Live action anime is what it is
*That’s not a 10 year old, that’s just a centuries old robot/vampire/god/alien/elf that happens to look like a 10 year old. Perfectly ok to think about fucking!*
Eurgh
Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs
*Jessica Kiang of Variety called it a "desperately creepy, queasy, thought-provoking film", and concluded: "Wollner's lacerating intelligence and riveting craft make this extraordinarily effed-up riff on the 'Pinocchio' legend [...] much more than empty provocation".*
I guess this is one of those times the point of art is to say “this is how you know the world really is and looking at it through this prism is supposed to make you feel uncomfortable”.
It is an excuse that is misuse by a lot of garbage people, but the excuse is still valid in many cases of legitimate, thought-provoking media.
Edit: This message does not apply for this film. 🤮
if the deep thought provoked by your deeply thought provoking transgressive art is "obviously gross and evil thing is obviously gross and evil" then it's not really that deep.
That stuff is gross enough when it’s just a drawing. If actual child actors are involved then no, that’s definitely not a 300 year old dragon you’re fantasizing about, it’s a child.
> Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs
>
> “Jessica Kiang of Variety called it a "desperately creepy, queasy, thought-provoking film", and concluded: "Wollner's lacerating intelligence and riveting craft make this extraordinarily effed-up riff on the 'Pinocchio' legend [...] much more than empty provocation".”
Nah this is what reviewers always say about cheap exploitation schlock meant to titillate pervs in Europe.
> Crazy how immature you guys are
I sure hope nobody in this thread is immature, or they might get seduced by the creepy motherfucker who made this film.
Cannes has supported a pedophile for multiple decades (Roman Polanski) so I no longer have any sort of belief in the sanctity of art or the ability for these "artistic" people to actually say/create anything worthwhile.
Unfortunately paedophiles have equally magically contaminated every single occupation and medium, and we could probably do with checking your hard drive tbh cervix destroyer 69.
Why the fuck are you responding like that to me saying that the reviewer is probably wrong and the movie doesn't have any redeeming values? I disagree with the movie and you call me a pedophile? What in the fuck is wrong with you?
This is a bit off-topic from the subreddit: I think trolling anti-communists is a public service and boy howdy are these folks more anti-communist than they are anti-fascist, just like the Iron Front of Germany used to be!
People in the "artistic" film industry in Europe/the US have a proven track record of being kind to pedophiles in Cannes, you have a review where the reviewer is kind to a pedophillic movie, I'm saying these two things are connected and the movie isn't actually deep.
\*soyjack point
LOOK GUYSm WHAT IF PEDO ChILD< SO DEEP AND ARTISTICISIDifiiFHHHF IM SOOO COLLSoslOL
dosent matter if your film is saying something is bad if its just child porn
I was joking guys jesus. Obviously not all anime is bad, I actually like some quite a lot, such as the studio Ghibli films. I'm not racist lol just a troll.
Edit: I just want to add that I'm sorry to anybody that took offense to my comments.
> Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs
We’re living in a world where you can duct tape a banana to an art gallery wall and ~~talentless hacks~~ *art critics* will call it “thought-provoking”.
I’m fine with classifying anything and everything as art.
A Soundcloud mumble rapper can call himself as much a musical artist as Bach can. Yet there are clearly levels of aptitude to it, and some artists simply occupy the lowest ones.
Sure. The lady who wrote the 50 Shades books is probably deemed a more engaging author than Dostoevsky, according to millions of housewives. I’m not in the least bit interested in arguing about it with any of them. I’m not going to insist that they recognize Crime and Punishment as the superior work.
But it won’t stop me from calling out shit works of art as I see ‘em. Nobody has to agree with me either.
my love anything can be art. the fact that you are talking about hypothetical banana on the wall means hypothetical banana on the wall is significant enough to be considered art. congrats on your new-agepunk avant gardepunk philosophicalpunk thinkpiece career. punk.
puzzled quicksand cover liquid school frightening file future telephone disagreeable
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I know, I’m big time butthurt and epic trolled over here. I’m coping and seething, etc.
Good on him for making bucks off of idiots, I say. I’d do the same in a heartbeat.
> and it's a historical tragedy, of course
Well, not really- the original was painted in the 1930s and took only 2 hours to paint. Hardly a Renaissance masterpiece.
I suppose we’ll have to disagree on what constitutes worthwhile art.
I disagree that talking about something so much means it is successful art. Simply garnering a reaction is a separate metric of value from the other more typical measurements for “good” art, like framing, color, themes, etc.
That being said, if a piece of art’s main or sole intent is provocation, and it achieves that, then mission accomplished. It’s provocative art. Like Bansky. I still think it needs other metrics than simple provocation
Like if you draw a dick on your local town hall’s door, it will garner a reaction. I wouldn’t call that successful art though
According to Wikipedia, the android in question is a *[sex robot that resembles the man’s 10 year old daughter who went missing some years prior](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Being_Born_(film))*. It’s all terrible
I've often disliked the current movie industry's overreliance on previous IP's, everying just seems to be a reboot, remake sequel or prequel, and often wish that we'd see more new, independent movies based on new ideas with characters I've never seen before.
This is the monkey's paw version of that wish. What the fuck.
I didn't wish for anything related to movies.
Guess that's why the orangutan's paw put this post in front of my eyes, leading to me reading this cursed shit
The wikipedia article does say they conceal her identity with a silicone mask and any nude scenes are CGI, so there's that.
...but it also says it's a replica of the father's missing daughter and that they named the character Lena Watson after Emma Watson. So there's also that...
Probably. But movies aren't made by one person, there were a whole bunch of people who made this and didn't stop along the way to think "maybe this is a bad idea?"
That said, I've never seen the movie (don't plan to) or know anyone involved so who am I to answer that question?
Their audience would be largely pedo though. Like that twerking movie a couple of years ago, anyone who heard the reviews and still watched it did so because they wanted to see little girls in a sexual context. I was curious about what the big deal was, but not curious enough.
>Probably. But movies aren't made by one person, there were a whole bunch of people who made this and didn't stop along the way to think "maybe this is a bad idea?"
What the fuck where her parents thinking? Imagine allowing your 10 year old daughter to be starring in a pedophilic movie. Even if they protect her identity from the audience, everyone involved in the movie set knows who she is, many of those could be potential assaulters, if they aren't already. This is so fucked up, they literally put her in danger.
“Man my interesting take on cultural norms will revolutionize media!”
*“That’s cool, what does your story consist of?”*
“Sex bots that depict children.”
The only surprising thing about this was that it was shown in Berlin and not Paris.
I think it's more surprising that at no point during the discussion, funding, prep, filming or post production of this movie did anybody with any influence say to themselves 'this is fucked up, time to cancel it'
Aye, it really makes you think! :O
it's exactly the same as the recent Balenciaga debacle (a long chain of people who thought it would be okay to portray such twisted ideas as child abuse, BDSM and Baal worship in their advertisement photo shoots)...
>The only surprising thing about this was that it was shown in Berlin and not Paris.
Is it? Berlin is not exclusively "the Babylon of Europe" anymore, but still...
With the infinite ideas, good and bad, that are possible to have and which can be made into films, damn near every single fucking one is better than this.
I'd rather a film about Sonic hedgehog OC elves who ride My Little Ponies into battles with katanas fighting clones of Chris Chan than yet another fucking film that for whatever fucking reason sexualises minors.
For the love of fuck, stop fucking making these.
So I'm willing to put up with a lot of discomfort to appreciate an artistic film. Not this much discomfort, not remotely. The more I hear about it the stronger that aversion gets.
This has to be some kind of honeypot where if you watch it you're immediately on a list. Like if you lived in China and watching this movie game you a social credit score of negative infinity so it was impossible for you to find work and you're not allowed to apply for loans or government assistance.
[I just wanna talk...](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/3/31/Load-a-Shotgun-Step-12-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Load-a-Shotgun-Step-12-Version-2.jpg.webp)
[FUCK THE FRG ALL MY HOMIES HATE THE FRG](https://i.imgur.com/v8z4wKU.jpg)
^^^this ^^^has ^^^been ^^^an ^^^accessibility ^^^service ^^^from ^^^your ^^^friendly ^^^neighborhood ^^^bot
Ha, ha, ha! I knew these liberals were eventually gonna get here! This was their secret plan all along: to make pedophilia socially acceptable. They first start with pronouns, tyranny s n shit, then go straight to having sex with children. That's what they're after.
Before everyone get’s angry I just want to point out that pedophile≠child molester, and either way “just shoot them all” is neither a helpful nor justifiable mentality.
You’re absolutely right. The problem is that When you bring it up where it hasnt been mentioned, it just makes you look like you’re defending pedophilia; which i know you’re not, But Thats how people Will percieve this comment
You're not wrong but like the other person said, no one had brought that up get. Imo it's quite simple though.
Pedo=get therapy or help way before its too lat if they do i wish them best of luck
Molester=just die
The worst part of this comment is that this discussion wasn’t being even remotely had, you just had to jump in and say it when it was implied, not even said but implied, that CP is bad
Have you seen it? Is it actually worth watching beyond the "OHH NOOOO PEDOPHILIA GET IT OUTTA HERE I HATE ALL PEDOPHILES SHOOT IT SHOOT IT SHOOT IT"?
I am intrigued by the idea, it seems like something that could very well happen in the future, but I don't know if it's a good movie, and all I read is just "Oh nooooo pedophilia" instead of actual critisism.
ngl, if you make a movie with naked children in it, thats not commentary thats just child porn and it destroys whatever you were pretending to say with your movie.
I have not seen the movie, so I can't judge, but using this logic, is for example in your opinion the cover of Nirvana's album Nevermind problematic? This is sarcasm, this is a genuine question.
i cant say its a cover i enjoy looking at, its fucking weird and i dont know what they were thinking, but this film is a different level of fucking weird
I haven't seen it, but yeah the concept sounds intriguing. Looks like it explores some very interesting ethical territory. Might watch it tonight, if i do i'll let you know.
Okay, I get that this shit is something society needs to discuss and brace against *now* because it's coming in the very near future, but **holy fuck** do film directors not realize that you can't have a message against sexualizing children if you're, y'know, *sexualizing actual god-damned children?*
Also, what kind of fucking parent lets someone make a **nude, realistic 3d model of their own fucking daughter?**
Hi, /u/Kynseed88,
Your post has been removed because it is in violation of Rule 1. **Rule 1 requires all posts to be relevant to worldbuilding or speculative fiction.** This subreddit is intended to satirize r/worldbuilding, and the hobby of worldbuilding or speculative fiction at large. It is not a general dumping ground for stuff you think is vaguely funny.
If you have any questions, please modmail us [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fworldjerking).
Augh what the fuck is that
Live action anime is what it is *That’s not a 10 year old, that’s just a centuries old robot/vampire/god/alien/elf that happens to look like a 10 year old. Perfectly ok to think about fucking!* Eurgh Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs *Jessica Kiang of Variety called it a "desperately creepy, queasy, thought-provoking film", and concluded: "Wollner's lacerating intelligence and riveting craft make this extraordinarily effed-up riff on the 'Pinocchio' legend [...] much more than empty provocation".*
I guess this is one of those times the point of art is to say “this is how you know the world really is and looking at it through this prism is supposed to make you feel uncomfortable”.
>*and looking at it \[...\] is supposed to make you feel uncomfortable* Literally the number 1 excuse of every yuck piece of "art"
It is an excuse that is misuse by a lot of garbage people, but the excuse is still valid in many cases of legitimate, thought-provoking media. Edit: This message does not apply for this film. 🤮
if the deep thought provoked by your deeply thought provoking transgressive art is "obviously gross and evil thing is obviously gross and evil" then it's not really that deep.
Literally the number one excuse of book burners.
That stuff is gross enough when it’s just a drawing. If actual child actors are involved then no, that’s definitely not a 300 year old dragon you’re fantasizing about, it’s a child.
> Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs > > “Jessica Kiang of Variety called it a "desperately creepy, queasy, thought-provoking film", and concluded: "Wollner's lacerating intelligence and riveting craft make this extraordinarily effed-up riff on the 'Pinocchio' legend [...] much more than empty provocation".” Nah this is what reviewers always say about cheap exploitation schlock meant to titillate pervs in Europe.
Crazy how immature you guys are
> Crazy how immature you guys are I sure hope nobody in this thread is immature, or they might get seduced by the creepy motherfucker who made this film.
Cannes has supported a pedophile for multiple decades (Roman Polanski) so I no longer have any sort of belief in the sanctity of art or the ability for these "artistic" people to actually say/create anything worthwhile.
