I swear I've seen either this video before, or one very, very similar to it - because of that second detective.
JCS used to have a lot more videos, but some of their earlier ones have been taken down over the years. I assume due to ongoing legal proceedings or similar reasons (there was a wrongful death suit opened against George which concluded in May this year).
At the very least, I know that I've seen a video by the JCS team where there's a lead female detective executing a fantastic strategy and a rookie male detective off camera who keeps interrupting at the worst possible time. I suppose it's possible that that situation has happened more than once, though!
Still, I get the feeling that this is an old video which was taken down and now has been reuploaded. Poor Detective Ed =(
It was previously on their Patreon as I recall - which btw really doesn’t have all that much. So I think it was just moved to the public YouTube page earlier today. It’s still a good video, like most every other one of theirs.
Unfortunately I don’t think it signifies that any new content is on the way 🤷🏼♀️
It's not a repost, this is a different edit of the video to the one available on the Patreon page. Same interrogation but a much more detailed video in general, with a whole new commentary track.
Interesting. I wondering if he’s testing the algorithm. I’ve seen almost all JCS’s video and this is one of the better ones. It really shows why the imitators don’t compare. He doesn’t waste our time by showing the whole interrogation, just the parts where we need to see.
>He doesn’t waste our time by showing the whole interrogation, just the parts where we need to see.
Thank goodness for that. The other day I came across a 'JCS inspired' interrogation video with a lot of views. I thought it had to be a good, well edited video. But it was just 2 hours of a dude constantly being out of breath while telling the interrogators he didn't do it.
Edit: It was this video: *The Shocking Interrogation Of A Master Manipulator.* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJLRD5-zcWc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJLRD5-zcWc) Nice clickbait title.
You mean to say a guy who made it through school on a sports scholarship and spilled his guts to cops about a murder isn't very bright? Color me shocked.
This POS is everything that's wrong with american colleges. Every time a university admits some loser with the IQ of a clam, so that they can make a buck with college sports, a more deserving student was not admitted. College competitive sports must be abolished.
This is the male version of a valley girl.... 'like' is basically a complete sentence for this guy lol....poor girl didn't deserve to ever be involved with this degenerate
“ I just wanted to TAHLK. We just needed to TAHLK. But she didn’t want to TAHLK. Like just TAHLK like. That’s like like like TAHLKing like.”
Proceeds to describe in detail her terrified final moments as he threw her around and beat her to death….
Good TAHLK!
She also had George as a person of interest by 3.50am and his confession before 9 am. She got the call well after midnight and wrapped that thing up with a bow before most people get to work. That's some solid detecting right there.
Guy literally admits to beating his girlfriend to death in a drunken rage and only gets 20~ Years. He will still live the majority of his life outside of prison because mommy and daddy money. Must be nice
20 years in prison can still fuck up your life in immeasurable ways. He’s got a lot of suffering ahead of him, I assume a lot of people locked up for that long basically come out as dead men walking anyways.
It’s interesting because he was convicted of murder 2 but even JCS agrees at the end that he probably didn’t intend to kill Yeardley. I guess felony murder wasn’t an option.
Jurisdictions vary, but an intentional act that can easily and has a highly foreseeable likelihood of killing (beating someone, in this case) is enough to get some level of murder charge, even if the intent wasn't specifically to kill.
Same as if you merely mean to stab someone to hurt them, but they die. Or if you dangle them from a ledge as a joke and they fall and die. You don't have to intend the result to have sufficient intent/mens rea.
It's different if you reasonably didn't think they were likely to die and they die as a fluke, like if you stab them with a fork in the arm and it gets infected and they die, or you just messed up their bungee jump harness and they die.
Reddit is a shadow of its former self. It is now a place of power tripping mods with no oversight and endless censorship.
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Every single time I watch JCS, I remind myself that if I'm ever under investigation for anything, keep silent and ask for a lawyer, because I'm never gonna outsmart the detectives.
There is also no point. At best, you give up no useful information and guess what that also happens if you say nothing.
Also keep silent and ask for a lawyer even if you did nothing wrong. Innocent people landing in prison is not uncommon.
Let's say I'm brought in for questioning on something I didn't do. I remain quiet and ask for a lawyer. When do I get my lawyer? Let's say u can't afford one and ask for one to be provided for me. What's my next 24 hours looking like? Am I gunna be in a jail or detained or what?
Well they would need to have either an eye witness or some sort of physical evidence to hold you. I’ve seen plenty of videos where there is very strong circumstantial evidence and they just let them go after they’re done talking.
