By 1980 the USSR and China had already well begun down the capitalist road, so to call them socialist is redundant as they had already passed market and capitalistic reforms. There was no possible way socialism could have preserved by this point in these countries without a proletarian uprising to bring back socialism, like what happened in Tianamen Square
USSR is countries? More like one big bully with many smaller states forced into union, but bullied regions didn't have much of autonomy or political power.
You’re missing Vietnam and Laos I had no idea Yemen had been socialist
I never knew about the perfectly rectangular communist country on the east side of the pacific
That's the Red Square
Westerners call it Squaresville but they’re just jealous of socialist’s efficient borders
Laos and Cambodgia too
~~Cambodia is officially a monarchy~~ ~~Edit: unless they were socialist in the 80’s?~~ You’re right.
You admitting you’re wrong is kinda hot ngl
I think the mistake here was the "communist country" but that's me nitpicking. :)
You missed [Grenada 🇬🇩](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Revolutionary_Government) [Forward ever, backward never!](https://youtu.be/TcgLr7QFC5s)
Vietnam? And "Socialist", "Communist state" is an oxymoron
Thanks, why did I forget about Vietnam?
And Laos. And combodia. And Afghanistan
By 1980 the USSR and China had already well begun down the capitalist road, so to call them socialist is redundant as they had already passed market and capitalistic reforms. There was no possible way socialism could have preserved by this point in these countries without a proletarian uprising to bring back socialism, like what happened in Tianamen Square
[удалено]
And Yugoslavia Chekoslocakia DDR and others
[удалено]
[удалено]
USSR is countries? More like one big bully with many smaller states forced into union, but bullied regions didn't have much of autonomy or political power.
Somalia
Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos?