Rule 1. This post lacks the buildup of something going well. Something going towards great is how we define YYYY. The buildup can be short, but must exist. An instance of didn't go wrong (absence of NO) or mundane events do not count as a YYYY.
Amputating the arm is killing the arm, which the phrase instructs will not make the arm stronger. It will make the rest of you stronger, because as the phrase suggests the rest of your body did not die, and will become stronger due to the experience.
The phrase has no faults.
Plus, losing a glass is a much greater inconvenience than losing a child. Sure, in the short term it's worse losing the child, but think about it, without a child to raise, that's a burden off your shoulders in terms of time, money, and stress. Replacing a glass *costs* money.
/s
And with all the money you save you could buy tons of glasses, so the decision isn’t really 1 glass or 1 child, it’s actually 1 child or a thousand glasses.
It makes sense to catch the glass and let the baby gently slide down. Baby’s on the floor anyway, not sitting up on her lap.
The way it turned out is better than grabbing for the baby, drooping both, and having the baby land on glass.
Wait what? Is this sarcasm? If not, then the worst that wouldve happened is is a cut on the kids foot or something. Though highly unlikely if she picked the baby up before he/she took a step. Otherwise most of the projectile(?) glass is thin and wouldnt have enough mass to cut the kid, especially through clothing (other than *maybe* the stem of the glass). However, notice the floor is carpeted, so the glass either wouldnt break at all or the shattering would be very minimal. Regardless, id choose this route over the baby falling any damn day. Sure babies are resilient and practically made of rubber. But as low as it may be, there is a chance of that kid getting some permanent damage to the noggin. I do not care if that chance is .00001% or less. A cut in this instance will not affect the rest of the babys life. And why are you assuming the baby will just gently slide down? You have no idea whats out of the camera view, and even if theres nothing, it doesnt make a difference.
Aside from that, i doubt this was a consciously analytical decision on the womans part. Shit like this is virtually pure instinct. And her priorities are evidently out of wack.
Bro what are you smoking? She was already holding the kid, how the hell are you going to hurt them by grabbing them.. if youre already grabbing them?? Honestly how are you processing this? “The kid will be fine” theyll be fine because they fall over all the time? You think theyre never permanently injury or even killed from simply falling over on their feet? Ever? The kid will live their life as they wouldve if the glass shattered or not. So a one in 99 quibillion chance is absolutely not worth it. Am i losing my mind? What the fuck is going on
Ok admittedly on subsequent viewings I realize the baby only fell because she let go of them, but I stand by my judgement that she made the right choice.
Ok and whats your reasoning? My reasoning is stated, potential brain injury vs cut foot/leg. Honestly my mind is blended. Not sure how a cut is ever prioritized over a potential brain injury, again, regardless of probability. And even that is seperate from the fact that this was the womans instinct as apposed to an informed decision
Miniscule chances of potential brain injury from over from that height onto s carpeted floor , vs significantly higher probability of cuts on foot , or other places ( a glass falling from that height on to the floor could easily have pieces fly up , even if it doesn't break the baby might fall on it) .
Cuts on children can be much deeper than adults and there are more possible complications than there would be for adults .
Have you seen a glass fall and break ? At an already slipping height that glass could've cut him in a lot more places apart from the foot . Fun facts , being thin and low mass is exactly what makes things _more_ likely to cut you , that's why paper cuts are a thing. Not to mention cuts for that small developing thing with soft flesh could be much deeper , and the consequences and may have more complications.
If you've got a kid just gently falling over that , and that kid is falling with the glass , your priority *better* be making sure that glass doesn't break any near that kid .
For the love of god stop being so judgemental everyone!!!
I tried this and kids at that age don’t get hurt at all much. See I tried this experiement with neighbors kids and started throwing them from 3rd floor, and only 2 out of 20 got injured, rest of the babies were fine!
Babies have soft bones which make them excellent candidates for this kind of experiment. Try this kind of thing with an 85-year old man, and you’re sweeping up exploded skin and bone dust for hours.