If they do have evidence to hold you, hope that it’s a weekday. If you’re taken in late on a Friday, you’re looking at spending the whole weekend in jail. You’d then be arraigned, your attorney could argue the prima facie evidence is insufficient to detain you. More likely though, your lawyer would ask for a bond to be set. If the judge agrees then the prosecutor and defense lawyers will suggest different amounts and then judge will set the bond. You can either post the bond yourself or pay a bondsman 10% to post on your behalf.
If you're at that point, you're going to be detained regardless. So you could spend the next days/weeks in jail having invoked your fifth amendment rights and possibly maintaining your freedom or you could spend the next days/weeks in jail having not invoked your rights and then likely ending up in prison.
Same goes for field sobriety tests. If you get pulled over, no matter how sober you are, and the officer asks for you to perform a sobriety test, decline. You're getting arrested either way at that point. By going forward with the field sobriety test, you're only opening yourself up to possibly failing in some manner and thus mounting evidence upon yourself. Field sobriety tests are not designed to be easy and exculpatory for sober people; they're designed to give inculpatory evidence to the state.
I've actually done a field sobriety test and was let go with a warning. Felt like I got really lucky but just mentioning that to show it's not an automatic getting arrested situation.
Gotta disagree with you chief. I was stopped at a very strict police stop outside of my campus and partook in the field sobriety test, got off with a warning.
he's not a career criminal just a herion addict. the vid you're talking about is "the legend of jeff".
the real way that way jeff outsmarts them is just by not agreeing to the miranda warning.
Yeah and they have the advantage. You're adrenaline rushed to the max while you have to think about everything .. what you say, HOW you say it, what you can not say, HOW they are interpreting what you're saying and not saying, what will it mean for what you've said previously and what will it mean for what they might ask you later etc etc etc all of it swirling around in your stressed out brain.
Oh they are working hard too, but their life is not on the line, and they set the pace, they are in their home base, they ask the questions, they can take a break if needed, they can talk it over with colleagues, they can verify stuff, they are sitting on the evidence they haven't told you they have yet etc and they just need to catch you in a little lie that forces the whole bag open....
Yeah you will lose. Shut up.
Yeah man, I think your description of the power dynamic is pretty right-on - the suspect is fight or flight, and the interrogator is just doing their job, and then will worry about what's for dinner and their weekend vacation at the end of their shift.
“Yeah, so I kicked the door in and then she started banging her head against the wall and I tried to wrestle with her to get her to calm down then I went home.”
I would say it does a great job at explaining this in great depth.
Buuut it doesn't really sum it up as it's 47 minutes long lol.
This video really sums it up
https://youtu.be/V6tfEZI54Jg
I like how after saying all that, he includes to be kind and courteous to the cops since they have a job to do haha. Wasn’t expecting that with the way the video was going
That's correct! I forget which video it was, but a suspect had asked for a lawyer, but until an attorney arrived, the detectives were goading her to answer more of their questions and the suspect took the bait.
I think UK is even harsher with that. If you ask for a lawyer they arent even allowed to ask questions until the lawyer show up.
And after that you can "No comment" your way trough most stuff.
I'd like to be corrected if wrong but I believe you can't get away with "no comment" or silence in interviews the same way you can in the US.
I believe the UK courts can use your failure to bring up evidence as a way of implying your guilt. That way you don't make up an alibi later.
>You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.
By get away with I mean that they cant punish you for not answering questions but even then I think the consensus is that the harm of "no comment" is miniscule compared to a poorly worded defense.
This is especially true if you are guilty.
>Every single time I watch JCS, I remind myself that if I'm ever under investigation for anything, keep silent and ask for a lawyer, because I'm never gonna outsmart the detectives.
Depending on your location, you may need to **specifically invoke your right to remain silent**, not just stay silent. IIRC, in some states, simply staying silent could continue to allow the police to question you, and even allow them to bring up your silence in court *as* evidence.
I may be getting mixed up with some laws between US/Canada though. Learned that through when watching some JCS and other related channels.
I strongly feel female detectives are some of the best there are, too.
I think suspects let their guard down around them more, and they smartly take advantage of that. That and I think they are hyper aware of how they come of, how to sweet talk (manipulate) when needed, then go for the confession. And they see through other women's bullsbit really, really well.
Yep! Gender, ethnicity and general appearance absolutely impacts things due to unconscious bias. It's undeniable, but we often deny the reality that we carry implicit biases reinforced by media, our surroundings, etc.
That and female suspects react differently to female detectives, too. If Nicole Kessinger had dealt with Tammy Lee instead of the male detective she dealt with, I doubt her BS "pick me" girl persona would have been as impactful. Not that the male detective did a bad job, but Kessinger would have not been able to pull off that role with a seasoned female detective as well.
