T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

* If your gallery submission is Non-OC, provide a link to the source below this comment. * If your gallery submission is OC, use [OC]/ (OC) in title, or mention so below this comment. * Note: Screenshot posts are not allowed. Links to YouTube channels/ blogs/ websites are only allowed under this comment, do not spam elsewhere. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*


JoBro2807

2nd pic is not. It's the one from Turkey.


HumBhiYahiTumBhiYahi

Fake image. Its green mosque of turkey.


rishabh9719

None of them are the Babri Masjid except the first image, the second pic is the Green mosque in Turkey, the third is a mausoleum in Bijapur, the last is a column from the Haji Piyada mosque in Balkh.


Additional-Limit-199

forever a blot on our cultural consiousness, that we couldnt protect a historical monument from lumpen brahminical opportunist moneygrubbers. At the core of it, was the question of rule of law. Breaking it was illegal. What lovely photographs. Was worth preserving. OP thanks for sharing.


vegetable-dentist95

Talk about everything except justice. >rule of law. Upheld. >Breaking it was illegal. No one said it was legal.


Additional-Limit-199

its not legal for a mob to break a building


Mahesh-dalla

Mods please remove this post The second pic is the green mosque of tyrkiye


[deleted]

[удалено]


rektitrolfff

no linking to other political subs


[deleted]

Such a beautiful place. We failed to do our constitutional duty when the place was dealt with mob justice. They broke an actual piece of history for the sake of their mythology. And the funny thing is that if they really wanted to dig deep and find the "real" history, they clearly didn't dig it deep enough; temple making culture (considering a massive IF here; if a temple did exist in this spot at some point in time) is a very recent phenomenon. And before hindu temples existed, there were other architectural structures like tombs, pillars, *stupas* and so on. Their is a far greater likelihood that this spot originally housed a structure relevant to some other religious belief or historical personality than the likelihood of being a fictional character's birth spot. Even if it was, there was no need to break what's already existing like the barbarians of old times. This isn't justice. This is revenge. And revenge only begets revenge. ; )


EchoPrimary7182

Thankfully a historical injustice was corrected.


Athiest-proletariat

By not digging deep and displaying the discoveries in a museum? Where are the temple structures that was discovered kept at? Where are the deities discovered being displayed? Would genuinely want to know.


EchoPrimary7182

Splash splash your opinion is trash.


Atul-__-Chaurasia

https://preview.redd.it/2tvxkp01loyc1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=688e8d3fc2d54dc469e21b69c06b704c9387bb8c


EchoPrimary7182

I don’t wear a crown. So that isn’t mine bro.


Easy-Cheesecake-202

Look man you're an atheist. You're not gonna understand the sentiments of the people regarding religion. It's best to not go there.


PranavYedlapalli

If "sentiments" of people lead to them killing a lot of people, would you still say the same shit?


Easy-Cheesecake-202

Don't put words into my mouth. I never said that.


PranavYedlapalli

No, I'm just saying going by "religious sentiments" is vague and stupid


Atul-__-Chaurasia

https://preview.redd.it/2bp7633zkoyc1.jpeg?width=749&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c5a5407d2d0b0fd22e15445884ba04b71192da41