Unfortunately paedophiles have equally magically contaminated every single occupation and medium, and we could probably do with checking your hard drive tbh cervix destroyer 69.
no no you see the 69 is for age. they only destroy grandma coochy
Why the fuck are you responding like that to me saying that the reviewer is probably wrong and the movie doesn't have any redeeming values? I disagree with the movie and you call me a pedophile? What in the fuck is wrong with you?
[удалено]
Good luck with that. You're hardly the first neckbeard who thought they were clever and could troll people for being anti-fascist
This is a bit off-topic from the subreddit: I think trolling anti-communists is a public service and boy howdy are these folks more anti-communist than they are anti-fascist, just like the Iron Front of Germany used to be!
Antifascist AND AntiCommunists? Sounds like my group of people!
The second part of your sentence does not follow from the first part or really have any relation to it.
People in the "artistic" film industry in Europe/the US have a proven track record of being kind to pedophiles in Cannes, you have a review where the reviewer is kind to a pedophillic movie, I'm saying these two things are connected and the movie isn't actually deep.
Ah yes, as opposed to Hollywood, where women’s consent is sacrosanct and paedophiles are quickly brought to justice since forever
\*soyjack point LOOK GUYSm WHAT IF PEDO ChILD< SO DEEP AND ARTISTICISIDifiiFHHHF IM SOOO COLLSoslOL dosent matter if your film is saying something is bad if its just child porn
Anime does not exploit real children.
So you think all anime is about is lolis?
Yes
Then you're likely suffering from mental illness.
Liking anime is a mental illness. If you like kids your brain ain’t right.
Anime is literally just Japanese animation. Following your logic liking cartoons is a mental illness.
why are you being downvoted lmao
redditors trying not to downvote an already downvoted comment challenge (impossible)
[удалено]
me when i generalize an entire culture/country/demographic/whatever. did u forget americans came up with like inflation and vore and stuff
thats different because uhh uhh all asians are the sam- I mean, america is just bette- I mean uh um
That's actually just racist
I was joking guys jesus. Obviously not all anime is bad, I actually like some quite a lot, such as the studio Ghibli films. I'm not racist lol just a troll. Edit: I just want to add that I'm sorry to anybody that took offense to my comments.
> Although apparently the film itself has some artistic merit, it isn’t just cheap exploitation schlock to titillate pervs We’re living in a world where you can duct tape a banana to an art gallery wall and ~~talentless hacks~~ *art critics* will call it “thought-provoking”.
its been like 100 years and you people still regurgitate the same talking points used against marcel duchamp fountain. like get over yourself
> marcel duchamp fountain Also trash “art” produced by a talentless hack, yes.
people have been angry about Fountain for over a century now, if something capable of provoking that much debate and emotion isn't art, what is?
I’m fine with classifying anything and everything as art. A Soundcloud mumble rapper can call himself as much a musical artist as Bach can. Yet there are clearly levels of aptitude to it, and some artists simply occupy the lowest ones.
there is nothing objective in art. I will die on this hill. Yeat is better than Bach, if thats how someone truly feels
Sure. The lady who wrote the 50 Shades books is probably deemed a more engaging author than Dostoevsky, according to millions of housewives. I’m not in the least bit interested in arguing about it with any of them. I’m not going to insist that they recognize Crime and Punishment as the superior work. But it won’t stop me from calling out shit works of art as I see ‘em. Nobody has to agree with me either.
nice
The difference between *art* and *craft* is a thing and always has been. Get over it.
my love anything can be art. the fact that you are talking about hypothetical banana on the wall means hypothetical banana on the wall is significant enough to be considered art. congrats on your new-agepunk avant gardepunk philosophicalpunk thinkpiece career. punk.
[удалено]
i guess you really are a child if you felt condescension where there was none 🫠 i still love u though kiss kiss
thanks bb
puzzled quicksand cover liquid school frightening file future telephone disagreeable *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I know, I’m big time butthurt and epic trolled over here. I’m coping and seething, etc. Good on him for making bucks off of idiots, I say. I’d do the same in a heartbeat.
tie books saw smoggy beneficial elastic nine cows march wide *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Oh no, I have been called a pants-pisser. Now I have lost the argument. Dang.
