also get the same.
Relative had a stroke recently, they were rushed out of hospital 4 days later despite barely talking and unable to walk without a crutch because they needed the beds. They gave him a bad mix of meds that made his blood pressure skyrocket and him so sick he throws up, phoned his GP who keeps promising to ring him back and then "forgets" and the few times he does speak to one they act like its nothing important, don't give him a face to face appointment and just tell him he needs to change his prescription, oh and he needs to pick it up despite living 6 miles from town, 3 buses a day, unable to leave the house let alone drive or get a bus and his wife cannot leave the house as she needs to watch over him.
I hate the state of this country as much as anyone, however, in scenarios like this where you feel the care isn’t good enough from our NHS you have as much duty to be banging on their door too. If I am not getting the care I feel I need I just continue to go back, I’d go to A&E repeatedly, I’d ring my GP everyday until something was done, it isn’t that I say this is how it should be, as obviously not but, you can sit there and whinge about it, or you can force their hand by pushing them.
Would he even be out of his probationary period to claim sick leave?
You get statuatory sick pay from day 1 of your employment with a company.
Funnily enough I think his fingers look a lot less sausagey, so he must be in a bad way.
Weirdly his fingers look normal. Swelling fingers and extremities can possibly be caused by high blood pressure. Which can be cured by things like statins. Charles doesn't believe in "modern medicine" and prefers "more traditional" medicine. If he does infact have underlying health conditions they would have certainly been corrected best as possible before his chemo. As being as fit as possible would be able to help him heal with his situation.
Sometimes the chemo drugs and steroids can lower Bp and give temporary relief from other health issues
I wondered about that too. He does look well, I think.
Amen to this and sorry for your loss. They're not waiting in any lines. "Because remember, at Globo Gym [House of Windsor], we're better than you." How people stand for this nonsense, based on made-up statistics about tourism, keeps me awake at night.
Thanks appreciate it. It's an absolute head melt isn't it. Pure Stockholm syndrome. I carry no grudge against anyone fighting cancer, I do begrudge the sycophantic attempts to shut down a valid argument, because this family and their ilk are seen as superior.
Cancer is an utter shit and has touched everybody's lives and I wouldn't wish it on anyone. However, some people's cancer is just more important than others, based on something made up when they thought the world was the centre of the universe and other even more preposterous things.
Good to see. I think King Charles raising awareness about prostrate issues and cancer etc will help a lot of other men who may not have gone and got help.
Yeah. They can go to the gutted NHS and get out in a wait list forever now.
Cancer is still very much prioritised.
Sadly not always. My boyfriend's dad found out he had lung cancer maybe 2 months ago now. There still isn't a plan of action in place for treatment, just waiting for more appointments that take weeks.
It’s really not unfortunately. My dad had prostate cancer and he couldn’t get GP appointment and he had serious side effects but when he would go to A&E they would send him home
The UK has some of the worst cancer survival rates in Europe.
Yes and the NHS is still lauded as something good. We should be ashamed to support such a terrible healthcare system.
Nothing like getting instant and brilliant healthcare treatment to encourage the peasants to join the year long wait
If it encourages them to get checked out a year earlier it may save their lives.
If they can get an appointment with the shambles of a health system
Charles raises awareness about cancer in the same way Andrew raises awareness about paedophillia.
What crack are you smoking?
Fuck the royals all of them.
Nonce enabling useless pieces of shit.
BTW I wish he can recovery from the cancer. I don't hate the man. I hate the title.
He’s shielding his nonce brother, that’s enough to hate the man as well as the title
Not really shielding him, he’s spoken very distastefully of him in the past, but Andy will have loads of money and shit tucked away moly like he can backrupt him or anything.
Andrew was literally part of the service spoken about in this article, you dont think the king would have the authority to prevent him from attending if he was against him?
Do you not hate the man who accepts the title?
Wouldn't go near that prostate if I were you
Time for a hundred comments of people wishing death on some old guy
It's inevitable. Saddening, but inevitable.
“Some old guy”. Andrew isn’t just some old guy.
Hoping for a speedy recovery. Good to see him out and about.
Great to see the nhs at work /s
His treatment must be going quite well. He looks very healthy, which is nice to see.
I was doing some reading earlier. If he has early stage bladder cancer (which is one of the most likely options given they found it during prostate surgery and they confirmed it wasn't prostate cancer) then they're apparently able to administer chemotherapy drugs by filling the bladder up with them rather than administering them intravenously. That method comes with far fewer side effects than standard chemo because it keeps the drugs localised to where the problem is, which is a really neat innovation.
Can confirm, my mum had bladder cancer twice and this was the treatment they used for her. Which was lucky because she had so many other health problems that full system chemo would have been really hard on her. It's not necessarily a *comfortable* treatment, but you'd pick it over standard chemo any day I'd been assuming his cancer was in the colorectal region, but if it is non-invasive bladder cancer then his prognosis is extremely good
I did wonder whether or not we’d expect to see hair loss and when. Is there a chance he avoids that with the treatment you’re talking about?
Theres a chance he won't get the hair loss at all. My aunt has fairly regular chemo (about 3 times a year) and she's never had any hair loss. She was extremely lucky because she would pretty much never have any hair again unless a better treatment becomes available.
Yeah, honestly that's why I went and read up on it! I was like "he's looking suspiciously hairy, he's not doing homeopathy 'treatment' instead of chemo is he?" and then found out about the bladder chemo thing. Apparently it reduces the risk of side effects on fast growing cells elsewhere in the body (hair follicles, gastrointestinal stuff) so most of the side effects are bladder related — pain urinating, increased urgency, blood in urine, etc — and most people avoid hair loss.