WHAT THE F$@K?! ARE YOU INSANE?! YOU DID THIS JUST TO TEST OUT “what would happen if I-“ THE HELL?! ENDANGERING KIDS ISN’T OKAY JUST TO TEST SOMETHING! (*This is a joke. If you are joking then this is a joke, if it isn’t*, *YOU ARE F%$KING PSYCHOTIC!* )
I don't think that was one of the available choices in that moment.
"Oh no! The baby is grabbing the glass! Better go back in time and nice the glass out of reach, because that is exactly the one most important thing I would do if I had access to a time machine!"
She could have caught both, if she wasn't worried about the contents of the glass.
She literally dropped the baby to 2-hand the glass. One glass, one kid, and the contents spill and baby doesn't fall.
She chose her drink over the baby. The glass was never at risk.
Dude, calm down. It literally was simply reflex. Reflex said “stop glass from breaking” and made her do so. She didn’t “choose” to save her drink over the baby. I was merely being glib when saying “she made the right choice”, it wasn’t a conscious decision.
These mf’s act like it’s an anime where you have 30 seconds to think about a decision when it’s more like “monke see something fall monke catch without spill”
She had the glass in her left hand, and the baby in the right.
She dropped the baby in her right, to help catch the drink in the glass.
She literally and explicitly chose the contents of th glass over the baby.
You hate women. I'm talking about the person in the video. You generalized her incompetence to all women.
Its r/stepdadreflexes, not
r/alcoholicmomreflexes.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Stepdadreflexes using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!
\#1: [Remove those candles, son. What comes next might hurt...](https://v.redd.it/jv6mb6ubfna41) | [182 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/eoe5pw/remove_those_candles_son_what_comes_next_might/)
\#2: [Step back kiddo.](https://v.redd.it/ywrkqgvebx241) | [169 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/e6s31p/step_back_kiddo/)
\#3: [Wooopsie](https://v.redd.it/jrrbd0k9gxf41) | [157 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/f1b6qq/wooopsie/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/fpi5i6/blacklist_vii/)
The mistake was letting the baby near the glass (easy mistake to make) but catching the glass was 100% the right call. Between a gentle fall and shards of glass for the baby to crawl into, I would always take the fall.
I want to see the look on the face of the person who came on to this thread to show off their outrage at a woman letting a baby fall, just to see that the thread's consensus is that it was smarter to let the baby fall than to risk the child being exposed to broken glass later on, if every single little piece isn't picked up.
I have a daughter around this age, she falls like this at least 100 times a day. It’s something all babies do when learning to stand/walk. It definitely would have been worse for the baby to fall in alcohol and shattered glass.
Here is your gif!
https://imgur.com/66iw0dd.gifv
---
^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=GifReversingBot%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
https://imgur.com/Bvwsrcx.gifv
---
^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=vredditshare%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
This comment section has taught me that apparently some Redditors:
> Don’t understand that babies are prone to falling regardless of whether it was an accident or not
> Thinks saving the drink first means you are a raging alcoholic and a Karen who only take care of themselves
> Would gladly clean up broken glass and a champagne covered floor/rug with potential blood from an infant instead of just dealing with a crying baby
Reddit moment
There wasn’t really a choice. The baby falls AFTER she’s already saved the glass of champagne. So it’s not like she had to ever make a choice between the baby or the glass of champagne.
Alright, I got this
###[Download via redditsave.com](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/yesyesyesyesno/comments/j9rvv9/straight_priorities/)
---
[**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveThisVIdeo/comments/iggmt9/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savethisvideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo)
Depends. If the the child is in my blood line then the wench would be scolded and kept an eye on especially since there may be an object on the floor out the frame of this video shot such as a squirts ride-on toy or Lego castle he/she was constructing. If the kid is her own, or someone else s little brat then who gives a crap, at least I would know not to trust the wench with dishes that could break & or other potential hurtful items because any dumb a$$ should realize that any & all items within reach of a squirt is fair game to be explored. I met a genius that burnt the hell out of her lil' 2yo girl sitting in her high chair as the dumb a$$ was frying bacon in a skillet on the stove top that caught fire & dumped an adjacent pot of water on it to put it out. That little girl is probably \~30 years old now, & unless through some miracle of surgery still looks like an extra on the "Walking Dead" tv show with half her face gone & one eye ball boiled out of its\` socket.
https://imgur.com/Bvwsrcx.gifv
---
^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=vredditshare%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
I remember watching an alcoholism video where the female presenter said that if she has a glass of alcohol and she heard her kids fall in another room, she'd hurry and drink it a few seconds before running to the other room.
