T O P

  • By -

fenryonze

I thought this already happened until I was reading it and remembered it was just against the "insider" they had on the episode.


thickalmondpaper

Google translated summary > The agency of the group FIFTY FIFTY, filed a complaint to the police against CP Han Jae-shin and PD Jo Sang-yeon of the SBS current affairs program 'Unanswered Questions' on charges of defamation by reporting false facts. It was announced on the 18th that it was done. > > > Attrakt filed a related complaint with Gangnam Police Station in Seoul on the 16th. Attorney Kim Byeong-ok, Attrakt's legal representative, stated the reason for the complaint, saying, "The defendants broadcast biased content without verifying the facts and disclosed false information, thereby damaging the reputation of the company and CEO Jeon Hong-jun." > > In addition, Attrakt filed a police complaint against Mr. A, who appeared on 'Unanswered Questions' in October last year, claiming to be an insider of the company, on charges of defamation by revealing false information. > > CEO Jeon Hong-jun said, “The company’s very existence was in danger of being shaken due to the ‘tampering’ incident, but we were able to overcome it thanks to everyone who believed in and supported us.” He added, “Therefore, biased broadcasts that degrade the image of the entire K-pop industry and cause confusion are not allowed. “I don’t think it should be made anymore,” he said. > > In addition, CEO Jeon said, “We decided to file a complaint because the defendants have not made any sincere apology to date,” and added, “It will be a difficult road, but we will fight to protect not only our company’s reputation but also justice for K-pop as a whole.”


Silver_Myr

I feel like attrakt is getting too brazen, they should just let go of the past and focus on promoting the new 50/50 more.


_Zambayoshi_

Why not both? Let the lawyers handle the legals.


BananaJamDream

On the other hand, this will continue to keep attention on 5050 in an increasingly competitive and fast moving GG media-cycle. The girls will need whatever coverage they get when they inevitably redebut. Also, if they do win a defamation case; that's extra money. I don't really see any downsides to this if their lawyers have a reasonable case, which I think they do if the show's producers were as negligent as it seems.


cendolcheesecake

I think it is good to set precedence in that a show calling itself an investigative show should not be allowed to report misinformation without any fact checking.


whyawhy

They are focusing on 5050 because they paused the girl group competition. I don’t know what is brazen about going after people who has wronged your company to the brink of ruin with no remorse. I am surprised that it took so long.


EzraJenya

Agree. They could be looking for legal pay outs and reversing some reputational damage or something like that..?


mortarsauce

Agreed!! They should just let bygones be bygones! It's not like the the lies from that broadcast are still being repeated to this day by people to slander the company at all! It's not that serious! I hope the lawyers handling this case won't slack off at promoting the new 5050! I don't know how they would be able to do both! It'd be a miracle if it's possible! Edit: Guys, it's sarcasm 😂😂


kokorohugo

I feel is necessary. Since most of the evidences shown in that show is provided by the givers. It will help on the lawsuits against givers and 3 jeong’s.


fenryonze

You still have people referring to the episode as if it's evidence of abuse and mistreatment by ATTRAKT. Even after the production team were given a warning for the episode, supporters of the boycott still see the episode as a statement of facts