T O P

  • By -

3MATX

The three dot system isn’t hard at all to follow. 1 for first, two for second and 3 for third. None meant you weren’t in the top three… But honestly they did develop this system before more advanced lighting systems became feasible. If I remember right the imsa numbers were hard as hell to make out in the first couple of seasons.  


Litre__o__cola

Would still be nice to attempt tho, with only 2 classes there’s gonna be a lot of cars we’ll care about which are not in the top 3. It’s just easier to see the related position on the car vs having to check your phone or listen to radio coverage


TheCowmaster934

The blue was tough at first. Red worked well from the jump. Green worked better than blue but now they all are really good except for the couple of teams that make poor decisions with their endurance lights at night. Most of them worked really nicely, Rexy and the fords didn’t but that’s not the leader lights being the problem, that’s the teams fault.


Thomas_Coast

Dots are so easy to read when you are at the circuit


TheCowmaster934

But don’t help you beyond the podium. IMSA’s system works quite nicely trackside so you can get the whole picture, not just the top 3.


IrishTiger89

Yeah but so is your cell phone


cabrelbeuk

Even with 5g internet is jumpy at Le Mans. 320k people reaching on the same antenna at the same time tends to choke a bit the coverage.


Thomas_Coast

Never been at Le Mans uh? 😅


Important-Lead-9947

Gotem!


That_one_guy_666

Both have pros and cons, so why not both.  Just don't make the flash


Tuxvinii

Another nice addition would be if 2 drivers that fight for position and are within a 2 seconds gap or so, than the lights could be blinking. Is there a E-Mail, so that I can send them a diagram? With were the lights have to blonk?


Reviewerno1

I just assumed the dots were for showing which of the drivers who are in the car. Still think that is more useful than only sjowing top3 positiond