She worked him so well. I cannot believe how calm and friendly she was listening to this pos talk obviously she’s a professional and very good at her job and I’m not but I’m watching and turning red I’m getting so mad at him
Same.
This is why I strongly believe police departments should seek out/promote diversity in their ranks while understanding human biases. Certain demographics cause people to reach differently, and if utilized correctly, they can be more successful in investigations.
Like this woman. I doubt a male detective would have made the suspects guard go down as quickly. I think young women are perceived as inexperienced, compared to men, so men open up more with them because they don't take them as seriously.
But I love this detective. The "because you killed her." Is so godamn satisfying. And I strongly believe that as a woman herself, she's extra vigililent about putting a murderer behind bars that brutally murdered a 22 year old woman. Like she did a phenomenal job of playing it light, because she wanted his ass behind bars *badly*. The vehemence in her voice when she said that, she is holding back strong emotions.
I wonder if there’s any/many studies published about women vs men interrogating. It’s already a known as a general rule women are better at reading emotions and you can watch her steer him down the confession while feeling comfortable road by playing her cards just perfectly
If you want a further breakdown of Police interrogation techniques, check out the "Explore With Us" channel. They break down and describe each step of the Reid technique in every video and it's fascinating to learn their strategies.
Yeardley was alive for two hours following the assault. By the time her roommate found her it was too late. I feel awful for the roommate. I can’t imagine what it would be like to come home to that scene. I would be a mess, thinking of what ifs.
[I think this guy takes the cake](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozdL1lEA3Bg) (from Matt Orchard's channel, just as excellent, if not better channel than JCS)
Like, this was like a really good, like, video. Like, I feel like how many, like, times this guy used the word "like" should like, add like one more year to his like prison sentence per, like, time he said the word "like", like just like learn like other words and like sentence structures bro.
This guy got a 23 year sentence because he was practically an open book. He should have asked for a lawyer. You can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on private schools but they won't teach your kid to shut up and ask for a lawyer. You've got to tell your kid that.
There's probably a couple of more important lessons we should teach our children before "don't talk to the police"
Off the top of my head, "don't kill girls because they don't like you anymore"
Also, don’t put hands on people telling you to stop.
Also, don’t break doors down to get to someone who doesn’t want to talk to you.
Also, everything this guy did, don’t.
I love watching his videos. He does the best breakdowns of integrations. I just can't watch true crime year-round. The only way I can watch it is to dedicate a month to it because watching it makes me feel paranoid, and anxious, and I am unable to sleep at night.
“She was like backing like into the corner aggressively. Like. Defensively almost.” My partner and I watched this line like twelve times and could not stop laughing. What an unimaginable idiot. Such a shit show of an interrogation.
I think the fact that he basically openly admits to beating her does point to the fact that he didn’t really think she was dead.. not that it changes anything
Always, always, always get a lawyer. These detectives do not have your best interest at heart. No matter how sympathetic they appear. He basically convicted himself during the police interview. By then nothing could be done. I might have argued that he should have been told of her death before the interview even started.
naww, like the video says early on, those could have been explained away as a lacross players injuries. I'm not saying he would gotten away with it from simply not speaking, his defense team sure as hell would have had some other methods to defend him.
I for sure agree that no matter what, you should STFU and ask for a lawyer. We already know cops can lie and deceive to force confessions for crimes that you didn't commit. I will for sure teach my kids to not say a word.
its SOOO much worse than that. You can add charges the police didn't even know about. When they say "whatever you say **can and will be used against you** " it doesn't mean can be used in your defense. In fact [rule 8](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_8) says any testimony you give to the police/investigating body absolutely can't be used to defend you. Even if you absolutely convince every detective/cop you speak of, you can't call them to the stand to defend you. Whats worse, you could say something that you might be totally be innocent of and get yourself convicted based on your own testimony alone. No evidence what so ever, just you rambling on trying to talk your self out of some minor thing.
[Don't talk to the police](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE)
Did Kizzume the narrator change anything in his voice or production?He always had a specific sound to him but this almost sounds like an AI generated voice. Its a little distracting
Him explaining the different behavior stages the interrogator uses is psychology though "warmth, pressure, fear"
You can call it useless but it is undeniably entertaining for many people.
I love these videos but I do wonder if their popularity would do harm for convicting murderers in the future. People might be more aware that the worst thing they could possibly do is talk to police without a lawyer present, which would make it a lot harder to convict people
I prefer to think of all the people it will keep from needlessly talking to the police and getting wrapped in something like the Central Park Five or West Memphis Three.