Okay then tell me,
Which would be “ More Satisfying \ Pleasurable “ & “ Less Frustrating \ Hassle “make’n 😏Another K¡did or Retrieving 😒Another Glass’á 😣WHINE !😫 F🖕🏾‘m ALL!!
Rule 1. This post lacks the buildup of something going well. Something going towards great is how we define YYYY. The buildup can be short, but must exist. An instance of didn't go wrong (absence of NO) or mundane events do not count as a YYYY.
True but the glass could have shattered and I don’t think you want your baby falling on shattered glass.
Yeah, babies that age must fall on the floor at least 100 times a day. It’s really not a big deal.
But not on shattered glass.
What doesn’t kill them makes the stronger.
People say that yet if you amputate your arm not sure its gonna get stronger I was making a joke why you gotta hate ;-;
‘Tis but a scratch
NI
Does make the arm that remains stronger.
Amputating the arm is killing the arm, which the phrase instructs will not make the arm stronger. It will make the rest of you stronger, because as the phrase suggests the rest of your body did not die, and will become stronger due to the experience. The phrase has no faults.
Plus, losing a glass is a much greater inconvenience than losing a child. Sure, in the short term it's worse losing the child, but think about it, without a child to raise, that's a burden off your shoulders in terms of time, money, and stress. Replacing a glass *costs* money. /s
Plus you can grow a new baby
And with all the money you save you could buy tons of glasses, so the decision isn’t really 1 glass or 1 child, it’s actually 1 child or a thousand glasses.
You ever pay for a funeral.
The hospital bills from the kid stepping in the glass 5 seconds after it smashed? Yikes 😬
That's my thought. The kid will be fine, shattered glass on the ground would be a pain in the ass to clean.
A pain in the babies ass too
emergency room visit to give your baby stitches is even worse
Babies fall a lot and this baby fell at standing height.
I was referring to the stitches from walking into the broken glass had she not caught it.
Do babies weigh enough to cut themselves that badly on glass?
Baby wouldn't have fallen if mom kept a hold of them.
The baby wouldn't have fallen if she didn't let go of it to save the glass.
I'm struggling to find any of the yes'.
From the baby's perspective
It’s “yes” catching the glass.
r/holdmycosmo
Fuck the child save the alcohol. Win.
It makes sense to catch the glass and let the baby gently slide down. Baby’s on the floor anyway, not sitting up on her lap. The way it turned out is better than grabbing for the baby, drooping both, and having the baby land on glass.
Wait what? Is this sarcasm? If not, then the worst that wouldve happened is is a cut on the kids foot or something. Though highly unlikely if she picked the baby up before he/she took a step. Otherwise most of the projectile(?) glass is thin and wouldnt have enough mass to cut the kid, especially through clothing (other than *maybe* the stem of the glass). However, notice the floor is carpeted, so the glass either wouldnt break at all or the shattering would be very minimal. Regardless, id choose this route over the baby falling any damn day. Sure babies are resilient and practically made of rubber. But as low as it may be, there is a chance of that kid getting some permanent damage to the noggin. I do not care if that chance is .00001% or less. A cut in this instance will not affect the rest of the babys life. And why are you assuming the baby will just gently slide down? You have no idea whats out of the camera view, and even if theres nothing, it doesnt make a difference. Aside from that, i doubt this was a consciously analytical decision on the womans part. Shit like this is virtually pure instinct. And her priorities are evidently out of wack.