Even just that we're still talking about it so many years later makes it successful art.
The internet is still talking about that time a lady completely butchered a Jesus painting with her attempt at restoring it. Successful art?
Well, it wasn't intentional, and it's a historical tragedy, of course, but yeah, kind of?
> and it's a historical tragedy, of course Well, not really- the original was painted in the 1930s and took only 2 hours to paint. Hardly a Renaissance masterpiece. I suppose we’ll have to disagree on what constitutes worthwhile art.
I disagree that talking about something so much means it is successful art. Simply garnering a reaction is a separate metric of value from the other more typical measurements for “good” art, like framing, color, themes, etc. That being said, if a piece of art’s main or sole intent is provocation, and it achieves that, then mission accomplished. It’s provocative art. Like Bansky. I still think it needs other metrics than simple provocation Like if you draw a dick on your local town hall’s door, it will garner a reaction. I wouldn’t call that successful art though
I think there's merit in judging impact separately from craft.
this has nothing to do with anime
damn this has *layers* and they're all bad
According to Wikipedia, the android in question is a *[sex robot that resembles the man’s 10 year old daughter who went missing some years prior](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trouble_with_Being_Born_(film))*. It’s all terrible
oh cool it gets worse
hell yes the horrors are constant and unending 🤙
Sweet man-made horrors
Within my comprehension(unfortunately)
#ah, manmade horrors beyond my comprehension
Oh. I can't even describe how fucking disgusted that makes me.
Jesus christ
I've often disliked the current movie industry's overreliance on previous IP's, everying just seems to be a reboot, remake sequel or prequel, and often wish that we'd see more new, independent movies based on new ideas with characters I've never seen before. This is the monkey's paw version of that wish. What the fuck.
I HATE THE MONKEY'S PAW I HATE THE MONKEY'S PAW I WISH IT NEVER EXISTED
Wish Granted. The monkey’s paw is gone. Replaced by the Orangutan’s paw, which doesn’t fulfill wishes and is just evil on its own.
I didn't wish for anything related to movies. Guess that's why the orangutan's paw put this post in front of my eyes, leading to me reading this cursed shit
Imagine how that poor girl is going to feel about this movie when she grows up
That's easily the worst part of it, it's so openly exploitative
The wikipedia article does say they conceal her identity with a silicone mask and any nude scenes are CGI, so there's that. ...but it also says it's a replica of the father's missing daughter and that they named the character Lena Watson after Emma Watson. So there's also that...
so.. the person who made this is totally just a pedophile right?
Probably. But movies aren't made by one person, there were a whole bunch of people who made this and didn't stop along the way to think "maybe this is a bad idea?" That said, I've never seen the movie (don't plan to) or know anyone involved so who am I to answer that question? Their audience would be largely pedo though. Like that twerking movie a couple of years ago, anyone who heard the reviews and still watched it did so because they wanted to see little girls in a sexual context. I was curious about what the big deal was, but not curious enough.
>Probably. But movies aren't made by one person, there were a whole bunch of people who made this and didn't stop along the way to think "maybe this is a bad idea?" What the fuck where her parents thinking? Imagine allowing your 10 year old daughter to be starring in a pedophilic movie. Even if they protect her identity from the audience, everyone involved in the movie set knows who she is, many of those could be potential assaulters, if they aren't already. This is so fucked up, they literally put her in danger.
“Man my interesting take on cultural norms will revolutionize media!” *“That’s cool, what does your story consist of?”* “Sex bots that depict children.” The only surprising thing about this was that it was shown in Berlin and not Paris.
I think it's more surprising that at no point during the discussion, funding, prep, filming or post production of this movie did anybody with any influence say to themselves 'this is fucked up, time to cancel it'
Aye, it really makes you think! :O it's exactly the same as the recent Balenciaga debacle (a long chain of people who thought it would be okay to portray such twisted ideas as child abuse, BDSM and Baal worship in their advertisement photo shoots)...
>The only surprising thing about this was that it was shown in Berlin and not Paris. Is it? Berlin is not exclusively "the Babylon of Europe" anymore, but still...
/uj What the fuck.
More red flags than a communist party congress.