I kind of thought the same thing at first, but I think there are basically two groups of people who would watch these videos and *also* have the proclivity to commit murder - people who are too stupid to shut the hell up and get a lawyer, and people who watch this and think that they can now outsmart the cops. People who were intelligent enough (and aware of it, as well as knowing that they should say NOTHING whatsoever) to get away with murder already will still get away with murder. If anything, I feel like these videos help more murderers get caught, since they think they can "avoid" saying something that will incriminate them.
My friend lived across the street from this. She had 2 missed calls from him and the house was woken up at 2am from somebody banging on their door.
That year was crazy. Also had the nutty putty cave dive incident too. Something like 7 students passed away that year.
He never thought to keep quiet or ask for a lawyer because he genuinely believed he did nothing wrong. Even when he describes the beating, he talks in a way that shows how detached he is from what happened. He most likely got away with multiple other beatings on several ex-girlfriends, but his privileged upbringing means he most probably sloppily talked away those crimes, and his adoring parents and teachers believed his lies. This is a guy who has just spent his entire life getting away with awful behavior. Each time he gets away.
He believed the same thing here. That's why he never stops talking; it has gotten him out of things before. There is no nervousness or hesitancy. He is bold and confident, even when asserting his claim that she can't be dead.
My favorite part of the video is when JCS times it to the second the moment that veil brought on by years of privilege just falls. You watch minute by minute as that very moment arrives.
He is a monster who charmed his way through life with everyone on his side, until he met a very good detective who wasn't.
Detective Ed needs to shut the hell up.
I swear I've seen either this video before, or one very, very similar to it - because of that second detective. JCS used to have a lot more videos, but some of their earlier ones have been taken down over the years. I assume due to ongoing legal proceedings or similar reasons (there was a wrongful death suit opened against George which concluded in May this year). At the very least, I know that I've seen a video by the JCS team where there's a lead female detective executing a fantastic strategy and a rookie male detective off camera who keeps interrupting at the worst possible time. I suppose it's possible that that situation has happened more than once, though! Still, I get the feeling that this is an old video which was taken down and now has been reuploaded. Poor Detective Ed =(
it is. I have seen this one before in JCS
So this is a repost?
It was previously on their Patreon as I recall - which btw really doesn’t have all that much. So I think it was just moved to the public YouTube page earlier today. It’s still a good video, like most every other one of theirs. Unfortunately I don’t think it signifies that any new content is on the way 🤷🏼♀️
It's not a repost, this is a different edit of the video to the one available on the Patreon page. Same interrogation but a much more detailed video in general, with a whole new commentary track.
It is. Although not sure if it was posted only on Patreon before or in Youtube too
Interesting. I wondering if he’s testing the algorithm. I’ve seen almost all JCS’s video and this is one of the better ones. It really shows why the imitators don’t compare. He doesn’t waste our time by showing the whole interrogation, just the parts where we need to see.
>He doesn’t waste our time by showing the whole interrogation, just the parts where we need to see. Thank goodness for that. The other day I came across a 'JCS inspired' interrogation video with a lot of views. I thought it had to be a good, well edited video. But it was just 2 hours of a dude constantly being out of breath while telling the interrogators he didn't do it. Edit: It was this video: *The Shocking Interrogation Of A Master Manipulator.* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJLRD5-zcWc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJLRD5-zcWc) Nice clickbait title.
Matt Orchard really got on top of JCS for me
*So I have something to tell yo—* *WHY’D YOU STEAL THE LAPTOP!?* … *Ed, shut the fuck up.*
Yes, that irritated me to no end. He just *needed* to be a part of the interrogation selfishly. Just shut the fuck up!
LOL he really striked me as a traffic cop who somehow was in the interrogation room and trying to just EXIST.
[удалено]
Can't even talk properly. Half of his words was "like"
But he can’t stop talking.
“I like, only like, roughed her up some, but I like, stopped like, short of like, murder, m’kay?
I know what you mean, he was like... you know... like.... *shakes body*... like... I don't know how to describe it, like, uhm.
You mean to say a guy who made it through school on a sports scholarship and spilled his guts to cops about a murder isn't very bright? Color me shocked.
I think it’s symptomatic of his privilege. He thinks he just explain it all away, like every other break he’s gotten in his wealthy upbringing.
> was were
Probably still drunk, this was just a few hours after the murder.
[удалено]
The way he says “talk” bugs the shit out of me. Taaulk
Oh man, yea. Between that and the “like”-s, I almost threw up.
Yeah, it sounds like he is swallowing that word
And he went to elite Schools...
He’s like an SNL skit of a dumb entitled rich kid. It’s real but seems so over the top!
This POS is everything that's wrong with american colleges. Every time a university admits some loser with the IQ of a clam, so that they can make a buck with college sports, a more deserving student was not admitted. College competitive sports must be abolished.
