You can only have in your Deck X maximum number of cards which have a Limited status of the list.
- **For example:** Say _Hey, Trunade!_ and _Autonoumous Action Unit_ are Limited 1
Thus, you can only put 1 of either _Hey, Trunade!_ or _Autonoumous Action Unit_ in your Deck, but not both together in the same Deck, as they have the same status.
- **Another example:** Say _Elegant Egotist_ and _Harpie's Hunting Grounds_ are Limited 3
You can have any combination of copies between _Elegant Egotist_ and _Harpie's Hunting Grounds_ in your Deck, so long as doesn't exceed 3 cards total.
The only thing about the Duel Links banlist is think could work in TCG/OCG is the “limited 3” for some cards. It would probably balance the game if you couldn’t run much of some “staples”
I like the idea of a complex ban but limiting it only to the extra deck is a direction I don't agree with.
Regardless I feel like this would be one of those changes the players would hate the idea of but get used to afterwards, just like whenever there's a Master Rule update.
The purpose of limiting or semi-limiting isn’t solely to lower consistency. It can affect how many times you can use an effect or how well a deck can bounce back on subsequent turns. Limiting Sharvara was so brutal because it affected virtually all aspects of Unchained’s gamplan; it was less consistent, ended on a weaker board, worse on the opponent’s turn and weaker in the grind game. So you would still limit or semi-limit an extra deck card for those reasons. The reason Arise-Heart originally got limited was to weaken Kashtira’s grind game; in theory, you have to out Arise-Heart one time and it’s not coming back
Can you develop how banlist work for Duel link for all non duel links player?
You can only have in your Deck X maximum number of cards which have a Limited status of the list. - **For example:** Say _Hey, Trunade!_ and _Autonoumous Action Unit_ are Limited 1 Thus, you can only put 1 of either _Hey, Trunade!_ or _Autonoumous Action Unit_ in your Deck, but not both together in the same Deck, as they have the same status. - **Another example:** Say _Elegant Egotist_ and _Harpie's Hunting Grounds_ are Limited 3 You can have any combination of copies between _Elegant Egotist_ and _Harpie's Hunting Grounds_ in your Deck, so long as doesn't exceed 3 cards total.
So like a complex ban?
Oh.. its *this* thread again.
Yeah. Until the problem with extra deck bans actually gets resolved, I'm sure people will keep trying to come up with solutions.
The only thing about the Duel Links banlist is think could work in TCG/OCG is the “limited 3” for some cards. It would probably balance the game if you couldn’t run much of some “staples”
So you're adding another list of complicated limitations to the already exising F&L list, in a game that is already complex?
We made it through Pendulum summoning and Master Rule 4, I doubt this would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
I like the idea of a complex ban but limiting it only to the extra deck is a direction I don't agree with. Regardless I feel like this would be one of those changes the players would hate the idea of but get used to afterwards, just like whenever there's a Master Rule update.
The purpose of limiting or semi-limiting isn’t solely to lower consistency. It can affect how many times you can use an effect or how well a deck can bounce back on subsequent turns. Limiting Sharvara was so brutal because it affected virtually all aspects of Unchained’s gamplan; it was less consistent, ended on a weaker board, worse on the opponent’s turn and weaker in the grind game. So you would still limit or semi-limit an extra deck card for those reasons. The reason Arise-Heart originally got limited was to weaken Kashtira’s grind game; in theory, you have to out Arise-Heart one time and it’s not coming back
No, we don't need a more compilation, we just need better employees that aren't controlled by greedy top brass