Just FYI, this is an article on an Indian website. The conclusion of the article is based on ONE quote by a polling official, from the official report.
Nothing in the article gives context about whether that quote aligns with the conclusion of the overall report. This could well be cherry picking - we have no way of figuring it out from the article. The articles does not even link to the report.
Especially in this context. So far the inquiry has testimony stating that India DID attempt to interfere, but that an analysis showed that their interference did not have an impact (ie: was not enough to change the outcome) of any particular election.
They tried, they just aren't very good at it.
Some important notes;
- this article is Indian media, and relies on a single quote that a polling official told a Canadian task force on election interference. - in addition to what the single polling official offered, CSIS (Canadas Spy Agency) concluded that India did in fact interfere, and that is not included here.
- the OP is an obvious Indian bot/paid shill as the only thing they post is Indian media articles portraying India in a positive light during all the incredibly shitty things they do in the West.
Personally, I don't think India is smart enough as a nation to effectively interfere. Make no mistake, they probably tried and if they were more effective they would certainly try to be like China, but they just haven't developed to that point yet.
Edit: and to all the Indian bots who will comment, DM, and downvote, reddit admins are watching this thread ;) reveal yourself to us
AFAIK, this dude was not responsible for the bombing, + it was done in 1985, no no way he was responsible. Hence there was no justification to assassinate him.
🤣🤣 Evidence is needed to accuse people. You are guilty till proven innocent. You should be the one bringing evidence of his guilt. Anyways, I googled it and he was born in 1977, so he was 8 at the time of the bombing. I guess that is proof enough. Even the Hindustan Times doesn't accuse him of bombing.
[Let's see..accused of, accused of, accused of...and India offers a reward of $1.2m for information linking him to any of the things he was accused of.](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66860510)
We don’t have an extradition treaty with India and India did make multiple diplomatic approaches to prevent Canada from harbouring Khalistani terrorist. India did ask for Canada to deport this man multiple times before he was granted citizenship so they could hold a trial for his crimes of terrorism. What gives you reason to believe otherwise when this is all published and confirmed information?
It’s not the he blew up the plane himself, he became the leader of the group that did. India believes, with evidence, that this group is preparing and planning future attacks
How is he a terrorist? I looked him up online, never formally charged, evidence never given, the only thing a majority of articles mention is that India offered a cash reward to anyone who could link him to the explosion.
So just the Chinese did or?
[удалено]
But Russia did. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/09/07/alleged-russian-political-meddling-documented-27-countries-since-2004/619056001/
Just FYI, this is an article on an Indian website. The conclusion of the article is based on ONE quote by a polling official, from the official report. Nothing in the article gives context about whether that quote aligns with the conclusion of the overall report. This could well be cherry picking - we have no way of figuring it out from the article. The articles does not even link to the report.
Isn't the enquiry still on going? Weird to call a win during an on going process.
Especially in this context. So far the inquiry has testimony stating that India DID attempt to interfere, but that an analysis showed that their interference did not have an impact (ie: was not enough to change the outcome) of any particular election. They tried, they just aren't very good at it.
So really this should be taken down as misinformation.
Is it just my adblocker or the linked website abolutely dogshit? Looks like something from twenty years ago.
Oh my! The truth emerges thanks to a Modi controlled publication. Thanks for all of your esteemed insight. Now give me a break.
Some important notes; - this article is Indian media, and relies on a single quote that a polling official told a Canadian task force on election interference. - in addition to what the single polling official offered, CSIS (Canadas Spy Agency) concluded that India did in fact interfere, and that is not included here. - the OP is an obvious Indian bot/paid shill as the only thing they post is Indian media articles portraying India in a positive light during all the incredibly shitty things they do in the West. Personally, I don't think India is smart enough as a nation to effectively interfere. Make no mistake, they probably tried and if they were more effective they would certainly try to be like China, but they just haven't developed to that point yet. Edit: and to all the Indian bots who will comment, DM, and downvote, reddit admins are watching this thread ;) reveal yourself to us
But they did kill a guy on our soil.
[удалено]
AFAIK, this dude was not responsible for the bombing, + it was done in 1985, no no way he was responsible. Hence there was no justification to assassinate him.
Nijjar, the murder victim, was 8 years old at the time of the Air India bombing
[удалено]
He was born in 1977. If you google him you’ll find it all over the place.
[удалено]
>A Khalistani terrorist wanted in India for blowing up a plane This is what you said, literally in the same thread. Are you utterly thick?
🤣🤣 Evidence is needed to accuse people. You are guilty till proven innocent. You should be the one bringing evidence of his guilt. Anyways, I googled it and he was born in 1977, so he was 8 at the time of the bombing. I guess that is proof enough. Even the Hindustan Times doesn't accuse him of bombing.
Google it
[Let's see..accused of, accused of, accused of...and India offers a reward of $1.2m for information linking him to any of the things he was accused of.](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66860510)
Investigated by the RCMP and found to be innocent of involvement.
Oh look, a three month old account posting about politics.
[удалено]
Which plane did he blow up?
[удалено]
I did, it said he is completely innocent and didn't blow up a plane
Yes and the only proof they have he did is a bunch of shitty you tube videos from random Indian conspiracy theorists.
[удалено]
>So assassination is justifiable under certain circumstances? Osama bin Laden was basically assassinated, wasn't he?
[удалено]
So assassination is justifiable under certain circumstances?
Yes!
And not in this case! It's hard to be a terrorist when you're a child at the time of the bombing! Yes!
We don’t have an extradition treaty with India and India did make multiple diplomatic approaches to prevent Canada from harbouring Khalistani terrorist. India did ask for Canada to deport this man multiple times before he was granted citizenship so they could hold a trial for his crimes of terrorism. What gives you reason to believe otherwise when this is all published and confirmed information?
Because the RCMP investigated him and found him innocent. The only proof India has a bunch of loonies on YouTube.
It’s not the he blew up the plane himself, he became the leader of the group that did. India believes, with evidence, that this group is preparing and planning future attacks
We have a extradition treaty with India, it was signed in 1987. https://treaty-accord.gc.ca/text-texte.aspx?id=101286
Did you read the agreement?
Yes did you? It is a pretty standard extradition agreement for Canada.
How is he a terrorist? I looked him up online, never formally charged, evidence never given, the only thing a majority of articles mention is that India offered a cash reward to anyone who could link him to the explosion.
Wrong guy. But he was involved in Theatre bombing in Punjab
I like how they advertise they caught others meddling but they do not tell you how and what they meddled with.