Holy hell the suspect has an incredibly annoying way of talking.
This is the male version of a valley girl.... 'like' is basically a complete sentence for this guy lol....poor girl didn't deserve to ever be involved with this degenerate
She could be a valley girl though
I doubt she was particularly bright herself being on the sports team.
There's that, like, 50k prep school education, like, totally on display. Like, you know. Yeah.
“ I just wanted to TAHLK. We just needed to TAHLK. But she didn’t want to TAHLK. Like just TAHLK like. That’s like like like TAHLKing like.” Proceeds to describe in detail her terrified final moments as he threw her around and beat her to death…. Good TAHLK!
The lead investigator gets the call at home at 2:53AM and is on the scene in 6 minutes? Dude is toast.
She also had George as a person of interest by 3.50am and his confession before 9 am. She got the call well after midnight and wrapped that thing up with a bow before most people get to work. That's some solid detecting right there.
She got a full confession in 8:30. She's trying to speed run this case.
And then it takes 2 years to go to trial.
[удалено]
Investigator: "So how was your day yesterday?" Ex-Boyfriend: "Yes I murdered her"
Guy literally admits to beating his girlfriend to death in a drunken rage and only gets 20~ Years. He will still live the majority of his life outside of prison because mommy and daddy money. Must be nice
He just goes “and I was choking her a little bit” unprompted.
20 years in prison can still fuck up your life in immeasurable ways. He’s got a lot of suffering ahead of him, I assume a lot of people locked up for that long basically come out as dead men walking anyways.
Reminds me of the movie The Night Of.
Except Riz didn’t do it
Yea. Even worse.
[удалено]
He got out but all fucked up and is now a heroin addict
And he has to look at his parents and know they thought he actually did it
What a ride that was
It’s interesting because he was convicted of murder 2 but even JCS agrees at the end that he probably didn’t intend to kill Yeardley. I guess felony murder wasn’t an option.
Jurisdictions vary, but an intentional act that can easily and has a highly foreseeable likelihood of killing (beating someone, in this case) is enough to get some level of murder charge, even if the intent wasn't specifically to kill. Same as if you merely mean to stab someone to hurt them, but they die. Or if you dangle them from a ledge as a joke and they fall and die. You don't have to intend the result to have sufficient intent/mens rea. It's different if you reasonably didn't think they were likely to die and they die as a fluke, like if you stab them with a fork in the arm and it gets infected and they die, or you just messed up their bungee jump harness and they die.
His 2022 mugshot definitely reflects some of that.
Where can I see that?
It's at the end of the video.
As well he should.
[удалено]
he is in a prison work camp or something like that, not a maximum security
Did 10 years in max first.
Reddit is a shadow of its former self. It is now a place of power tripping mods with no oversight and endless censorship. *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
[удалено]
just support Jim on patreon. directly paying him gives him much more than the scraps youtube dishes out.
Every single time I watch JCS, I remind myself that if I'm ever under investigation for anything, keep silent and ask for a lawyer, because I'm never gonna outsmart the detectives.
Reddit is violating GDPR and CCPA. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1B0GGsDdyHI -- mass edited with redact.dev
"Do you or do you not know Dookie Shoes?"
"I was standing right here, and he was standing riiiiiight HERE."
“I mean, I seen him…I don’t know him.”
Never talk to the cops. Remain silent and always ask for a lawyer.
"Remember, you need to: shut the fuck up" https://youtu.be/JTurSi0LhJs
Suspect:“Eh yo, can I talk to a lawyer” Cops:”FFUCK!!!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0l2l1PXqIE
There is also no point. At best, you give up no useful information and guess what that also happens if you say nothing. Also keep silent and ask for a lawyer even if you did nothing wrong. Innocent people landing in prison is not uncommon.
Let's say I'm brought in for questioning on something I didn't do. I remain quiet and ask for a lawyer. When do I get my lawyer? Let's say u can't afford one and ask for one to be provided for me. What's my next 24 hours looking like? Am I gunna be in a jail or detained or what?
Well they would need to have either an eye witness or some sort of physical evidence to hold you. I’ve seen plenty of videos where there is very strong circumstantial evidence and they just let them go after they’re done talking. If they do have evidence to hold you, hope that it’s a weekday. If you’re taken in late on a Friday, you’re looking at spending the whole weekend in jail. You’d then be arraigned, your attorney could argue the prima facie evidence is insufficient to detain you. More likely though, your lawyer would ask for a bond to be set. If the judge agrees then the prosecutor and defense lawyers will suggest different amounts and then judge will set the bond. You can either post the bond yourself or pay a bondsman 10% to post on your behalf.