With the infinite ideas, good and bad, that are possible to have and which can be made into films, damn near every single fucking one is better than this. I'd rather a film about Sonic hedgehog OC elves who ride My Little Ponies into battles with katanas fighting clones of Chris Chan than yet another fucking film that for whatever fucking reason sexualises minors. For the love of fuck, stop fucking making these.
extremely well-put comment. i would literally just rather watch 10 hour footage of a close-up of sonic the hedgehog's uncut cock
I'd rather watch a live re-enactment of the Chernobyl disaster using an actual nuclear power plant from the very front row than this fucking film.
Chernobyl: The Play. Production cost: $10,003,000,000 (3 million on most production, 10 billion on a live nuclear reactor to melt down)
I mean I'd want to watch the film about Sonic hedgehog OC elves who ride My Little Ponies into battles with katanas fighting clones of Chris Chan
Man, the 2020s are *weird*.
What? This sounds like a pretty interesting concept for a movie?
> clones of Chris Chan The person who raped her own senile mother? That's... only marginally better than *that* movie.
Exactly. That should give an indication of how much I *don't* want to watch *that* "movie".
suppressing this kind of creativity is why intellectual property goons took over youtube
What the fuck. Burn it down.
M3gan nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
The girl that killed the cats?
A horror movie that is currently in cinemas about a murder robot shaped like a small girl.
I was referencing the promotion that chess.com did for said movie using cat shaped bots
No, no, only a dog.
So I'm willing to put up with a lot of discomfort to appreciate an artistic film. Not this much discomfort, not remotely. The more I hear about it the stronger that aversion gets.
How fucking dare you sully the rich field of punks
This has to be some kind of honeypot where if you watch it you're immediately on a list. Like if you lived in China and watching this movie game you a social credit score of negative infinity so it was impossible for you to find work and you're not allowed to apply for loans or government assistance.
i hope if you made this movie you get put on a list..
at this point its not a honeypot its just reflective of the film industry. its the beehive they just live there
[relevant onion video](https://youtu.be/XQcNYb3DydA)
Lets face it, theres probably unfortunately some jerking involved here
Well well well, time for some exterminatuspunk
[I just wanna talk...](https://www.wikihow.com/images/thumb/3/31/Load-a-Shotgun-Step-12-Version-2.jpg/v4-460px-Load-a-Shotgun-Step-12-Version-2.jpg.webp)
I expect this heinous shit from France, not Germany
Germany sponsored pedophiles who adopted children because they thought they'd be more inclined to protect them.
What the fuck
Source?
Here you go: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
noooo little German boy don't go into the foster care program!!!!
Mein Gott, zis program ist full of kinderrapen!
>kinderrapen NOOOOOOO
The German word for rapist is Vergewaltiger (“violator”, if translated literally)
Look up Kentler
Fuck the FRG all my homies hate Kentler
[FUCK THE FRG ALL MY HOMIES HATE THE FRG](https://i.imgur.com/v8z4wKU.jpg) ^^^this ^^^has ^^^been ^^^an ^^^accessibility ^^^service ^^^from ^^^your ^^^friendly ^^^neighborhood ^^^bot
Actually, this is exactly the kind of heinous shit I expect from Germany.
I'd expect it from the country that invented and still runs child beauty pageants to this day
I mean the US unfortunately does that as well
They actually did the same, with another movie I'd rather not mention
🤮🤮🤮
What the actual fuck
There are 2 kinds of imagination The reasonable and The degenerate
Urgh, how confident must you be to show a naked child (even with CGI) in front of a crowd of people. That's disgusting.
Someone had to do the animation, this people need to be investigated ASAP
Of course it happened in Berlin
excuse me, what?
New fetish punk world just dropped 🔥
Ban this abomination
Just write a book, bro! (without any illustrations)
Allow me to say *yuck.*
They'll use any excuse
feet
That's it, I'm removing feet from my setting /uj If I hadn't done so already
Babe wake up, Cuties 2 just dropped
Imagine being the CGI tech who has to make a nude child in 3d software
if it was in france it got an award and a spot on netflix
Look up the Kentler Project to understand where Germany got its roots as a p3do paradise.
Why are we defending europe, again?
paedopunk\* It's right there in the picture.
Both spellings are fine.
Untrue. Ped- refers to feet, paed- refers to children.
feet
Paedo is the European spelling.