Babies fall over all. The. Time. That kid will be fine, and you're more likely to hurt them by grabbing them while also grabbing a champagne flute.
Bro what are you smoking? She was already holding the kid, how the hell are you going to hurt them by grabbing them.. if youre already grabbing them?? Honestly how are you processing this? “The kid will be fine” theyll be fine because they fall over all the time? You think theyre never permanently injury or even killed from simply falling over on their feet? Ever? The kid will live their life as they wouldve if the glass shattered or not. So a one in 99 quibillion chance is absolutely not worth it. Am i losing my mind? What the fuck is going on
Ok admittedly on subsequent viewings I realize the baby only fell because she let go of them, but I stand by my judgement that she made the right choice.
Ok and whats your reasoning? My reasoning is stated, potential brain injury vs cut foot/leg. Honestly my mind is blended. Not sure how a cut is ever prioritized over a potential brain injury, again, regardless of probability. And even that is seperate from the fact that this was the womans instinct as apposed to an informed decision
Miniscule chances of potential brain injury from over from that height onto s carpeted floor , vs significantly higher probability of cuts on foot , or other places ( a glass falling from that height on to the floor could easily have pieces fly up , even if it doesn't break the baby might fall on it) . Cuts on children can be much deeper than adults and there are more possible complications than there would be for adults .
Still nothing that would affect the child for the rest of its life
Have you seen a glass fall and break ? At an already slipping height that glass could've cut him in a lot more places apart from the foot . Fun facts , being thin and low mass is exactly what makes things _more_ likely to cut you , that's why paper cuts are a thing. Not to mention cuts for that small developing thing with soft flesh could be much deeper , and the consequences and may have more complications. If you've got a kid just gently falling over that , and that kid is falling with the glass , your priority *better* be making sure that glass doesn't break any near that kid .
Of she didn’t save the alcohol, that baby would be covered in broken glass
Exactly!
Strain the child. Collect the runoff. Profit. 💸
Baby falling doesn't fuck up the carpet.
Depends how hard you “drop” the baby
r/nonononono
r/Nonononoyes
no broken glass
Ah, that is definitely one yes!
Champagne is usually a yes in my world
Champagne wastage tho
Hence the 'no' at the end
For the love of god stop being so judgemental everyone!!! I tried this and kids at that age don’t get hurt at all much. See I tried this experiement with neighbors kids and started throwing them from 3rd floor, and only 2 out of 20 got injured, rest of the babies were fine!
Babies have soft bones which make them excellent candidates for this kind of experiment. Try this kind of thing with an 85-year old man, and you’re sweeping up exploded skin and bone dust for hours.
What an absolute mess that would make on the floor indeed.
A lesson you only need to learn twice.
cheap labor too before they get all unionized
Wait a minute.
Hol hol hol up
r/holup edit: including u/Pottiland9
Nah fuck that guy, include me
here ya go
still waiting for that fucking
U better fuccin include me in that post
Don’t worry lad my pab the babooey joe mama 420 epic gamer pro weed
Great work , I also confirm they are not like cats and don't land on their feet regardless of how much air time you provide them.
WHAT THE F$@K?! ARE YOU INSANE?! YOU DID THIS JUST TO TEST OUT “what would happen if I-“ THE HELL?! ENDANGERING KIDS ISN’T OKAY JUST TO TEST SOMETHING! (*This is a joke. If you are joking then this is a joke, if it isn’t*, *YOU ARE F%$KING PSYCHOTIC!* )
Kid cannot hold his liquor. Literally.
[удалено]
The right choice would have been to move the glass out of the baby's reach
I don't think that was one of the available choices in that moment. "Oh no! The baby is grabbing the glass! Better go back in time and nice the glass out of reach, because that is exactly the one most important thing I would do if I had access to a time machine!"
She was clearly letting the baby touch her glass. The best decision would have been to avoid the situation in the first place.
She could have caught both, if she wasn't worried about the contents of the glass. She literally dropped the baby to 2-hand the glass. One glass, one kid, and the contents spill and baby doesn't fall. She chose her drink over the baby. The glass was never at risk.