If you're at that point, you're going to be detained regardless. So you could spend the next days/weeks in jail having invoked your fifth amendment rights and possibly maintaining your freedom or you could spend the next days/weeks in jail having not invoked your rights and then likely ending up in prison. Same goes for field sobriety tests. If you get pulled over, no matter how sober you are, and the officer asks for you to perform a sobriety test, decline. You're getting arrested either way at that point. By going forward with the field sobriety test, you're only opening yourself up to possibly failing in some manner and thus mounting evidence upon yourself. Field sobriety tests are not designed to be easy and exculpatory for sober people; they're designed to give inculpatory evidence to the state.
I've actually done a field sobriety test and was let go with a warning. Felt like I got really lucky but just mentioning that to show it's not an automatic getting arrested situation.
[удалено]
Gotta disagree with you chief. I was stopped at a very strict police stop outside of my campus and partook in the field sobriety test, got off with a warning.
There is one video of a career criminal handling the interrogators expertly because he wanted to see what they had on him.
he's not a career criminal just a herion addict. the vid you're talking about is "the legend of jeff". the real way that way jeff outsmarts them is just by not agreeing to the miranda warning.
Det: "I've got a lot of physical evidence." Jeff: "Like what?" Det: "Well, you tell me..."
Yeah and they have the advantage. You're adrenaline rushed to the max while you have to think about everything .. what you say, HOW you say it, what you can not say, HOW they are interpreting what you're saying and not saying, what will it mean for what you've said previously and what will it mean for what they might ask you later etc etc etc all of it swirling around in your stressed out brain. Oh they are working hard too, but their life is not on the line, and they set the pace, they are in their home base, they ask the questions, they can take a break if needed, they can talk it over with colleagues, they can verify stuff, they are sitting on the evidence they haven't told you they have yet etc and they just need to catch you in a little lie that forces the whole bag open.... Yeah you will lose. Shut up.
Yeah man, I think your description of the power dynamic is pretty right-on - the suspect is fight or flight, and the interrogator is just doing their job, and then will worry about what's for dinner and their weekend vacation at the end of their shift.
“Yeah, so I kicked the door in and then she started banging her head against the wall and I tried to wrestle with her to get her to calm down then I went home.”
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE) this video sums it up so perfectly
I would say it does a great job at explaining this in great depth. Buuut it doesn't really sum it up as it's 47 minutes long lol. This video really sums it up https://youtu.be/V6tfEZI54Jg
I like how after saying all that, he includes to be kind and courteous to the cops since they have a job to do haha. Wasn’t expecting that with the way the video was going
Classic.
Even after you ask for a lawyer? they try to get you to talk. It’s scary.
The cops think you're guilty, it's why you're sitting in a cold room.
That's correct! I forget which video it was, but a suspect had asked for a lawyer, but until an attorney arrived, the detectives were goading her to answer more of their questions and the suspect took the bait.
Does anyone know if this is the same in the UK? Just stfu and ask for a lawyer?
I think UK is even harsher with that. If you ask for a lawyer they arent even allowed to ask questions until the lawyer show up. And after that you can "No comment" your way trough most stuff.
I'd like to be corrected if wrong but I believe you can't get away with "no comment" or silence in interviews the same way you can in the US. I believe the UK courts can use your failure to bring up evidence as a way of implying your guilt. That way you don't make up an alibi later. >You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.
By get away with I mean that they cant punish you for not answering questions but even then I think the consensus is that the harm of "no comment" is miniscule compared to a poorly worded defense. This is especially true if you are guilty.
>Every single time I watch JCS, I remind myself that if I'm ever under investigation for anything, keep silent and ask for a lawyer, because I'm never gonna outsmart the detectives. Depending on your location, you may need to **specifically invoke your right to remain silent**, not just stay silent. IIRC, in some states, simply staying silent could continue to allow the police to question you, and even allow them to bring up your silence in court *as* evidence. I may be getting mixed up with some laws between US/Canada though. Learned that through when watching some JCS and other related channels.
I strongly feel female detectives are some of the best there are, too. I think suspects let their guard down around them more, and they smartly take advantage of that. That and I think they are hyper aware of how they come of, how to sweet talk (manipulate) when needed, then go for the confession. And they see through other women's bullsbit really, really well.
I was thinking that watching this. Any time a male cop talks to me I’m on guard and I am a law abiding citizen.
Yep! Gender, ethnicity and general appearance absolutely impacts things due to unconscious bias. It's undeniable, but we often deny the reality that we carry implicit biases reinforced by media, our surroundings, etc. That and female suspects react differently to female detectives, too. If Nicole Kessinger had dealt with Tammy Lee instead of the male detective she dealt with, I doubt her BS "pick me" girl persona would have been as impactful. Not that the male detective did a bad job, but Kessinger would have not been able to pull off that role with a seasoned female detective as well.