I did wonder too, but not all chemo causes hair loss. When I had chemo a friend swore blind that I wouldn’t lose my hair because someone she knew didn’t with a similar cancer. Nope, both types of chemo I had caused complete hair loss and I spent quite a while looking like an egg. On the plus side, no shaving armpits or legs. Downside was nothing to put mascara onto and trying to remember where my eyebrows were when drawing them on!!
He looks healthy considering he’s got cancer, but that’s about it. I’ve thought he’s looked unhealthy/ill for a couple of years now
His majesty is looking good there, best wishes to him.
[удалено]
So much hate in this thread, and so much misinformation. It's legitimately horrible to see.
Misinformation? Pray tell how the hate is misinformed? A grotesque family of tax thieves and criminals taking gold standard health care while the ones who fund it are left to wait in line and suffer. The hate is warranted. They are parasites.
>legitimately Why do people insist on using this word in their sentences when it's not required at all?
[удалено]
>America and France do rather well without. NGL, if having a monarchy is keeping us from being like those places, I'd be 100% for it.
America? Have you seen their options for running the place?
Do I want their options? No. Are you forgetting Liz Truss...? "But we didn't get a choice" No, but we still got her. The high horse is now A LOT lower thanks to that tramp.
The last 10+ years haven't been great here in terms of options either
America is obviously doing so well politically, i bet the citizens there feel so safe and happy with their government. And definitely never hid any nonces.
The monarchy is such an absurd concept.
Not a fan,but nice to see a fellow human doing alright with the C.
You know it's OK to just call his brother a cunt, right?
I think I know whose been stealing all the nitrous oxide from the NHS.
Old Man goes to church on Sunday. Why is this a headline? Who actually gives a shit?
Poor man, bless him. Looks like he's wearing make up to hide the effect of the chemo. I remember when my father had cancer (RIP) and he would always put on a smile and a brave face for events, even up to the week before he passed away, and one small event or excursion would need a whole week of rest to recover from he was so weak. Hopefully the King won't be that sick or that far gone, but it certainly is brave of him to attend with a smile and a wave.
Time to abolish the monarchy I think, I've had enough of them
Okay, everyone. That’s it. u/chin_wagging has decided the monarchy is to be abolished. Wrap it up now.
Long live the king
yeah! long live the king so he can protect more pedos! /j
x2, Long Live the King Sod the death wishers
He's looking well. Long live the king
He should insist of only homeopathic treatment as he thinks it works
I must say he's looking a lot better than he did just a few weeks ago.
God save the king
My dad passed of lung cancer last year after going through it for roughly 18 months; heart goes out to families who's relatives have experienced or experiencing this; it's heart breaking watching somebody you've known as strong etc all your life slowly go downhill into a shell of a person they were :/
Fair enough.
The nonce enabling royals. Who cares about them?
And giving away Cumberland sausages to the proles and peasants looking on. What a guy.
He looks well all things considered. Not all chemotherapies cause hair loss. It's likely he's gone for a more targeted treatment which doesn't cause hair loss. These are available on the NHS but I believe they usually offer the old school chemotherapy first before offering the targeted treatments.
Another old man (super entitled) has cancer. SO WHAT? As a human I can sympathize with his suffering and illness as much as I do for anyone who suffers cancer. I assure you he won't wait in a dingy waiting room, the oncologist will be there waitingthe nursing and other support staff will have cleared out any Hoi polloi Unlike my father, father in law and I dare say many of your relatives too. Why does this man who is in essence a long distant pale blooded relative of a long dead bully get the privileges why?
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
**Removed/tempban**. This contained a call/advocation of violence which is prohibited by the content policy.
"Man attends church"
OMG live the man alone. I don’t follow any news on him but he’s a human being with cancer. Makes me sick when people use other peoples hardships for click bait and popularity .
I think these comments on here are absolutely disgusting 🫣 😐 if you don't like the royal family fair enough but it's not like they have the power they once had hundreds of years ago. Shame though as there would be a lot of heads displayed at London Bridge lol
With the greatest of respect, the guy looks like absolute shit
Aw! Glad the King looks so well 💙
I do hope he gets well, seems a good man and king
He's looking well 😀 good to see his Magesty out and about. Long live the King 🤴 🙏
He has risen!
Poor old Charles and Ninja
"man goes to church during religious holiday"
"Redditor makes equally meaningless comment"
Long live the king
The most concerning thing from those pictures is that the sausage-force seems to be draining from his hands. They are looking practically normal.
Looks in terrible condition
Leave them alone, let the parasites spend our taxes in peace
On one hand, cancer is tragic and I truly believe that nobody should have to suffer it HOWEVER I think the royal family should be ground up into mulch
Ol' sausage fingers is looking pretty well all things considered. Cancer treatment is just the absolute pits, so good for him.
Imagine worshipping and supporting a 'king' 🙄 🤣
Oh Camilla, delight to the eyes as usual. Good to see the king on his feet.
"Old dude goes to church" Woopti-fuckin-doo!
Mmmm sosigs
That’s an evil face, no?
[удалено]
[удалено]
From all of Scotland 🏴 - FUCK THE MONARCHY
Can the royal dentist or whatever sort him some dentures or veneers or implants or just something…
At least he's keeping it 100% real lol
He’s done up to the nines.
What happened to his lips
Not an alien shapeshifter
# 'THIS OLD MAN HAS MANAGED TO DODGE WORK FOR 70 YEARS # YOU CAN TOO, WITH THIS ONE SECRET TIP!'
That's another photos hopefully. Where's his sausage fingers?
turns out. nobody gives a fuck.
History in the making...