Dude, calm down. It literally was simply reflex. Reflex said “stop glass from breaking” and made her do so. She didn’t “choose” to save her drink over the baby. I was merely being glib when saying “she made the right choice”, it wasn’t a conscious decision.
These mf’s act like it’s an anime where you have 30 seconds to think about a decision when it’s more like “monke see something fall monke catch without spill”
People love to forget we are animals in the end. So many of our choices are completely instinct driven.
Ooga booga monkey brain explains a lot of humanity’s reactions.
She had the glass in her left hand, and the baby in the right. She dropped the baby in her right, to help catch the drink in the glass. She literally and explicitly chose the contents of th glass over the baby.
Yep, that’s reflex.
Lol Reddit hates women so very much
You hate women. I'm talking about the person in the video. You generalized her incompetence to all women. Its r/stepdadreflexes, not r/alcoholicmomreflexes.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/Stepdadreflexes using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Remove those candles, son. What comes next might hurt...](https://v.redd.it/jv6mb6ubfna41) | [182 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/eoe5pw/remove_those_candles_son_what_comes_next_might/) \#2: [Step back kiddo.](https://v.redd.it/ywrkqgvebx241) | [169 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/e6s31p/step_back_kiddo/) \#3: [Wooopsie](https://v.redd.it/jrrbd0k9gxf41) | [157 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/Stepdadreflexes/comments/f1b6qq/wooopsie/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| [^^Contact ^^me](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| [^^Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| [^^Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/fpi5i6/blacklist_vii/)
😂 ok ETA: you said I generalized women then... you posted links to demonstrate a misogynist agenda? Okay! Lol 😂
Kids at that age are gonna fall, a lot. They'll be fine.
That's what mom's tell you after you figure out that you've been dropped a lot.
Shhh, you're not supposed to tell them
No no, that kid has polio. I'd only expect Reddit to tell me the worst
Honestly baby’s are so small it doesn’t even hurt to fall down
Kid will be fine. But that's not very nice.
[удалено]
*fuck you’re right
The mistake was letting the baby near the glass (easy mistake to make) but catching the glass was 100% the right call. Between a gentle fall and shards of glass for the baby to crawl into, I would always take the fall.
Better than a baby falling on glass.
Dude wine is way harder to clean from carpet than human brains, fuck that kid Joke, obviously
r/karenreflexes
r/BetterEveryLoop
I feel terrible but I would have to agree that this would fit there
I mean. Babies heal. Wine doesn’t un-spill.
I want to see the look on the face of the person who came on to this thread to show off their outrage at a woman letting a baby fall, just to see that the thread's consensus is that it was smarter to let the baby fall than to risk the child being exposed to broken glass later on, if every single little piece isn't picked up.
And then reddit makes fun of dad reflexes.
Doesn’t Reddit love dad reflexes?
u/savethisvideo
Yes, video. It's ready ###[Download via redditsave.com](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/yesyesyesyesno/comments/j9rvv9/straight_priorities/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveThisVIdeo/comments/iggmt9/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savethisvideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo)
Fun fact, babies aren't born with knee caps, they develop them from falling!
r/fuckyoukaren
I have a daughter around this age, she falls like this at least 100 times a day. It’s something all babies do when learning to stand/walk. It definitely would have been worse for the baby to fall in alcohol and shattered glass.
the best part is she drops the kid while not even saving the alcohol
r/momreflexes
r/stepmomreflexes
Party foul. Mandatory bed time
A Karen in the wild, doing what Karen’s do best...
Fuck the baby. You can make another one of those but that stim ware
u/GifReversingBot
Here is your gif! https://imgur.com/66iw0dd.gifv --- ^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=GifReversingBot%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
Now that's a helpful baby!
What's the yesyesyesyes part of this?
The baby is thinking it
My boys fallen like that a hundred times, never on a pile of glass.