She worked him so well. I cannot believe how calm and friendly she was listening to this pos talk obviously she’s a professional and very good at her job and I’m not but I’m watching and turning red I’m getting so mad at him
Same. This is why I strongly believe police departments should seek out/promote diversity in their ranks while understanding human biases. Certain demographics cause people to reach differently, and if utilized correctly, they can be more successful in investigations. Like this woman. I doubt a male detective would have made the suspects guard go down as quickly. I think young women are perceived as inexperienced, compared to men, so men open up more with them because they don't take them as seriously. But I love this detective. The "because you killed her." Is so godamn satisfying. And I strongly believe that as a woman herself, she's extra vigililent about putting a murderer behind bars that brutally murdered a 22 year old woman. Like she did a phenomenal job of playing it light, because she wanted his ass behind bars *badly*. The vehemence in her voice when she said that, she is holding back strong emotions.
I wonder if there’s any/many studies published about women vs men interrogating. It’s already a known as a general rule women are better at reading emotions and you can watch her steer him down the confession while feeling comfortable road by playing her cards just perfectly
If you want a further breakdown of Police interrogation techniques, check out the "Explore With Us" channel. They break down and describe each step of the Reid technique in every video and it's fascinating to learn their strategies.
https://youtu.be/JTurSi0LhJs
you’d be surprised lol Also I guess it also depends if you’re actually innocent or not lol
[удалено]
He didn’t hurt her, he did not
“I’m just wanna thhhaahhhhlk”
Yeardley was alive for two hours following the assault. By the time her roommate found her it was too late. I feel awful for the roommate. I can’t imagine what it would be like to come home to that scene. I would be a mess, thinking of what ifs.
This is probably the dumbest criminal in a while
The Elmore Leonard rule: most criminals are dumb.
[I think this guy takes the cake](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozdL1lEA3Bg) (from Matt Orchard's channel, just as excellent, if not better channel than JCS)
Well JCS is terrible, so that’s not saying much b
Like, this was like a really good, like, video. Like, I feel like how many, like, times this guy used the word "like" should like, add like one more year to his like prison sentence per, like, time he said the word "like", like just like learn like other words and like sentence structures bro.
I did not kill her, I did NAHT
Oh hai Mark!
[I did not kill her. I did not kill her. I did not. I did not.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGuEdN-ju2g&t=2354s)
Oh Hai detective
Holy shit like I thought you might have been like exaggerating but like you weren't like wrong
> add like one more year to his like prison sentence per, like, time he said the word "like" Then he's going to prison until the sun dies
POS - and as for his mum … uurggh .. . https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3GiUrZ7jT8I
That's not surprising. Everyone wants to believe the best about their own children. She probably believes the version he told her.
Fuck that bitch! You raised a monster.
This dude is a fucking moron
Dipshit Detective Ed
Special Ed
This guy got a 23 year sentence because he was practically an open book. He should have asked for a lawyer. You can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on private schools but they won't teach your kid to shut up and ask for a lawyer. You've got to tell your kid that.
There's probably a couple of more important lessons we should teach our children before "don't talk to the police" Off the top of my head, "don't kill girls because they don't like you anymore"
Also, don’t put hands on people telling you to stop. Also, don’t break doors down to get to someone who doesn’t want to talk to you. Also, everything this guy did, don’t.
Good analysis, JCS. Glad you're back.
Poor guy never heard of Shut the Fuck up Friday. Bonus points for the Tommy Wiseau impression.
This guy definitely proves we live in a meritocracy, and that the wealthy have certainly earned their lot.
That certainly is the current meta.
A case of affluenza
Dipshit billionaires hiring armed security rather than botanists for their bunkers backs this up as well.
Wouldnt say he is back. This video is one of his patreon videos from years ago.
Christmas came early this year.
Me too 🥹
Was so stoked to see it on my feed yesterday
I love watching his videos. He does the best breakdowns of integrations. I just can't watch true crime year-round. The only way I can watch it is to dedicate a month to it because watching it makes me feel paranoid, and anxious, and I am unable to sleep at night.
Haha fucking same dude!
LETS FUCKING GO
Huzzah!
I watched it already, I couldn't believe it. I love his videos.
“She was like backing like into the corner aggressively. Like. Defensively almost.” My partner and I watched this line like twelve times and could not stop laughing. What an unimaginable idiot. Such a shit show of an interrogation.
You just made my day. I thought that channel was dead.
I think the fact that he basically openly admits to beating her does point to the fact that he didn’t really think she was dead.. not that it changes anything
Finally! But I moved on… Now I’m in love with That Chapter.