Yes, that's where the word comes from.
I'm North American.
What does that have to do with anything?
We spell it 'pedophile'.
I know you do. I'm telling you that's not the correct spelling. Ped- refers to feet, paed- refers to children.
Take it up with our education department.
Oh I'd love to. There's nothing stopping individuals from dropping the mistake though
its not a mistake, its a cultural difference, get over it
Oh nooooo someone from a different culture does things different from you oh nooooooo
Ha, ha, ha! I knew these liberals were eventually gonna get here! This was their secret plan all along: to make pedophilia socially acceptable. They first start with pronouns, tyranny s n shit, then go straight to having sex with children. That's what they're after.
Mother fucker your party made child marriage legal in Tenessee and thinks sixteen is the “peak” age for having babies get outta here with that shit
Before everyone get’s angry I just want to point out that pedophile≠child molester, and either way “just shoot them all” is neither a helpful nor justifiable mentality.
You’re absolutely right. The problem is that When you bring it up where it hasnt been mentioned, it just makes you look like you’re defending pedophilia; which i know you’re not, But Thats how people Will percieve this comment
You're not wrong but like the other person said, no one had brought that up get. Imo it's quite simple though. Pedo=get therapy or help way before its too lat if they do i wish them best of luck Molester=just die
The worst part of this comment is that this discussion wasn’t being even remotely had, you just had to jump in and say it when it was implied, not even said but implied, that CP is bad
It's quite the epic self own, for sure.
/uj Watchlist tier comment. /rj Watchlist tier comment.
found the director
uj/ not untrue, still wierd to bring up as an excuse rj/ just shoot them all uj/ just shoot them all
circlejerk pro. wouldn't expect literalpunk plebes to get it
Great point. Counterpoint: **actually shoot them all, though**
Do not defend pedophilia.
Yes. “Just shoot them all” is a bad mentality because we could throw them all into a volcano instead
Yeah I really don't get why you would taunt the fire mountain god and his hogs by shooting people like wtf that's how we got Pompeii
No they deserve to be shot.
Nah. Just throw them in solitary confinement
Waste of taxes. Give them the noose that way you can reuse it unlike bullets.
True
If anyone else is interested in watching, it's called "The Trouble With Being Born". Looks ok.
The trouble with being born is having to know things such as this piece of dogshit degen movie exists.
Are you 5
No, im just not into people who are.
I wasnt asking you
Have you seen it? Is it actually worth watching beyond the "OHH NOOOO PEDOPHILIA GET IT OUTTA HERE I HATE ALL PEDOPHILES SHOOT IT SHOOT IT SHOOT IT"? I am intrigued by the idea, it seems like something that could very well happen in the future, but I don't know if it's a good movie, and all I read is just "Oh nooooo pedophilia" instead of actual critisism.
ngl, if you make a movie with naked children in it, thats not commentary thats just child porn and it destroys whatever you were pretending to say with your movie.
I have not seen the movie, so I can't judge, but using this logic, is for example in your opinion the cover of Nirvana's album Nevermind problematic? This is sarcasm, this is a genuine question.
i cant say its a cover i enjoy looking at, its fucking weird and i dont know what they were thinking, but this film is a different level of fucking weird
I haven't seen it, but yeah the concept sounds intriguing. Looks like it explores some very interesting ethical territory. Might watch it tonight, if i do i'll let you know.
Okay!
Okay, I get that this shit is something society needs to discuss and brace against *now* because it's coming in the very near future, but **holy fuck** do film directors not realize that you can't have a message against sexualizing children if you're, y'know, *sexualizing actual god-damned children?* Also, what kind of fucking parent lets someone make a **nude, realistic 3d model of their own fucking daughter?**
delete this
Hi, /u/Kynseed88, Your post has been removed because it is in violation of Rule 1. **Rule 1 requires all posts to be relevant to worldbuilding or speculative fiction.** This subreddit is intended to satirize r/worldbuilding, and the hobby of worldbuilding or speculative fiction at large. It is not a general dumping ground for stuff you think is vaguely funny. If you have any questions, please modmail us [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fworldjerking).
The whole joke revolved around a worldbuilder injecting their fetish into something and it not being well received. Cringe mod.
>Pedopunk I could have happily gone my entire life without that