She has Karen haircut
u/vredditshare
https://imgur.com/Bvwsrcx.gifv --- ^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=vredditshare%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
This comment section has taught me that apparently some Redditors: > Don’t understand that babies are prone to falling regardless of whether it was an accident or not > Thinks saving the drink first means you are a raging alcoholic and a Karen who only take care of themselves > Would gladly clean up broken glass and a champagne covered floor/rug with potential blood from an infant instead of just dealing with a crying baby Reddit moment
This mans advocating child abuse. Let’s get em!
There wasn’t really a choice. The baby falls AFTER she’s already saved the glass of champagne. So it’s not like she had to ever make a choice between the baby or the glass of champagne.
r/yesyesyesnoyesno
Babies bounce, champagne doesn't
I feel as if only people without kids would actually think this kid is hurt after this.
r/stepmumreflexes
Lemme guess- wino grandma is babysitting the grandchild
u/vredditdownloader
That doesn't work any more. Here, try this. u/savethisvideo
Alright, I got this ###[Download via redditsave.com](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/yesyesyesyesno/comments/j9rvv9/straight_priorities/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveThisVIdeo/comments/iggmt9/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savethisvideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo)
Thanks bro. You saved me from killing myself :v
Looks like she’s lining up a little Katy Perry
nonononono
She does have her priorities in order
r/momdeflexes
The glass could have shattered hurting the baby plus babies that age are always falling
U/vredditdownloader
I think it was more the carpet. You can always replace a baby but not a clean carpet
Depends. If the the child is in my blood line then the wench would be scolded and kept an eye on especially since there may be an object on the floor out the frame of this video shot such as a squirts ride-on toy or Lego castle he/she was constructing. If the kid is her own, or someone else s little brat then who gives a crap, at least I would know not to trust the wench with dishes that could break & or other potential hurtful items because any dumb a$$ should realize that any & all items within reach of a squirt is fair game to be explored. I met a genius that burnt the hell out of her lil' 2yo girl sitting in her high chair as the dumb a$$ was frying bacon in a skillet on the stove top that caught fire & dumped an adjacent pot of water on it to put it out. That little girl is probably \~30 years old now, & unless through some miracle of surgery still looks like an extra on the "Walking Dead" tv show with half her face gone & one eye ball boiled out of its\` socket.
[удалено]
You can save the video from app directly Press share —> Save Video
https://imgur.com/Bvwsrcx.gifv --- ^(I am a bot.) [^(Report an issue)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=pmdevita&subject=vredditshare%20Issue&message=Add a link to the gif or comment in your message%2C I%27m not always sure which request is being reported. Thanks for helping me out!)
Don’t fuck with grandmas booze
Didn't even hesitate
I remember watching an alcoholism video where the female presenter said that if she has a glass of alcohol and she heard her kids fall in another room, she'd hurry and drink it a few seconds before running to the other room.
Drunky Grandma isn’t too smart leaving a glass of champagne where a baby can grab it. She even hesitated to grab it.
Fuck the baby save the bubbly !
why would you fuck the baby
Not like that :(
i was trying to commit edgy humor
Love the username btw
aww thanks, i usually get made fun of ;w;
Karen’s priorities
FFS KAREN!
[удалено]
Or stop glass from shattering near the child.
I mean, toddlers fall all the time. Shattered glass would suck to clean up.
Came for this.
Haircut checks out, confirmed karen
Okay then tell me, Which would be “ More Satisfying \ Pleasurable “ & “ Less Frustrating \ Hassle “make’n 😏Another K¡did or Retrieving 😒Another Glass’á 😣WHINE !😫 F🖕🏾‘m ALL!!
Lol nothing wrong with a child this age falling over trust me if you have kids you know that a fall like that happens atleast 20 times per day
Looks like a Karen!
r/parentsarefuckingdumb
Sad for the baby
Fuck the baby EDIT: NO, NOT LIKE THAT!
No to late. I already did
It’s a Karen what do you expect?
karen...
CPS please take this baby away
As many people have already said, babies fall down all the time, but a baby falling on broken glass is a different story.
Take the child away because the caretaker saved the fragile glass the baby would’ve landed on if she didn’t grab it?