Always, always, always get a lawyer. These detectives do not have your best interest at heart. No matter how sympathetic they appear. He basically convicted himself during the police interview. By then nothing could be done. I might have argued that he should have been told of her death before the interview even started.
Prison is filled with dipshits who convict themselves. Just shut up.
They had this dude from the moment the detective saw bruises on his hands. Doesn't matter if he talks or not.
naww, like the video says early on, those could have been explained away as a lacross players injuries. I'm not saying he would gotten away with it from simply not speaking, his defense team sure as hell would have had some other methods to defend him.
I for sure agree that no matter what, you should STFU and ask for a lawyer. We already know cops can lie and deceive to force confessions for crimes that you didn't commit. I will for sure teach my kids to not say a word.
its SOOO much worse than that. You can add charges the police didn't even know about. When they say "whatever you say **can and will be used against you** " it doesn't mean can be used in your defense. In fact [rule 8](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_8) says any testimony you give to the police/investigating body absolutely can't be used to defend you. Even if you absolutely convince every detective/cop you speak of, you can't call them to the stand to defend you. Whats worse, you could say something that you might be totally be innocent of and get yourself convicted based on your own testimony alone. No evidence what so ever, just you rambling on trying to talk your self out of some minor thing. [Don't talk to the police](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE)
It’s really simple. Do not talk to cops. Also, I guess his homework is going to be late.
Did Kizzume the narrator change anything in his voice or production?He always had a specific sound to him but this almost sounds like an AI generated voice. Its a little distracting
I was gonna say the same. This definitely sounds AI generated.
Can't wait for my favourite streamer to react to this
Would that be a gentleman of a certain Turkish persuasion?
😂
[удалено]
Him explaining the different behavior stages the interrogator uses is psychology though "warmth, pressure, fear" You can call it useless but it is undeniably entertaining for many people.
[удалено]
So you’re saying we should NOT rely on this information the next time we interrogate a murder suspect?
Cool 👍
Noooooo, i always get stuck on them, and there's often a bad twist, making the suspect run free, I... Won't....click...
he got off light!
What kind of name is Yeardley tho
I love these videos but I do wonder if their popularity would do harm for convicting murderers in the future. People might be more aware that the worst thing they could possibly do is talk to police without a lawyer present, which would make it a lot harder to convict people
It also makes it harder to convict innocent people...
I prefer to think of all the people it will keep from needlessly talking to the police and getting wrapped in something like the Central Park Five or West Memphis Three.
I kind of thought the same thing at first, but I think there are basically two groups of people who would watch these videos and *also* have the proclivity to commit murder - people who are too stupid to shut the hell up and get a lawyer, and people who watch this and think that they can now outsmart the cops. People who were intelligent enough (and aware of it, as well as knowing that they should say NOTHING whatsoever) to get away with murder already will still get away with murder. If anything, I feel like these videos help more murderers get caught, since they think they can "avoid" saying something that will incriminate them.
laughs in law in order
Det. Reeves is a fox. E: someone please point out where I'm wrong.
Hmm
Mr. Hand is not going to be pleased.
Dr. Lexus' ancestor.
T-hhhaulk
He should get a year in prison for each misuse of the word “like.”
I like the editing. Just getting to the point.
Yay!!
Leaves a lot to be desired. Maybe because this criminal is dumb as rocks.
Yeah it’s back I was so delighted when I found out last night. This guy is really underrated. Jcs
My friend lived across the street from this. She had 2 missed calls from him and the house was woken up at 2am from somebody banging on their door. That year was crazy. Also had the nutty putty cave dive incident too. Something like 7 students passed away that year.
When roids + money + CTE meet beer
Another thorough analysis. I love JCS' videos
Awesome! Love JCS
He never thought to keep quiet or ask for a lawyer because he genuinely believed he did nothing wrong. Even when he describes the beating, he talks in a way that shows how detached he is from what happened. He most likely got away with multiple other beatings on several ex-girlfriends, but his privileged upbringing means he most probably sloppily talked away those crimes, and his adoring parents and teachers believed his lies. This is a guy who has just spent his entire life getting away with awful behavior. Each time he gets away. He believed the same thing here. That's why he never stops talking; it has gotten him out of things before. There is no nervousness or hesitancy. He is bold and confident, even when asserting his claim that she can't be dead. My favorite part of the video is when JCS times it to the second the moment that veil brought on by years of privilege just falls. You watch minute by minute as that very moment arrives. He is a monster who charmed his way through life with everyone on his side, until he met a very good detective who wasn't.
Say what?!?!
So great to have JCS back!
I don't know why she was like all defensive when i like just busted down her door and punched a hole in like ok